| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Jeane DuPont
DuPont Enterprises Fluffeh Bunneh Murder Squad
5
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 23:25:00 -
[1] - Quote
To the point that I have no reason to hide any intentions from anyone in this medium of communication, and as the CEO of a corporation who has by no means whatsoever ever engaged on anything harmful to any economic activity the known alliance called Intaki Prosperity Initiative may have in Placid, and more specifically at the Viriette constellation, I come here to openly state having the general public as testimony that I am making a business proposition to given alliance that also works towards Intaki prosperity.
DuPont is a corporation that was forged on seeking profit parameters. There is no other reason for our slogan to be "Flipping the coin and winning both sides". DuPont not only keep planetary activities in Intaki, Brarel, and Agoze, but also on a C5 Anoikis system where it keeps planetary activities, high end LADAR exploration, minerals refining and manufacturing of goods, and one of the more important things, we keep a science team to explore the Talocan civilization as Vechtor already brought public on this IGS thread:
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=48091
With that in mind, I still believe though that it is possible to achieve returns of scale and therefore profits, still making reasonable investments on things that can really bring prosperity and economic progress.
DuPont is offering IPI the proposition to build THE FIRST TRUE INTAKI SHIPYARDS, in the Intaki system.
The idea is simple and perfectly executable.
DuPont would take the responsibility to assemble, keep and refuel half the costs of a station orbiting a suitable moon in the Intaki system, with Ship Assembly facilities. The other half of the installation costs, as well as half the costs of refueling the station and any other costs with defense the station would need would be responsibility of IPI.
Once the station is structured and has ship assembly arrays online, IPI would have someone in charge to manage ship manufacturing contracts, meaning:
- To accept mineral/components and BPCs needed to assemble ships at Intaki 5-5 Astral Mining station, charging the same price CAS station at Agoze would charge and openly from any interested capsuleer; - To transport given materials and blueprints to the shipyards in order to begin ship manufacturing; - To transport finished ships back to Astral Mining station at 5-5 in order to be delivered to the contractor; - To keep registry of every ship manufactured at the shipyards for auditing purposes and publicity to the Intaki society;
It may seem difficult to actually make profits with this activity, as the initial investment and POS fuelling to start this venture would be in the range of 700MM-1 Bil ISK. Still, given station can generate cash from other activities it can have at the same time. This would be something to be discussed further, directly between both organizations leaders/operating officers.
What I'm offering is the sharing of risks on something truly great to the Intaki community, something that would bring attention from anyone in New Eden. Suffice to say that if IPI takes it into consideration without DuPont Enterprises help as I'm offering, or taking other parties help, the same goal would be achieved. In my understanding, a more legitimate one than simply using Agoze CAS station in terms of Intaki Prosperity initiatives.
|

Jeane DuPont
DuPont Enterprises Fluffeh Bunneh Murder Squad
5
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 02:11:00 -
[2] - Quote
Not to mention that you would be redirecting the flow of minerals eventually being marketed at Agoze to its rightful trade center at Intaki 5-5... |

Layla Saitana
Intaki Resource Allocation Group Intaki Prosperity Initiative
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 16:32:00 -
[3] - Quote
As a voting member of the IPI council, I can tell you that as long as Vechtor is a member of your corporation I will never support such a partnership.
Given all that he's been involved with in the past, I trust him less than the squids and that's quite an accomplishment.
Fire him publicly and I'd be willing to entertain a discussion. Otherwise this is a dead deal in my book. |

Silas Vitalia
Nobilta Nera
221
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 17:49:00 -
[4] - Quote
I'm always looking for a good investment, and would be happy to purchase a majority stake in your venture. I can provide as much seed money as you require.
Contact me if this is of interest.
|

Katrina Oniseki
Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
432
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 18:36:00 -
[5] - Quote
"Give us money so we can set up a starbase. We'll let you 'own' half of it (and pay for half the fuel too)!"
Seems legit. |

Link Joker
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 21:33:00 -
[6] - Quote
Katrina Oniseki wrote:"Give us money so we can set up a starbase. We'll let you 'own' half of it (and pay for half the fuel too)!"
Seems legit.
A summation. I needed that, because goodness knows the rest of it made no sense. |

Jeane DuPont
DuPont Enterprises Fluffeh Bunneh Murder Squad
5
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 22:15:00 -
[7] - Quote
Layla Saitana wrote:As a voting member of the IPI council, I can tell you that as long as Vechtor is a member of your corporation I will never support such a partnership.
Given all that he's been involved with in the past, I trust him less than the squids and that's quite an accomplishment.
Fire him publicly and I'd be willing to entertain a discussion. Otherwise this is a dead deal in my book.
I'm sorry but portraiting Vechtor of something he isn't with such strong proofs to support his defense is something that is completely outside our agenda. Vechtor has a history of dedicated works towards Intaki security and prosperity that goes way beyound your efforts to that same end.
By the way I never saw you in Intaki.
|

Jeane DuPont
DuPont Enterprises Fluffeh Bunneh Murder Squad
5
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 22:17:00 -
[8] - Quote
Katrina Oniseki wrote:"Give us money so we can set up a starbase. We'll let you 'own' half of it (and pay for half the fuel too)!"
Seems legit.
Not sure I understood your reply Ms. Oniseki... is this a proposition? Because mine was quite clear on the sharing of half the entire venture risks...
|

Jeane DuPont
DuPont Enterprises Fluffeh Bunneh Murder Squad
5
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 22:18:00 -
[9] - Quote
Silas Vitalia wrote:I'm always looking for a good investment, and would be happy to purchase a majority stake in your venture. I can provide as much seed money as you require.
Contact me if this is of interest.
Thank you Ms Vitalia. My proposition was directed to IPI because theoreticaly they are the most interested part working towards real Intaki prosperity. But I don't see why we coudn't study other models...
I'll get in touch with you.
|

Silas Vitalia
Nobilta Nera
221
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 22:25:00 -
[10] - Quote
Jeane DuPont wrote:Silas Vitalia wrote:I'm always looking for a good investment, and would be happy to purchase a majority stake in your venture. I can provide as much seed money as you require.
Contact me if this is of interest.
Thank you Ms Vitalia. My proposition was directed to IPI because theoreticaly they are the most interested part working towards real Intaki prosperity. But I don't see why we coudn't study other models... I'll get in touch with you.
I'm aware I wasn't the intended party, but this might be a good opportunity. I'm entirely not interested in the day-to-day of running a starbase, but I've the funds to make whatever you need possible. Looking forward to your mail.
|

Sakaane Eionell
Intaki Liberation Front
40
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 15:03:00 -
[11] - Quote
Ms DuPont,
Please let me take a moment to ensure I understand your proposition correctly.
You would like to cooperate with IPI to build what you believe would be the first "true" Intaki shipyard.
DuPont Enterprises would be responsible for...
Quote:the responsibility to assemble, keep and refuel half the costs of a station ILF/IPI would be responsible for...
Quote:The other half of the installation costs, as well as half the costs of refueling the station and any other costs with defense the station
IPI would have someone in charge to manage ship manufacturing contracts, meaning:
- To accept mineral/components and BPCs needed to assemble ships at Intaki 5-5 Astral Mining station, charging the same price CAS station at Agoze would charge and openly from any interested capsuleer; - To transport given materials and blueprints to the shipyards in order to begin ship manufacturing; - To transport finished ships back to Astral Mining station at 5-5 in order to be delivered to the contractor; - To keep registry of every ship manufactured at the shipyards for auditing purposes and publicity to the Intaki society;
For the moment, let's set aside the fact that only members of the corporation which owns the starbase (and their alliance-mates, where applicable) can be granted roles to access deployed arrays, which means there can be no "shared" ownership--for IPI to be "responsible" for everything you are proposing, DuPont could not assemble nor "keep" the starbase.
Quote:What I'm offering is the sharing of risks Really? You want me, as IPI President, to ask our industrial pilots to effectively double their work? Then you want me, as ILF Isha-Sainika, to ask ILF's combat pilots to double their work? While you contribute......essentially nothing other than some fuel blocks? Exactly what risk would you be sharing?
This proposition seems more like 5%-10% responsibility for DuPont and 90%-95% work for IPI.
Since the general public is unable to access starbases which do not belong to them, I will grant you that using contracts as a workaround is perhaps worth considering. But then, ILF already owns a starbase in Intaki so there is no reason to set up another one. If our Silpa pilots are agreeable to the added workload of monitoring third party contracts this is something we could do out of our existing location as a percentage of our available manufacturing jobs. Thank you for the idea.
Still, I'm sure other corporations would prefer not to wait for our pilots to tend to their contracts, and the facilities in Agoze are freely available to anyone, thus IPI will still be proceding with our Agoze initiative.
If you want to foster cooperation between your organization and IPI, perhaps DuPont would consider contributing the fuel blocks or equivalent ISK of what you figure you would have spent on this "true Intaki shipyard" to the existing ILF starbase.
As for Layla Saitana's comments... She is a duly appointed representative to IPI and her voice carries much weight in the council. Personally, I also happen to agree with her. Sakaane Eionell Isha-Sainika, ILF; President, IPI
- Solitary Pilot | @ILFCorp - |

Layla Saitana
Intaki Resource Allocation Group Intaki Prosperity Initiative
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 15:34:00 -
[12] - Quote
Jeane DuPont wrote:I'm sorry but portraiting Vechtor of something he isn't with such strong proofs to support his defense is something that is completely outside our agenda. Vechtor has a history of dedicated works towards Intaki security and prosperity that goes way beyound your efforts to that same end.
By the way I never saw you in Intaki.
First, Vechtor is a tool. I've got all the proof of that I need. No one he's worked with in Intaki will have anything to do with him now, so I can't see any reason to jump into bed with him.
As for not seeing me in Intaki, I wasn't aware that you'd been appointed hall monitor. But here's a newsflash for you sister: I'm ethnically Intaki, but I'm not from Intaki. I'm Sajhan by birth and I currently keep a residence in Dubaana.
For someone who claims to want to help the Intaki people, you don't seem to understand much about us. Quick history lesson: The Intaki as a people are widely dispersed and live in places other than the Intaki System. True Intaki prosperity means the creation of a free Intaki state that will include more than just one planet in one system. |

Jeane DuPont
DuPont Enterprises Fluffeh Bunneh Murder Squad
5
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 22:49:00 -
[13] - Quote
Sakaane Eionell wrote: Please let me take a moment to ensure I understand your proposition correctly. Fair enough. Woudn't expect anything different from an open minded person like you.
Sakaane Eionell wrote: You would like to cooperate with IPI to build what you believe would be the first "true" Intaki shipyard. Precisely.
Sakaane Eionell wrote: For the moment, let's set aside the fact that only members of the corporation which owns the starbase (and their alliance-mates, where applicable) can be granted roles to access deployed arrays, which means there can be no "shared" ownership--for IPI to be "responsible" for everything you are proposing, DuPont could not assemble nor "keep" the starbase. I was generaly speaking. I am well aware of the restriction CONCORD laws imposes on the who can own and use what regarding starbases. Generaly speaking, a joint venture such as this would imply in one of the parts being in fact anchoring every structure and using it. Generaly speaking, the way DUPO could be helping with that would be like buying part of the given POS, haulling arrays to Intaki if necessary, assisting your pilots on what is possible to initiate operations and so on... By keeping it, generaly speaking, DUPO would be responsible to buying half of its fuel, haulling fuel to Intaki if needed etc. The way I wrote at this IGS was a general proposition, for starters, and wasn't my intention to go deep into the details of how this would be implemented, which I believe would not be in the scope of this thread.
Sakaane Eionell wrote: Really? You want me, as IPI President, to ask our industrial pilots to effectively double their work? Then you want me, as ILF Isha-Sainika, to ask ILF's combat pilots to double their work? While you contribute......essentially nothing other than some fuel blocks? Exactly what risk would you be sharing?
I don't want anything, it was a proposition... The way I made the proposition was a gesture of good faith, so, indeed, you would be in control of the day-to-day tasks. If this implies in double or tripple work to your industrial and/or combat pilots, I see it as the result of you working on something major, bigger than what you have been doing so far. But how would I manifest the well intentions I had if this occured differently? If by any chance I proposed that DUPO would be in charge of all the industrial work, woudn't you assume that your role in this endeavour would be reduced by simply "refuelling a station"? Considering IPI is an alliance fully devoted to Intaki, this doesn't sound so absurd to me...
Sakaane Eionell wrote: This proposition seems more like 5%-10% responsibility for DuPont and 90%-95% work for IPI. |

Jeane DuPont
DuPont Enterprises Fluffeh Bunneh Murder Squad
5
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 22:49:00 -
[14] - Quote
My intention was in fact to, shall it succeeds, seem more like 5%-10% CREDIT to DUPO and 90%-95% CREDIT to IPI.
Sakaane Eionell wrote: If you want to foster cooperation between your organization and IPI, perhaps DuPont would consider contributing the fuel blocks or equivalent ISK of what you figure you would have spent on this "true Intaki shipyard" to the existing ILF starbase.
I could, but this would harm the beliefs I have on the original statement. The current ILF starbase is not a public shipyard in the sense that no one can freely fill a pipeline of industrial manufacturing such as people normaly do on general megacorps stations. Why would anyone justify donating such big ammount of resources on something that is not so clearly working towards anyone but ILF and IPI?
Sakaane Eionell wrote: As for Layla Saitana's comments... She is a duly appointed representative to IPI and her voice carries much weight in the council. Personally, I also happen to agree with her.
You are free to agree with whomever... I am free to point out that by agreeing such way you woudn't be listening... |

Morwen Lagann
Tyrathlion Interstellar
108
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 23:30:00 -
[15] - Quote
Jeane DuPont wrote:The current ILF starbase is not a public shipyard in the sense that no one can freely fill a pipeline of industrial manufacturing such as people normaly do on general megacorps stations. Why would anyone justify donating such big ammount of resources on something that is not so clearly working towards anyone but ILF and IPI?
Amusingly enough, the same could be said of your proposal. Just swap out the acronyms and a couple words:
The proposed DUPO starbase would not be a public shipyard in the sense that no one can freely fill a pipeline of industrial manufacturing such as people normaly do on general megacorps stations. Why would anyone justify donating such a big amount of resources on something that is not so clearly working towards anyone but DUPO? |

Caellach Marellus
Aideron Robotics Darkmatter Initiative
486
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 23:47:00 -
[16] - Quote
Jeane DuPont wrote:You are free to agree with whomever... I am free to point out that by agreeing such way you woudn't be listening...
I think she's listening, she's just not selling what you're buying.
Probably because the whole thing reads like the great potential for scamming. Enjoy your gaming.
http://northern-goblin.blogspot.com |

Katrina Oniseki
Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
432
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 00:22:00 -
[17] - Quote
This is cute.
Did Vechtor put you up to this, DuPont? |

Jeane DuPont
DuPont Enterprises Fluffeh Bunneh Murder Squad
5
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 01:24:00 -
[18] - Quote
Morwen Lagann wrote: Amusingly enough, the same could be said of your proposal. Just swap out the acronyms and a couple words:
The proposed DUPO starbase would not be a public shipyard in the sense that no one can freely fill a pipeline of industrial manufacturing such as people normaly do on general megacorps stations. Why would anyone justify donating such a big amount of resources on something that is not so clearly working towards anyone but DUPO?
Doesn't make sense, because the idea was to create something different than what you are saying, as I stated above. I just wrote that this woudn't be a DUPO POS because my proposition would be for ILF [IPI] to be in control of it.
|

Jeane DuPont
DuPont Enterprises Fluffeh Bunneh Murder Squad
5
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 01:27:00 -
[19] - Quote
Caellach Marellus wrote:Jeane DuPont wrote:You are free to agree with whomever... I am free to point out that by agreeing such way you woudn't be listening... I think she's listening, she's just not selling what you're buying. Probably because the whole thing reads like the great potential for scamming.
I don't know how this could be a scam if DUPO would be taking this ammount of risks with things happening in a pipeline where things don't happen if previous organization doesn't take place.
As for selling what we are buying, I knew this could happen since my first post when I stated
Jeane DuPont wrote: What I'm offering is the sharing of risks on something truly great to the Intaki community, something that would bring attention from anyone in New Eden. Suffice to say that if IPI takes it into consideration without DuPont Enterprises help as I'm offering, or taking other parties help, the same goal would be achieved. In my understanding, a more legitimate one than simply using Agoze CAS station in terms of Intaki Prosperity initiatives.
|

Jeane DuPont
DuPont Enterprises Fluffeh Bunneh Murder Squad
5
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 01:28:00 -
[20] - Quote
Katrina Oniseki wrote:This is cute.
Did Vechtor put you up to this, Jeane DuPont? Of course he did. Vechtor is a reasonable person.
Its a shame I-RED wasn't the one to make those efforts before. Understandable, tho, given I-RED is strictly military.
|

Katrina Oniseki
Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
432
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 01:36:00 -
[21] - Quote
Jeane DuPont wrote:Katrina Oniseki wrote:This is cute.
Did Vechtor put you up to this, Jeane DuPont? Of course he did. Vechtor is a reasonable person. Its a shame I-RED wasn't the one to make those efforts before. Understandable, tho, given I-RED is strictly military.
Something like that. |

Jeane DuPont
DuPont Enterprises Fluffeh Bunneh Murder Squad
5
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 01:43:00 -
[22] - Quote
Katrina Oniseki wrote: Something like that.
...which woudn't stop you from evaluating the idea without prejudgements...
Ironactly stating it is "cute" adds nothing. |

Katrina Oniseki
Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
432
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 02:05:00 -
[23] - Quote
Jeane DuPont wrote:Katrina Oniseki wrote: Something like that.
...which woudn't stop you from evaluating the idea without prejudgements... Ironactly stating it is "cute" adds nothing.
Actually, I have evaluated the idea. I did so before making my first reply to the thread. In fact, I've no issue with the idea beyond a few nitpicks. True, it does need a little work for viability and efficiency... but it's still a good one. It's the fact that you, DuPont Enterprises, are the one presenting it that it draws and smirk and a laugh.
The idea would be sound were it made between parties who have already established trust and goodwill between them. DuPont Enterprises has not. Before you start launching risky and trust-sensitive joint ventures with the IPI, I think you should first tackle the rather ill reputation your oft named member has brought to your corporation.
Simply put; it wouldn't be so bad if someone more reputable than you were suggesting this. (Which incidentally, is exactly what's 'cute' about this situation.) |

Morwen Lagann
Tyrathlion Interstellar
110
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 02:31:00 -
[24] - Quote
Jeane DuPont wrote:Morwen Lagann wrote: Amusingly enough, the same could be said of your proposal. Just swap out the acronyms and a couple words:
The proposed DUPO starbase would not be a public shipyard in the sense that no one can freely fill a pipeline of industrial manufacturing such as people normaly do on general megacorps stations. Why would anyone justify donating such a big amount of resources on something that is not so clearly working towards anyone but DUPO? Doesn't make sense, because the idea was to create something different than what you are saying, as I stated above. I just wrote that this woudn't be a DUPO POS because my proposition would be for ILF [IPI] to be in control of it.
No, what doesn't make sense is how you think a tower anchored by someone in DUPO, which makes it a DUPO POS by definition, can be controlled by someone outside of DUPO. Clearly you've never even looked into how tower access works. Only pilots who are registered members of the corporation that anchored the tower - and have the appropriate roles activated for their account - can work with a tower or its attached facilities. Anyone outside of that corporation, even within the same alliance, cannot do anything meaningful.
If the IPI wants a tower they will be in control of, they will put one up themselves.
Oh wait. They already did. |

Jeane DuPont
DuPont Enterprises Fluffeh Bunneh Murder Squad
5
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 02:47:00 -
[25] - Quote
Morwen Lagann wrote:No, what doesn't make sense is how you think a tower anchored by someone in DUPO, which makes it a DUPO POS by definition, can be controlled by someone outside of DUPO. Clearly you've never even looked into how tower access works. Only pilots who are registered members of the corporation that anchored the tower - and have the appropriate roles activated for their account - can work with a tower or its attached facilities. Anyone outside of that corporation, even within the same alliance, cannot do anything meaningful.
If the IPI wants a tower they will be in control of, they will put one up themselves.
Oh wait. They already did.
You clearly didn't read my reply to Ms. Eionell about those doubts. DUPO keeps a large POS in a C5 WH system and is well aware on how POS clearances works. This doesn't prevent by no means the kind of joint venture I proposed anywhere in New Eden for any tasks you could imagine.
As for ILF already having erected a POS in Intaki, yes they did, they used to have a station called Prosperity Station which also happened to have a shipyrard where all those ships manufactured by them were put to sell at Intaki 5-5. Production on those shipyards had to be stoped when ILF was accused of collaborating with State Protectorate forces and facing a war against Moira. as you can study on this following links:
http://community.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1265770
http://community.eveonline.com/news.asp?a=single&nid=3760&tid=7
What you don't know is that by this time, Vechtor was one of the major colaborators to ILF by trading huge ammounts of minerals out and into Intaki filling many contracts Apollonius had put as well as many minerals buy orders Apollonius Verus had placed in 5-5 so the "manufacturing machine" could be kept at work.
Its amazing what we have filled in our databanks regarding Intaki history... |

Vechtor
DuPont Enterprises Fluffeh Bunneh Murder Squad
13
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 02:57:00 -
[26] - Quote
Katrina Oniseki wrote:The idea would be sound were it made between parties who have already established trust and goodwill between them. DuPont Enterprises has not. Before you start launching risky and trust-sensitive joint ventures with the IPI, I think you should first tackle the rather ill reputation your oft named member has brought to your corporation.
Simply put; it wouldn't be so bad if someone more reputable than you were suggesting this. (Which incidentally, is exactly what's 'cute' about this situation.)
Katrina, I'm sorry, but with regard to what reputation are you referring to?
How many kills I have for I-RED? How many kills I have for KISEC? How many kills I have for ILF and how many kills I had for ICC while it was an I-RED member? I even fought with I-RED in Syndicate against Ta8ula Rasa with 100% efficiency before you could even fly a damn frigate... what are you talking about?
If you are referring to the reputation of threatening ILF of destruction, can you prove the original idea was mine? Because I can prove you it isn't, and as matter of fact if I read this one more time, I'll make all the NEOCOM transmissions I have about this issue public, right here, in the IGS, on a different thread. |

Morwen Lagann
Tyrathlion Interstellar
112
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 03:09:00 -
[27] - Quote
Allow me to make this crystal clear to you, since it has become obvious to everyone here that you're thicker than the plating of an Abaddon:
If you or someone else in DUPO anchors the tower, the only people with actual, tangible control are in DUPO.
Not me, not people in ILF or any of the other corporations in IPI, not Jacus ******* Roden. DUPO.
If there's any risk here, it's entirely on the IPI's side, and it's well beyond the limits of what are considered acceptable levels. They're providing half of the fuel, and all of the construction materials, and you are the ones with direct access to the tower and its facilities. There's absolutely nothing stopping you from just taking the materials and leaving. Absolutely nothing, except your word.
I'm normally pretty open to taking risks and trusting people, but not when they're running around doing everything but what they need to do to get people to want to trust them.
You're not making anyone here think that trusting you is even remotely a good idea.
Quite the opposite. |

Katrina Oniseki
Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
432
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 03:09:00 -
[28] - Quote
Vechtor wrote:Katrina Oniseki wrote:The idea would be sound were it made between parties who have already established trust and goodwill between them. DuPont Enterprises has not. Before you start launching risky and trust-sensitive joint ventures with the IPI, I think you should first tackle the rather ill reputation your oft named member has brought to your corporation.
Simply put; it wouldn't be so bad if someone more reputable than you were suggesting this. (Which incidentally, is exactly what's 'cute' about this situation.) Katrina, I'm sorry, but with regard to what reputation are you referring to? How many kills I have for I-RED? How many kills I have for KISEC? How many kills I have for ILF and how many kills I had for ICC while it was an I-RED member? If you are referring to the reputation of threatening ILF of destruction, can you prove the original idea was mine? Because I can prove you it isn't, and as matter of fact if I read this one more time, I'll make all the NEOCOM transmissions I have about this issue public, right here, in the IGS, on a different thread.
First, allow me to state that the amount of kills you have for I-RED means next to nothing. In fact, even I have more kills than you and I've only been part of I-RED since ((July 2010)). Even so your combat record is irrelevant since we're discussing industrial activities.
The reputation I vaguely referred to is one of being untrustworthy or generally undesirable to deal with. From what I gather, you're persona non grata
Of course, if I'm wrong.. someone other than you or Jeane DuPont or any other member of your corporation or alliance is welcome to correct me. |

Sakaane Eionell
Intaki Liberation Front
42
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 03:20:00 -
[29] - Quote
Jeane DuPont wrote:As for ILF already having erected a POS in Intaki, yes they did, they used to have a station called Prosperity Station which also happened to have a shipyrard where all those ships manufactured by them were put to sell at Intaki 5-5. Production on those shipyards had to be stoped when ILF was accused of collaborating with State Protectorate forces and facing a war against Moira. as you can study on this following links: http://community.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1265770http://community.eveonline.com/news.asp?a=single&nid=3760&tid=7What you don't know is that by this time, Vechtor was one of the major colaborators to ILF by trading huge ammounts of minerals out and into Intaki filling many contracts Apollonius had put as well as many minerals buy orders Apollonius Verus had placed in 5-5 so the "manufacturing machine" could be kept at work. Its amazing what we have filled in our databanks regarding Intaki history... What does any of this have to do with the topic at hand?
The fact remains: ILF has a starbase in Intaki. We are perfectly capable of accepting third party contracts to manufacture ships at said starbase if we so choose. There is no need for us to take on the burden of a second starbase for that purpose. Sakaane Eionell Isha-Sainika, ILF; President, IPI
- Solitary Pilot | @ILFCorp - |

Caellach Marellus
Aideron Robotics Darkmatter Initiative
487
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 03:37:00 -
[30] - Quote
Jeane DuPont wrote:I don't know how this could be a scam if DUPO would be taking this ammount of risks with things happening in a pipeline where things don't happen if previous organization doesn't take place.
You set up a tower and run fuel in with a Blockade Runner. The amount of "previous organisation" required to do that is entirely your own.
You're then requesting a large volume of mineral resources (at a time when minerals are at a high value cost and "experts" are suggesting they only go higher) from another corporation under the guise that you will infact use those minerals for a stated value. At this point the only guarantee they have is your word on this.
And as we've seen your word is somewhat meaningless due to bad blood with an entity within your corporation. Instead of publicly coming out and trying to play the public pressure or shame card to more than one entity here, perhaps you should work better on your diplomatic relations and give the parties you plan on working with reason to actually trust you before coming out here with grand public showpieces. Quite frankly things of this level are private matters that really should be negotiated in private communique.
I mean no offence, but I've been monitoring this for no more than half a day and I can even come to that logical evaluation of the situation, how haven't you spotted this?
Morwen Lagann wrote:not Jacus ******* Roden.
F##k Roden
Enjoy your gaming.
http://northern-goblin.blogspot.com |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |