| Pages: [1] |
1. Research Agents - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
I get all that, and I accept the fact that I will most likley have to run some Bull **** missions to raise my standing with Viazam. I was only asking what had changed. At one time that agent was available to me with my current skills and standing ...
- by GeneralD - at 2009.11.11 06:15:00
|
2. Research Agents - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
My position is that at one time I had enough of a standing to qualify for that agent. And then out of the blue something changed. My corp. is exactly the way it was when I selectted that agent (IÆm the only one in my corp.) and now I donÆt have en...
- by GeneralD - at 2009.11.10 02:15:00
|
3. Research Agents - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Ok, time for stupid questions, my standing to this guy is 8.75 which are enough but now it says my corp. standing needs to be 1.70 which I donÆt recall seeing before. My corp. is 3 people which havenÆt changed in months because none of us play muc...
- by GeneralD - at 2009.11.07 15:29:00
|
4. Research Agents - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Did somthing happen to Research Agents. I dont seem to be able to access any of my agenets because it appears the standing Requirements have been raised. If thats the case then I want my several thousand data cores!!!! GeneralD
- by GeneralD - at 2009.11.07 06:56:00
|
5. Death of Matrix Online - in Out of Pod Experience [original thread]
If you want to try something interesting. Take a look at Megawars III. I ran across this website the other day. I have always felt that Megawars was a first iteration of EVE. The new version is pretty close to the old one even though I miss my dot...
- by GeneralD - at 2009.06.13 02:36:00
|
6. Supercaps, Caps, Drones and Fighters, a New Zulupark Blog - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Bad Idea, A carrier should be able to defend itself. If CCP limits the number of fighters the carrier can launch then it should be allowed to mount Launchers or Turrets. If you invest a year of your time to acquire the skills on a carefully laid ...
- by GeneralD - at 2007.10.21 21:10:00
|
7. Question on kill rights - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: GeneralD on 15/07/2007 17:06:44 Yep, I was pretty stupid. Id like to find out the gang limitations because I think that all gang members become concord tagets if one gang member starts aggression. I know that these are stupid quest...
- by GeneralD - at 2007.07.15 17:06:00
|
8. Question on kill rights - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I was minding my own business when out of the blue I get ganked in a .5 system by a person I never saw before. It was nicely done, I was hauling ore in my mammoth, he hits me with a passive targeter (I never saw the lock) and 3 shots I'm dead. My ...
- by GeneralD - at 2007.07.15 08:03:00
|
9. Please allow us to train atleast 2 characters at the same time! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: GeneralD on 11/12/2005 04:14:25 Another option might be to have the ability to Re-Spec your charecter. It works very well in City of Hereos. After you win a very hard mission you then get to re assign all of your skills to try somth...
- by GeneralD - at 2005.12.11 04:10:00
|
10. Ship Crews - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Actually when I hear the term crews I think of Corp mates gunning my turrets for me on my Battleship. (as in Galaxy gunner slots in Planetside) GeneralD
- by GeneralD - at 2005.09.13 05:41:00
|
11. Dear CCP: Please reset the game 4tw. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I think it could work if you got to keep your skill points and could re-assign them if you wanted to. Personally I feel that this would be a nice option even if they dont reset the game. CCP keeps changeing the ground rules, I.E. projectile nerf, ...
- by GeneralD - at 2005.03.25 02:51:00
|
12. Balancing vs content - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Its not that we have'nt read the Blogs. Weve seen the Graphs and Charts and Read about how the map needs to be changed. The information is certainly there, the point is we DONT AGREE with it and this is the only way to let our views be known. CCP...
- by GeneralD - at 2005.03.04 16:35:00
|
13. A Personal Opinion, And Couple Of Questions For The Whole Player Base - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Well said Verone!! Can we start a petition right now to STOP the proposed EW changes, the sweeping weapon changes and the "lets get rid of the highway" map changes. Fix balance issues by ADDING CONTENT, not by nerfing what is already in the gam...
- by GeneralD - at 2005.03.04 16:06:00
|
14. The New World Order(ish) - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Quote: If you think of jumpgates like roads and bridges in RL. When a war occurs between two nations its usually the roads and bridges that are targeted first to reduce movement. Well for story-line reasons people who hate each other are "cu...
- by GeneralD - at 2005.02.27 23:25:00
|
15. The New World Order(ish) - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I am fundamentally opposed to these "change the rules in the middle of the game" approach to fixing these "balance" issues. I can think of several alternate content additions that would accomplish the same thing without changing the basic map ever...
- by GeneralD - at 2005.02.27 06:23:00
|
16. Electronic & Propulsion Warfare - Skills, Modules & Ships - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Bad call. To change things just to change them is getting upsetting. The time we spend learning skills and then in the blink of an eye months of work go down the drain and we have to start on a new track. Its Simple people , the game is realy goo...
- by GeneralD - at 2005.02.16 06:37:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |