| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
81. Q. for a DEV: Why is CCP removing the hangar view as an option? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Hyperforce99 Edited by: Hyperforce99 on 15/06/2011 16:56:22 I'm making this thread in an attempt to get a straight answer from one of CCPs Developers. For how many times has this been asked by both myself and other peopl...
- by Evelgrivion - at 2011.06.15 23:58:00
|
82. Ships for $ - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Evelgrivion on 15/06/2011 11:39:28 Originally by: Trebor Daehdoow In the hopes of clarifying matters, here is the timeline of what happened at the Summit. I drafted the minutes on the virtual goods session, and when this iss...
- by Evelgrivion - at 2011.06.15 11:39:00
|
83. "Step foot into the Captain's Quarters" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: de v Shouldn't it be 'set foot'? Just sayin. Shouldn't it be optional? Just sayin'.
- by Evelgrivion - at 2011.06.15 09:34:00
|
84. CCP if you're remodeling how about the deathclones? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I can definitely get behind this idea, 100%. Some revamped explosion effects, especially for capital ships, would be great too. Cascading reactor failures along the lengths of the hulls would add a great deal to the wow-factor of destroying a carr...
- by Evelgrivion - at 2011.06.15 09:22:00
|
85. What is wrong with sending it in to get painted? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Tres Farmer Lol, I missed that one.. Stuff for AUR out of thin air. Wonderful. If CCP really suggested that by themself they got no clue what so ever. WTF is going on in Iceland? It's pretty clear that whatever they ...
- by Evelgrivion - at 2011.06.15 04:43:00
|
86. What is wrong with sending it in to get painted? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Evelgrivion on 15/06/2011 03:56:53 Originally by: Nova Fox Send car in to paint shop, spend some aurum, get car back with new paint job some time later. So... why such the anger? That is if thats going to be the system that ...
- by Evelgrivion - at 2011.06.15 03:47:00
|
87. Ships for $ - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Evelgrivion on 15/06/2011 02:47:07 Originally by: Vandrion Ranger-- There are those of us that get irritated when people fail to react or don't see the larger picture. I posted a link to this thread in the Science and Indy f...
- by Evelgrivion - at 2011.06.15 02:37:00
|
88. Ships for $ - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Ciar Meara Edited by: Ciar Meara on 14/06/2011 13:17:47 Originally by: CCP Zinfandel I got a break between meetings. I have 11 minutes to post again in this thread. I apologize I haven't been able to read all t...
- by Evelgrivion - at 2011.06.14 13:24:00
|
89. Ships for $ - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Evelgrivion on 14/06/2011 11:16:39 Double post. Delete me plx.
- by Evelgrivion - at 2011.06.14 11:16:00
|
90. Ships for $ - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Jin Endashi Originally by: Nullity That doesn't solve the problem as the root of the problem is that someone pays CCP real cash to magically spawn a Scorpion for them. This bypasses all normal game mechanics. W...
- by Evelgrivion - at 2011.06.14 11:09:00
|
91. Ships for $ - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Evelgrivion on 14/06/2011 11:03:14 Originally by: CCP Zinfandel "Shall I hold this until the store properly supports BPCs or a Scorpion trade-in? Or shall I start selling it now for 3-4 months and then change how we sell it ...
- by Evelgrivion - at 2011.06.14 10:58:00
|
92. Ships for $ - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Evelgrivion on 14/06/2011 01:34:26 Originally by: Tippia Originally by: Syphon Lodian You can buy ships with money already. You're missing the point here. It's not that you can get your hands on a ship by getting a...
- by Evelgrivion - at 2011.06.14 01:32:00
|
93. Ships for $ - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Evelgrivion on 14/06/2011 01:26:18 Originally by: Syphon Lodian You can buy ships with money already. People keep acting like PLEX is sacred, and that Aurum is the first step introducing physical money into EVE. It's not. ...
- by Evelgrivion - at 2011.06.14 01:24:00
|
94. Ships for $ - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Evelgrivion on 13/06/2011 22:32:18 Originally by: Mister Smithington I'm of two minds about whether or not I should be raging about this. On the one hand, it's just a scorp, and I'm sure that it will actually work out to be ...
- by Evelgrivion - at 2011.06.13 22:32:00
|
95. Ships for $ - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Evelgrivion on 13/06/2011 22:22:02 Originally by: Lothros Andastar Protip: You can buy ships for Isk, which comes from Plex, so you can buy ships for Dollars anyway. Dead wrong. Nothing in EVE, beyond PLEX itself, i...
- by Evelgrivion - at 2011.06.13 22:21:00
|
96. Ships for $ - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Evelgrivion on 13/06/2011 22:03:04 There's nothing that I like about this feature. However, I'll suffer it so long as these ships are 100% identical in performance to the Tech 1 Scorpion. If those Aurum ships are ANY better t...
- by Evelgrivion - at 2011.06.13 22:03:00
|
97. Instead of nerfing super carriers:... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Evelgrivion on 13/06/2011 20:50:49 Originally by: Speaker4 theDead Originally by: voiddragon Originally by: Speaker4 theDead "OMG, it's not fair, SC's are too powerful, nerf, nerf nerf....." Hello Kitty onl...
- by Evelgrivion - at 2011.06.13 20:48:00
|
98. Instead of nerfing super carriers:... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Hesperius Originally by: Evelgrivion This idea isn't bad, but it fails to take into account player behavior; everyone overcompensates with numbers. Super Carriers simply cannot remain viable in the roles they are cur...
- by Evelgrivion - at 2011.06.13 20:34:00
|
99. Instead of nerfing super carriers:... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Hesperius The DD alpha strike is accountable for the massive HP on SC. Start there instead of fail cascading in balance issues. My solution This idea isn't bad, but it fails to take into account player behavior; ever...
- by Evelgrivion - at 2011.06.13 20:24:00
|
100. Instead of nerfing super carriers:... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Evelgrivion on 13/06/2011 20:05:20 The only capital ships in EVE that are actually balanced are Dreadnoughts. It's not that Dreads need to be boosted, it's that everything else desperately needs to be toned down. The wide scale mat...
- by Evelgrivion - at 2011.06.13 20:04:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |