| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

baltec1
1115
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 06:40:00 -
[1] - Quote
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=12951426
I spotted your problem, there is a **** poor tank on it.
He also managed to pod you
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=12951432
Which begs the question, how did you miss three alarms? |

baltec1
1115
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 07:31:00 -
[2] - Quote
Dbars Grinding wrote:all miners should just quit this game until ccp does something. D3 is actually coming out soon.
Why would CCP do anything? Its barge pilots fault for not fitting a tank. |

baltec1
1115
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 07:36:00 -
[3] - Quote
Surfin's PlunderBunny wrote:Also I misread the title so thread did not deliver 
Here have a fish |

baltec1
1115
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 08:03:00 -
[4] - Quote
Natassia Krasnoo wrote:baltec1 wrote:Why would CCP do anything? Its barge pilots fault for not fitting a tank. baltec....Tell me something. Do you not fit your ships to have them perform at top efficiency for the activity you are using them for? So why would a miner do any differently? Fitting a tank to a barge comes at the cost of mining effieciency. I'm not much of an industrialist, I have a character that mines on occasion when I don't feel like scanning, running missions, or trying to pick a fight. Why should a miner be forced to fit a tank to mine because of gankers? It's like trying to say PVP'ers should be forced to gimp their PVP ships with one less tank module or gun. I understand this is primarily a PVP game and I have nothing against it. I enjoy my PVP when I get some just like the next guy/girl. I'm just curious to know why a lot of people feel that miners are not entitled to peak efficiency for their ships.
An untanked hulk will tank more than an untanked pilgrim. EVE is a dangerous place, fitting no tank on anything is just asking for trouble, especially if said ganker can make a profit from your death. |

baltec1
1117
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 08:20:00 -
[5] - Quote
Aqriue wrote: Now, if the hulk pilot is responsible for a tank then of course the same responiblity should be for the guy getting tracked by XL guns should upgrade to a capital ship with a buffer to counter the Titan. Problem solved, we leave Hulks as is and un-nerf Titans since CCP doesn't need to get involved. Balance as it should be 
Problem with that argument is that the hulk CAN tank if you fit it with one where as the titans invalidate 90% of all ships in the game. |

baltec1
1117
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 08:26:00 -
[6] - Quote
Serene Repose wrote: Balderdash. Again. "It's just a sandbox." / "This game isn't for you." (Inferring there's a right way and a wrong way.) As the OP said, ganking Hulks is sanctioned by CCP. Miners, as a result, are sanctioned victims. The game is TILTED in favor of criminal behavior by CCP's variables calibration. That same calibration, without "changing" the game, could even things up, or favor the miner. That CCP has skewed the game in this direction, and refuses to UNskew it only proves whose side they're on.
PvP isn't the point of EVE. Calling ganking miners "PvP" is like calling wearing your daddy's shoes "being grown up." If you all were such badasses, you'd be where actual well-fitted, amply-skilled combat pilots roam, taking your chances on your own skills. The fact you're NOT doing this is proof you CAN'T. If you can swim, what're you doing in the wading pool.
Sell this smack to some blind, deaf, fool.
People kill hulks for profit. Incidently the hulk pilot is a player and the gank pilot is a player which means it is pvp. Same as how selling stuff in jita is pvp. PVP is the backbone of EVE. |

baltec1
1117
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 08:35:00 -
[7] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote: A player should be able to have 15-20 thousand EHP on a Hulk, at the expense of a few low slots.
They can... |

baltec1
1117
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 08:46:00 -
[8] - Quote
Its hard to adapt to something that can alpha any subcap with any fit. As for the deads, they dont work, it has been tried and the got wiped out.
Hulks however act like everything else, fit a basic tank and it will survive destoyers, supertank it and they will need 4 alpha nados to make sure they kill it. Fit no tank at all and it will die easily. |

baltec1
1117
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 08:48:00 -
[9] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:baltec1 wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote: A player should be able to have 15-20 thousand EHP on a Hulk, at the expense of a few low slots. They can... Yes, I know what you mean, but currently it's very clumsy. I envision a system in which all barges have a single middle slot for a scanner, and with the ability to fit, say, an 800mm plate (400mm for T1 barges?), would work better. Maybe even change the exhumer resist bonus into an armor amount bonus. At that point, the risk-reward concept should become much more obvious to miners.
And now we have super mining hulks with lows stuffed full of MLU and still dieing to destroyers.
You can already fit a hulk with a 20k buffer, rock scanner and an MLU so there is no need at all for CCP to change anything. Its down to the pilot to fit it. |

baltec1
1118
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 11:37:00 -
[10] - Quote
Jastra wrote:
can you share that fit, seriously if thats non faction then I'll just shut up and go away because if thats true then yeah I agree that may be working as intended
[Hulk, New Setup 1] Mining Laser Upgrade II Damage Control II
Small Shield Extender II Invulnerability Field II Survey Scanner II Magnetic Scattering Amplifier II
Modulated Strip Miner II, Pyroxeres Mining Crystal II Modulated Strip Miner II, Pyroxeres Mining Crystal II Modulated Strip Miner II, Pyroxeres Mining Crystal II
Medium Core Defence Field Extender I Medium Core Defence Field Extender I
Mining Drone II x5 Warrior II x5
|

baltec1
1119
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 14:08:00 -
[11] - Quote
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:Knug LiDi wrote:What I will add to this discussion, is only this:
Yup. And isn't it almost psychotic how they insist that engaging and popping a paper-bag of a Mack is PvP and NOT akin to a suicidal Terrorist Attack ? These Idiots would blame the World Trade Center Towers for not being tanked with 10 foot Lead Sheets.
Its not terrorism its piracy. |

baltec1
1119
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 16:25:00 -
[12] - Quote
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
When you are deliberately going to plan on winding up in a Cargohold-nerfed capsule, it's not Piracy.
Piracy involves financial benefit at the least.
They do it for money. You can make a profit from killing a hulk with a destroyer. |

baltec1
1119
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 16:28:00 -
[13] - Quote
Lharanai wrote:[quote=Kietay Ayari]
I am not crying for CCP to make highsec 100% safe, but I am afraid that the OP does not belong to a 0.001 % of EVE players and that the recent ganking behaviour will lead in long term to a significant drop in subs. I hope I am wrong with that prediction, we will see what comes.
This "recent ganking behaviour has been in game for the past 9 years. Its just as bad now as any time so I doubt we will see a drop in subs over this. |
| |
|