Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

sycore101
Global Economy Experts Stellar Economy Experts
43
|
Posted - 2012.04.08 20:40:00 -
[1] - Quote
Have i missed something here ???
About 3 or 4 weeks ago i was perhaps interested in buying another Battleship. I look today & whatthe hell .. over 200 mil for a Maelstrom, & even the others are rapidly rising in price.
What the hell is going on, i knwo there as to be some buffs on ore drops in the drone regions but to affect ships prices like this.
Who or what is playing with the prices, i know people like to have their laughs in this game but really extortionism.
What the hell happend People |

Herman Klaus
Touched By Klaus
44
|
Posted - 2012.04.08 20:46:00 -
[2] - Quote
See the price of Trit then read your own question again. |

velox
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.04.08 20:50:00 -
[3] - Quote
I think what your seeing is a market response in part to ccp's sudden action in banning bots. Your toon is probably not old enough to realise that back at the start of eve ships where expensive. Minerals had value.
Years of market abuse saw megathrons selling for 70 mill, instead of a price where the miners/industrialists would actually have a profit margin.
CCP recently removed the ability to reprocess Pax Amara into 6 nocxium 2 iso, this trade good was holding nocxium at an artifial low. Now you can see that within 7 days Nocxium has nearly doubled in price.
As for talk of a drone buff, i think you miss understood. They plan to remove mineral drops from drones and replace them with bounties. As the drone region currently provide more than 40% of high end minerals used in eve expect to see prices rise more.
Dont Q.Q. about the market, buy now while 200mill is cheap.
V. |

Aina Sasaki
Red Core Paradigm Shift Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.08 21:21:00 -
[4] - Quote
What Velox said. Things are going to get much more expensive still than they are now. It will probably be a few months before things start to stabilize. x_x - Rei |

Irisa Selenia
Capital Consortium Partners One Stop Research
30
|
Posted - 2012.04.08 21:24:00 -
[5] - Quote
You can start enjoying your 400 million isk abaddons pretty soon. |

Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat Working Stiffs
590
|
Posted - 2012.04.08 22:10:00 -
[6] - Quote
When I looked yesterday, Maelstroms were selling below mineral cost at under 205m.
I have two Maelstrom BPOs which are completely useless at such low prices. |

velox
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.04.08 23:41:00 -
[7] - Quote
Tau Cabalander wrote:When I looked yesterday, Maelstroms were selling below mineral cost at under 205m.
I have two Maelstrom BPOs which are completely useless at such low prices.
This happens more times than you would think, in a volatile market people place their sell order and go about their business. Then over the course of last weekend nocx's artificial cap was lifted and mineral prices rose. Now instead of checking their sell prices at the start of the week they just look at who they need to undercut.
I noticed passing through essence that thorax's were selling at about 8.2 mill production cost at the time was 8.4 so I bought them all :) at one point I had 300 of them, I moved them to other regions where they flew out at prices between 9.5 and even some at 11 mill.
For the sellers they may well have recovered their costs having paid for minerals at an earlier rate but technically they boo boo'd
I cant remember the last time my freighter all was this busy. Let the good times roll.
V. |

Block Ukx
Forge Laboratories
61
|
Posted - 2012.04.09 01:57:00 -
[8] - Quote
sycore101 wrote:Have i missed something here ???
You could have protected yourself against inflation by investing in MRD It has been going up since July 2010, when it traded at 0.76 ISK/MRD. Today it closed at 2.18 ISK/MRD.
|

Brock Nelson
551
|
Posted - 2012.04.09 02:33:00 -
[9] - Quote
Every PVP'er in this game should take economics 101 before asking this kind of question. Signature removed, CCP Phantom |

Voidfinger
The Suicide Kings Test Alliance Please Ignore
8
|
Posted - 2012.04.09 03:55:00 -
[10] - Quote
personally I would like to see BS and larger ships get ridiculous so that smaller ship battles would take place instead of seeing 50+ supers and 200+ BS fighting it out. Lets see 400+ frigates and cruisers going at it! |

Misanth
RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE
541
|
Posted - 2012.04.09 04:39:00 -
[11] - Quote
Voidfinger wrote:personally I would like to see BS and larger ships get ridiculous so that smaller ship battles would take place instead of seeing 50+ supers and 200+ BS fighting it out. Lets see 400+ frigates and cruisers going at it!
a) irrelevant to the thread
b) at those abnormous amounts of ships, alpha > all, and size doesn't matter.. 200 frigs, 200 battleships, hell 200 motherships.. they'll just alpha primary
If you wanted "small ship battles" you should start by leaving blob please ignore, look at wh-/lowsec corporations, perhaps solo a bit in low-/null in frigate/interceptor, and take it from there. But now we're back to a)
I had BS 5 trained well before I could even lay my hands on an Armageddon, don't even know who could build them. My first Prophecy I had to buy a BPC (from ingame trade channel, no contracts), then haul minerals to have it built. TL;DR - people above have a point, too many items are sold under manufacturing cost. It was same for my capital production, I just sold off all cap BPO when, at max/optimal ME, it would still cost me more to buy minerals on sell at Jita than I could've sold the ships for.
About time CCP correct this. But for now, it's all just speculation. shiptoastin' liek a baws |

Riley Moore
Sentinum Research
413
|
Posted - 2012.04.09 09:40:00 -
[12] - Quote
It's simple:
People gank our freighters. We use our isk to jack up mineral prices through rumours, speculative reasoning and just plain manipulation. Your ships now become twice as expensive.
Don't come crying you lost at pvp. Large volumes of highly researched Ammo, drones, charges and ship bpo's. Biggest BPO store in EVE! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=445524#post445524 |

shar'ra matcevsovski
Hedion University Amarr Empire
26
|
Posted - 2012.04.09 11:55:00 -
[13] - Quote
considering that CCP hasnt CHANGED ANYTHING about mineral resources just yet (except pax amarrian book) it's all about stockpilling and market manipulation atm. The upcoming change could defenently make ships more expensive, no doubt.
im sure some "price sky rocketing" threads are just made, to create the impression that you should by a lot of minerals at p. high prices now just to save their investments :D atm. market and forums are kindoff messy about it and I wouldnt give to much about forecasts i.e
at the end of the day nobody knows exactly what changes will come, give it some time and see what happends. |

Raven Ether
Republic University Minmatar Republic
141
|
Posted - 2012.04.09 12:53:00 -
[14] - Quote
After the Hubris of Incursions and boundless isk farming...
Comes the Nemesis of Industry, that will wash over this galaxy and deliver it into a new age of economical control. |

Large Collidable Object
morons.
1250
|
Posted - 2012.04.09 21:33:00 -
[15] - Quote
A lot of this was quite predictable and it was pretty obvious that CCP aimed at increasing the mineral price - bot bans, removal of drone poo, adding another isk faucet by makiing drones pay out bounties, further removal of isk sinks like Pax Amarria, continued insane Incursion isk payouts, a half-hearted bounty nerf accross the board etc..etc...
So even casual traders like me invested everything but some savings for a rainy day into Mins, Plex, Ships and Modules way beforehand.
I appreciate the fact that some people will actually learn for the first time that even T1 BS are not some throwaway junk you replace with half an hour of incursion running. You know... morons. |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
144
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 02:19:00 -
[16] - Quote
Raven Ether wrote:After the Hubris of Incursions and boundless isk farming...
.
lol Incursions that have been around a year & a half are getting the blame for this 2 week old spike what you going to do next blame Incursions for Hulageddon & Jita burns?
An' then [email protected], he come scramblin outta the Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's-á crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'-á |

Kara Books
Deal with IT.
99
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 02:49:00 -
[17] - Quote
This is what the world could look like without made in China |

Cedo Nulli
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
102
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 03:38:00 -
[18] - Quote
Large Collidable Object wrote: I appreciate the fact that some people will actually learn for the first time that even T1 BS are not some throwaway junk you replace with half an hour of incursion running.
Ah I see ... Finally they are back to being throwaway junk for the 0.0 sanctum running "better then the rest" douches ?
Because we know how REAL the danger is in deep blue doing that.
Baseline is that anything needing a fleet ought to be more lucrative then solo activities of same sort. |

Mutnin
SQUIDS.
158
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 06:55:00 -
[19] - Quote
Riley Moore wrote:It's simple:
People gank our freighters. We use our isk to jack up mineral prices through rumours, speculative reasoning and just plain manipulation. Your ships now become twice as expensive.
Don't come crying you lost at pvp.
Don't be a troll and think you or any traders have caused this. The prices have increased due to CCP's action and they have failed to place any sort of artificial safety net after their mass banning of bots, announcement of nefing drone minerals as well as the pax thing.
CCP is screwing with too many things at once, with the mineral markets and that has caused the speculation and rising prices. Market guys didn't cause this they just reacted to it.
I do know that BC at 50 mil ISK is bad for PVP and makes it tough for newer corps such as my own that recruit a lot of new players. I can afford to lose a 50 or 100 million ISK hull but it's much harder for our new players. This is a problem and CCP needs to address it as raising the bar on noobs will only harm the game.
Flying smaller is really not a option in most cases. |

Johnny Frecko
Fruidian Logic IDENTITY UNKN0WN
6
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 12:32:00 -
[20] - Quote
Flying smaller isn't an option for you. When the major battleship masses get destroyed, no one will have a big ship, every fight will take place basically in frigate/destroyer/cruiser.
Battleship battles should be left to the major powers, Much like super-cap battles. not every 30 men corp should be able to buy and maintain and replace 25 faction battleships and 5 super-caps.
And, err. the "reacting" is what did all the mess. People were dumping 400-500 billion into the mineral market for speculation purposes. This drove prices up instantly. cheap battleships were picked up and reprossesed BY MARKETERRS. not by anyone else, not by you elite pvpers.
Being a pvper doesn't mean you should be able to replace 50M hulls every day. That's just how it is. |

Jessie-A Tassik
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
53
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 18:24:00 -
[21] - Quote
velox wrote:Tau Cabalander wrote:When I looked yesterday, Maelstroms were selling below mineral cost at under 205m.
I have two Maelstrom BPOs which are completely useless at such low prices. This happens more times than you would think, in a volatile market people place their sell order and go about their business. Then over the course of last weekend nocx's artificial cap was lifted and mineral prices rose. Now instead of checking their sell prices at the start of the week they just look at who they need to undercut. I noticed passing through essence that thorax's were selling at about 8.2 mill production cost at the time was 8.4 so I bought them all :) at one point I had 300 of them, I moved them to other regions where they flew out at prices between 9.5 and even some at 11 mill. For the sellers they may well have recovered their costs having paid for minerals at an earlier rate but technically they boo boo'd I cant remember the last time my freighter all was this busy. Let the good times roll. V.
Ah yes, the "artificial cap" of being able to play the game the way you want, that is killing drones for minerals. People should be FORCED to boringly mine. FORCED TO.
We now have Dev God granting completely "natural" bennies to the 0.0 mega-corps. Cause nothing is more natural than being talked into doing something stupid by those with a vested interest in you doing that stupid thing. |

Jessie-A Tassik
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
53
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 18:27:00 -
[22] - Quote
Mutnin wrote:Riley Moore wrote:It's simple:
People gank our freighters. We use our isk to jack up mineral prices through rumours, speculative reasoning and just plain manipulation. Your ships now become twice as expensive.
Don't come crying you lost at pvp. Don't be a troll and think you or any traders have caused this. The prices have increased due to CCP's action and they have failed to place any sort of artificial safety net after their mass banning of bots, announcement of nefing drone minerals as well as the pax thing. CCP is screwing with too many things at once, with the mineral markets and that has caused the speculation and rising prices. Market guys didn't cause this they just reacted to it. I do know that BC at 50 mil ISK is bad for PVP and makes it tough for newer corps such as my own that recruit a lot of new players. I can afford to lose a 50 or 100 million ISK hull but it's much harder for our new players. This is a problem and CCP needs to address it as raising the bar on noobs will only harm the game. Flying smaller is really not a option in most cases.
But does it benefit Null Sec? If it does, well, they are over 10% of the player population. Or under 10%. Who cares. The point is, CCP programmers got drunk with the CSM and then acted like one would expect nerdes with no social skills to act.
Congratulations. |

Adunh Slavy
Ammatar Trade Syndicate
575
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 18:34:00 -
[23] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote: Ah yes, the "artificial cap" of being able to play the game the way you want, that is killing drones for minerals. People should be FORCED to boringly mine. FORCED TO.
You are not forced to mine, or go to null sec. Many are making a lot of ISK on these changes and hardly ever undock. By brining mining and industry to parity with shooting rats, players are being given more options, not less. |

Traejun DiSanctis
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 20:10:00 -
[24] - Quote
Adunh Slavy wrote:Jessie-A Tassik wrote: Ah yes, the "artificial cap" of being able to play the game the way you want, that is killing drones for minerals. People should be FORCED to boringly mine. FORCED TO.
You are not forced to mine, or go to null sec. Many are making a lot of ISK on these changes and hardly ever undock. By brining mining and industry to parity with shooting rats, players are being given more options, not less.
You are forced to do nothing. You never have to set foot in null...and you never have to mind. Ever. If you think those are the only options...you are wrong. |

clixor
Celluloid Gurus
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 11:12:00 -
[25] - Quote
Mutnin wrote:[quote=Riley Moore]It's simple:
The prices have increased due to CCP's action and they have failed to place any sort of artificial safety net after their mass banning of bots, announcement of nefing drone minerals as well as the pax thing.
CCP is screwing with too many things at once, with the mineral markets and that has caused the speculation and rising prices. Market guys didn't cause this they just reacted to it. .
I find it ironic that the general consensus has always been that CCP should never interfere with the markets, but now they FINALLY are effective against bots they should've thought of a safety net??
And anyway, flying a BS was never intended for people who just trained BS1 . I think it adds something to game experience to make flying a first BS for a new player a more rewarding experience.
As the market is universal the consequences are for everybody. So smallish gangs all have to downgrade, or spend more time mining / whatever if they don't want to do that.
In the end CCP WILL evaluate the situation though. If they come to the conclusion that (making this up) 90% of mins were botted, then there is something wrong with game mechanics and they will have to adjust to make more (real players) mine. |

silent Serena
Khanid Mineral Reserves
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 11:33:00 -
[26] - Quote
clixor wrote:Mutnin wrote:[quote=Riley Moore]It's simple:
The prices have increased due to CCP's action and they have failed to place any sort of artificial safety net after their mass banning of bots, announcement of nefing drone minerals as well as the pax thing.
CCP is screwing with too many things at once, with the mineral markets and that has caused the speculation and rising prices. Market guys didn't cause this they just reacted to it. . I find it ironic that the general consensus has always been that CCP should never interfere with the markets, but now they FINALLY are effective against bots they should've thought of a safety net?? And anyway, flying a BS was never intended for people who just trained BS1 . I think it adds something to game experience to make flying a first BS for a new player a more rewarding experience. As the market is universal the consequences are for everybody. So smallish gangs all have to downgrade, or spend more time mining / whatever if they don't want to do that. In the end CCP WILL evaluate the situation though. If they come to the conclusion that (making this up) 90% of mins were botted, then there is something wrong with game mechanics and they will have to adjust to make more (real players) mine.
Actually, the minerals might have been aquired by bots. Looking at plush/trit and zyd traded in jita you can assume that currently a large part of trit is probably from droneregions. However its hard to tell without knowing how large quantities that are used by the alliances that are holding drone regions as self supply. Either way, I think trit will spike but is this really a bad thing? It will encourage players to start mining trit again. Theres tonns of systems in highsec that isnt beeing mined properly. This will likely drive the price down to some new equalibrium, but for mining to happend it has to be compedetive with other sources of low risk incomes in highsec.
Sorry for bad english
|

Nomad I
University of Caille Gallente Federation
58
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 11:57:00 -
[27] - Quote
shar'ra matcevsovski wrote:considering that CCP hasnt CHANGED ANYTHING about mineral resources just yet (except pax amarrian book) it's all about stockpilling and market manipulation atm.
Your point is not really right. The tradingplaces are taking future price levels in account. Everyone knows that a higher price can't be avoided. There is just one question left: At wich level the markets will be stable.
@CCP: It's really sad, that we haven't the opportunity of making futures contracts. |

papamike
Precipice Industries
20
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 12:02:00 -
[28] - Quote
silent Serena wrote:
Actually, the minerals might have been aquired by bots. Looking at plush/trit and zyd traded in jita you can assume that currently a large part of trit is probably from droneregions. However its hard to tell without knowing how large quantities that are used by the alliances that are holding drone regions as self supply. Either way, I think trit will spike but is this really a bad thing? It will encourage players to start mining trit again. Theres tonns of systems in highsec that isnt beeing mined properly. This will likely drive the price down to some new equalibrium, but for mining to happend it has to be compedetive with other sources of low risk incomes in highsec.
Sorry for bad english
Don't apologize. Your 'bad english' actually holds more value than the majority of the whine posts in this thread. As someone said above, owning a BS wasnt meant to be this easy. I remember my first Megathron. Was so pimp with its meta 3 fittings back in 2006.
Ive long hoped for a change that could make tech 1 ships viable and commonplace again. Id say ask some of the older pvp players from the RMR era how cool pvp was back then when t1 cruiser combat was the norm, and battleship fleet engagements of 100 or so chars was an amazing occurrence, but quite frankly i doubt you would listen and secondly, most of the older players left when the game got boring and non-consequential.
This mineral pricing is a 'Great Rebalancing'. Im really hoping it brings back consequence to alot of players. You will hate it when you loose something, but the satisfaction of achieving is that much greater.
|

Nomad I
University of Caille Gallente Federation
58
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 12:20:00 -
[29] - Quote
papamike wrote:[quote=silent Serena]
Ive long hoped for a change that could make tech 1 ships viable and commonplace again. Id say ask some of the older pvp players from the RMR era how cool pvp was back then when t1 cruiser combat was the norm, and battleship fleet engagements of 100 or so chars was an amazing occurrence, but quite frankly i doubt you would listen and secondly, most of the older players left when the game got boring and non-consequential.
1) You wish is wrong. PVP in 0.0 is about ISK. You have to field the best adapted ships, like the drake, mael or abaddon. The alternative is loss of sov. Even in Low older player are flying faction ships because they are better adapted to the mechanics.
2) 0.0 player will paying for their specific ship types and won't change to cruiser. Many of them getting already ISK by plexes. The others will rat more.
3) Higher prices garantees less botting for the the amount of ISK. Botting is getting more intelligent, instead of 24/7 generating ISK.
There is no alternative to BS and BC. When a coalition getting Tech goo, the new economical power directly translates into military power. Mining costs more work time than looting and this means, all of us have to rat or mine more. This will be known as an inflation.
Summary: A huge inflation will make most players poorer. They have to mine or rat more to finance PVP, caused by less minerals from RMT, drones and loot. |

qDoctor Strangelove
Beware of the Red Fox
7
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 13:23:00 -
[30] - Quote
Mega used to me 17 000 isk pu back in the days.
A maelstrom, with T1 rigs, T2 fittings should be about 1 PLEX. |
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |