Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 [30] 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
581. Pod Ransoming or that aspect of piracy dies this winter. - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Slider VII wrote: Aqriue wrote: You know that buff to destroyers everyone was always asking for....and there you go. And in other news, alt account is being turned off and main account is flopping even closer as I am loosing interest in EVE...
- by Feligast - at 2011.10.21 17:51:00
|
582. Idea's to help with mining and suicide PVP - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Elanore Binchiette wrote: That is esactly my point. High sec isnt safe at all. If it was I wouldnt have made a suggestion. Although thank you for proving my point. You're welcome. Of course, it's not supposed to be, so you might want to w...
- by Feligast - at 2011.10.21 17:34:00
|
583. Incentive Based Daily Gameplay via Skill Queue Bonuses - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Three things. 1. No. 2. Hell no. 3. Not everyone runs missions. If you're even going to consider this as a valid idea, you have to allow implementation through many avenues, not just mission running. Missions have too many rewards now as it is.
- by Feligast - at 2011.10.21 17:26:00
|
584. Add range on watch list - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
+1 to both OP and second post.
- by Feligast - at 2011.10.20 21:54:00
|
585. Null Sec : Power Projection NOT Sovereignty System - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Bloodpetal wrote: I want Null Sec Sov to feel more like Low Sec "ownership" that Low Sec residents have over their systems by simple power projection. Fine then. For the love of God, NO. You happy now?
- by Feligast - at 2011.10.20 21:51:00
|
586. Small corps, 0.0, numbers and capitals. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Thur Barbek wrote: The word "right" is an opinion based word. No two people have the same definition of it. In context of this discussion, imo, the word "right" means "Until you stop me."
- by Feligast - at 2011.10.20 20:36:00
|
587. LOLZ at 0.0 corps - epic fail - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
captain dirka wrote: Recruitment for pvp corporations is open again. Competent corporations and Pilots only please. Why would you want competent corps and players? Wouldn't that just throw off the ones you have now?
- by Feligast - at 2011.10.20 20:20:00
|
588. Free Lyris - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Infinimo wrote: Free Lyris Nairn, goodposter extraordinaire and Spacebook Superstar. I approve this product and/or service. (PS free him so he stops posting at goonfleet dot com :cripes:)
- by Feligast - at 2011.10.20 20:03:00
|
589. Would this solve many of the 0.0 and Large alliance issues? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Toyota County wrote: Updated ideas: 1. Alliances limited to x(20?) corps. Corps limited to X (300?) members 2. Alliances can only set alliance members to BLUE 3. Alliances mechanics changed so each corp has an equal share in alliance roles ...
- by Feligast - at 2011.10.20 19:24:00
|
590. Null Sec : Power Projection NOT Sovereignty System - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Bloodpetal wrote: I want Null Sec Sov to feel more like Low Sec. For the love of God, NO.
- by Feligast - at 2011.10.20 19:03:00
|
591. A plan to give balance to cloaking (Images) - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
This thread is still going? Tippia and Ingvar, you guys have way more patience than I do.
- by Feligast - at 2011.10.19 20:02:00
|
592. The EVE community should extend its sympathies. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP Wrangler CCP Pann CCP Fallout CCP Zymurgist I'll certainly miss all of you. Even you, Zymurgist, after deleting so many of my posts. IMO a horrible decision to gut the community team when you could have saved more money and resources by havi...
- by Feligast - at 2011.10.19 19:46:00
|
593. Proposal: Higher Penalties for High Security Space Attacks (Ganks) - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote: HighSec stands for "High Security" which its not. It isn't "secure" if the killer is able to get in and kill someone. High sec is supposed to be the place the new people go and carebears can do thier thing in relative...
- by Feligast - at 2011.10.19 19:10:00
|
594. Proposal: Higher Penalties for High Security Space Attacks (Ganks) - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Roldanus wrote: In some cases you picked the wrong Corps as allies. You are definitely building a bad reputation. You wanna know the best part? We don't give a **** what you pubbies think.
- by Feligast - at 2011.10.19 19:06:00
|
595. Getting bored by Wreck Thiefs - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Kitty Stormwarden wrote: Rohk's Rail Guns obvious troll is obvious
- by Feligast - at 2011.10.19 18:50:00
|
596. The answer to the ultimate question of Life, the Universe, and Cloaking. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Ingvar Angst wrote: Feligast wrote: Ingvar Angst wrote: Satav wrote: hmm, I like it. Except for the cyno-delay. No one would be able bring in caps/supers efficiently anymore. But good idea on the disappearing from local. +1 He...
- by Feligast - at 2011.10.19 18:34:00
|
597. The answer to the ultimate question of Life, the Universe, and Cloaking. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Ingvar Angst wrote: Satav wrote: hmm, I like it. Except for the cyno-delay. No one would be able bring in caps/supers efficiently anymore. But good idea on the disappearing from local. +1 Hence the exception for Black Ops however. T...
- by Feligast - at 2011.10.19 18:19:00
|
598. ECM: Reevaluated - A Look into the Future of EVE - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
My only concern is the potential to run these modules for longer than 4 hours. Would that then start to cause heat damage to the module?
- by Feligast - at 2011.10.18 21:18:00
|
599. CCP thinks the "little" guy should stay in High Sec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Zey Nadar wrote: ps. I quit my previous corp cause Im leaving the game, in case you wonder. Its not that I want to be in a NPC corp. Maybe part of your problem is that you've been three godawful corps in your time.
- by Feligast - at 2011.10.18 20:39:00
|
600. "FIX" Self Destruct Mechanism - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
ShahFluffers wrote: 5 or 6 gank-fit battleships don't have an issue chewing through a ["normal"] capital ship once it has capped out. The idea I tossed out above has somewhat of the same effect... once the modules have burnt out they can not lo...
- by Feligast - at 2011.10.18 20:24:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 [30] 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |