| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 20 30 |
141. Corps side steping FW in attemps to effect it's outcome. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Farrqua Originally by: Pithecanthropus Originally by: Farrqua Criss cross wars? Corps are in criss cross wars all of the time. And most of your alliances have two three or four different wars happening daily....
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.08.19 17:21:00
|
142. Corps side steping FW in attemps to effect it's outcome. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Rutger Centemus Wait, let me get this straight - someone that has been in a Matari npc-corp for his entire eve-career is arguing to change the FW- and wardecsystems over an alleged 'exploit' by an RP-alliance, which is figh...
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.08.19 17:20:00
|
143. Corps side steping FW in attemps to effect it's outcome. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Jonathan Swift Originally by: Victoria Ehr No Jade, Jericho Fraction is too gutless and lazy to join faction warfare, bunch forum trolls i say. Yeah So, the Militia you want us to join, while maintaing our RP id...
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.08.19 17:09:00
|
144. Corps side steping FW in attemps to effect it's outcome. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Farrqua Criss cross wars? Corps are in criss cross wars all of the time. And most of your alliances have two three or four different wars happening daily. What makes FW different and a special case than everyone else? If ...
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.08.19 17:09:00
|
145. Corps side steping FW in attemps to effect it's outcome. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Just cuz SF "claims" they never retreat to Gals space, doesn't mean the war deccing is still not currently flawed. Make "claims" all you want, but the bottom line is it's still open for other corps to do it... they have done it... more will do it....
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.08.19 16:53:00
|
146. Corps side steping FW in attemps to effect it's outcome. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Kovid I don't know of any Caldari feet chasing -SF- ever . Odd... so when you all hugged that station, you were just painting each other's toe nails?
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.08.18 20:59:00
|
147. Corps side steping FW in attemps to effect it's outcome. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Xeronn TBQFH because killing those hoardes of t1 caracal nubs yelds a great chanche of killing and hopefully either making whiners like yourself see what eve is all about or make them go away as soon as posible...that in re...
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.08.18 20:55:00
|
148. Corps side steping FW in attemps to effect it's outcome. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Pithecanthropus on 18/08/2008 19:35:09 Originally by: Cassandra Valieries - SF are inflicting damage on the Caldari faction. Serious damage since they got their own whine thread... no, its just when you have an alliance ...
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.08.18 19:35:00
|
149. Corps side steping FW in attemps to effect it's outcome. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Roy Batty68 If SF is whining about the "no alliances in FW" topic, that would be... hmmm... yep, a different topic. And yes, they can use the tools in place as well. I'm equal opportunity on that front. But nice try on the...
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.08.17 01:56:00
|
150. AFK Cloaking, Really? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
If you can't cloak and monitor your computer, playing Eve is far too complicated for you. What you are all calling a nerf to cloaks, is simply an assurance that you are playing. If you can't do that.... OMFG, leave. ------------------------------...
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.08.17 01:34:00
|
151. Corps side steping FW in attemps to effect it's outcome. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Roy Batty68 This all reeks a bit of the usual, "waaah, I'm not comfortable! CCP make me comfortable!" when players already have the tools to solve their own issues. If I'm not mistaken, SF wants alliances to join FW.....
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.08.17 01:19:00
|
152. Corps side steping FW in attemps to effect it's outcome. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Its a simple solution... instead of having the multiple wars cross with multiple scenarios, let the corp that is getting war decced inside a militia chose the latest war's scenario. They can either... 1. Promote the war into a full militia war. ...
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.08.17 01:12:00
|
153. Drinking Games On Vent - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Have everyone get in a bs with small turrets and std launchers and play a 50/50 war. --------------------------------- Pithecanthropus erectus, a name derived from Greek and Latin roots meaning upright ape-man.
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.08.15 21:15:00
|
154. CSM: How they can gain confidence and respect from the Eve community. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I think CCP could add to that "advert" which pop-ups every month or so on your login screen... saying it'll only show once... and utilize it for some generic voting on player accounts. I agree the CSM is dabbling in issues that are designed for t...
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.08.15 21:09:00
|
155. Corps side steping FW in attemps to effect it's outcome. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Garreck I'm sorry you have such a closed-minded view on a game of such scope. I'm not closed-mined. I'm in the militia. I haven't seen anything that would make SF's actions hinder the movement of what Caldari has done, i...
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.08.15 20:47:00
|
156. Corps side steping FW in attemps to effect it's outcome. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: SurrenderMonkey This isn't a problem and there really isn't anything wrong with it. They're fighting a private war with a private corporation that happens to also be in a militia. That's not really the navy's problem, regar...
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.08.15 20:27:00
|
157. Corps side steping FW in attemps to effect it's outcome. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Pithecanthropus on 15/08/2008 20:08:53 Originally by: Rhatar Khurin Factional naviesd attacking those who have wardecced is a ghastly idea. It's just gonna make loads of carebear corps join up with the FW and get added suppo...
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.08.15 20:08:00
|
158. Corps side steping FW in attemps to effect it's outcome. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: SurrenderMonkey You mostly just seem to be crying about other people not playing the way you want them to. LOL... no, I'm picking on them for playing their lame style. I'm debating whether or not CCP needs to look into ...
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.08.15 19:55:00
|
159. not sure how many people know about this but . . . - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cool --------------------------------- Pithecanthropus erectus, a name derived from Greek and Latin roots meaning upright ape-man.
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.08.15 19:46:00
|
160. [IDEA] How to fix the local debate... - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
I actually don't mind local myself, I'm just trying to find something to settle the crowds. I think a change could make some new interesting battles, only because I've seen too many failed attempts at good fights when local changes and the ****roa...
- by Pithecanthropus - at 2008.08.15 19:43:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 20 30 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |