| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 |
101. [Retribution 1.1] Armor Tanking 2.0 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Bouh Revetoile wrote: X Gallentius wrote: Bouh Revetoile wrote: IMO, the biggest problem of armor tanking is that EWAR don't translate into EFT numbers... With active armor tanking you lose the mid slots to capacitor booster mods. Examp...
- by Nikuno - at 2013.03.02 18:38:00
|
102. New Eden Open Prizes at Risk? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
raven666wings wrote: Bottom line: You got scammed out of some PLEX and 10k USD by Eleet Pee Vee Pee small time tournament hosts/scammers on the interwebz. Question is what are you gonna do bout it Well I'm hoping that CCP was just so busy wi...
- by Nikuno - at 2013.03.02 08:11:00
|
103. Sticky:[Retribution Point Release] Combat Battlecruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Jonas Sukarala wrote: Nikuno wrote: Jonas Sukarala wrote: Its a shame CCP don't make the Tier 3 bc's(attack bc's) into a different category and then make some the combat bc's into attack bc's some them of them would really benefit from th...
- by Nikuno - at 2013.03.01 08:12:00
|
104. New Eden Open Prizes at Risk? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
16 business days and counting.
- by Nikuno - at 2013.02.28 22:12:00
|
105. Sticky:[Retribution Point Release] Combat Battlecruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Jonas Sukarala wrote: Its a shame CCP don't make the Tier 3 bc's(attack bc's) into a different category and then make some the combat bc's into attack bc's some them of them would really benefit from this like the brutix being active tank now t...
- by Nikuno - at 2013.02.28 22:10:00
|
106. [Retribution 1.1] Armor Tanking 2.0 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Jonas Sukarala wrote: TrouserDeagle wrote: Hopefully we'll see a fix for mandatory cap boosters when the battleships get redone (right?). like cap is an issue on battleships Cap is a massive issue for many battleships. All amarr and ga...
- by Nikuno - at 2013.02.28 22:05:00
|
107. New Eden Open Prizes at Risk? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP Dolan wrote: An announcement has been made here regarding the prizes for the New Eden Open. We at CCP are saddened by the closing of Own3d and the content they streamed to gamers worldwide will be greatly missed. We had partnered with t...
- by Nikuno - at 2013.02.26 17:38:00
|
108. Sticky:[Retribution Point Release] Combat Battlecruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nova Satar wrote: Typical CCP lol... New Brutix is out with it's revamped slots and new armour mods to compliment, yet this thread is still full of shield fits for it. So many ships with a bonus nobody cares about! I guess when the Typhoon is...
- by Nikuno - at 2013.02.25 18:24:00
|
109. Cap Batteries - Low Slot Module instead of Mid Sot Module - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Or double or triple the amount of capacitor they give, then it might be worth fitting one of the right size rather than encouraging more oversizing to make stuff work
- by Nikuno - at 2013.02.23 22:30:00
|
110. AAR = Devs Completely Shield Biased - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Paikis wrote: Ctzn Snips wrote: Can you explain to me how active armor tanking is more cap efficient than active shield tanking? I'll wait. Um, it uses less capacitor per unit of repaired armour than shield boosters do? Cos, y'know that...
- by Nikuno - at 2013.02.22 20:26:00
|
111. Question about the Warp Speed (WS-6xx) implants - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
As warp speed makes an infinitesimally small difference to the amount of time it takes to cross the majority of systems I'd strongly recommend getting a more useful implant. Current mechanics mean that for most systems (under say a warp of 80AU)...
- by Nikuno - at 2013.02.22 18:05:00
|
112. Sticky:[Retribution Point Release] Combat Battlecruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Well the brutix is a very nice ship, if you shield tank it. The armour tanking bonus continues to be a red herring. Anyone else tried it out?
- by Nikuno - at 2013.02.20 20:23:00
|
113. [Retribution 1.1] Armor Tanking 2.0 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Goldensaver wrote: Nevyn Auscent wrote: Hakan MacTrew wrote: I have often wondered, as armour is supposed to be about longevity and shield more about burst tanking, how is it that thre is a skill to make shield tanking easier on Cap usage...
- by Nikuno - at 2013.02.18 07:49:00
|
114. New king of the hill? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
And just look at how well Gallente are doing in that listing !!..... Oh, wait; no, they're still not
- by Nikuno - at 2013.02.18 07:39:00
|
115. Dev Blog: No Brakes - Ship Balancing in Retribution 1.1 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Nomistrav wrote: Suffice to say, my Dominix will probably still be using the ASB simply because I can dish out more Drone Damage Amplifiers with less risk involved in my Active Tanking. This is the expected outcome for a lot of armour repair...
- by Nikuno - at 2013.02.17 14:51:00
|
116. Dev Blog: No Brakes - Ship Balancing in Retribution 1.1 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Mund Richard wrote: Merouk Baas wrote: So, how much does nanite paste cost? How does that compare to the cost of cap booster charges for the ASB? How much do the blueprints for charges cost? How much do the blueprints for repair paste cost? ...
- by Nikuno - at 2013.02.16 11:30:00
|
117. Sticky:[Retribution Point Release] Combat Battlecruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Aglais wrote: Will people actually use the Ferox ever over a Brutix or Myrmidon? For any reason? Every time it needs a larger fleet. Or remote reps in small gang. Or using ASBs. Or pretty much most of the time except for the rare 1v1 situ...
- by Nikuno - at 2013.02.13 18:25:00
|
118. [Retribution 1.1] Armor Tanking 2.0 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Well, it's apparent that Fozzie is still reading these this thread and that for battlecruisers (from his recent responses) so it seems we can assume that the decisions have been made and what we see now is what we'll be getting. I have to admit to...
- by Nikuno - at 2013.02.11 13:01:00
|
119. Sticky:[Retribution Point Release] Combat Battlecruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Bouh Revetoile wrote: So, to finish with this kinetic moaning, let's have a loot at a Deimos (worst case scenario for a Drake) : With DCU+2EANM+explosive hardener, resist are as follow : em75,05;ki91,89;ex74,73;th83,78 So, the Drake will apply ...
- by Nikuno - at 2013.02.11 12:58:00
|
120. Ancillary Armor Reppers, using nanite repair paste. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The reason is that the AAR, unlike the ASB, is a very mediocre module. I mainly see it replacing the first rep in most setups in pve on the basis that they're predictable as to when you'll want the extra rep boost and can choose your timing to c...
- by Nikuno - at 2013.02.11 10:16:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |