| Pages: [1] |
1. Lowsec fixed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
and here's an afterthought. I can't even GET to .0 for being ganked. I'm not AFK piloting - every jump is WTZ. The gang on the far side of the gate can lock, scramble and destroy me after I uncloak and before I finish aligning. enjoy the loot. N...
- by Massillon - at 2008.03.20 01:52:00
|
2. Lowsec fixed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Merin Ryskin Besides, lowsec really isn't that dangerous, IF you are willing to actually defend yourself instead of just whining on the forums. What I've proposed gives new opportunities to the players willing to take advant...
- by Massillon - at 2008.03.19 16:22:00
|
3. R.I.P. Arthur C. Clarke - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Rest in peace, Clarke. Another dead hero..
- by Massillon - at 2008.03.19 03:13:00
|
4. Lowsec fixed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Bronson Hughes Adjust the ratio of available ores. People have been mining in HiSec for years. Whole belts have been wiped out in Jita, Motsu, and other densely populated systems. Having the higher-end HiSec ores just stop r...
- by Massillon - at 2008.03.19 01:49:00
|
5. Lowsec fixed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Bellum Eternus Nine times out of ten pirates *want* to fight. All that will do is give them more chances to kill your cap ships. And we all know that's what carebears really want, their cap ships being blown up. Let'...
- by Massillon - at 2008.03.18 23:48:00
|
6. Lowsec fixed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Tressin Khiyne You sir, are a ninny. I know you are, but what am I? Contribute to the discussion, or go back to your elite pew pew.
- by Massillon - at 2008.03.18 23:17:00
|
7. Lowsec fixed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Thargat Doing stuff "better" in lowsec will only create more deflation. If CCP wanna do something they should nerf high sec minerals instead. Originally by: Massillon 5. Belts in systems with sec higher than 0.6 ...
- by Massillon - at 2008.03.18 23:12:00
|
8. Lowsec fixed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Dire Wraith To be honest, after getting blown up a couple of times, even after trying to be caution and looking around first in a shuttle and using the map, nothing (short of sweeping out the player pirates) will ever get me...
- by Massillon - at 2008.03.18 22:58:00
|
9. Lowsec fixed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
None of these are my ideas. They were posted in another thread today or yesterday, and I am collecting them here so they don't get washed out in the usual spume of bile and tears. Right now lowsec is crap because piracy has a different risk/rewar...
- by Massillon - at 2008.03.18 22:01:00
|
10. What is EVE's current top flaws, and how would you solve them? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
1. UI. There is no question in my mind that the EVE UI is terrible. Suck it up. Poach some of those amazing geeks currently doing their own work on the wow UI for free, move them out to Iceland, and open-source that beast. Properly done, this will...
- by Massillon - at 2008.03.13 14:55:00
|
11. Most Useless ship in EVE. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Falcon Troy Edited by: Falcon Troy on 07/03/2008 19:12:39 Yeah it's good for ice mining...while you train for the Retriever. So it's role is limited use to about a week. Then the Retriever pwns it. How much more than...
- by Massillon - at 2008.03.07 20:05:00
|
12. Most Useless ship in EVE. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Procurer, definitely. I think there is an existing role for the Procurer though: it's the cheapest route into the ice market. With a strictly T1 setup, how much would it cost to lose one? I'm betting far less than 5m, and guaranteed less than 1...
- by Massillon - at 2008.03.07 18:56:00
|
13. Target locking is cumbersome. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
CCP, why can't we bind a hotkey for target locking our current selection? Locking your target is perhaps the most vital combat function. Shouldn't it be at least as simple as activating a module? Similarly, why do I get a lag burst when I activ...
- by Massillon - at 2006.11.30 13:30:00
|
14. A modest push in the other direction - in EVE New Citizens Q&A [original thread]
Originally by: GC13 8/10 Very good effort, but the sarcasm wasn't laid on thick enough. In fact, the only cue I had was the sheer absurdity of the proposition. Heh heh. Well, using anything with "entitlement" in it would have been a d...
- by Massillon - at 2006.03.02 02:42:00
|
15. A modest push in the other direction - in EVE New Citizens Q&A [original thread]
Originally by: Dark Shikari Originally by: Reo Zan Actually what would be better would be that CCP could find some way to send a signal to your computer that would actually melt your hard drive and motherboard and reneder your comp...
- by Massillon - at 2006.03.01 23:44:00
|
16. A modest push in the other direction - in EVE New Citizens Q&A [original thread]
I've been lurking here for a while. I'm surprised that no one has seen the real problem until now. The real problem is that players are able to keep their skill points, no matter what. In a game whose most outstanding point is that PVP has real m...
- by Massillon - at 2006.03.01 22:57:00
|
17. The Solo Factor - in EVE New Citizens Q&A [original thread]
This game is like any other MMG in that the solo content is just barely enough to let you get a leg up in time to apply and be accepted in a corporation. Be ready to get bored in a month or two if you stay completely solo. The game's structure s...
- by Massillon - at 2006.01.23 18:08:00
|
18. Stupidity of CCP - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Stop playing EVE. 1. To do any PVP, one requires a supply train. The higher a level of PVP you undertake, the more supplies are required. Replacing a frigate is easy, but replacing a HAS kitted out with full tech2 gear and a complete set of impla...
- by Massillon - at 2005.08.16 01:34:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |