Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
1. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
C-137 wrote: Crazy Vania wrote: A single carrier can only field 1 support drone at all time. No existing drone mechanics allow to scram subcapitals (only point). Are you sure you're a carrier pilot trying to argue from their perspective? ...
- by NaK'Lin - at 2016.06.23 14:14:53
|
2. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Fyt 284 wrote: Crazy Vania wrote: Are you sure you're a carrier pilot trying to argue from their perspective? You seem a little bit removed from reality :) He has admitted in this thread he is not a carrier pilot, and has frankly been unp...
- by NaK'Lin - at 2016.06.23 11:58:56
|
3. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Evelgrivion wrote: Morgaine Mighthammer wrote: while i agree that the old fighters would be better than the proposed changes, i still like the idea of making the heavy rocket attack something that you should actually think about when to use...
- by NaK'Lin - at 2016.06.23 02:47:28
|
4. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Miss 'Assassination' Cayman wrote: I find the nerf to light fighter salvo DPS a bit concerning. Reducing the alpha and application is a good move, but carriers will need at least as much DPS as they have now, if not more, to be viable without t...
- by NaK'Lin - at 2016.06.15 13:36:31
|
5. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Additionally, Bombers (Heavy Fighters) should SERIOUSLY not be scrammable by stuff other than Anti-fighters, still) They are already slow as hell, and of no real danger of anything but capital ships. There's no point in throwing Supercapitals anot...
- by NaK'Lin - at 2016.06.15 12:51:27
|
6. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Carriers outclassed by dreads for Capital vs Capital. /clap Carriers now less good at fighting subcaps in small numbers; need moar carriers. N+1 /clap Micro-gang nerds with a single interceptor will hold a carrier on grid for a good 5+ minutes e...
- by NaK'Lin - at 2016.06.15 12:22:50
|
7. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Skia Aumer wrote: Zenafar wrote: omg can't you just forbid using SB while NSA is active? So no more 2500 scanres and screw campers with ****** gate fits Chimera with NSA has 750 mm scan res. Incursus has 750 mm too. Do you think it's fine...
- by NaK'Lin - at 2016.06.10 23:26:20
|
8. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Linus Gorp wrote: It *is* Provi and ESPECIALLY Volt being super bad. Have you seen Horrible Third Party drop anywhere else? Every time they did, they got wrecked like the baddies they are. The reason that carrier died is on the carrier pilot ...
- by NaK'Lin - at 2016.06.10 18:17:05
|
9. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Skia Aumer wrote: Omfala Brinalle wrote: P.S.Other people have the same opinion .... Speak for yourself, alright? I dont think there should be any special case with NSA switching off SeBos or something like that. I also dont think a carrie...
- by NaK'Lin - at 2016.06.10 17:55:46
|
10. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Sister Bliss wrote: CCP Larrikin wrote: Hi M8s, With the 118.6 release, we're making some tweaks to a bunch of capital gameplay. We would love your feedback! As a first piece of feedback, I really urge you and CCP as a whole to invest i...
- by NaK'Lin - at 2016.06.10 15:53:05
|
11. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Skia Aumer wrote: Cala Wrynn wrote: I'm happy with the dread and fax ecm immunity, being jammed in your dread by a set of ec-300's is pretty devastating... And being jammed by the same EC-300 in a freaking Titan is not a big deal? You mu...
- by NaK'Lin - at 2016.06.10 14:23:57
|
12. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Cala Wrynn wrote: I'm happy with the dread and fax ecm immunity, being jammed in your dread by a set of ec-300's is pretty devastating... You've got a utility high, you know.... *hint hint*
- by NaK'Lin - at 2016.06.10 14:15:09
|
13. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Anthar Thebess wrote: NaK'Lin wrote: Anthar Thebess wrote: It was not about jamming carrier, but fighters. Griffin could jam all carrier fighters. CCP simply want to people keep in cruisers. Who would ever start to play eve to fly s...
- by NaK'Lin - at 2016.06.10 14:09:01
|
14. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Archeras Umangiar wrote: When pressing F3 and having in example 3 light fighters with the salvo and 2 long range heavy fighters with the bomb launcher, can we get only the salvo OR the bombs to launch? (maybe bombs to F4? or manual? or atleast ...
- by NaK'Lin - at 2016.06.10 14:00:56
|
15. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Anthar Thebess wrote: It was not about jamming carrier, but fighters. Griffin could jam all carrier fighters. CCP simply want to people keep in cruisers. Who would ever start to play eve to fly something more just a frigate or cruiser hull. ...
- by NaK'Lin - at 2016.06.10 13:56:28
|
16. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Jones Beach wrote: Empress Honeybadger wrote: CyberRaver wrote: Considering the hull and armour jump its a viable comparison, also the role is different for each one, a BLOPS is not meant to be a forward ship of the line, a HAC is Your...
- by NaK'Lin - at 2016.06.10 13:54:15
|
17. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Empress Honeybadger wrote: Because you never drop on solo carriers with a small fleet and I drop on them everyday. I would expect more accuracy from your posting then, please. in order to get a proper discussion forward, we shall stop having...
- by NaK'Lin - at 2016.06.10 13:53:14
|
18. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
quote=Empress Honeybadger] CyberRaver wrote: You are meant to jam the fighters **** nugget The carrier isnt the one you should be jamming but sure cry more, my salt powered carrier is loving the fuel So when you drop on a carrier, if the c...
- by NaK'Lin - at 2016.06.10 13:21:36
|
19. Sticky:[February] Force Auxiliary Skills - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
So, it is actually a bad solution. Personally I believe we should get all relevant SP refunded and simply allocate them into something and make a commitment. Alternatively, Just take each persons Tactical Logi Recon skill level and convert it int...
- by NaK'Lin - at 2016.02.09 09:34:42
|
20. First Scalding Pass Frig Thunder Dome - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I might actually show up for this in person and mark my comeback to active playing again... Hoping 100 nerds show up, ...
- by NaK'Lin - at 2015.11.24 04:44:52
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |