|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Algey
The Littlest Hobos
Ushra'Khan
   |
Posted - 2008.12.31 20:10:00 -
[1]
You do not wish to renounce slavery, and wish to remain allied to your slaver masters. That's what we already know, however rest assured that we will continue to make you pay for your evil ways.
Do remember that CVA do not even notice you in their fleets, and will only protect you when it suits them. You are dealing with slavers, and they know only one type of relationship. In that relationship you are not a master.
|
Algey
The Littlest Hobos
Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2009.01.01 00:47:00 -
[2]
What on earth are you trying to show with that horribly formatted wall of gibberish? If it is meant to show that you sometimes kill ships belonging to other alliances, then oddly yes you do. Sometimes you also kill ships belonging to us.
However you are losing, and losing convincingly. If you wish to disagree based on your own data you may, however we will keep punishing you until you cease your support for slavery.
|
Algey
The Littlest Hobos
Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2009.01.16 14:47:00 -
[3]
 Originally by: Hardin
Of course not. You are enemies of everyone building prosperity and civilisation in Providence.
Prosperity built by the hands of slaves, those who labour for it but never receive the benefits. That is not civilisation, and it is not tolerable.
|
Algey
The Littlest Hobos
Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2009.01.22 13:44:00 -
[4]
This may surprise you slaver, but we do not feel the urge to hold all of the -A- pilots for nine generations of brainwashing to make them act as we do. We no longer hold space, and as such are not really in a position to request that -A- follow any ROE within our space now are we.
That said even if we were to hold space I doubt we would be interested in negotiating on the behalf of those who were not actively fighting to end slavery with any NBSI group. There are those who fight slavery, and those who give comfort and support to slavery as far as I can see. |
Algey
The Littlest Hobos
Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2009.01.22 23:12:00 -
[5]
If that were true Zaximus, then SSI would not have had the Providence slavers defend their outpost deployment, have been using Sylph jump bridges, or been in the intel channels used by the pro slavery forces.
It is hard to be neutral under those circumstances.
|
Algey
The Littlest Hobos
Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2009.01.23 17:59:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Garreck
Quite right. Neutrality to CVA is good enough grounds for Ushra'Khan to fire upon an organization, while neutrality to Ushra'Khan is not good enough grounds for CVA to fire upon an organization. No need to spin that at all. Kind of speaks for itself for most folks.
That isn't true at all. We only fire on neutrals in the two dedicated free fire zones, and those are zones where pilots entering the space contribute to the finances of slavery.
There is no way you can contribute to the coffers of the slavers and be neutral, no way at all. |
Algey
The Littlest Hobos
Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2009.01.28 00:08:00 -
[7]
Kelban, do you have any idea how long U'K has been fighting slavery? You are aligned with the Providence slavers, and find it strange that we find that a little annoying, maybe even slightly distasteful?
You wish to be allied to them, that is your choice. I do not believe for a second there is anyone who thinks we'd ignore that alliance though.
|
|
|
| |
|