| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 |
381. Why Nanos are NOT the problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The problem isn't stacking... the problem is BIG ships traveling too fast. They are far too overpowered compared to ceptors, frigs, destroyers, dictors. Quite possible the solution could be like the fix to 1mn, 10mn, and 100mn mwds... add overdriv...
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.06.25 20:47:00
|
382. Nano's aren't the problem, Stasis webifiers ARE! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Dominatus Crispus Edited by: Dominatus Crispus on 24/06/2008 20:14:20 Originally by: Pithecanthropus Of course I ... like tinkerbell wings and fancy warp stabbed ships. there i'm an idiot. :) You fail at li...
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.06.24 20:20:00
|
383. Where's all the amarr-Minmatar smack? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Tenuo It's because they aren't infested with f1-f8 headroller mission idiots who like to smack, fly caracal blobs and generally suck at playing. No... I call that FUN! If you wanna talk about sucking, see the various na...
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.06.24 20:17:00
|
384. What to do with my drake - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Drakes make good bait. --------------------------------- Pithecanthropus erectus, a name derived from Greek and Latin roots meaning upright ape-man.
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.06.24 20:12:00
|
385. [factional warfare] FW stat reveiw (permanent thread please sticky) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I just want to know what Caldari and Gallente are not alligned next to each other in the FW Militia screen. Who's the genius who put out the order they are listed? Just doesn't make sense to have Caldari and Gallente listed separated with Amarr ...
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.06.24 20:10:00
|
386. Nano's aren't the problem, Stasis webifiers ARE! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Haakelen Edited by: Haakelen on 24/06/2008 16:53:27 griefers took an edit to post that? had to make it bold? LOL --------------------------------- Pithecanthropus erectus, a name derived from Greek and Latin roots ...
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.06.24 16:55:00
|
387. Nano's aren't the problem, Stasis webifiers ARE! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Tenuo What about proving your so called "Veteran Status" by posting on your mains? Every single idiot on this forum can get an alt and post that he's a 5+ year veteran, I'm not buying it. Ask me if I care. Part of the ...
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.06.24 16:54:00
|
388. Nano's aren't the problem, Stasis webifiers ARE! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
When you weight the nuts and bolts of it all. Nano's simply are too overpowered. Even those who play nanos agree. Big ships traveling fast is flawed. I laugh at all the reasons people like Hack conjure up... pulling ridiculous arguments out of his...
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.06.24 16:51:00
|
389. Nano's aren't the problem, Stasis webifiers ARE! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: VenutianLoVe Pith makes very valid points Of course I do... I've played 5+ years. Haak is just that... a hack. There are people who actually play this game, and he has only witnessed about 10% of Eve. Stupid nanoweenies...
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.06.24 16:38:00
|
390. Nano's aren't the problem, Stasis webifiers ARE! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Grath Telkin So, not only are you now ****ed that ships go fast, but you don't like cloakers either? You heard it here first folks, the next mega whine session will be recons if they get this done. ITS NOT FAIR, I CAN'T S...
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.06.24 16:22:00
|
391. Nano's aren't the problem, Stasis webifiers ARE! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
1. blobbing is not a ship... its not unbalanced against anything. 2. ECM can't jam (or out run) a fleet. 3. All fleets are diverse, except a nano fleet. Using multiple diverse ships still doesn't get nano kills. that is why its flawed. you can...
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.06.24 16:20:00
|
392. Nano's aren't the problem, Stasis webifiers ARE! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Problem isn't the webs, its the fact that people tend to follow the least risk factor and the biggest i-win factor. The problem is the next muppet who joins the line of the already overpopulated nano fleets. Based on pure incurred damage, speed t...
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.06.24 15:57:00
|
393. The Problem With Nanos - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The problem is nano's are weenies. This game promotes weenieisms. --------------------------------- Pithecanthropus erectus, a name derived from Greek and Latin roots meaning upright ape-man.
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.06.23 22:33:00
|
394. Confessions from a Nano Pilot - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Pithecanthropus on 23/06/2008 22:31:34 Simple... nano pilots are selfish ego maniacs, while all others just want what is best and pure for this game. Anyone can see they are unbalanced and overpowered. Not only can you nano, but you...
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.06.23 22:31:00
|
395. To the Caldari wussies in Nourv - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Gut Punch Try again. Just yesterday, a gallente fleet jumped into numberically superior caldari force in Old Man Star who had drones out. Results can be found here . In fact, the only people that ran were the caldari who b...
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.06.23 22:25:00
|
396. Nano Counters (yes it can be done!) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Bottom line... nano fleets are made to gank 1 or 2 players. To me that is not pvp, that's a grief fest with chestpoppers looking for an ego trip. --------------------------------- Pithecanthropus erectus, a name derived from Greek and Latin roots ...
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.06.23 22:19:00
|
397. Nano Counters (yes it can be done!) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Pithecanthropus on 23/06/2008 22:08:59 Originally by: Psychotic Turtle Once a nano nerf would be implemented, what would you say to all the people that spent months on end training to fly these ships? I tell them toug...
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.06.23 22:09:00
|
398. Lets just vote on it... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Y --------------------------------- Pithecanthropus erectus, a name derived from Greek and Latin roots meaning upright ape-man.
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.06.23 19:12:00
|
399. To the Caldari wussies in Nourv - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Cardinal Payne Sounds to me like the Caldari played their usual cautious way. And the Gallente their usual flamboyant way. In terms of ISK I am sure the Caldari are ahead. But I tip my hat to the Gallente fleet for having t...
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.06.23 19:07:00
|
400. Could a new T1 cruiser fix things? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nano's are broken. Big ships going fast is a huge flaw in the game. What CCP needs is to instate an accelerated max speed per ship. The faster you fly over that speed, your structure should start taking damage. Too much damage, and POP! The faste...
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.06.23 16:42:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |