| Pages: [1] |
1. Bug with FLAG status + trouble raising military index + test request.. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
With today's Sisi patch, all testing has come to an end. Sov and structures (including POS) were removed. I'm onlining a TCU but can't even anchor a Hub until it's claiming. I guess they don't want us testing these upgrades anymore.
- by Gramtar - at 2009.11.25 19:29:00
|
2. Bug with FLAG status + trouble raising military index + test request.. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Silvarus Trighton Is this the total # of spawns that you are getting at 5? Or are these the only decent spawns you got? Because this isn't anywhere near the 20 people they said it would support. And if its 3-4 sanctums/have...
- by Gramtar - at 2009.11.25 03:24:00
|
3. CCP, stop being stupid with the pirate detection array upgrade - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Anisa Schardl Why are you trying to compute their value on bounties alone? If you do that, then you need to take into account that over half of the income from L4s comes from loot, salvage, and LP rewards. Just a few high me...
- by Gramtar - at 2009.11.24 21:12:00
|
4. Bug with FLAG status + trouble raising military index + test request.. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Level 5 up and running. Here's the long and the short of it: Gives you 1-2 Sanctums and 1-2 Havens at any one time. Isk earning potential is in the range of 20M-30M / hour. This will support between 2 and 4 people at a time. Depending on the cos...
- by Gramtar - at 2009.11.24 21:02:00
|
5. CCP, stop being stupid with the pirate detection array upgrade - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Just finished running the highest level anomaly in our fully upgraded system. Blood Raider Sanctum has about 10 waves, with BS bounties from 1M to 1.2M, apparently the highest value deadspace spawns. With a 10% corp tax, my total take was 38M isk...
- by Gramtar - at 2009.11.24 18:21:00
|
6. Bug with FLAG status + trouble raising military index + test request.. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Murauke sorry if this question has been asked before but what about truesec status? Does that contribute anything in the patch? Waiting on an answer from CCP whether Truesec aids in raising the indexes or improves the ch...
- by Gramtar - at 2009.11.23 22:40:00
|
7. Bug with FLAG status + trouble raising military index + test request.. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
The displayed index levels are still screwed up. We've had a guy mining in a dread for hours, some part of that time with Hulk help, and no movement on Industrial Index. Although we installed level 4 military upgrades last night, apparently the in...
- by Gramtar - at 2009.11.22 19:54:00
|
8. Bug with FLAG status + trouble raising military index + test request.. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Rakshasa Taisab If you want to leave those other 15 insta-respawn anomalies fallow, go ahead. But don't go around complaining if you're not willing to fully exploit everything. The tier 1-2 anomalies are worthless, less...
- by Gramtar - at 2009.11.22 08:11:00
|
9. Bug with FLAG status + trouble raising military index + test request.. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
@Sisyphus: 1) How do you set the reinforcement timer on the I-Hub? I'm pretty sure that's the structure supposed to have one. I have both starbase and station mgmt roles now, but there's no apparent option to set anything on the I-Hub. I thought ...
- by Gramtar - at 2009.11.22 02:07:00
|
10. Bug with FLAG status + trouble raising military index + test request.. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
@Sisyphus: Couple problems today: 1) everyone shows the military index at different levels. Some show ours at level 4, while I show it at 3. Can't install lev 4 upgrades. The indicator arrow shows its gone down today, while its gone up about 30% ...
- by Gramtar - at 2009.11.21 22:56:00
|
11. Bug with FLAG status + trouble raising military index + test request.. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
As Moon Kitten noted, we have 5 cleared anomalies and nothing new spawning. Military Index is Lev 3 + 30%, with level 2 upgrade installed and online. I noticed another, significant design problem with the approach to using large numbers of anomal...
- by Gramtar - at 2009.11.20 23:10:00
|
12. CCP: Capital ship fuel bays? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I forgot a big reason I carry GSC's for fuel storage in my dread: Ability to remove stront from cargo bay. In high lag, you sometimes can't turn off your siege module. Keeping extra cycles in cans shuts it down when you want to exit siege. For t...
- by Gramtar - at 2009.07.31 19:02:00
|
13. feedback of those new fuel bays on dreadnoughts - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Tairon Usaro the whole concept is CRAP !!! I agree. I can't tell yet whether Dreads will be about the same, a little better, or a little worse. Many dread pilots use 2x GSC. Carriers are being nerfed again, though. The ...
- by Gramtar - at 2009.07.30 15:39:00
|
14. mwd/cloak trick being stopped? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: lljkDeathscythe Edited by: lljkDeathscythe on 13/05/2009 17:10:56 This is rediculous. If this goes through i want my recons level 5 skillpoints refunding as they are now effectively useless. covops, recons just got shaf...
- by Gramtar - at 2009.05.13 17:15:00
|
15. mwd/cloak trick being stopped? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Well, it's now apparent that this change is a side effect from a brute force fix to Falcons doing the uncloak > jam 1 cycle > recloak thing. I could care less about the non-covops cloak changes, as I don't play in lowsec, but understand why...
- by Gramtar - at 2009.05.13 17:07:00
|
16. Corp Standings Slots need and increase - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I agree. Limiting the corp standings to 300 has several impacts, all of which discourage players from being members of smaller corporations. Aside from docking rights, Corporate (and not Alliance) standings apply to POS's as well. This means large...
- by Gramtar - at 2007.04.11 00:05:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |