Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 |
181. Sticky:[April] Confessor and Svipul Balance Tweaks - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Prometheus Exenthal wrote: Rek Seven wrote: Confessor will be too tough to fit now imo, resulting in there only being 1 or 2 viable fits. Fair enough, reduce the power grid to dissuade the use of oversized prop mods but increase the cpu to o...
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2015.04.08 09:32:40
|
182. Sticky:[April] Confessor and Svipul Balance Tweaks - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Rek Seven wrote: Prometheus Exenthal wrote: All of the strongest Confessor fits still fit... Obviously, because if they they didn't, it wouldn't be a fit. Let's move away from the "well my fit works" argument and answer me this; wh...
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2015.04.08 09:31:13
|
183. Sticky:[April] Confessor and Svipul Balance Tweaks - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: Kagura Nikon wrote: Nope. That is NOT how ccp works for YEARS. In the past yes, they used to follow the "let the players use their tools philosofy". But that stopped long ago, when they nerfed all e-war up to the poin...
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2015.04.08 09:30:24
|
184. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance Part 2 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
MeBiatch wrote: Kagura Nikon wrote: Nolak Ataru wrote: Took another system last night with domis, harpies, celestis, and dread fleets. Other side was a no-show Post-Entosis sov will be nothing but Ishtars and Domis and Huginns and Lokis. ...
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2015.04.07 11:22:15
|
185. Sticky:[April] Confessor and Svipul Balance Tweaks - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Inggroth wrote: Prometheus Exenthal wrote: The Svipul needs a lot of work. shaving off some more fitting resources and nuking 10mn afterburner agility (1mn can remain as-is IMO) would go a long way in my opinion, at least as first iterati...
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2015.04.07 11:18:53
|
186. Sticky:[April] Battlecruiser Warp Speed and Warp Rig Tweaks - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
James Baboli wrote: things I agree on general terms.... Another thing that may help a LOT BC and battleships is a reevaluation of buffer modules sizes. What that means? Right now the only plates used are 1600 on everything larger than a...
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2015.04.07 11:08:22
|
187. How CCP protect da Carebears - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
beakerax wrote: So you lost (at least) 26 identically fit pirate battleships, in highsec? Don't feel bad, OP. You blew up an incursion fleet. Technically... that is correct...
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2015.04.07 10:12:58
|
188. How CCP protect da Carebears - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Elenahina wrote: I'll be surprised if not only do you not get your ships back, but some of you don't get temp bans for "deliberately inducing server lag". It's a pretty well known fact that smartbombing large-ish groups of ships in high sec wi...
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2015.04.07 10:12:04
|
189. Fatigue & Improving the Black Ops Experience - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Toriessian wrote: I was one of the more vocal BLOPs folk when jump fatigue was introduced. Once the 50% fatigue bonus was given to BLOPS I was willing to give it a chance for awhile. I have now and its a very subpar experience. At most a fleet ...
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2015.04.07 10:07:07
|
190. Scooping loot using fleeted alts in hisec - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Rhamnousia Nosferatu wrote: So, I'd like to discuss and hopefully remove a mechanic commonly used in hisec, primarily but necessarily exclusively by gankers, in order to steal loot from wrecks while avoiding any (real) consequences. For the un...
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2015.04.07 10:05:23
|
191. Is assault frigates a bit underpowered? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
afkalt wrote: And with a 50% sig drop, I'd never fly anything else on a roam again, ever. Have you SEEN a dual MSAB hawk? THink my idea has more flavor and match the AF more. Immune to MWD shut down by scrams.
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2015.04.07 10:03:33
|
192. Fix the Hulk(ageddon) - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Extreme wrote: The hulk should had been the number 1 miner, at least it still is when you see the total costs for construction parts, but it got badly nerfed by poor cargohold. So for a few years now the Mackinaw has become the most populair mi...
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2015.04.07 10:02:43
|
193. Is assault frigates a bit underpowered? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
FireFrenzy wrote: have you seen harpy fleets recently? Harpies are in a special place because they have damage projection 10 times larger than most of the other assault frigates. That makes their role completely different.
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2015.04.07 10:01:31
|
194. Is assault frigates a bit underpowered? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
William Rokov wrote: Hi gyus! Several days ago we got huge discussion about t3 destroyers, HACs, assault frigates and their tier 1 analogs. During this discussion we noticed that assault frigates got a very special niche - they are best burner-...
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2015.04.07 10:00:34
|
195. Sticky:[April] Confessor and Svipul Balance Tweaks - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: Kagura Nikon wrote: The problem is that it makes more effect on making hard to use arties (the clear originalidea of the ship) than it makes har dusing 10mn ABs Which assumes that 10mn AB fits are the only problem...
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2015.04.07 09:58:01
|
196. Sticky:[April] Battlecruiser Warp Speed and Warp Rig Tweaks - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: Kagura Nikon wrote: Real eve is not like that. The MASSIVE acceleration advantage of gallente means they outpace minmatar EASILY at the start of the combat, and they can get tackle (and in tackle range they win, purel...
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2015.04.07 09:41:48
|
197. Sticky:[April] Battlecruiser Warp Speed and Warp Rig Tweaks - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Spugg Galdon wrote: lots and lots of talk in this thread about how useless CBCs are. The simple solution is to remove OGB's. Once OGB's are gone, have a look at how popular CBC's become. Yes, CBC's have other failings but these would only ...
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2015.04.07 09:37:52
|
198. Sticky:[April] Battlecruiser Warp Speed and Warp Rig Tweaks - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Well, It has been several years sicne last time I saw a BC field a command link. So why not drop that bonus, and put something else onits place? A small prop mod bonus for example... or an extra 10% resitance on the racia l resitance profile..
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2015.04.06 22:21:59
|
199. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance Part 2 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Reaver Glitterstim wrote: I don't see any reason to make capital ships have a longer duration. Sure, they're more difficult to shoot down, but they're also more difficult to get into position and a lot more valuable of a target. It's not like s...
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2015.04.06 14:25:22
|
200. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance Part 2 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nolak Ataru wrote: Took another system last night with domis, harpies, celestis, and dread fleets. Other side was a no-show Post-Entosis sov will be nothing but Ishtars and Domis and Huginns and Lokis. Drop drones + assist, turn on entosis, go ...
- by Kagura Nikon - at 2015.04.06 14:21:30
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |