Pages: [1] 2 3 |
1. CCP, you idiots. This whole mess was unneccessary? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Galding on 02/07/2011 19:26:09 Originally by: Discrodia They didn't say no non-vanity. They said no 'game-breaking' non-vanity. Originally by: Dev Blog It is CCPæs plan that the Noble Exchange (NeX store) will b...
- by Galding - at 2011.07.02 19:26:00
|
2. No "gold ammo" had better damn well mean No Pay-to-Win! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Solstice Project Originally by: cecil b d'milf we're talking at crossed purposes I think, souns like you think it's possible they will try for p2w too c/d ? pyramid quoting ... great ... whole post deleted. Any...
- by Galding - at 2011.06.26 20:40:00
|
3. No "gold ammo" had better damn well mean No Pay-to-Win! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Hyperforce99 Well, we players ourselves coined the term GOLDEN AMMO... so, perhaps hes just trying to speak OUR Language Actually, that's what they called it in the fearless newsletter. something about buying faction s...
- by Galding - at 2011.06.26 20:14:00
|
4. No "gold ammo" had better damn well mean No Pay-to-Win! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: I Love Boobies Even I, with half a brain, and that half only concerned about one subject, knows he meant "gold ammo" as a metaphor for Pay 2 Win. I am pretty sure he used that choice of words because those whom were upset ab...
- by Galding - at 2011.06.26 20:12:00
|
5. No "gold ammo" had better damn well mean No Pay-to-Win! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Vikarion Apparently one of the CSM has confirmed that "Gold ammo" meant no P2W. I want to see a devblog or blue bar with the exact quote: "The NeX store and aurum will only be used for vanity items, as long as there is ...
- by Galding - at 2011.06.26 19:57:00
|
6. No "gold ammo" had better damn well mean No Pay-to-Win! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Sujanra Acoma Originally by: ifollowed through Edited by: ifollowed through on 26/06/2011 19:37:45 Originally by: Vikarion Because that's how we're taking it. That was the question most of us wanted answe...
- by Galding - at 2011.06.26 19:54:00
|
7. Arums place in the Eve Universe - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Because saying: Only dust will have P2W MT, and there will be no non-vanity MT for spaceships in eve. is too hard. Instead we get one of the most vague meaningless statements you could make "There have been no plans for gold ammo", meaning, ther...
- by Galding - at 2011.06.26 19:50:00
|
8. Cliffnotes Please - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Flybye Sorry guys. I'm one of those type of people that log in an hour every month. All I've heard so far is that EVE wants to charge real money for in game things in the new patch and that other things cost an abnormally h...
- by Galding - at 2011.06.26 14:36:00
|
9. A non hatred yet coincidental thread about CCP and VALVe - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
TF2 doesn't have a sub fee, and was a very cheap game. You definitely should have got $20 worth out of it in the period before they even added micro transactions. Hence people weren't mad.
- by Galding - at 2011.06.26 05:04:00
|
10. Aurum as Loyalty Points - Perfectly Acceptable - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Galding on 26/06/2011 05:01:41 Edited by: Galding on 26/06/2011 05:01:01 Wait what? But the current plans for pay to win it would be EXACTLY like the LP store. Deposit Item+AUR, maybe some ISK and pop out a better item. Except ...
- by Galding - at 2011.06.26 04:58:00
|
11. CCP, take a leaf from sony. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I actually think that is a fair compromise, but they would have to continue sizable updates and expansions for TQ and ships in space like they have been. Part of it is because I would also like to see a fresh server where everybody is starting fr...
- by Galding - at 2011.06.26 03:15:00
|
12. Why I support microtransactions and so should you - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Shadow XII Because I'm tired of game servers that make me download custom textures and sounds. I just don't play them, but getting the prompt 'DOWNLOADING STUFF LOL' just wastes time. To be fair, I hate those too, you kn...
- by Galding - at 2011.06.26 02:56:00
|
13. Why I support microtransactions and so should you - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Shadow XII That's personal preference, not majority fact. Millions of people love TF2 for what it is and where it's going. People like you are just afraid of change. I'm just afraid of change? You are just pulling assum...
- by Galding - at 2011.06.26 02:44:00
|
14. Why I support microtransactions and so should you - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Galding on 26/06/2011 02:32:39 Originally by: Shadow XII Team Fortress 2. Since becoming MT'd, it has done nothing but improve. Valve knew how to balance the system, and I'm confident that CCP does too. You could not be ...
- by Galding - at 2011.06.26 02:32:00
|
15. Why I support microtransactions and so should you - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Shadow XII Which is why I'm confident that it won't happen. If you understand these concepts, I guarantee the professional game developers do, too. It wasn't about how good or bad they execute non-vanity MT, that is ho...
- by Galding - at 2011.06.26 02:25:00
|
16. Why I support microtransactions and so should you - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Galding on 26/06/2011 02:20:07 If there is pay CCP to winm then these are the implications, regardless of how flawless CCP could do it. -> There is already a spectrum of different levels of equipment for various prices, from tec...
- by Galding - at 2011.06.26 02:18:00
|
17. Why I support microtransactions and so should you - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Galding on 26/06/2011 01:55:07 Originally by: Shadow XII Originally by: robbyx Another ridiculous 12 year old who cant tell the difference between MT and PLEX. I implore you to convince me otherwise, but opening ...
- by Galding - at 2011.06.26 01:53:00
|
18. Why I support microtransactions and so should you - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Harcosi I'm a miner. So if people can buy ships that appear out of thin air because of MT, the way I choose to play Eve is no longer valid. Thus my subscription is no longer required. NO! Don't leave! In 2 months you ca...
- by Galding - at 2011.06.26 01:45:00
|
19. if monocles did something all would be ok - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Galding on 26/06/2011 01:38:34 Originally by: leth ghost like if they did something in the game they could justify the price but being only cosmetic its just making ccp look like they are greedy I agree, equipping a mono...
- by Galding - at 2011.06.26 01:38:00
|
20. What happens if... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Anna Maziarczyk Edited by: Anna Maziarczyk on 24/06/2011 07:03:43 All the Alliances that are banning for use of Aurum, and highly upset... Start passing out PLEX to active subscription holders. If whole alliances are m...
- by Galding - at 2011.06.24 07:08:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |