| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Okay, so, seriously. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I have followed various of these threads, particularly the long running one following the dev blog. I'm not entirely sure what we are arguing about any more. Originally CCP said they had to own all the content packaged in the their game, people p...
- by Grivan - at 2015.01.26 22:05:01
|
2. Okay, so, seriously. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Caleb Seremshur wrote: Games workshop got around this problem by saying that any imagery or art or modifications done within the context of their fiction or game universe automatically becomes their property upon submission. It was a blanket sn...
- by Grivan - at 2015.01.24 01:37:36
|
3. Okay, so, seriously. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Primary This Rifter wrote: Dradis Aulmais wrote: If you read the winter min they said they are likely going to do logo creation with a premade systems Unacceptable. I read the winter minutes as saying that an alliance could submit any l...
- by Grivan - at 2015.01.24 01:16:08
|
4. Ending with a bang. A big bang! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sol Project wrote: Grivan wrote: I think you should transfer all the ISK to me, this character is faceless and can not log in. It'd be so close, yet so far. I think I could hold my nerve and not destroy my good looks. You can't log in? ...
- by Grivan - at 2015.01.05 20:55:38
|
5. Ending with a bang. A big bang! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I think you should transfer all the ISK to me, this character is faceless and can not log in. It'd be so close, yet so far. I think I could hold my nerve and not destroy my good looks.
- by Grivan - at 2015.01.05 20:51:46
|
6. been a while since we got a free remap - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
That's totally fac(e)ist - our lack of face should not be used negatively. In answer to your question, yes, I do think we will get one or more again, sometime.
- by Grivan - at 2015.01.01 17:38:53
|
7. Ambulation in New Eden - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Riyria Twinpeaks wrote: @OP: I think the most important point you are making is, that walking around in your human avatars should have meaningful gameplay which fits into EVE and adds to it, but isn't required unless you are interested in doing...
- by Grivan - at 2014.06.08 17:17:00
|
8. Ambulation in New Eden - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mana Shian wrote: A well thought out and interesting read. Thank you for taking the time to write something like this up. Regardless, it belongs in F&I. I suppose it depends on the scope of 'ideas' in the definition - technically 95% ...
- by Grivan - at 2014.06.08 16:26:00
|
9. Ambulation in New Eden - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
tl;dr. EVE is considered to be the toughest game out there, the hardest to learn and even harder to master; 'spreadsheets in space' they call it. The players take pride in being older, maturer and arguable more intelligent, and yet, when a forum p...
- by Grivan - at 2014.06.08 15:52:00
|
10. Tournament ideas discussion - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
The biggest problem to player run 'small' tournaments is the inability to ensure your participants safety and enforce some basic rules - alongside the issue of spectators. Take any tournament that you want PVP in and you have a problem. - High se...
- by Grivan - at 2014.04.06 10:20:00
|
11. Limerick Contest - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mining with my toons when jumped by typhoons all my stuff now space fluff oh grr Goons!
- by Grivan - at 2014.03.18 22:56:00
|
12. Sovereignty - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Word limit. Every military conquest is for land, people and resources. Yes, the whole point is that the government comes in afterwards, sets it to rights and carebears it (farms, builds, teaches etc). The only empire I can think of that didn't do...
- by Grivan - at 2014.02.24 20:46:00
|
13. Sovereignty - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Anhenka wrote: POS spam is a bad idea because maintaining dozens or hundreds of POS's is the sort of pointless thing that makes logistical teams contemplate a bowl of pills and a whiskey chaser, or more likely not logging in to play EVE. Str...
- by Grivan - at 2014.02.24 20:39:00
|
14. Sovereignty - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Anhenka wrote: A: You have a system where unless an alliance wants to live and rat there, they need to spam POS's and maintain them at great time expenditure, then continuously babysit weak sov structures that don't have a reinforcement timer,...
- by Grivan - at 2014.02.24 00:29:00
|
15. Sovereignty - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Anhenka wrote: 1: POS spam was bad, terribly, insanely bad way of dictating sov. It will never, ever come back. 2: The idea that an alliance must be forced to carebear in mass in order to hold space is equally ridiculous. Not all alliances ar...
- by Grivan - at 2014.02.23 17:52:00
|
16. Sovereignty - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Trii Seo wrote: Um, maybe you should look into how sov actually works before making fix suggestions. POS-based sovereignity ceased to be a thing in Dominion. Yeah. I don't actually play with Sov, I assumed POS's still played a direct part. I...
- by Grivan - at 2014.02.23 16:26:00
|
17. Sovereignty - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I'll start off by saying that I'm sure CCP are working on this already and it wouldn't surprise me if we see the fruits of their labour by the end of the year, but still, I might have a good idea. Secondly, I'm not sure if this is a good idea, ...
- by Grivan - at 2014.02.23 13:57:00
|
18. Move Downtime - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sabriz Adoudel wrote: CCP Falcon wrote: ¦É> -Ö+»¦¥+Ñ-ç +ƒo ¦¥+¦+É+ö ¦¥-P+É-ç o-ç -Äl-P+öߦënb puods¦¥+¦ u+É+ö ¦¥-ì s¦¥nssß¦ë ¦¥+¦+É ¦¥+¦¦¥+Ñ-ç +ƒß¦ë -ç+É+Ñ-ç su+ɦ¥+» pu+É -Ä+Ép-P+¦o-ì +¦no +ƒo ¦¥lppߦë+» ¦¥+Ñ-ç uߦë -ç+Ѧâߦë+¦ sll+É+ƒ ...
- by Grivan - at 2014.01.13 00:34:00
|
19. Old Portraits - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I used to look like this: http://oldportraits.eveonline.com/Character/1082143465_256.jpg Then something horrible happened to my face. My word, I used to be such a pimp! Also. Save the archive. It's peanuts in the storage terms these days.
- by Grivan - at 2013.10.23 22:51:00
|
20. And here's how it should be done... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Regina Gerze wrote: Grivan wrote: Snip. lack of immersion? Highly amusing, but I'm a roleplayer and can think of using SomerBLINK as a crystal clear reference to those Casinos which we have NPC module things for. Lack of story telling?...
- by Grivan - at 2013.10.01 22:40:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |