| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
41. WHAT DID I SEE? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Oh god, EPIC WIN!
- by Aeaus - at 2007.12.10 08:05:00
|
42. T2 BlackOps BS question - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
These ships are really quite useless IMHO, they're weak BSs with the ability to jump, and portal others. IMHO the jump range should be at least that of carriers, if not higher.
- by Aeaus - at 2007.12.10 08:01:00
|
43. [TRI] Phobos - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
On a serious note, what does [TRI] stand for?
- by Aeaus - at 2007.12.10 08:00:00
|
44. Amarr battleship bug, need fix asap! (DEVS PLX LISTEN) - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: David Khan Originally by: Lokr WTS +5 Int implant. WTS +5 perception implant. WIN
- by Aeaus - at 2007.12.10 07:59:00
|
45. Best armor repair ingame vs best shieldbooster - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Well, let's see... Maybe because you generally have more lows to contribute to your tank then shields? 2 Mid Slots Modules != 2 Low Slot Modules And those Gist Amps are hard to fit in, but yea, best shield > best armor :)
- by Aeaus - at 2007.12.10 06:50:00
|
46. Low sec sentries - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Oh I would have so much fun with this, a Muninn would be able to tank Amarr sentries without breaking a sweat, also probably the reason they avoided it :)
- by Aeaus - at 2007.12.10 06:44:00
|
47. MMOs Time for industry regulation? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Paulo Damarr So Turbo tech games walks away with potentially tens of millions down to bad business practice at the consumers expense and you think that the MMO industry does not need regulation? They pay for a subscrip...
- by Aeaus - at 2007.12.10 06:19:00
|
48. [Trinity] Ship Fitter Programs - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
EFT 2.4 was released, it's updated :)
- by Aeaus - at 2007.12.10 03:55:00
|
49. MMOs Time for industry regulation? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Aeaus on 10/12/2007 03:30:52 MMOs provide a non-essential "service," industries that are regulated are those involved with... - Significant Market Control (Anti-Trust) - Significant environmental & social effects - Standards of Pro...
- by Aeaus - at 2007.12.10 03:30:00
|
50. Pith X-Type X-Large SB, Vepas's SBA, Kaikka's CPU, + More Faction Mods - in Sell Orders [original thread]
Pith X-Type X-large Shield Booster Vepas' Modified Shield Boost Amplifier Kaikka's Modified Co-Processor 3 x Dread Guristas Heavy Missile Launchers 1 x Domination 10mn Afterburner Contact me ingame with sane offers, will not be reading this th...
- by Aeaus - at 2007.12.09 21:59:00
|
51. ò Auction ò Armageddon Imperial Issue (Unique) - in Sell Orders [original thread]
Entity, I wish I could actually make a bid on this ship that wouldn't be beaten, good luck with your auction :)
- by Aeaus - at 2007.12.09 21:56:00
|
52. Carrier [Nerf/Buff] Proposal - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Any thoughts on the whole carrying other piloted ships proposed role? Other then the generic "that's not it's role" excuse :)
- by Aeaus - at 2007.12.09 05:48:00
|
53. Adjust insurance to also cover modules,implants / ideas for more pvp - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Agree, to a point, I think the following would highly benefit PVP... - High Security Space 95% Max Buildcost Insurance (So, T2 is covered, Faction is covered to price to T1, etc) - Low Security Space 75% Max Buildcost Insurance (Same as Above) - ...
- by Aeaus - at 2007.12.08 20:25:00
|
54. Carrier [Nerf/Buff] Proposal - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Another carrier class would be quite interesting, but, how would you set the price point? The same, higher, lower?
- by Aeaus - at 2007.12.08 20:22:00
|
55. Carrier [Nerf/Buff] Proposal - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: SnakeByte86 Carriers were perfectly fine, ccp messed it up some, and will be making it worse. Anyone who thinks carriers need nerfed obviously does not fly them, and is not from 0.0 Let's see here... <- Flies Carrier...
- by Aeaus - at 2007.12.08 06:33:00
|
56. Whats your most hated Trinity change? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The overview is really crappy, I wish you could collapse things without minimizing them, broadcasts are too big. Honestly, I'm using a LOT more space for the same information.
- by Aeaus - at 2007.12.08 06:21:00
|
57. Why sniper BS fleets? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Woolygimp A tanked battleship can typically tank several snipers depending on the quality of the tank. Being able to tank 5 or more isn't unheard of. Most snipers are completely untanked, so if you get blasters near them the...
- by Aeaus - at 2007.12.08 06:20:00
|
58. Carrier [Nerf/Buff] Proposal - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: lofty29 No. Part of the point of a carrier is that it can field nothing but drones. Lots of them. It would seem a bit stupid that the hyper-advanced races of the future could only invent a huge wtfwarmachine with the abili...
- by Aeaus - at 2007.12.08 06:16:00
|
59. Carrier [Nerf/Buff] Proposal - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Carrier pilot can obviously jump anywhere, carrying all the ships and pilots with him. Better trust your carrier pilots :) Carrier pilot can warp nearly endlessly keeping pilots occupied. This one isn't troubling, since the carrier takes ages to ...
- by Aeaus - at 2007.12.08 05:08:00
|
60. Carrier [Nerf/Buff] Proposal - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
What If... The Nerf Carriers had the following layout... 6 High Slots [3 Turret / Launchers] 25% More Powergrid And then the following bonuses... X Carrier Skill Bonuses: 50% bonus to X and X range per level X Racial Bonus 99% reduction in CP...
- by Aeaus - at 2007.12.08 05:07:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |