| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 |
81. The Null Deal: A Statement from Sovereign Nullsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Carl Stonewall wrote: bwahahahahhaahhaa the most bitter of foes that wont go to war with eachother but rather drop supers on newbie-pilots and rp'ers??? How about this for fixing 0.0 by joint venture... PL and goons mans up and shreds OTEC - ...
- by Andski - at 2014.09.29 05:49:00
|
82. The Null Deal: A Statement from Sovereign Nullsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Veers Belvar wrote: And the point is that the suggestions do nothing to create the conditions to make that large supercapital engagement more likely. They are geared towards getting smaller blocs to engage with larger ones - not towards getting...
- by Andski - at 2014.09.29 03:37:00
|
83. The Null Deal: A Statement from Sovereign Nullsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Snot Shot wrote: So the leaders of Null Sec SOV holding Alliances are tired of playing naked diplomacy Twister? Have you decided who's going to pull out of whos bum first? CCP can change null SOV to this but at the end of the day its the dipl...
- by Andski - at 2014.09.28 23:40:00
|
84. The Null Deal: A Statement from Sovereign Nullsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jace Sarice wrote: Feel free to get the supposed signatories to actually state they agree with this publicly. Then once we know they do, feel free to enjoy nobody caring. you're free to ask them
- by Andski - at 2014.09.28 21:37:00
|
85. The Null Deal: A Statement from Sovereign Nullsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nullsec leaders holding conquerable space have come together to put forth an open letter to CCP expressing their dissatisfaction with the Dominion sovereignty system and stating their support for occupancy-based sovereignty mechanics. The letter f...
- by Andski - at 2014.09.28 21:32:00
|
86. Sticky:[Oceanus] Cyno Exclusion Zone around starbases - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Oh Takashawa wrote: Because what EVE really needs are mechanics that make certain ships absolutely mandatory or you shouldn't even bother. installing ihub upgrades requires one of four ships doomsdaying something requires one of four ships f...
- by Andski - at 2014.09.18 00:52:00
|
87. Sticky:[Oceanus] Cyno Exclusion Zone around starbases - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Grarr Dexx wrote: HIC points go further than 25k fyi I don't see how this is an issue at all. they might have to burn the cyno for the ghostriders a tad bit further away this change is literally killing eve q_q
- by Andski - at 2014.09.18 00:12:00
|
88. Friend is quitting Eve after he is caught out with Bonus room scam - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
eve isn't for the weak
- by Andski - at 2014.09.18 00:04:00
|
89. Earn up to 20B/month by hunting Evil in Branch - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Seraph IX Basarab wrote: @ andski, benny, Angelique, Lucas, 6 not 60. Obvious typo is obvious. The over all loss isn't always spread across the entire CFC. For that individual that lost his 5 billion isk whatever, that's still 5 billion that ...
- by Andski - at 2014.09.16 19:22:00
|
90. Earn up to 20B/month by hunting Evil in Branch - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
also, if he wants to wave his numbers around he's still going to feel inadequate because we spent a pitiful sum of money on paying one half of the working class to kill the other half in hulkageddon 2, and when it came to exhumers we were paying o...
- by Andski - at 2014.09.16 03:03:00
|
91. Earn up to 20B/month by hunting Evil in Branch - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
also i'm not sure how you did the math that tells you 300 billion in damage / 50 billion in wardecs = 60 billion that's 6 billion in damage per billion absorbed across a coalition of 35k people which is really not much, and you're forgetting that...
- by Andski - at 2014.09.16 02:53:00
|
92. Earn up to 20B/month by hunting Evil in Branch - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Seraph IX Basarab wrote: Really? From a Machiavellian perspective the opposite would be true. If his acts were truly irrelevant, you would run the risk of bringing more strength to his cause by underscoring every little even he does. If he is e...
- by Andski - at 2014.09.16 02:46:00
|
93. Earn up to 20B/month by hunting Evil in Branch - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie wrote: I recently sent an expeditionary party to branch and found no evil there. I think this thread is an attempt to keep us from finding actual evil. I will be searching in high sec for the foreseeable future. The ev...
- by Andski - at 2014.09.15 18:42:00
|
94. Earn up to 20B/month by hunting Evil in Branch - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Princess Bride wrote: So many pages of words to explain why this isn't important. goons posting in a thread about goons is unusual, yes
- by Andski - at 2014.09.14 06:09:00
|
95. Announcement:A Reminder Regarding Real Life Harassment - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
so other people asserting that he did in fact make that blog post, a blog post that I read, isn't partial evidence on its own because you don't agree with them either
- by Andski - at 2014.09.12 18:54:00
|
96. Announcement:A Reminder Regarding Real Life Harassment - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Be assured that CCP cared enough to delete the thread you posted back in March too, but not to actually look into the subject. They literally care more about covering up their inconsistency than about the inconsistency itself.
- by Andski - at 2014.09.12 18:52:00
|
97. Announcement:A Reminder Regarding Real Life Harassment - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
evepal wrote: Are you asking me how evidence validates a point? or how he's meant to post evidence? no, i'm saying that you'd immediately attempt to discredit any evidence he posts i'm also saying that he'd violate the rules and get banned...
- by Andski - at 2014.09.12 18:41:00
|
98. Announcement:A Reminder Regarding Real Life Harassment - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote: garbage i'm sorry but your idea that he's winning because he's not important enough to convince is silly
- by Andski - at 2014.09.12 18:37:00
|
99. Announcement:A Reminder Regarding Real Life Harassment - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
i mean really even when he did post the evidence on his personal blog (and he took down the post later) people asserted that it was faked because there is absolutely no way CCP would disregard something like that those of us who have dealt with...
- by Andski - at 2014.09.12 18:36:00
|
100. Announcement:A Reminder Regarding Real Life Harassment - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
evepal wrote: If he wishes to include anecdotal evidence into the discussion, he must be prepared to back it up. If he doesn't, then it invalidates his statement when it's based upon that fallacy. Notice how I've not said his opinion is wrong...
- by Andski - at 2014.09.12 18:34:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |