| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] |
101. Sticky:Attack frigate changes - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
John Nucleus wrote: Thinking out loud... I'd like to see an Amarr frigate specializing in energy neutralizer. Something tanky that neuts the crap of everything around it. With drones... like a mini curse, something along that line anyway. I k...
- by Mechael - at 2012.07.02 23:18:00
|
102. Mid. Range Hauler - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Haulers should come in all sizes. Every type of ship should come in all sizes. Small/Medium/Large Combat vessels, attack vessels, EWar, logi, haulers, miners ... the works.
- by Mechael - at 2012.07.02 22:20:00
|
103. mothership - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
imo, the carriers that we have already should be tweaked so that they no longer have fighters but instead act as mobile repair and refuel stations for other player's ships. Ability to dock inside them is a must. The way carriers are now is just s...
- by Mechael - at 2012.07.02 22:16:00
|
104. Remove local - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Aoyagi Haineko wrote: shooting rats That's the root of the problem, right there. Why would anyone in their right mind ever do that? PvE in EVE is such a big joke, it hurts.
- by Mechael - at 2012.07.02 22:03:00
|
105. A working corporation finder... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Seriously, corps and alliances need some more TLC.
- by Mechael - at 2012.07.02 21:59:00
|
106. Bring back L5 missions to high-sec, please! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Covert Kitty wrote: How about instead l4's are removed from hs as well and hs incursions get another nerf. Risk free isk should be very strictly limited. Hs pve content should be able to buy you an assault frig in about two hours, which ideall...
- by Mechael - at 2012.07.02 21:56:00
|
107. Sticky:Attack frigate changes - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Crellion wrote: Mechael wrote: Thelron wrote: Or, you know, they could go ahead and not screw up things that work about as well as anything else in the game. Ships aren't intended to be effective solely against their size grouping and hig...
- by Mechael - at 2012.06.30 12:13:00
|
108. Sticky:Attack frigate changes - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Thelron wrote: Or, you know, they could go ahead and not screw up things that work about as well as anything else in the game. Ships aren't intended to be effective solely against their size grouping and higher... generally if you're a frigate ...
- by Mechael - at 2012.06.29 23:55:00
|
109. Sticky:Attack frigate changes - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
The thing that confuses me here is that I would have assumed that Attack Vessels would be all about damage and speed (to close and keep range.) A tackler is more about EWar (specifically of the propulsion jamming variety) than anything else, and...
- by Mechael - at 2012.06.29 00:59:00
|
110. Sticky:Attack frigate changes - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Harvey James wrote: here's a question why do missile cruisers like caracal get a bonus to light missiles? when that is supposed to be a frigate weapon system which uses too much cpu btw especially RML's. When you look at turret cruisers they g...
- by Mechael - at 2012.06.29 00:46:00
|
111. Sticky:Attack frigate changes - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Benny Ohu wrote: e: But thinking about it, that's not really 'long range offensive', is it? :( I don't understand how that can be done when desties are around, which are so close in training and use the same guns. I'm nub I guess :P Dessies ...
- by Mechael - at 2012.06.29 00:40:00
|
112. My friend needs clothes... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
With corpse collecting having been one of EVE's most amazing features for so damned long, the "meat locker" idea just makes sense. Do it, CCP. After all, aren't you guys making some sort of sick and twisted vampire game at some point in the futur...
- by Mechael - at 2012.06.11 16:01:00
|
113. Ideas for new modules - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Anchorable missle silo construction platform - when you put the appropriate materials into it, it upgrades into a missile silo that will reach across the entire solar system to bombard enemy structures. Anchor it next to your sovereignty blockade ...
- by Mechael - at 2012.04.24 05:23:00
|
114. Ideas for new modules - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Anchorable mines, T2 versions that are cloaked. They'll sit there in space until someone gets within x distance, and then boom. Would ideally come in all 4 sizes (small, medium, large, extra large) and with a new ship type (possibly new Destroyer?...
- by Mechael - at 2012.04.24 05:18:00
|
115. If you want more people to mine... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Arcana Mortis wrote: Revamp mining completely. As it stands, mining is the most boring thing in a game that, community aside (and I do love my EVE, don't get me wrong) is pretty boring. Give us EXPLOSIONS. Give us SURPRISE ROIDS Give us EXP...
- by Mechael - at 2011.09.08 11:46:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |