EVE Search - To those who would support slavers in Catch

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Intergalactic Summit

To those who would support slavers in Catch

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Conlin Gallente Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2008.12.29 15:36:00 - [1] Originally by: Solusar Originally by: shanda captison Originally by: Xeronn a side effect of Her Majesty`s gracious act is an influx of terrorist threats across Galnet I urge loyal honest citizen of all races and nations to disreguard such void threats , be assured the Empire will meet with deadly force any such terrorist foolish enough to take action against civilian or military ships , anywhere in or outside Empire borders . You cannot protect them as you demonstrated yesterday. Im sorry did you reinforce the POS you were siegeing or not? Ofcourse I do look forward to the logic that you "destroyed more ships than we lost therefore we won even if we failed in our strategic objectives", or that you never planned to destroy the tower or whichever way you wish to spin it for our amusement. You did indeed win the initial fight when we entered the system with 13 battleships jumping into your bubble camp with 23 battleships at 150km. But as always you failed to press the advantage and left the system. We have seen it many times before and we will see it many times in the future. If the best you can do is fail to reinforce a single medium control tower then things are not going to change. It is nice to see that the diplomatic approach you used to turn all of Providence against you is now being used in Catch. Why bother doing research on people when its easier to just presume things and start shooting. Freedom indeed. He ought to take a closer look at his family tree. There must have been a lot of lemons ........
Conlin Gallente Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2008.12.29 22:33:00 - [2] Originally by: Solusar Originally by: shanda captison Originally by: Xeronn a side effect of Her Majesty`s gracious act is an influx of terrorist threats across Galnet I urge loyal honest citizen of all races and nations to disreguard such void threats , be assured the Empire will meet with deadly force any such terrorist foolish enough to take action against civilian or military ships , anywhere in or outside Empire borders . You cannot protect them as you demonstrated yesterday. Im sorry did you reinforce the POS you were siegeing or not? . Mission Accomplished . The offending object has been removed . We of the Ushra'Khan continue our fight on the slavers !
Conlin Gallente Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2008.12.31 08:37:00 - [3] Originally by: Kelban Kevar lets see were do i start as far as i know my allaince does not support slavery basicly cause we dont roleplay and as far as cva slpyh and the rest of providence coming down to help out that would be because your trying to oppress my allaince in to being slaves for you when you ya self are slaves and pets of -a- we came out as neutral party to a place that was unclaimed we did our own logistics and building of everything we have with out help from any one ....there were no diplomate contact with us by you guys at all cpt you you showed up and started shooting my ppl.your then drove us to get closer ties with the the very ppl you dislike with ya constant attacks and you then fall back on ya rp to justicify it as attacking slavers no sir if any one is at fault it is you and ya epic failed rping.and farther more you did not run 2 jumps away as we had scout at the station system belonging to -a- you sir ran all the way back to curse and now you spout off in here nowing not many ppl will read it cause is a uk thread good day you and yours thugs,terrorist and slaver wanna be's I am confused as to who you are trying to dupe the most , the cva slavers & their pets or us ?. You came to catch threatening myself anf my comrades with bold tales of how you will crush us before a shot was fired in anger . You bragged you took the system sov from the sylph alliance , " we stole it and sylph did nothing to stop us !" , we fought them for it !". Then you call on them to save you ?. You begged us for friendly standings between our alliances , offering us Ice & free passage , something we already have . Who's more the fool here ? , you for thinking we would fall for your lies , or the slavers who protect you when your future plans are to backstab them ?. You are out of your league Kelban .
Conlin Gallente Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2008.12.31 16:27:00 - [4] Originally by: Equinox Daedalus Edited by: Equinox Daedalus on 31/12/2008 13:35:49 UK has a long tradition of Inviting others to do thier work. CVA welcomes those who would wish to fight on behaf of an Amarrian Providence as you welcome those who would fight against it. Clearly I've no illusions as to the relasonships and the nature of the beast. Numbers clearly are always a part of the nature of eve. Larger picking on smaller, tactical decisions are an important part of the life of a pod pilot. As I was away at the time of the incident your speaking of I've no idea what happened with any forces so I have no place to comment upon them. UK, you are correct. CVA controling Providence, Patrolling Lower domain, Parts of Derelik, and TMP as well as other regions for the empire, leads Catch being on the list of CVA assitance in such a manner that its never been our primary concern.We do offer assitance to the best of our ability and indeed have been more than willing to help on several occasions with the UK threat, even as O Thief has said. Hardly 1 year ago we barely had control of Providence. 1 year before that we only had half. 1 year before that we only had a bit. It is through faith and enlightment that we have flurished while others have not. Clearly everything CVA does in the universe does not revolve around UK, while it seems everything UK does revoles around making it about CVA and its allies. I hope that in time UK pilots are turned to an enlightned force and able to understand that what CVA does is for the benfit of everyone in eve. Indeed in time hopefully the members of UK can and will see the error of thier ways and ask for enlightment. The hand of god is open to everyone willing to bask in his holy light. Until such time we will continue to fight for the Amarrian Empire and its beliefs. Maybe in another year you will get your wish and CVA will be more into catch, Maybe not. Tis not my position to dictate CVA policy, only to enforce. Its the dawning of a new year today, and with that, I say: Amarr Victor! *edited some missspells : ( Equinox , the pilots do not wish to pray , or even believe in your amarrian ways , they have stated so on quite a few occassions . They even plan to reset your alliance one they have swelled their numbers to a point of 1000 . Something they openly advertise . They use you to there advantage slaver and like a gullible fool you accept this .Is their a hidden agenda here ?, or are you so soft these days you have become complacent ?. What more evidence do you need that they take you for a fool ?. You prattle on about the past , this is now , stop bringing up the past to swell your ego . It is a dawning of a new year slaver , one that has shown you how fat and sloppy you have become . I wish you luck in your ventures to clean Derelick
Conlin Gallente Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2009.01.01 06:51:00 - [5] No we killed a cruiser Blackbird from SSI trying to protect the tower as it was unachoring .
Conlin Gallente Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2009.01.16 11:08:00 - [6] Edited by: Conlin on 16/01/2009 11:08:44 Originally by: Hardin It was exactly this philosophy which ended up with Ushra'Khan alienating pretty much every neutral in Providence and driving them into the CVA camp. It seems the terrorists have not learned their lesson and look set to repeat the same mistakes again. Time will tell I suppose! Time will tell Hardin !. SSI decidely began hostilities from the very first day demanding we stopped entering their systems before any shots were fired . So I would like to ask where have we alienated ourselves ?, SSI knew not who we were , in fact their whole understanding of sovereignity in and around of Catch at the time of their move to the area not only confused us , but they were more confused of the whole situation they had presented themselves with . For several months the few systems between Catch and Provi were empty , until one day on my daily travels to Provi from the Curse Regions I was met for the first time with SSI . Who proceeded to make threats . If they had taken the course of diplomacy from the start , instead of hostile threats then they wouldnt be in the predicament they currently find themselves in . So yes Hardin , time will tell !.
Conlin Gallente Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2009.01.16 11:58:00 - [7] Originally by: Hardin Well I am not going to get in a circular discussion with you terrorist. As I have not been in space myself recently and do not have full access to all the available intelligence I am a mere observer to these events. It is therefore just my 'impression' from GalNet that UK's diplomatic skills are once again lacking and that you seem to be repeating old errors. But then again you are terrorists and murderers so I suppose that is to be expected and, from a CVA perspective, welcomed [] If you have no intention of getting into a circular discussion slaver , and as you have already stated no intelligence on the matter at hand , then why bother to open discussions in the first place till you have all the evidence at hand ?. Is this another attempt of "Hardins Spin !!" ?. The errors seem to be of your own making slaver , be wary of opinions till you gather what necessary intelligence is recquired .
Conlin Gallente Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2009.01.16 15:18:00 - [8] Originally by: Hardin Originally by: Hardin It seems the terrorists have not learned their lesson and look set to repeat the same mistakes again. Time will tell I suppose! Simply reading this discussion and other recent GalNet debates in which some UK members have contributed is enough to get an 'impression'. If I had written an epic tome condemning the failings of UK's diplomatic policies then maybe some deeper research might have been needed but as I was simply expressing my 'impression' and have not even tried to claim some amazing insight then I can't see what you are getting so tetchy about terrorist. Whilst I know that UK have to try and undermine my credibility with accusations of spin at every opportunity the fact is that I simply tell it as I see it. Honesty is the best policy in the long run! If it was honesty is the best policy slaver , I would hope the next time you would get some intel on the ongoing incidents in Catch . Its a poor man who opens his mouth with criticism before the facts are before him . Your attempts of spin are renowned within , and outwith U'K Hardin , the more you say , the more that hole you keep digging gets deeper
Conlin Gallente Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2009.01.17 11:14:00 - [9] I have a question for CVA . Sylph Have become a burden that CVA are prepared to support , sylphs burden has become SSI . Are you prepared to support SSI , even though they have moved in an alliance they are mutual blue to , that openly brags it was formed to invade Catch and take if for itself ?. That includes sylph space by the way
Conlin Gallente Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2009.01.18 07:52:00 - [10] Originally by: Drakmor Edited by: Drakmor on 18/01/2009 03:26:56 Sylphs Policy is not to reply on galnet to accusations or our policies the History between Slyph and Ushra'Khan is well known and Karn spin as much as you want Sylph was not a backstabber till you allowed pirates to operate from your outpost something we refused to do with CVA.. Then with word from your own FC Sapphrine time for Sylph to get off the fence and chose a side As for the SSI issue Sylph has always made friends and helped where we could.. No one from sylph are to respond to this post thats a standard policy spin as you wish we know what true fancy how Sylph are not Rpers but you still insist on running us down as slavers just becuase of a belief difference between you and CVA Drakmor Sylph President So you spin standard policy as well ?. Your alliance has become a wasted scrap of its former self Drakmor , I doubt there is more than a handful of former veterans from sylph who know the differences between Sylph & U'K . Who know the full story to even reply at all . I will not waste my time replying to SSI and their endless lies , as I stated before , SSi has become Sylphs burden , one that CVA seems to want to distance themselves from . We have our differences with CVA for sure , but they can at least see past the endless lies for what they really are . Sylph and the providence blocked failed last night in an attempt to remove our outpost . I throw a gauntlet to you Drakmor , your numbers greatly outnumber our small alliance . Just U'K & Sylph ,settle old wounds now , a fight to the end . What say you ? .

Conlin Gallente Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2009.01.18 11:31:00 - [11] You still maintain nuetral standings SSI ? http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=975144
Conlin Gallente Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2009.01.20 15:08:00 - [12] Originally by: Rorin Cutter Originally by: O Thief A few days later, more of their capital ships were destroyed in a successful baiting operation in their own cynojammed system, with additional firepower provided by -A-. "Lights on computer" Grabbing a cup of strong coffee and reading the days headlines in the com-link, I am thinking that this is a interesting development, -A- supporting terrorists like Ushra'Khan. It shows that it might be time to come home and help my family out for a while. Would it be they forgot , or misplaced there communique regarding the war with -A- over the past several weeks conveniently ?. Or would it be that RZR are the ones who were paid off by SSI that they so loudly voiced at us fron within there outpost ?. Also is it not the North you call home , and not Catch ?. Whatever the circumstances we eagerly await a homecoming visit from you .
Conlin Gallente Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2009.01.23 05:46:00 - [13] Originally by: ZAXIMUS hmmmmm ive talked to a few ppl and made inquires in to this matter SSI seems to have wanted to be nuetral to both sides they didnt want to get involed in uk's and cva little lover's spat and un uks lack of wisdom they decided to force ssi to pick sides. that is most troublesome cause if uk is looking to force ppl to do stuff your no better than the slavery you fight against and all the word play you can possiably come up with will not change the fact that your now demanding to make ppl slaves of your own uk has now become the monster they fought against i call upon the ppl to destroy both these beast uk and cva its time to end these games they play once and for all And joined Providence block fleets long before they decided to setup home in Catch . So nuetral they were not .
Conlin Gallente Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2009.01.23 14:27:00 - [14] Originally by: Il Morte Edited by: Il Morte on 23/01/2009 14:16:47 . Originally by: Becq Starforged And we are not in the habit of soliciting advice from CVA regarding who we might choose to fight alongside against common foes. WHAT? I am a little confused here must be the mulled wine I am drinking I think it might be spiked wiht something, but why are you soliciting advice from CVA. If it is sarcasm then I must have missed it. Or, are you referring to someone else seeking advice from CVA. I thought the issue at hand here was the fact that UK is stomping on SSI and it seems that CVA doesn't want to help them, and UK doesn't want the space so if GMLH is left alone and no one goes there what will happen? Will UK simply pack up there tower and go? Kind of the old joke from long ago I once saw from Jove, "What would happen if someone threw a war and no one showed up" Oh and yes to the previous post it does seem that SSI is posting under an alt about attacking CVA, know this is getting interesting. Let me get some long limbed Roes and watch Correct !....your confused !!!
Conlin Gallente Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2009.01.23 15:55:00 - [15] Originally by: Garreck Originally by: O Thief We do not enforce any ROE on anyone. Beyond 'you must be hostile to CVA to be friendly with us,' of course Further beyond 'you must be hostile to U'K to be friendly to us , ' of course
Conlin Gallente Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2009.01.23 16:52:00 - [16] Originally by: Garreck Originally by: Conlin Further beyond 'you must be hostile to U'K to be friendly to us , ' of course Neutral status to CVA is not dictated by whom you shoot at, rather whom you do not shoot at. The burden of enforcement of our policy in Providence is not "shoot these folks," but "you may only shoot these folks if you're going to be doing any shooting at all." Neutrality to Ushra'Khan has never been and is not currently grounds for CVA to fire upon an organization. This is a key difference in our policies, a difference which has changed minds about both of our organizations one way or another in the past. No need to spin slaver , as your boss says , Mr Rodj .......... Monkey see , monkey do
Conlin Gallente Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2009.01.24 07:18:00 - [17] Garreck , we have our differences , that is a certainty . I saw a small CVA contingency arrive in KW . Your pilots dictated religious scriptures to these SSI , only to be insulted by them . Are you here just to snipe at U'K ? , or here to show CVA support these SSI ?. I,ve been confused regarding SSI,s intentions from the very first day they arrived in Catch . They have continually wriggled and squirmed , used Sylph to their own benefits , tried to maintain they were nuetral when in fact that is far from the truth . So garreck , are you there new saviours now that Sylph have basically washed there hands of them ?, I wish you luck with that one if that is the case . They are hard work .
Conlin Gallente Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2009.01.24 09:31:00 - [18] A lot of the confusion has materialised from the lack of cohesion regarding SSI,s announcements . I personally was told from the start that U'K would feel the wrath of the providence block if we attacked SSI , there words not mine . This I hasten to add was from day one of contact with this alliance . Then we were informed they were nuetral to the Providence Block and had in fact stolen some of the systems within Catch from Sylph Alliance . Then we were told isk had changed hands between Sylph & SSI , and yet SSI were nuetral to Sylph etc . More confusion was added when we noticed SSI using & advertising jump bridge access to empire which they owned in a Sylph sovereignity & shared intel channels with Sylph . Lastly we were told , and this was the final straw for us , they were in fact part of a larger faction come to take Catch from Sylph , yet they involved Sylph & Severance in a failed attempt at an attack on our pos . Now to stop this from wandering off track here Garreck , and to stop the usual sniping of U'K pilots and CVA pilots , we want a simple announcement by SSI of their true intentions . They are red and a target due to there constant lies , and attacking U'K pilots from day one . They made there bed , now its up to them to lay in it . And I think youl,l find the term " a changing of powers !" , was possibly a sarcastic remark due to SSI,s constant claims .
Conlin Gallente Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2009.01.25 10:43:00 - [19] Originally by: Mister Builder As stated here is the statement. System Shock Alliance Statement of Position System Shock Alliance has always been an alliance built on personal freedom, and the belief all men and women are created equally. As such, SSI has instated an official policy of both anti-slavery and anti-piracy. From this day forward, SSI will not hold slaves, nor will it allow any member corporation to hold slaves. SSI would like to challenge all of their friends, allies and neighbors to follow suit in honor of Empress Jamyl I's decision to emancipate most of the Amarr slaves.And while this is a good start for the Amarr peoples i think it is possible that all slaves should and could be free.And what the Empress has done is a good first step in this general direction.And as this is a such a large undertakeing it is understandable that these things will take time to accomplish. SSI is dedicated to work with their allies in eliminating the threat of piracy to the greater Catch and Providence area . SSI strongly believes that piracy is the single biggest threat to the peace and security of our region, and will work to eliminate the threat. Signed Mister Builder Ceo OF System Shock Initiative So you are asking the Providence Block to renounce slavery , but you help the Providence Block in the same breath ?. When you mention friends & allies why cant you just say CVA & SYLPH etc ?. You have made so many statements Im finding this one so hard to believe , time will tell I guess . unfortunately you are still supporting slavery even though you politely ask your allies to renounce it . I will be watching your pilots very closely from this day forth regarding anti freedom slurs & slaves . If this is a genuine attempt at removing hostilities between U'K & your alliance I hope you have remembered to tell the rest of your alliance before they make "another" statement . Hostilities still remain between us I see from the engagement I had with Sylph today involving a Keres pilot from your alliance .
Conlin Gallente Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2009.01.26 05:45:00 - [20] Originally by: Jon Rocks O'thief, While your courage and resolve may be strong, you lack in many things. You claim to rid catch of the slavers and make grand statements about such. But...But, you have chosen your target and region to carefully. First, you blue up to the region "powerbloc" which makes you less nervous on your roams. Sure, you have SSI and sylph, neither known for there PvP elitism. Also knowing that SSI space is an inconvenient 12jumps or so around from Providence and if you go south its even more dangerous with -A-. Ahhh, Providence, CVA and there holders.. Your approach is that you cant break it so why bother. Its easier down here. Your not doing your people any good by taking the easy road. You are born of a slave and you may find that you will always have that blood and mentality. You would be better served joining a faction warfare gang and serving your people that way. Or, report to a slave colony. You seem to lack in many things also , one of them is knowing what your actually talking about . I have no idea who you are , maybe just another SSI hiding under another name , one thing I do know , -A- contacted us first regarding standings . We'd been roaming Catch / Provi & Curse long before friendly standings with -A- . So why that is an issue is beyond me , possibly beyond you .

Conlin Gallente Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2009.01.27 18:46:00 - [21] Originally by: Il Morte Very interesting thing I noticed this morning while having my mulled wine. I checked the galactic maps and it seems SSI no longer has GMLH. Unity does. Does this confirm that freedom is making a comback in lower catch? Has SSI made a deal with UK or just finally the inevitable happened. Do tell do tell please do tell. The situation is SSI are still trying to play both sides of the field through lies and tricks . Yesterday we finished off any last remains of SSI presence in GMLH . Hostilities between U'K & SSI are increasing daily . We know our limits and are watching the situation very closely as to the provi blocks response , so far their has been none . Time will tell .
Conlin Gallente Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2009.01.28 02:25:00 - [22] Originally by: Kelban Kevar i know your historys very well I say you dont !!! I say answer Il Morte , he was impartial from the start , but the more you ignore his simple recquests , the more foolish you are becoming . Even your friends are giving up on you .
Conlin Gallente Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2009.01.29 05:12:00 - [23] Run you say ?...... I constantly use what is left of your sovereignity to get where I wish to go , I easily evaded a Sylph & SSI attempt to blockade me last night . I challenge your bravado from within that station you have become so wholeheartedly attached to when I am in system . You wish to stop me Kelban ?. I have no need to call upon anybody to swat you out my way !!!!
Conlin Gallente Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2009.01.30 09:22:00 - [24] Originally by: Xennith who are you, which organisation do you belong to and where would we find you? your reputation hasnt spread so far that your name is recognisable. Just......... a sylph who rarely leaves his homeground . Nothing much to worry about Xennith .
Conlin Gallente Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2009.02.04 05:00:00 - [25] Originally by: brandon packy Originally by: Xennith Its one thing to use a starbase as a tool to cause damage to the subhuman refuse that supports slavers, but beyond that tactical scope and into the longterm strategic, its just ties us down and hampers our efforts to free our people. Some good points here, I still personally believe having a symbol of your triumph over slavers values more than playstyle. On a second note, the prov block doesnt really have any advantage. You guys hold the trump card (the best trump in this theatre i might add) in -A-. Defense isnt really a problem for you guys honestly. Our triumph is in being able to attack / kill & disrupt supply lines in the slavers own backyard . The Provi Block , especially Sylph do have an advantage . Especially to run !!!! Only last night they used one of there many jump bridge facilities to run from one of our fleets .Those fleets that Sylph rely on to outnumber us on a daily basis . They can bring overwhelming numbers through these jump bridges they rely on so heavily , bringing in reinforcements , whereas we are unable to . Hit , run , hide ....... The Freedom Fighters way !
Conlin Gallente Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2009.02.13 07:09:00 - [26] We have fought outnumbered for a very long time now , it is something we relish . We expect CVA to come running to his masters voice Sylph when it cries for help as Sylph are strong in numbers , but weak in fighting prowess . This Hardin who speaks for the Amarr Empire ....... what race , beliefs does he speak for this week ?. I can no longer keep up with his many alliances than Sylphs massive jump bridge network they rely on to hide from our fleets . Sylph failed to help SSI , to save their own assets , their history shows they can no more be trusted today than they were in the days of Unity . Who will be the first in the Providence Block to fight over the scraps ??!! .
Conlin Gallente Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2009.02.13 10:13:00 - [27] Originally by: Morden Nok Originally by: O Thief Why only yesterday, a 9 man CVA gang of HAC's and Command Ships engaged a 7 man U'K HAC gang and lost all of their ships without killing anything. So indeed, small scale engagements of the type you mention do occur. I should have made that more clear in my report. Thank you for picking me up on this. Why do you keep lying when we can easily check your "facts". U'K did lose 2 Recon ships there, so how did CVA "lose all of their ships without killing anything"? Now, you did win fight hands down still and it's very much possible that Conlin and Seliah have issues posting their losses thus making your records completely untrustworthy. On the other hand, you and Butterdog have been caught lying multiple times before... It seems your intel could possibly be very untrustworthy ................
Conlin Gallente Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2009.02.14 06:07:00 - [28] Originally by: Redwolf Originally by: Kazan Bho Edited by: Kazan Bho on 13/02/2009 17:13:11 Originally by: Hardin *Bark little doggies, bark!* Coming from one of the puppies who regularly runs around yipping whenever we stray too near their porch, unable to leave their yard and give chase under the restraint of such a short leash, this did make me smile Hardin. Thanks. As someone who know well the extent to which the 'leash' of CVA forces extends, I find your comments laughable. Besides, show me the evidence of this 'yipping' in our own 'yard' or elsewhere? No, I didnt think so. Post your flame bait when you can come to my 'porch' and leave in the ships you arrived in. I come and go as I please , when I please , and leave as I please . You seem upset Mr Redwolf . Yes we lost Unity as you keep reminding us , but what have you done in the 2 years since taking it ?. Grown fat & lazy !!! All I see achieved in Providence these days is yet another outpost ..... 30 now ?. U'K has used what little resources it has , faced many challenges and excelled in constantly being outnumbered . Your bitterness results from jealousy . You have to admit that for such a small alliance that usually faces 3,4-1 odds we pack a big punch for its size . CVA surrounds itself with alliances to protect its own assets , some of these alliances are becoming bitter by the incessant rules thrown at them by their masters CVA .
Conlin Gallente Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2009.02.16 18:19:00 - [29] Originally by: Octavinus Augustus Having read numerous accounts of events in GMLH yesterday, I thought I'd end my spamming session by giving a PERSONAL account of how I saw things progressing in GMLH. Given U'K claims of friendship with AAA I, personally, believed we were in for quite a fight for the system. I fully expected Ushra Khan to show up in strength to defend their tower, and AAA to send significant reinforcements. My impression today is that I was at least partly wrong. While AAA did send reinforcements, U'K presence was "limited" at best. I had expected a lot more from the U'K pilots, if for nothing else then to show their new friends in AAA that they mean business. It seems I was wrong. As events unfolded, my impression was that the majority of the fighting took place between AAA and the Providence Bloc, with U'K as interested bystanders. As to who "won" the fight I'd say that going by losses seem rather irrelevant to me. Both AAA and the Providence Bloc is able to sustain far greater losses than those suffered without taking notice at all. U'K didn't suffer much either of course, due to them never deploying in force. The real way of looking at the "win/loss" thing then is to look at what obejctives were met and what objectives weren't. The Providence Bloc had as it's purpose to destroy the two U'K towers - we succeeded. Needless to say, I expect U'K to be able to deploy more along the way, but for now the "Sov" game has probably turned against them in GMLH. That does make the Providence Bloc stand stronger in the area today than we did yesterday. The fact that AAA could field a 100 bs fleet on a secondary (to them) battlefield after one month of fighting Goons is impressive. In my mind, AAA should be pleased with their performance due to this and the way they performed on the field. It is obvious who is the "big dog" in Catch. I'll say no more of them, as they are obviously a bunch of "fringe barbarians" who care naught for GOD or Empire. To my mind the side achieving least in this fight was U'K. The losses they inflicted were insignificant and Amarr influence was strengthened in this part of Catch. The official U'K response today seems to be: Originally by: U'K We didn't want those towers or that space anyway If this is true, U'K will revert to their cloaking hit and run tactics that may look good on any killboard, but is unlikely to accomplish anything on the strategic scale. Or maybe U'K will make another bid for GML hoping for AAA intervention when needed. If so, the above "quote" is clearly untrue, but we shall see what happens next. Time will tell. Amarr Victor. Why so bitter Oct ?. In what fashion would you expect U'K to deploy against 90plus caps and over 300 support ?. We dont ask or rely on -A- to fight our fights , we have friends in their alliance , it was asked what was going on , and they sent a fleet to fight . I know this , I was the person who was contacted by -A- . You know as well as I do -A- take great enjoyment in attacking your alliance and your friends . How can you say after one fight your losses were insignificant slaver ? , have you forgotten the previous 2 attempts , where your fleets were sent packing , and all that was left were wrecks ?. Forgotten or its just apt at this moment in time to regret that they ever happened ?. You achieved your goals by finally destroying the 2 towers , but we controlled the situation for how many weeks now ?. You know well as I do ,that those 2 previous attempts by your underlings were poorly handled, and a final strike had to be made to restore your honour . We expected it for a long time , but everyday passed with nothing in sight . You got what you wanted and removed our 2 towers , and we got what we wanted by stealing and placing those towers to get a fight . All in all ?.... I,m happy ! .

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.