| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. FW bunker sites - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Limit the access to these bunkers, ctrl points ect to ships belonging to the race of the two opposing races only, having a whole lot of gal and caldari and even amarr ships against an amarr fleet which is made up the same way ruins the feeling of ...
- by Ghyran - at 2008.07.15 19:12:00
|
2. Pilgrim Fix - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Take away the damage bonus and i will hunt you down, pod you and then quit eve.
- by Ghyran - at 2008.06.09 04:43:00
|
3. Boost to faction ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Ghyran on 28/05/2008 18:32:06 all they have done so far is give the navy apoc the same bonuses as the standard one, ( apart from the new frigs ) Please tell me this is not all they intend to do to faction ships, seriously if it is ...
- by Ghyran - at 2008.05.28 18:30:00
|
4. The Ashimu - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
given their rarity they need to do at least something special that t2 cannot do. The Ashimmu is supposed to use lasers but cant and even if it had the fittings for lasers there is no incentive to fit them because ccp went and made projectile wepo...
- by Ghyran - at 2008.05.15 07:48:00
|
5. The Ashimu - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Please Fix it. everyone knows it badly needs 40% more PG at least and 20% more cpu. That would alow it to actually fit medium guns, tank , medium nos ect. most over looked ship in the game imo.
- by Ghyran - at 2008.05.15 05:01:00
|
6. Boost Patch? Really? Thats it? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Seriously they call this a boost patch? I hope this is the first of a few of them because they totally left out assault frigs, and Fixing 2 ships and dropping resistances is not fixing Amarr.
- by Ghyran - at 2008.03.16 10:36:00
|
7. + 20% to nos/neut range per recon level for pilgrim. Pretty, please ? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: ZENZATION Edited by: ZENZATION on 11/01/2008 14:12:23 The amount bonus should be changed in a range bonus, problem fixed. It wont be as powerful as the curse (as intended) but it wont have to get in webrange (and tank) t...
- by Ghyran - at 2008.01.11 21:59:00
|
8. + 20% to nos/neut range per recon level for pilgrim. Pretty, please ? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Removing the drain ammount bonus would kill its effectiveness entirely. You would drain an equal ammount of cap from yourself as you drain from the enemy. I say again, removing drain ammount bonus = BAD IDEA INDEED!
- by Ghyran - at 2008.01.11 21:31:00
|
9. New Feature - Space Terrain - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Imo i think it would be better to have fewer asteroids per system and have them larger, for example you could actually be in the same belt as somebody else and be 1000km apart and still have roids next to both ppl.
- by Ghyran - at 2008.01.11 07:59:00
|
10. + 20% to nos/neut range per recon level for pilgrim. Pretty, please ? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Ghyran on 09/01/2008 03:26:01 If CCP takes away the Drain amount bonus on the pilgrim it would be truly useless, it wouldnt have the drain capacity to kill pretty much any target. The pilgrims bonus currently means it has to operat...
- by Ghyran - at 2008.01.09 03:23:00
|
11. So i'm getting a bit tired of these boost Amarr threads aren't you? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Says the Gallente Pilot
- by Ghyran - at 2008.01.06 22:54:00
|
12. pilgrim - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
would it be totaly un fair to give this ship 125M bandwidth so it can use 5 heavies while keeping its 150m3 space? this would allow it to deploy a 'single' wave of large drones. with the HP buff it can take an age to kill a battleship.
- by Ghyran - at 2008.01.06 19:50:00
|
13. [Boost Patch] Comprehensive List of Underpowered Modules - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
lol thats like saying, Srry we didnt realize that nerfing lasers would result in amarr sucking
- by Ghyran - at 2008.01.06 04:51:00
|
14. EW scripts: a workable idea? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Yet i can be permajammed in my curse by an average fit Falcon... ie, can do absolutely nothing except tank, which i haven't got. Please explain to me how this is balanced when my tracking disrupter only effects guns and only one attribute and onl...
- by Ghyran - at 2008.01.06 00:16:00
|
15. Extravaganza Ares - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Its actually more noticeable on the nightmare. Full tank on its 8 low slots ( before trinity ) and now got 7 mids and 8 guns ( taking 100% bonus ) with 2 extra highs. so thats 8 lows, 7 mids and 10 high on a battleship :D honestly Nightmare was ...
- by Ghyran - at 2007.12.30 00:05:00
|
16. WTB: The Old CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I think CCP are tending to operate more towards telling us what we want instead of listening to what we want.
- by Ghyran - at 2007.12.13 08:10:00
|
17. Amarr HIC - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
not when it requires insane cap use to achive that, and when the broadsword can tank just as well with no cap use at all. i agree with you
- by Ghyran - at 2007.12.11 07:24:00
|
18. Amarr HIC - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Why is it that the Amarr heavy interdictor is the only one that looses a weapon slot for no real advantage over the other HICs. Hell the broadsword GAINS a turret and can tank far better. Whats the deal.
- by Ghyran - at 2007.12.11 05:58:00
|
19. New Zealot Pic - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
mini have EMP if they so choose to use it.
- by Ghyran - at 2007.11.28 10:45:00
|
20. "Game Changes" area on forum - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP needs to make an area on the forum called "Game Changes" where they post any changes they plan to make in the game. This would allow the comunity to give feedback on thoes changes before they are put inplace even on SISI, if enough of the co...
- by Ghyran - at 2007.10.21 21:40:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |