Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Drone dmg vs small ships on sissi... - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Brigsby5987 oh no now your not an invincible ship that can keep someone tackled until somebody in an anti nano setup comes along and makes you run away. Fit a tank lol.
- by Kransthow - at 2008.10.19 05:31:00
|
2. For interested blaster ship pilots: patch changes vs. blaster ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Murkon Salesgirl So by your statement, the close range HAC when it meets a blaster BS should just run away as it won't have any chance even in its own operating range? Well lets see what exactly a close range hac is, we ha...
- by Kransthow - at 2008.10.19 05:03:00
|
3. For interested blaster ship pilots: patch changes vs. blaster ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Murkon Salesgirl That's wrong. What about all the cruisers that are designed for close range? Oh wait.. they use blasters, so they can die to BS. The "LOL TRACKING" is all about getting close and orbit hug them to evade gu...
- by Kransthow - at 2008.10.18 21:09:00
|
4. For interested blaster ship pilots: patch changes vs. blaster ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Zana Kito In terms of 1v1 scenarios. 1. Should a BS turret be able to track and hit webbed cruisers or below while they orbit to generate transversal? Close range battleships should mean one thing to everyone on the battl...
- by Kransthow - at 2008.10.18 10:54:00
|
5. Missile damage on Singularity: Feedback thread - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Johnster Edited by: Johnster on 18/10/2008 07:25:39 OMG. ***ANOTHER*** caldari nerf!!! On sisi a few days ago my cruise missiles couldn't even hit a blood raider battleship rat, I logged out in disgust and have not reall...
- by Kransthow - at 2008.10.18 09:34:00
|
6. Everything I read says Matar caps are the worst... - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
nag has problems with dps and tanking not sure about nigg i think it dosen't tank to well I don't fly the ships personally but this is what I hear about them =/
- by Kransthow - at 2008.09.26 02:44:00
|
7. For interested blaster ship pilots: patch changes vs. blaster ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
hmmm, blasters do suck now GOGOGO CCP STYLE PATCH: large blaster now have 1 radian/second tracking, medium 2, small 4 blasters now do 3x as much damage as before
- by Kransthow - at 2008.09.08 05:06:00
|
8. Speed Rebalanced: Feedback thread - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Kreeak Originally by: Andnowthenews Q. How many POS or POS modules have been destroyed with nano?. A. None, Capitals and battleships do that. It can be done with the right set of speed ships. It can be done wi...
- by Kransthow - at 2008.08.27 06:42:00
|
9. Definitive list of ship changes/problems - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Ship: Frigates Problem: Insta die in web range Suggested fix: Make webbers sig radius based
- by Kransthow - at 2008.08.26 03:50:00
|
10. Definitive list of problem MODULES - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Module: Target painters Problem: They suck Suggested fix: Anything target painted can be targeted by anyone even if ecm'd, damped, beyond targeting range etc.
- by Kransthow - at 2008.08.25 14:47:00
|
11. Nanos are popular because smaller hulls have no survivability - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Gamesguy My old neutron ranis hit 300+ easy. with what, 3 mfs? New sig in da werkz
- by Kransthow - at 2008.08.17 12:57:00
|
12. Dominix needs fixing too uber - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Shinzu Takigawa Edited by: Shinzu Takigawa on 29/05/2008 11:00:15 Actually it should be more than enough to take down a domi. Did I forget to mention I was also using 4 yes 4 ballistic control units tech 2 giving extra ...
- by Kransthow - at 2008.05.29 11:02:00
|
13. highend shield- vs highend armortanking aka crystals vs slaves - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
THEY ARE DIFFERENT, JUST ACCEPT IT
- by Kransthow - at 2008.03.23 12:47:00
|
14. Falcon/ECCM Imbalance - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
the caldari ewar ships just seem overpowered because all other forms of ewar suck ass. in my opinion they should do away with racial ewar and give all the recons bonuses to all types of ewar
- by Kransthow - at 2008.03.23 12:45:00
|
15. High Security space needs more effective security! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
poasting in yet another suicide ganking
- by Kransthow - at 2008.03.23 12:39:00
|
16. Drone Sentient Spawns - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
*drools at the thought of Sentient (Enter name of favourite module here)*
- by Kransthow - at 2008.03.23 12:37:00
|
17. In-Station Graphics - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I would like it if they scaled the hangars, who hasn't felt a little silly when theyre sitting in a frig in a ginormus hangar. The huge hangars only look good with Capital ships tbh, battleships barely pull it off. If you had a little garage thing...
- by Kransthow - at 2008.01.02 13:00:00
|
18. A Plea to Examine RSD Specialised Ships. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
/signed /signed /signed
- by Kransthow - at 2008.01.02 12:55:00
|
19. Fix Gallente recon (this is the least you can do) - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Kransthow on 10/12/2007 12:02:25 Don't forget the celestis
- by Kransthow - at 2007.12.10 12:02:00
|
20. A Plea to Examine RSD Specialised Ships. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Keep damps The same as they are on speced ships and nerf them on other ships CCP k thx bi
- by Kransthow - at 2007.11.20 03:47:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |