| Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Jas Dor
Republic University Minmatar Republic
122
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 17:19:00 -
[1] - Quote
As it currently stands, it looks like CCP will make mining the major source for low end minerals.
With mining barge and exhumer tanks where they are high sec mining for low requires players to accepted the very real possibility of being ganked. Bot owners are fine with being ganked, its a cost of business on a throw away account. Players on the other hand hate being ganked. It leaves a permanent loss mail tied to the account. It also shows the player getting caught doing something stupid enough to give away and easy kill. While stupid might simply mean mining in a belt, players will tend to avoid such activities.
We've seen this with low sec. Players absolutely refuse to engage in conduct that requires them to self select to be victims. Instead we get a bunch of whining on the forums, then if CCP does not intervene abandonment of the feature/activity. Invariably, those looking for easy kills will blame the lack of such kills on carebearism. Unfortunately, such claims have until recently had great weight with CCP. What is normally not recognized is that refusal to participate is the antithesis of carebearism. One of the first (and hardest) steps of being a successful PvPer is not doing stupid things that are going to get you killed. Self selecting to be a victim is stupid.
CCP has decided to tie the eve economy, directly, to the willingness of players to self select for victimhood. The current state of mining follows the classic pattern of feature abandonment: 1. New Feature Becomes Available (CCP bans mining bots, starts removing non mining mineral faucets). 2. Players try out the newly profitable feature. 3. Players loose ships and realize that the mechanics of the feature require self selecting victimhood. 4. Players point out to CCP that the mechanics of the feature are stupid. 5. Players abandon the feature when CCP does nothing about it.
Right now we are in the state of people trying mining again for the first time in years. They are finding how poorly tanked barges are and complaining/exiting the feature. As a result of tying a core component of the economy to players self selecting to be victims we are seeing a major increase in inflation. This will continue until some equilibrium is reached with the non-mining mineral inputs still in the system and/or it becomes profitable to mine low ends in protected null sec space.
Most likely though is sudden, explosive, subscription loss when the inflation situation makes continuing to play this game untenable. |

Darth Tickles
Dark Sun Consortium
188
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 17:21:00 -
[2] - Quote
Eve is dying because I'm not getting my way thread #968572 |

Sentient Blade
Walk It Off Imperial Ascension
309
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 17:33:00 -
[3] - Quote
Give exhumers enough powergrid to fit some buffer mods and things would be better. |

FeralShadow
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
82
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 17:34:00 -
[4] - Quote
Do not care. Getting people away from all the huge super expensive ships that everybody has would only help the universe.
I've not flown a T1 ship in years. If i have to start flying T1 because of isk, so be it. It will be exciting. "I do believe in karma. -áThat means that whenever I do something sh**y to others, they somehow deserved it." |

Mark Androcius
9
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 17:34:00 -
[5] - Quote
If prices of minerals out of low or nullsec go up ( which is what inflation does ), then nullsec corporations and alliances will start focusing on mining the belts in their own systems more and more, because this becomes more profitable. This in turn will drag the prices down again, hey presto, you got your balance. Yes i am dutch, no i don't do drugs. |

Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux
1511
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 17:35:00 -
[6] - Quote
I guess Hulks should have more HP than a slaved deadspace fit Avatar. That'll fix those dirty griefers wagons.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos
Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Adunh Slavy
Ammatar Trade Syndicate
589
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 17:37:00 -
[7] - Quote
Jas Dor wrote: Most likely though is sudden, explosive, subscription loss when the inflation situation makes continuing to play this game untenable.
I doubt that will be the case. At least not in the dramatic scene of players running for the hello kitty hills. |

Copine Callmeknau
Kangaroos With Frickin Lazerbeams Ninja Unicorns with Huge Horns
67
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 17:39:00 -
[8] - Quote
Funny how rampant suicide ganking is, when I managed to hulk mine for 4-5 months on a hisec alt without someone so much as boxing me up..
Guess I must just be pro, nothing at all to do with picking a quiet, out of the way system |

Roime
Shiva Furnace
458
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 17:40:00 -
[9] - Quote
Your whole thought structure is based on the stubborn fallacy that mining is a solo activity that can only be performed in high security space.
Mining does not make anyone a victim. Being unorganised, unwilling to co-operate with others and doing it in the wrong place makes one a victim. It is therefore no different from any other activity in EVE.
|

Mark Androcius
9
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 17:40:00 -
[10] - Quote
Probably less greed would work too. In stead of fitting a cargo extender for example, fit 1 or 2 warp core stabs, so you can actually warp away and not be warp scrambled, it's just a thought. Yes i am dutch, no i don't do drugs. |

Stellar Vix
State War Academy Caldari State
87
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 17:41:00 -
[11] - Quote
So get paid twice as much for you loots and paying twice as much for the things you buy?
AmIrite?
-Vix SWA Instructor, Commander Select Currently being blamed as SWA's CEO SWA PVP Program |

Doc Fury
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
754
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 17:41:00 -
[12] - Quote
Mark Androcius wrote:If prices of minerals out of low or nullsec go up ( which is what inflation does ), then nullsec corporations and alliances will start focusing on mining the belts in their own systems more and more, because this becomes more profitable. This in turn will drag the prices down again, hey presto, you got your balance.
Mining still sucks, so I really don't see this happening unless missions, incursions, moongoo, and etc have their payouts nerfed a lot.
More new and low-SP players will mine low ends in high sec. The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'no.' |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
306
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 17:42:00 -
[13] - Quote
Industrialists with sand in their vaginas across New Eden, story at eleven.
Now back to your regularly scheduled bullshit. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Mark Androcius
10
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 17:46:00 -
[14] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:Industrialists with sand in their vaginas across New Eden, story at eleven.
Now back to your regularly scheduled bullshit.
Wahahahahahah Yes i am dutch, no i don't do drugs. |

Marduk Nibiru
Risk Breakers C0NVICTED
168
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 17:49:00 -
[15] - Quote
Jas Dor wrote: 3. Players loose ships and realize that the mechanics of the feature require self selecting victimhood.
I have to wonder if you've ever been out of hisec. Let me tell you how it works and why what you're claiming here is false:
Mining out in 0.0 has to be at least as stupid as mining in lowsec, right? If you're in lowsec and get blown up, at least it takes a chunk out of the offending party's sec status and gives you free right to kill them. In 0.0 they don't even get that. It is completely lawless out there. So why would anyone mine in 0.0, right?
Well, people do. A lot of people do. You can make a crap load more money mining in 0.0 than in hisec. What keeps people out of lowsec right now is not the danger, it's the fact that it's a complete waste of time. There's nothing in lowsec that outperforms mining for Veldspar in terms of ISK per m3....certainly not enough to risk anything.
What happens in 0.0 is that people mine in groups and within alliances full of people who love to blow **** up. Having a gang come into system to explode miners is actually cool because then they get to fly out and get a fight without having the effort of roaming.
We set up special channels that people report neutral and red activities in. See a red or neut in your system? Drag them into the chat and then the system you're in...say what they're flying...or NV if you are hiding and haven't seen them.
People who are mining (or ratting for that matter) watch these channels and carefully observe local for anyone that's not blue. As soon as such a person comes into the system, or hopefully sooner based on intel, all carebearing activities cease and you dock up, safe up, pos up, and/or cloak up. Then you wait for the alliance to respond or maybe you get into something more PvP oriented and help blow up these invaders yourself.
So, that's how you do it. You don't go out and solo-mine in lowsec, nullsec, and you really shouldn't be in hisec either. EvE is simply not a game for the solo player. I don't think CCP should really cater to them either. Get a good group together and you can do dangerous things with more safety. Be out there all alone and yeah, you're gonna die.
So there it is. That's why you're full of ****. Maybe CCP will lose a couple subs, but I think they are subs from people who simply don't like the game. This is fine, we shouldn't really be too worried about it. There are, in fact, plenty of people who DO like the game. Corp up! |

Nimbat
Kerrigan Corporation
4
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 18:09:00 -
[16] - Quote
I long for the day when faction ships are an awesome and rare sight and when the majority of EVE flies T1 ships. It would be amazing. |

Darth Tickles
Dark Sun Consortium
193
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 18:16:00 -
[17] - Quote
Nimbat wrote:I long for the day when faction ships are an awesome and rare sight and when the majority of EVE flies T1 ships. It would be amazing.
What she said ^
|

Jas Dor
Republic University Minmatar Republic
123
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 18:17:00 -
[18] - Quote
Adunh Slavy wrote:Jas Dor wrote: Most likely though is sudden, explosive, subscription loss when the inflation situation makes continuing to play this game untenable.
I doubt that will be the case. At least not in the dramatic scene of players running for the hello kitty hills.
I note the use of the past tense. Yes, you managed to avoid a gank, but how many buffs to gank ships ago was that? |

Jas Dor
Republic University Minmatar Republic
123
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 18:20:00 -
[19] - Quote
Roime wrote:Your whole thought structure is based on the stubborn fallacy that mining is a solo activity that can only be performed in high security space.
Mining does not make anyone a victim. Being unorganised, unwilling to co-operate with others and doing it in the wrong place makes one a victim. It is therefore no different from any other activity in EVE.
Are you claiming that group mining in low/null is an efficient way to get minerals into the game? A once a week corp mining op for a couple hours isn't going to meet the mineral demand in this game.
|

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
309
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 18:21:00 -
[20] - Quote
Jas Dor wrote:Roime wrote:Your whole thought structure is based on the stubborn fallacy that mining is a solo activity that can only be performed in high security space.
Mining does not make anyone a victim. Being unorganised, unwilling to co-operate with others and doing it in the wrong place makes one a victim. It is therefore no different from any other activity in EVE.
Are you claiming that group mining in low/null is an efficient way to get minerals into the game? A once a week corp mining op for a couple hours isn't going to meet the mineral demand in this game.
Thousands of corps. Please, don't forget to livestream your mining ops.
Preferably with accompanying webcam for maximum tear extraction. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Selinate
852
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 18:25:00 -
[21] - Quote
It's not that hard to live and mine in lowsec.... |

Sri Nova
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
49
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 18:26:00 -
[22] - Quote
DUDE !!! what are you doing !! you giving away all the sooooper seecwet 0.0 stuff !!!
Marduk Nibiru wrote:Jas Dor wrote:
3. Players loose ships and realize that the mechanics of the feature require self selecting victimhood.
I have to wonder if you've ever been out of hisec. Let me tell you how it works and why what you're claiming here is false: Mining out in 0.0 has to be at least as stupid as mining in lowsec, right? If you're in lowsec and get blown up, at least it takes a chunk out of the offending party's sec status and gives you free right to kill them. In 0.0 they don't even get that. It is completely lawless out there. So why would anyone mine in 0.0, right? Well, people do. A lot of people do. You can make a crap load more money mining in 0.0 than in hisec. What keeps people out of lowsec right now is not the danger, it's the fact that it's a complete waste of time. There's nothing in lowsec that outperforms mining for Veldspar in terms of ISK per m3....certainly not enough to risk anything. What happens in 0.0 is that people mine in groups and within alliances full of people who love to blow **** up. Having a gang come into system to explode miners is actually cool because then they get to fly out and get a fight without having the effort of roaming. We set up special channels that people report neutral and red activities in. See a red or neut in your system? Drag them into the chat and then the system you're in...say what they're flying...or NV if you are hiding and haven't seen them. People who are mining (or ratting for that matter) watch these channels and carefully observe local for anyone that's not blue. As soon as such a person comes into the system, or hopefully sooner based on intel, all carebearing activities cease and you dock up, safe up, pos up, and/or cloak up. Then you wait for the alliance to respond or maybe you get into something more PvP oriented and help blow up these invaders yourself. So, that's how you do it. You don't go out and solo-mine in lowsec, nullsec, and you really shouldn't be in hisec either. EvE is simply not a game for the solo player. I don't think CCP should really cater to them either. Get a good group together and you can do dangerous things with more safety. Be out there all alone and yeah, you're gonna die. So there it is. That's why you're full of ****. Maybe CCP will lose a couple subs, but I think they are subs from people who simply don't like the game. This is fine, we shouldn't really be too worried about it. There are, in fact, plenty of people who DO like the game. Corp up! |

Jas Dor
Republic University Minmatar Republic
124
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 18:29:00 -
[23] - Quote
Nimbat wrote:I long for the day when faction ships are an awesome and rare sight and when the majority of EVE flies T1 ships. It would be amazing.
Bak in the day PvPers always flew the best ship that they could. Only lack of SP drove the use of inferior ships. Faction ships started appearing more in PvP when CCP added them to the market. Prior to that they lacked the visibility for widespread use.
If you make PvP ships navfordable PvPers will quit. They will not downgrade the ship types they fly.
|

Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux
1512
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 18:31:00 -
[24] - Quote
Jas Dor wrote:Nimbat wrote:I long for the day when faction ships are an awesome and rare sight and when the majority of EVE flies T1 ships. It would be amazing. Bak in the day PvPers always flew the best ship that they could. Only lack of SP drove the use of inferior ships. Faction ships started appearing more in PvP when CCP added them to the market. Prior to that they lacked the visibility for widespread use. If you make PvP ships navfordable PvPers will quit. They will not downgrade the ship types they fly.
You're wrong.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos
Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

masternerdguy
Inner Shadow NightSong Directorate
141
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 18:32:00 -
[25] - Quote
Jas Dor wrote:Nimbat wrote:I long for the day when faction ships are an awesome and rare sight and when the majority of EVE flies T1 ships. It would be amazing. Bak in the day PvPers always flew the best ship that they could. Only lack of SP drove the use of inferior ships. Faction ships started appearing more in PvP when CCP added them to the market. Prior to that they lacked the visibility for widespread use. If you make PvP ships navfordable PvPers will quit. They will not downgrade the ship types they fly.
I won't quit. Because all of a sudden the favorite ship will just be a tier lower hull. More BC and C less BS. Things are only impossible until they are not. |

Selinate
852
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 18:33:00 -
[26] - Quote
Nimbat wrote:I long for the day when faction ships are an awesome and rare sight and when the majority of EVE flies T1 ships. It would be amazing.
IMO, faction ships should be made a lot more rare for BPC's to drop, or increased building requirements.. They're too prevalent as it is in PvP, it's kind of annoying... |

Nimbat
Kerrigan Corporation
7
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 18:33:00 -
[27] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Jas Dor wrote:Nimbat wrote:I long for the day when faction ships are an awesome and rare sight and when the majority of EVE flies T1 ships. It would be amazing. Bak in the day PvPers always flew the best ship that they could. Only lack of SP drove the use of inferior ships. Faction ships started appearing more in PvP when CCP added them to the market. Prior to that they lacked the visibility for widespread use. If you make PvP ships navfordable PvPers will quit. They will not downgrade the ship types they fly. You're wrong. -Liang
Who is? |

Darth Tickles
Dark Sun Consortium
194
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 18:36:00 -
[28] - Quote
Jas Dor wrote:Bak in the day PvPers always flew the best ship that they could. Only lack of SP drove the use of inferior ships. Faction ships started appearing more in PvP when CCP added them to the market. Prior to that they lacked the visibility for widespread use.
If you make PvP ships navfordable PvPers will quit. They will not downgrade the ship types they fly.
LOL
Another group of people that are supposedly going to quit the game.
Have you considered that maybe everyone else isn't a whiny entitled baby like you?
|

Kattshiro
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
57
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 18:36:00 -
[29] - Quote
I actually mine right now due to time conflicts and level of concentration... I have never been ganked (I dont even fly hulks...) I think it's blown out of proportion honestly.
2. If I am ganked.... I dont give a **** about a loss mail. It's not a matter of pride. I also fail to see how getting ganked in a covetor is a stupid "mistake.." How could it be. (Yeah yeah why the **** are you mining youre doing it wrong blah blah)
I dont mine in lowsec because i'd then have to pay 100% attention...which I already stated I can't do or else i'd be doing something else...
I dont think people want to mine in low sec due to being forced to pay attention to how boring mining really is. That's the problem aside from the part that mining to be profitable or useful needs to be done in a group. Address the fundemental nature of mining and make it more entertaining/non stationary and you'll see an upswing.
As of now you see: People like me who can't devote 100% of their attention yet still want to interact with the game (work, school work...hungover) People who really dont have an issue with the mechanics of it... I dunno how they do it. mandatory mining corp ops Bots. |

Jas Dor
Republic University Minmatar Republic
124
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 18:38:00 -
[30] - Quote
Just a quick note. If I did the math right a JF cn haul around 360m units of trit in the form of compressed veld. Those that understand logistics will grasp why this means that significant amounts of trit will not be coming from 0.0. |

Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux
1512
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 18:40:00 -
[31] - Quote
PVPers are not going to quit because higher tier ships are more expensive. They'll downgrade the ship they fly before quitting.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos
Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Selinate
852
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 18:42:00 -
[32] - Quote
Kattshiro wrote:I actually mine right now due to time conflicts and level of concentration... I have never been ganked (I dont even fly hulks...) I think it's blown out of proportion honestly.
2. If I am ganked.... I dont give a **** about a loss mail. It's not a matter of pride. I also fail to see how getting ganked in a covetor is a stupid "mistake.." How could it be. (Yeah yeah why the **** are you mining youre doing it wrong blah blah)
I dont mine in lowsec because i'd then have to pay 100% attention...which I already stated I can't do or else i'd be doing something else...
I dont think people want to mine in low sec due to being forced to pay attention to how boring mining really is. That's the problem aside from the part that mining to be profitable or useful needs to be done in a group. Address the fundemental nature of mining and make it more entertaining/non stationary and you'll see an upswing.
As of now you see: People like me who can't devote 100% of their attention yet still want to interact with the game (work, school work...hungover) People who really dont have an issue with the mechanics of it... I dunno how they do it. mandatory mining corp ops Bots.
If I were mining, I would actually rather mine in low sec space almost exclusively. While the profit isn't really that much better (if it is at all), certain low sec pockets are pretty much completely empty, and on top of that it's actually not that hard at all to take stuff from low sec to high sec or vice versa (just fit like 3 stabs in your lows, a decent tank, and you'll be able to make it through Rancer if you want. I've done it multiple times FFS). Want advice on how to not lose your hulk in lowsec? Align for a station and dock when you see a neutral in local. Not that hard.
I don't see why there's so much whining. Do you people want some form of farmville except where you play it in spaceships? That takes the fun out of the game for me. |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
310
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 18:43:00 -
[33] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:PVPers are not going to quit because higher tier ships are more expensive. They'll downgrade the ship they fly before quitting. -Liang While simultaneously ramping up the tear factor for everybody involved.
As previously stated, CCP has successfully buffed the tears of the unwashed masses.
**** is about to get really good around here!!!              He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Bane Necran
277
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 18:46:00 -
[34] - Quote
You really seem fixated on the victim thing. And loss mails are only as important as you want them to be.
I've never really thought of myself as a victim when i lose ships. It's more of a job hazard. And after you lose enough ships you stop caring, which is why griefers prefer to target new players for precious tears. |

IGNATIUS HOOD
Zephyr Corp Black Thorne Alliance
297
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 18:51:00 -
[35] - Quote
/hands you a new stick so you can beat a dead horse some more....
I'm sorry this ganking of HS miners you speak of is so much a non issues aside from the times when someone is making a concerted effort to gank HS mining.
Hulkageddon, Ice Interdiction etc etc etc...
Do you not realize that the gankers are going to be pricing themselves out of business? Ganking is a barely profitable venture as it is and now with the 'Boomerang Exploit' fixed, and the fact that Concorded ships payout no insurance you have to be a moron or a total a$$hat with deep pockets to want to keep on ganking for the 'fun' of it. Also with profitablity comes incentive to innovate. I'm curious to see where that leads. I for one am optimistic about the changes becuase it shakes up the established order of things. An established order that alot of folks continually b!tch about. Some of the same people saying the sky is falling now were the same folks p!ss!ng and moaning about bots and drone droppings. Now these folks are lamenting the CCP fixes.
I swear people who play this game aren't happy unless they are miserable.
I'm going to reserve my OMG EVE IS DYING!!11!!!1!!!1! paranoia until after I see evidence that it is in fact dying.
Perhaps you should as well OP
PS. Barges do not need moar tank, just smarter pilots. PSS. Anyone who says mining is boring needs to get some EVE friends. A few Covetors (Hulks are overpriced targets IMO) with an Orca + a six pack of beer is a wonderful way to kill a few hours. 'perfer et obdura; dolor hic tibi proderit olim'
Be patient and tough; some day this pain will be useful to you. |

Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux
1514
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 18:53:00 -
[36] - Quote
Uh, most of the PVPers I know may grumble for a while, but it won't last that long. We're a pretty adaptable lot and as a whole are remarkably good at ISK making and such. Hell I'm grumbling over the market prices of stuff, but a volatile market is going to incredibly good for my ISK reserves.
Don't confuse grumbling over short term discomfort with the perpetual whine we hear from die hard carebears.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos
Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
311
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 18:55:00 -
[37] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Uh, most of the PVPers I know may grumble for a while, but it won't last that long. We're a pretty adaptable lot and as a whole are remarkably good at ISK making and such. Hell I'm grumbling over the market prices of stuff, but a volatile market is going to incredibly good for my ISK reserves. Don't confuse grumbling over short term discomfort with the perpetual whine we hear from die hard carebears. -Liang I was agreeing with you and extrapolating your point. Learn reading comprehension, I guess?
See also: THAT WAS NOT AN ARGUMENT. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

IronLemur
Apple Construction Inc Northern Associates.
1
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 18:56:00 -
[38] - Quote
Darth Tickles wrote:Eve is dying because I'm not getting my way thread #968572
Played-out "L2P" comment that contributes nothing to a thread #5,665,324
|

Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
94
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 18:57:00 -
[39] - Quote
Bane Necran wrote:I've never really thought of myself as a victim when i lose ships. It's more of a job hazard. And after you lose enough ships you stop caring, which is why griefers prefer to target new players for precious tears. QFT. "Fun fact: carebears are not necessary for the game to function." --áTippia |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
311
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 18:58:00 -
[40] - Quote
IronLemur wrote:Darth Tickles wrote:Eve is dying because I'm not getting my way thread #968572 Played-out "L2P" comment that contributes nothing to a thread #5,665,324 How about this then? HTFU He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux
1514
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 19:17:00 -
[41] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:Liang Nuren wrote:Uh, most of the PVPers I know may grumble for a while, but it won't last that long. We're a pretty adaptable lot and as a whole are remarkably good at ISK making and such. Hell I'm grumbling over the market prices of stuff, but a volatile market is going to incredibly good for my ISK reserves. Don't confuse grumbling over short term discomfort with the perpetual whine we hear from die hard carebears. -Liang I was agreeing with you and extrapolating your point. Learn reading comprehension, I guess? See also: THAT WAS NOT AN ARGUMENT.
Ummm, I don't know how I could have deduced that but w/e. The point is well and truly belabored now.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos
Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
312
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 19:20:00 -
[42] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Liang Nuren wrote:Uh, most of the PVPers I know may grumble for a while, but it won't last that long. We're a pretty adaptable lot and as a whole are remarkably good at ISK making and such. Hell I'm grumbling over the market prices of stuff, but a volatile market is going to incredibly good for my ISK reserves. Don't confuse grumbling over short term discomfort with the perpetual whine we hear from die hard carebears. -Liang I was agreeing with you and extrapolating your point. Learn reading comprehension, I guess? See also: THAT WAS NOT AN ARGUMENT. Ummm, I don't know how I could have deduced that but w/e. The point is well and truly belabored now. -Liang Maybe the problem is you read every post and just assume that people are arguing with you instead of maybe trying to add to what you've already said.
Just a thought, though. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux
1514
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 19:58:00 -
[43] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote: Maybe the problem is you read every post and just assume that people are arguing with you instead of maybe trying to add to what you've already said.
Just a thought, though.
Let's take a look at what was said: "PVPers are not going to quit because higher tier ships are more expensive. They'll downgrade the ship they fly before quitting."
"... While simultaneously ramping up the tear factor for everybody involved."
It seems that relatively obvious that by saying "everybody involved", PVPers are included in that ramping up of the tear factor. Really, it could also be argued that its the responsibility of a poster to ensure their posts are understandable by the readers - which includes people who have a different native language. It could be argued that a certain poster has poor communication skills if they didn't say what they meant.... ?
Just a thought, though. 
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos
Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
313
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 20:02:00 -
[44] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Darth Gustav wrote: Maybe the problem is you read every post and just assume that people are arguing with you instead of maybe trying to add to what you've already said.
Just a thought, though.
Let's take a look at what was said: "PVPers are not going to quit because higher tier ships are more expensive. They'll downgrade the ship they fly before quitting." "... While simultaneously ramping up the tear factor for everybody involved." It seems that relatively obvious that by saying "everybody involved", PVPers are included in that ramping up of the tear factor. Really, it could also be argued that its the responsibility of a poster to ensure their posts are understandable by the readers - which includes people who have a different native language. It could be argued that a certain poster has poor communication skills if they didn't say what they meant.... ? Just a thought, though.  -Liang
Yes, the tears upon which they sup routinely have been (and continue to be) buffed. That's what I meant.
The tears you get will be better. The tears that your victims give will be better.
It's too bad that apparently anything I reply to you has to be spelled out like I'm dealing with a spergy six year old...
My point was valid regardless - that you got defensive is the true tell here. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux
1514
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 20:04:00 -
[45] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:My point was valid regardless - that you got defensive is the true tell here.
It's not being defensive when someone screws up what they're trying to say and you have to correct them. 
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos
Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
313
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 20:07:00 -
[46] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:My point was valid regardless - that you got defensive is the true tell here. It's not being defensive when someone screws up what they're trying to say and you have to correct them.  -Liang
I'm not sure you corrected anybody there Liang.
Unless CCP has not buffed tears? He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |
|

CCP Phantom
C C P C C P Alliance
1140

|
Posted - 2012.04.11 20:12:00 -
[47] - Quote
Moved from General Discussion. CCP Phantom - German Community Coordinator |
|

Alain Kinsella
100
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 21:13:00 -
[48] - Quote
You can have a *lot* of fun in destroyers, even before the recent changes (though then it would primarily be the Thrasher). I <3 Agony Uni.
As for mining, I'm still happy digging into planets, thanks (though I freely admit rocks are tempting again). Will wait and see how CCP fills out the Ore ship line.
BTW, is this some new form of roid rage? I may have come here from Myst Online, but that does not make me any less bloodthirsty than the average Eve player.
Just more subtle.
|

Jessie-A Tassik
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
53
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 21:47:00 -
[49] - Quote
Adunh Slavy wrote:Jas Dor wrote: Most likely though is sudden, explosive, subscription loss when the inflation situation makes continuing to play this game untenable.
I doubt that will be the case. At least not in the dramatic scene of players running for the hello kitty hills.
The only reason CCP is doing anything is because people began leaving in sufficient numbers to scare them.
So try to be less of an idiot. |

Xylorn Hasher
Sumiyoshi-Kai
31
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 22:00:00 -
[50] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Darth Gustav wrote: Maybe the problem is you read every post and just assume that people are arguing with you instead of maybe trying to add to what you've already said.
Just a thought, though.
Let's take a look at what was said: "PVPers are not going to quit because higher tier ships are more expensive. They'll downgrade the ship they fly before quitting." -Liang
You are wrong Liang. Most pirate corps have strong industrial alt corps. How do you think who is making CAP ships, drugs, T2 ships and other stuff? Large part of it is made in lowsec by us.
I went outlaw one and half a year ago with around 800m in wallet. Now its more than 15 Bils in cash and more than double in hardware. All was earned in lowsec by that time. So dont worry bout us :)
|

Adunh Slavy
Ammatar Trade Syndicate
595
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 23:24:00 -
[51] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote: So try to be less of an idiot.
Soon as you stop being a douche bag |

Jas Dor
Republic University Minmatar Republic
125
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 23:43:00 -
[52] - Quote
Xylorn Hasher wrote: You are wrong Liang. Most pirate corps have strong industrial alt corps. How do you think who is making CAP ships, drugs, T2 ships and other stuff? Large part of it is made in lowsec by us.
I went outlaw one and half a year ago with around 800m in wallet. Now its more than 15 Bils in cash and more than double in hardware. All was earned in lowsec by that time. So dont worry bout us :)
Might I humbly suggest that
1. Now that this has been moved to Market discussion the quality of the posting seems to be improving; and
2. A low sec pirate who reads market discussion might not be representative of the average 0.0 line pilot (for one thing you have the good sense to do something more fun than being a 0.0 line pilot). |

Silver Ott
Baxter Inc Babylon 5..
2
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 23:53:00 -
[53] - Quote
biggest crybaby thread ever boohoo sadstory
|

Jas Dor
Republic University Minmatar Republic
125
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 00:16:00 -
[54] - Quote
Hum. I find it surprising how many people here are rejecting the simple concept that eve is a game and people playing a game will not adopt the role of victim. Sure folks will lose ships PvPing. Getting into a ship who's role is to be an easy kill for somebody else, not so much.
Trit averaged 5.89 yesterday. It's averaging 6.19 as we speak (nope make that 6.20 on sell orders). That's a tad over 17.8m/hour from mining and rising. I hate to point this out but it doesn't look like players are much interested in getting ganked in mining barges for the what the market is currently willing to pay them. |

Daniel Plain
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
36
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 00:31:00 -
[55] - Quote
the reason you are wrong OP is that you assume that everyone cares as much about losing ships as you do. i myself regularly scan down low class WHs and clean them out in a cheap BC. if i get ganked, i eject and warp to the exit hole without losing a second thought. and i can also confirm that i am not the only one doing this, i even met a guy who was solo MINING in a C2 once.
TL;DR: people don't care about losing ships, therefore you're wrong. |

Silver Ott
Baxter Inc Babylon 5..
2
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 00:49:00 -
[56] - Quote
... |

Javajunky
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
6
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 01:32:00 -
[57] - Quote
About mining...
.... working as intended .... some people like it, even if you dont, sorry ... thank you CCP for making mining the thing the cool kids do... .... no changes necessary, miners are happy
That is all...
|

Jas Dor
Republic University Minmatar Republic
128
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 03:00:00 -
[58] - Quote
Daniel Plain wrote:the reason you are wrong OP is that you assume that everyone cares as much about losing ships as you do. i myself regularly scan down low class WHs and clean them out in a cheap BC. if i get ganked, i eject and warp to the exit hole without losing a second thought. and i can also confirm that i am not the only one doing this, i even met a guy who was solo MINING in a C2 once.
TL;DR: people don't care about losing ships, therefore you're wrong.
What makes you think that I am arguing from personal feeling and not a string of observations about player behavior. You yourself are helping to prove my thesis. You indicate that you do not mind dying, in a relatively low probability event (killed in a WH), without social stigmatization (**** happens in a WH), while doing something relatively interesting. Yeah, I don't mind the occasional ship loss from living outside of empire either.
There is a big difference from doing something relatively secure and signing up to do a stupid. Becoming gank bait in a barge is signing up to do something stupid. So is carrying 1B in a T1 hauler. Both are things people either don't do or only do once. Right now we are seeing a bunch of people going "tried it, got ganked, got the message about mining in high sec." Unfortunately unless a significant number of lemmings volunteer to be gank bait in high sec, low end prices will continue to rise.
As indeed they have. |

Silver Ott
Baxter Inc Babylon 5..
2
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 03:09:00 -
[59] - Quote
omg the sky is falling y2k is coming everybody panic
maybe you should consider playing eve in a bombshelter or the likes until patch day just to be on the safe side |

Kreeia Dgore
EntroPrelatial Industria EntroPraetorian Aegis
1
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 04:30:00 -
[60] - Quote
I want a minigame! Did you guys see the fanfest state of the economy video? Mining is one of the most performed activities (though bots may have caused this), but it is the most hated one. I would like to see a minigame, nothing difficult, but something that will benefit folks plying aftively, not half afk or bots. If there would be a minigame, for example similar to the scanning proces of identifying anomalies, while now you would identify the most yielding parts of the asteroid to gain better yield and not having to chop through the rock parts, it would speed things a bit and surely make them more fun. Those either botting or mostly afk would be left with the possibility of mining, but wouldn't be as efficient as when playing actively.We could have a special module for that, or just adjust the survey scanners, we need them anyway. Once mining will be more fun (and hulks somehow boosted in defence), the situation may get better. Right now, it is just a dull activity folks have to do. I also appreciate the new ideas about group mining ops in mining belts, but frankly, mining mechanics is old and boring, you would give us great new place to be, but it won't help for in the end the folks will just be bored together. |

Talisa Latarien
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 08:45:00 -
[61] - Quote
Not willing to depose the "We're all going to die" approach to the problem, but I think it's quite natural that there's a connection between profitability and security of mining. The higher the mineral cost (especially, Trit), the more it costs to build a T1 gank ship and modules for it. Now, some equipment comes from ratting, missioning, etc, but ships do have to be built. And, as mentioned earlier, Concordokken=no insurance. On the other hand, mineral prices going up means more profitability for miners.
So, at some point in time the price of expendable alpha ships will be comparable to the price of expected loot from an average mining setup. And loot is pretty random (unless someone is crazy enough to mine T2-fitted and alone at the same time) - salvaged stuff worth 2 mil from several abandoned BC wrecks at a gate the other day, while getting 50 mil worth salvage from one hisec belt rat frig.
So the only question is, how high will the mineral prices go now that minerals from drones are out of this game, and refining mission loot is marginal at best. Correct me if I am wrong. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine
58
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 09:00:00 -
[62] - Quote
People often quit EVE because they find it too hard.
That doesn't mean EVE is too hard. |

Raven Ether
Republic University Minmatar Republic
146
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 11:22:00 -
[63] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:Jas Dor wrote:Roime wrote:Your whole thought structure is based on the stubborn fallacy that mining is a solo activity that can only be performed in high security space.
Mining does not make anyone a victim. Being unorganised, unwilling to co-operate with others and doing it in the wrong place makes one a victim. It is therefore no different from any other activity in EVE.
Are you claiming that group mining in low/null is an efficient way to get minerals into the game? A once a week corp mining op for a couple hours isn't going to meet the mineral demand in this game. Thousands of corps. Please, don't forget to livestream your mining ops. Preferably with accompanying webcam for maximum tear extraction.
I would pay good isk to watch that.
Btw, it's only noobs that get swept over and over by suicide ganks. People who know what they are doing can find one of many many high sec systems to mine safely.
Op is a scrub |

Llyandrian
Livestock Science Exchange
42
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 13:31:00 -
[64] - Quote
This is all part of the null sec industry buff. |

Scrapyard Bob
EVE University Ivy League
857
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 13:45:00 -
[65] - Quote
Talisa Latarien wrote: So the only question is, how high will the mineral prices go now that minerals from drones are out of this game, and refining mission loot is now marginal at best. Correct me if I am wrong.
The simple answer - they will rise in price until either demand slacks off or the ISK/hr rises to the point where people jump in and start harvesting. Players will either have to help harvest the materials to increase supply and/or reduce their consumption to match their new income levels.
Figure that, in hi-sec, you can get 30-40M per hour from running L4s, 40-60M (maybe 80M) from running incursions. Traditionally, mining income has been measured at around 8-12M ISK/hr. As that rises to more closely match the other methods of earning income in hi-sec, more people will start mining as a career path. Which is probably about 10-20% higher then current prices (hi-sec ores would need to settle in at around 180-220 ISK/m3 for the long-term). Or whatever ISK/m3 pushes that up into the 20-25M ISK/hr range for a solo Hulk.
The same holds true out in null-sec. The ABC ores will rise in value to the point where they are somewhat competitive with the other ways of earning income out in null. That's probably around 500-600 ISK/m3 for those ores, and maybe 15k ISK/u for Morphite.
(Current market prices for the 8 minerals aren't far off where I expect them to be come July. But there will definitely be a price spike in May/June.) |

Zarere
Team Pizza Viro Mors Non Est
10
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 13:54:00 -
[66] - Quote
Its funny how everyone thinks that cheap battleships are a birthright.
I'm not that old, but werent there a time when battleships were a rarity, maybe we're coming back towards those times again? |

Marduk Nibiru
Risk Breakers C0NVICTED
174
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 15:53:00 -
[67] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:PVPers are not going to quit because higher tier ships are more expensive. They'll downgrade the ship they fly before quitting. -Liang
Actually...
I'm regularly broke. A consequence of not really playing a lot and not having a clear agenda when I do.
Since I also get blown up a lot, I very often have to downgrade what I'm flying. I'm not the kind of guy that can lose 300mil a week and be OK. I'd be ratting ALL the time for that to work and flying minmatar...I can't really rat all that effectively either.
So I often find myself forced into flying a rifter or a cruiser. And yeah, I just ship down to what I can afford and go out again.
Besides that, I actually like the small ships more. Rifter is my favorite ship to fly. I created a minmatar character because of it. I'd rather go out in a rifter than most anything else (except maybe a griffin, which I learned is pretty damn fun to fly too).
I actually hate flying around in battleships. They're expensive, slow, and boring. They take forever to train effectively too.
So here's one PvP pilot that would be happy to see the vast majority of fleets composed of AF, HAC, or something like that where I can fly my poor-man rifter without looking like a dweeb. Such fleets are way more fun even if you're rich...in my opinion. |

Jas Dor
Republic University Minmatar Republic
128
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 16:00:00 -
[68] - Quote
Talisa Latarien wrote:Not willing to depose the "We're all going to die" approach to the problem, but I think it's quite natural that there's a connection between profitability and security of mining. The higher the mineral cost (especially, Trit), the more it costs to build a T1 gank ship and modules for it. Now, some equipment comes from ratting, missioning, etc, but ships do have to be built. And, as mentioned earlier, Concordokken=no insurance. On the other hand, mineral prices going up means more profitability for miners. So, at some point in time the price of expendable alpha ships will be comparable to the price of expected loot from an average mining setup. And loot is pretty random (unless someone is crazy enough to mine T2-fitted and alone at the same time) - salvaged stuff worth 2 mil from several abandoned BC wrecks at a gate the other day, while getting 50 mil worth salvage from one hisec belt rat frig. So the only question is, how high will the mineral prices go now that minerals from drones are out of this game, and refining mission loot is now marginal at best. Correct me if I am wrong.
Considering that a mining barge can be ganked by a destroyer, this seems more likely to result in an inflationary spiral than eventual stability. |

Immortis Vexx
Lupus Draconis Dragehund
1
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 16:49:00 -
[69] - Quote
Honestly, I'm tired of both people on both sides of the mining fight. Here are some items I have for both sides of this.
PVPr foolishness A) you CAN'T tank a hulk to be sustainable in highsec. If a destroyer or 2 frigs can do it, anything can. B) DSCAN doesn't work in highsec! With 40 other ships floating around in space dscan is pointless. you PVPrs just don't fricken get it. C) Warp stabs on a mining boat DON'T WORK. This should be obvious but I'll explain anyway. A mining boat will not have enough time to align and get up to speed before ganked; even if you are already pointed in the right direction. Plus being bumped around, it's pointless.
Miner foolishness A) If you are mining in a system that has 500 people, you are an idiot. B) If you aren't watching local for known gankers (and not making effective use of the negative standing tool), you are an idiot. Learn the denizens of your home! C) If you are AFK mining, you are an idiot. D) Your mining boat is not made to fight in a war, If you think it should.. you are an idiot. Mining scows are for MINING not battle. CCP doesn't need to make a "tank miner" because the very idea of this is ridiculous E) If you are mining highsec with a hulk (AND have the ability to orca support), you are an idiot. This is a big one so I'll go into more detail...
- A covetor (at max) gets 15% less ore per cycle than a hulk.
- Even with terrible drone skills you can tank belt rats long enough to kill them before taking armor damage.
- Highsec gankers look for juicy targets. Your objective is to be NOT on that list
- You can recoup the cost of a covetor (and they are SUPER EASY to build) in minutes compared to getting ganked in a hulk
I am a high/lowsec miner, and a profitable one. I have also been ganked, several times. To suggest that only miners "hide behind the game mechanics" its stupid too. How come I can't deploy drones to any rifter that warps into the belt? If a rifter comes on scene, my only option is to GTFO. Gankers have concord security up until the very second that they engage. You say that miners hide behind concord and I say that it is exactly the opposite.
Vexx
|

Darth Tickles
Dark Sun Consortium
219
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 16:54:00 -
[70] - Quote
Immortis Vexx wrote:B) DSCAN doesn't work in highsec! With 40 other ships floating around in space dscan is pointless. you PVPrs just don't fricken get it.
Accusing pvpers of not "getting" dscan while demonstrating that it is you who doesn't "get" dscan.
|

Debiru
Flashpoint Industries
1
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 17:03:00 -
[71] - Quote
Nullsec isn't Wonderland, and it isn't made for people to be a loner. You want to mine in nullsec, or lowsec for that matter, than you get some friends or a corp together and you run a mining op. Mining in nullsec doesn't equal how many Hulks and Barges that come out to mine, it equals the effectiveness of your scouts and the intelligence of your FC in picking a suitable and defensible location.
If you're still in the belt after a neut has jumped in-system that you don't know the location of, you've already lost, doesn't matter if your ship has been blown up yet or not.
Stop viewing the pvp'ers as worthless pewpew addicts and start paying them to scout the gates and defend the belts with ECM ships, and the pvp'ers might stop viewing the miners as carebear squatters.
Oh, and you won't be self-selecting yourself for victimhood anymore.
Share the wealth and stop assuming pvp has nothing to do with mining.
As for ganking in highsec, it's easily avoidable. In 6 years and spending time in all 3 sec status areas, I've only ever lost a single barge, and it was in wormhole space (and was completely my own fault, not the fault of game/mining mechanics). If a destroyer, battlecruiser, or battleship warps into your belt in highsec, you should already be warping out. And if you're sitting on the warp-in location in a belt, you've already selected yourself to be a victim.
Do I think barges and Exhumors should get a tanking buff? Yes. I do. Do I think it should be large, or that it is necessary? No. They aren't pvp ships and their first method of defense is the pilot being attentative and intelligent. Don't blame CCP because you lack those traits.
In other news, yay buffed mineral prices. Now if we can make Titans and SCs rare again (well, again for the Titans), I'd be in love. |

Immortis Vexx
Lupus Draconis Dragehund
1
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 17:03:00 -
[72] - Quote
Darth Tickles wrote:Immortis Vexx wrote:B) DSCAN doesn't work in highsec! With 40 other ships floating around in space dscan is pointless. you PVPrs just don't fricken get it. Accusing pvpers of not "getting" dscan while demonstrating that it is you who doesn't "get" dscan.
Okay, then explain to me how dscan works effectively in highsec instead of just giving a cryptic, uninformative post that calls me a fool without any details. Don't get me wrong, if you can provide me with a good set of reasons and how to use it in high sec, I will certainly say that you were right.
Vexx |

Debiru
Flashpoint Industries
1
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 17:11:00 -
[73] - Quote
Immortis Vexx wrote:Darth Tickles wrote:Immortis Vexx wrote:B) DSCAN doesn't work in highsec! With 40 other ships floating around in space dscan is pointless. you PVPrs just don't fricken get it. Accusing pvpers of not "getting" dscan while demonstrating that it is you who doesn't "get" dscan. Okay, then explain to me how dscan works effectively in highsec instead of just giving a cryptic, uninformative post that calls me a fool without any details. Don't get me wrong, if you can provide me with a good set of reasons and how to use it in high sec, I will certainly say that you were right. Vexx Tips;
1.) Don't mine in a system that is heavily populated. 2.) If there are too many results, lower the range of your Dscan, and look for destroyers, cruisers, battlecruisers, and T1 battleships with silly names. 3.) Stay aligned at low-speed at all time and always have your destination selected on overview except when selecting targets for mining lasers. This will allow you to warp out within 2-5 seconds depending on your skills. Don't wait to be targeted to warp out, warp out if you see a ship warp in that isn't a mining ship (Memorize the mining cruisers/frigates). 4.) Buff and resistance fit your barge. You have spare medium slots, and when mining solo, a survey scanner isn't necessary |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
543
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 17:15:00 -
[74] - Quote
Debiru wrote: In other news, yay buffed mineral prices. Now if we can make Titans and SCs rare again (well, again for the Titans), I'd be in love.
RMT confiscations will hopefully make them rare again. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Immortis Vexx
Lupus Draconis Dragehund
2
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 17:25:00 -
[75] - Quote
Debiru wrote:Immortis Vexx wrote:[quote=Darth Tickles][quote=Immortis Vexx]B) DSCAN doesn't work in highsec! With 40 Stuff
Vexx Tips; 1.) Don't mine in a system that is heavily populated. 2.) If there are too many results, lower the range of your Dscan, and look for destroyers, cruisers, battlecruisers, and T1 battleships with silly names. 3.) Stay aligned at low-speed at all time and always have your destination selected on overview except when selecting targets for mining lasers. This will allow you to warp out within 2-5 seconds depending on your skills. Don't wait to be targeted to warp out, warp out if you see a ship warp in that isn't a mining ship (Memorize the mining cruisers/frigates). 4.) Buff and resistance fit your barge. You have spare medium slots, and when mining solo, a survey scanner isn't necessary
1) See the first point that i made previously, this is simply a reiteration of what i said 2) Funny names? WTF does that have to do with anything? How does lowering the range help? Seeing battleships and rifters, and any other ship is incredibly common in highsec. Dscan is a GREAT tool for lowsec but I still can't see this level of intel being worth a damn in high sec 3) This one I can kinda see as valid. Though it does make it a logistical nightmare when solo mining and only having a 15km range. 4) As I stated previously even with a fully buffer/resist fitted hulk you will most likely still be ganked. why? This makes you more of a "juicy" target. I agree that this is the only way to "safely" mine and have at least some semblance of defense but again, its a mining barge, not a battleship.
Vexx
|

Mocram
Inventores Lda.
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 17:29:00 -
[76] - Quote
IGÇÖve been a miner/industrialist in eve for more the 7 years When I started mining, IGÇÖve made all the way from the small Procurer, to the Retriever and into the Covetor. Mining my stuff, and hauling it to the station Then I decided I should make a second account, all that running to the station was getting on my nerves, so, I made an hauling account, and I trained to be the sales man to, hauling from one station to the other in my humble Iteron IV. It was damn fun After 3 months in EVE, someone asked me if I wanted to go to 0.0GǪ Big voyage, I learned about the famous ABC (Arkonor, Bistot and Crokite), the 3 most valuable, except for the Mercoxite, so I learned to fly the Hulk and use T2 mining lasers and crystals So, in 0.0, we mined ABC and got pye and Trit from hauling Spawns. Remember that at the time, the only capital Ships available were the Freighters, so imagine what it was to haul minerals. Also, freighters couldnGÇÖt get stuff from POSs if I remember correctly Mining at the time was fun, but low-sec was as closed then as it is now, a bit less because you could actually hire ppl to guard gates(mining would pay for it), even so, it was something I never actually understood the risk vs effort
End of the story of my life [:=d
Until some days ago, before the destroyer buff, I used to mine Ice, although not paying a lot, I could actually do it while playing with kids and addressing wife agro accordingly. Lost some ships of course to ganks, but also gained some. That was until I actually lost two nicely tanked (modules + gang links in orca) Mackinaws for 2 destroyers, first one I didnGÇÖt see it coming, the second I saw him warping in, tried to warp but it was to late So, I started thinking to myself if it was really doable to mine in high sec. The answer was no, and still is. Covetor dying to 1 Destroyer and Mackinaw dying to 2 Destroyers. (hulk can be a bit better, but also not enought in my POV
Null sec for me is like no manGÇÖs land. A Piece of Land for the the pirates. I do know you can make a lot of isk in low-sec but you also lose a lot High sec is much safer the low sec, you can actually own the systems and mine in hidden belts. Its NBSI, so if someone enters system, align and warp to POS. You canGÇÖt do that in high-sec or low-sec, or else youGÇÖll be more time out of the Belt rather the in the Belt Also ABC is only in null sec, wich makes it actually profitable to mine
Question is, who is going to mine Trit and Pye ABC are mineable in Nul Medium end Ores will also start to be mined there What about low end? Is it possible to get enough Trit from Null into High to feed High Sec Needs None is going to mine in low-sec, at least not if he can make the calcs
Imagine you have one char, or maybe 2 chars You can get into a Drake in aprox. 2 weeks and start making lvl 3, and go to lvl4GÇÖs in 1 month more You need a bunch of time to be able to get into a covetor and use a strip miner. 1 month at leas
Missioning can give you between 15 to 100M/hour at absolutely no risk, and with no need for a 2nd account or friends, and can also get wife and kids agro Mining needs to group up to get to 20M/hour, and still need to be careful for suicide ganks
Solutions Given up on 3 account Given up on my towe Getting ready to group u Preparing myself to go to 0.0 and have fun. Let some others be the stupid ones to mine Ice and low end Mins. IGÇÖm going to have fun in blowing up stuff and do some null sec Exploration
CCP Solutions I Believe there are some, maybe changing the mineral compositions of some ores ore things like that. Something that will put the mining income aligned with missioning. But hey, I never tried to guess what CCP will do next, or I would be in constant paranoia.
|

Mocram
Inventores Lda.
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 17:31:00 -
[77] - Quote
Immortis Vexx wrote:Debiru wrote:Immortis Vexx wrote:[quote=Darth Tickles][quote=Immortis Vexx]B) DSCAN doesn't work in highsec! With 40 Stuff
Vexx Tips; 1.) Don't mine in a system that is heavily populated. 2.) If there are too many results, lower the range of your Dscan, and look for destroyers, cruisers, battlecruisers, and T1 battleships with silly names. 3.) Stay aligned at low-speed at all time and always have your destination selected on overview except when selecting targets for mining lasers. This will allow you to warp out within 2-5 seconds depending on your skills. Don't wait to be targeted to warp out, warp out if you see a ship warp in that isn't a mining ship (Memorize the mining cruisers/frigates). 4.) Buff and resistance fit your barge. You have spare medium slots, and when mining solo, a survey scanner isn't necessary 1) See the first point that i made previously, this is simply a reiteration of what i said 2) Funny names? WTF does that have to do with anything? How does lowering the range help? Seeing battleships and rifters, and any other ship is incredibly common in highsec. Dscan is a GREAT tool for lowsec but I still can't see this level of intel being worth a damn in high sec 3) This one I can kinda see as valid. Though it does make it a logistical nightmare when solo mining and only having a 15km range. 4) As I stated previously even with a fully buffer/resist fitted hulk you will most likely still be ganked. why? This makes you more of a "juicy" target. I agree that this is the only way to "safely" mine and have at least some semblance of defense but again, its a mining barge, not a battleship. Vexx
btw yay for a relaxing profession in EVE. Is it supposed to be this hard to mine in high sec???? c'mon guys, if i rat in a belt in null i just need to watch local, and that is risky. |

Debiru
Flashpoint Industries
1
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 18:30:00 -
[78] - Quote
Quote: btw yay for a relaxing profession in EVE. Is it supposed to be this hard to mine in high sec???? c'mon guys, if i rat in a belt in null i just need to watch local, and that is risky.
It's not if you're smart and pick a place to mine that doesn't have gankers everyday. Unfortunately, judging by this thread, most people aren't very good at that. |

Jas Dor
Republic University Minmatar Republic
129
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 18:55:00 -
[79] - Quote
Time to market and gank risk of the hauler are also inflationary pressures. If it takes an hour to haul to market prices will rise to reflect this. If gank risk caps the maximum amount that can be hauled at less than the capacity of the hauler, prices will also rise to reflect this. Sure you might be able to mine in Khanid, but can you efficiently get the minerals to market? |

Traejun DiSanctis
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 19:16:00 -
[80] - Quote
Jas Dor wrote:Time to market and gank risk of the hauler are also inflationary pressures. If it takes an hour to haul to market prices will rise to reflect this. If gank risk caps the maximum amount that can be hauled at less than the capacity of the hauler, prices will also rise to reflect this. Sure you might be able to mine in Khanid, but can you efficiently get the minerals to market?
Nice analysis. You raise good points. To date, the market pressure applied by piracy (ganks) in hi-sec has been negligible. I would estimate it at ~5%, which is a perfectly acceptable predicted "loss" and/or "waste" figure when trading at high volume.
Due to recent events - and those that are predicted to occur in the near future - the loss/waste figure is likely to continue to rise. Not as a result of an increase in piracy - at least not in the long term - but because the volume of trading (i.e. the number of materials entering the market) is decreasing rapidly.
Thus, while the number of loss/waste events does not appreciably increase, the % of loss/waste will (perhaps already has) increased dramatically. Hence, we see 100%+ increases in the value of certain items/materials over short periods of time. |

Darth Tickles
Dark Sun Consortium
222
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 19:20:00 -
[81] - Quote
Traejun DiSanctis wrote:To date, the market pressure applied by piracy (ganks) in hi-sec has been negligible. I would estimate it at ~5%, which is a perfectly acceptable predicted "loss" and/or "waste" figure when trading at high volume
Hmmm...I ran the numbers in my outtamyass machine, came up with 6.5896%. I'm curious where the discrepancy arose between our respective pulledfromass numbers?
|

Kalli Brixzat
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 19:29:00 -
[82] - Quote
Darth Tickles wrote:Traejun DiSanctis wrote:To date, the market pressure applied by piracy (ganks) in hi-sec has been negligible. I would estimate it at ~5%, which is a perfectly acceptable predicted "loss" and/or "waste" figure when trading at high volume Hmmm...I ran the numbers in my outtamyass machine, came up with 6.5896%. I'm curious where the discrepancy arose between our respective pulledfromass numbers?
lol this made me happy.
In all seriousness, Traejun's numbers contained no decimals...and was preceded by a ~ |

Red Teufel
Blackened Skies THE UNTHINKABLES
48
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 19:30:00 -
[83] - Quote
mmmm tears |

Marduk Nibiru
Risk Breakers C0NVICTED
175
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 21:30:00 -
[84] - Quote
Immortis Vexx wrote: D) Your mining boat is not made to fight in a war, If you think it should.. you are an idiot. Mining scows are for MINING not battle. CCP doesn't need to make a "tank miner" because the very idea of this is ridiculous
Actually, I don't know that it's all that ridiculous. I'd think that in a universe where war is the norm, with as much violence as EvE has and his supposed to have had all along, at least one company somewhere would develop a mining vessel that could take at least one tap from a ball peen hammer. Something that takes some effort to gank and has a moderate chance of escaping. Maybe it doesn't pull in the ore like a Hulk, but it wouldn't be like mining in a BS either and could at least use strip miners... |

Kalli Brixzat
4
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 21:37:00 -
[85] - Quote
Marduk Nibiru wrote:Immortis Vexx wrote: D) Your mining boat is not made to fight in a war, If you think it should.. you are an idiot. Mining scows are for MINING not battle. CCP doesn't need to make a "tank miner" because the very idea of this is ridiculous
Actually, I don't know that it's all that ridiculous. I'd think that in a universe where war is the norm, with as much violence as EvE has and his supposed to have had all along, at least one company somewhere would develop a mining vessel that could take at least one tap from a ball peen hammer. Something that takes some effort to gank and has a moderate chance of escaping. Maybe it doesn't pull in the ore like a Hulk, but it wouldn't be like mining in a BS either and could at least use strip miners...
There's really no middle ground on this issue.
Miner mine, they don't fight. TBH, they shouldn't even be able to defend against much.
From a business perspective - given the relatively small chance of being popped in hi-sec - it would not make financial sense to sacrifice the ability to mind (not even a little bit) just to make a ships lightly more survivable. |

Mookie Quantico
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
19
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 22:13:00 -
[86] - Quote
Jas Dor wrote:As it currently stands, (DELETED for BREVITY) makes continuing to play this game untenable.
That's about all I needed to read....
Pro Tip: EMBRACE the CHAOS and PROFIT from it. True Story. 
Off you go.
Mook
|

Feckfor Rufard
Deadwood Reserrection CORE Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 11:49:00 -
[87] - Quote
Jas Dor wrote:Nimbat wrote:I long for the day when faction ships are an awesome and rare sight and when the majority of EVE flies T1 ships. It would be amazing. Bak in the day PvPers always flew the best ship that they could. Only lack of SP drove the use of inferior ships. Faction ships started appearing more in PvP when CCP added them to the market. Prior to that they lacked the visibility for widespread use. If you make PvP ships navfordable PvPers will quit. They will not downgrade the ship types they fly. ,
so what your saying is , less people getting blown up in there multi-billion isk navy whatever, faction whatever, bs's on the jita undock and being the laughing stock of the eve news the next day....darwin at work?
|

Alain Kinsella
100
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 23:32:00 -
[88] - Quote
Kalli Brixzat wrote:There's really no middle ground on this issue.
Miner mine, they don't fight. TBH, they shouldn't even be able to defend against much.
From a business perspective - given the relatively small chance of being popped in hi-sec - it would not make financial sense to sacrifice the ability to mind (not even a little bit) just to make a ships lightly more survivable.
In that case, would you instead go with a more agile mining ship? Say on par with a Blockade Runner in agility and tank but without the cloak?
Miners get a 'fighting chance' to GTFO, and perhaps get bold enough to try ninja low/null mining (or mine in Sov Space without worrying as much about the Neutral Cloaker 'problem'). PvPers get an actual hunt rather than the highsec equivalent to structure shooting, and get more challenging targets (catching one should be more satisfying).
There are solutions to the mining ship 'problem' that do not require tanking, as seen today anyway. I may have come here from Myst Online, but that does not make me any less bloodthirsty than the average Eve player.
Just more subtle.
|

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
1045
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 23:53:00 -
[89] - Quote
To be fair, RP-wise, you'd expect a mining ship to have HP comparable to a combat vessel of similar size and complexity, if not even higher. Sure, you would not expect its combat capabilities to be even in the same order of magnitude, but come on, it can really use a bit more HP. Like, say, 2-4 times more than right now. Give or take. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/User:Akita_T http://eve-search.com/stats/Akita_T |

Nub Sauce
State War Academy Caldari State
38
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 00:06:00 -
[90] - Quote
Akita T wrote:To be fair, RP-wise, you'd expect a mining ship to have HP comparable to a combat vessel of similar size and complexity, if not even higher. Sure, you would not expect its combat capabilities to be even in the same order of magnitude, but come on, it can really use a bit more HP. Like, say, 2-4 times more than right now. Give or take.
This makes sense.
Also reminds me of that one CCP vid that shows a mining barge under attack... There's no such thing. If it is attacked, it's already dead. There's no saving it. |

Silver Ott
Baxter Inc Babylon 5..
2
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 02:06:00 -
[91] - Quote
lets rename the game pansys online
back in 2004 i was just fine mining in my little probe in insmother after my first week or two crunshing down those juicy arkanor rocks ooh the sweet memories
anyways if mining is so hard dont mine noone is making you
find a solution to your problem insead of whining on forums for another dumbdown for the game |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |