| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Loss of History and Citadels - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Well, in that german language Forum were this: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=457283&find=unread
To make it short, i want the Outposts to be just an warpable Site like "The Bonfire" or some like that. In it, just...
- by Razefummel - at 2016.03.25 01:26:29
|
2. We want your corp little things! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
tl;dr First of all: Role and Title Management ---> Redo it plz. Second one: Lockingvotes: Why is it impossible to Lockdown ALL BPO-¦s/Assets with ONE Vote? Thats an Pain in the Ass if you want to relocate 2000 BPO-¦s for example... POS...
- by Razefummel - at 2015.01.04 05:06:14
|
3. CCP... Mystery of the Eve "Mystery code" ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
If someone grants me a whish for my Mystery Code... I want just my old Hairstyle back in wich i started my Journey a couple of Years ago... an propper Beard and Eybrows would be fine too... Maybe next year... Regards Razefummel *EDIT*...
- by Razefummel - at 2014.12.28 03:14:27
|
4. Thera not pve friendly! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
At last the OP and his friends didn-¦t payed for the new AL-Clones at all... so where is the Problem here?.
- by Razefummel - at 2014.12.11 00:51:47
|
5. Sticky:Dev Blog: The ETC is Dead, Long Live the PLEX Activation Code! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Well... whats with the Buddyinvite Rewards btw.? If an Player today activates his Account directly with an ETC in the Accountmanagement, the Buddy will get an Plex as Option afaik. If an Player activates his Account with an PLEX the Buddy wil get...
- by Razefummel - at 2014.05.25 00:06:00
|
6. Jester Trek Latest Blog - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Prince Kobol wrote: Razefummel wrote: Just a little thing from a Carebear like me: We read the EULA and ToS. After that we will see that scamming ist ALLOWED. Than we will see if this Soundcloud file is an case of harrasement or not. IF it...
- by Razefummel - at 2014.03.27 16:43:00
|
7. Jester Trek Latest Blog - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Just a little thing from a Carebear like me: We read the EULA and ToS. After that we will see that scamming ist ALLOWED. Than we will see if this Soundcloud file is an case of harrasement or not. IF it is --> Permaban IF it-¦s NOT --> Not...
- by Razefummel - at 2014.03.27 16:14:00
|
8. Second weapon system Marauders for the factions - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I think that an second Weaponsystem for Marauders and Blackops would be nice. Just to get it straight, if CCP rebalanced Ships so that we got 2 Weaponsystems for each Race so why dont get this completly in Line for all Ships of an single Race ev...
- by Razefummel - at 2014.03.10 22:17:00
|
9. Sticky:[Winter] Marauder rebalancing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Maybe this incredible Idea was from "CCP EA" because EA was known for its perfectly balanced Game Mechanics and Units in their Games... who knows? I don-¦t like the Idea of the "Cynobaiting Highsec-Dreads" witch is presented here...
- by Razefummel - at 2013.09.01 21:46:00
|
10. Sticky:[Winter] Marauder rebalancing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Would someone PLEASE explain where this change has something comon with balancing ? Just give the Marauder Class Battleships more Sensorstreingh and the PvP-Balancing is absolutly done. just saying. Greetings Raze
- by Razefummel - at 2013.09.01 18:38:00
|
11. Sticky:[Odyssey 1.1] Tech 1 Industrials, Round 2 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
tl:dr (whole Threadnought) 2 questions wich i have atm... 1. Why renaming an Group of Ships witch have almost the same Design, ecept of the length, and wich is the Reason (probably) it was consecutively numbered ? 2. Why don-¦t just give all Ra...
- by Razefummel - at 2013.07.18 20:38:00
|
12. Multiboxingsoftware... Y ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ranger 1 wrote: I really don't think we need another thread to make people who don't understand the fundamental differences between bots and multibox software look foolish, the existing threadnaught is doing that remarkably well. There ARE d...
- by Razefummel - at 2013.03.06 20:32:00
|
13. Multiboxingsoftware... Y ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Razefummel wrote: Thats ridiculous. No it's not. If you insist that GÇ£automationGÇ¥ has nothing to do with actual automation and with the control being reliant on some piece of software, then mouse drivers most certainly qua...
- by Razefummel - at 2013.03.06 19:26:00
|
14. Multiboxingsoftware... Y ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Arduemont wrote: ... By that logic one person using one ship is having their character automated. Your not moving the ship, the driver software for your mouse is converting it into information that the Eve client can use. Without that software...
- by Razefummel - at 2013.03.06 18:29:00
|
15. Multiboxingsoftware... Y ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: ... No, the point is that the difference makes no difference. ... Is my english realy that bad or is it just nonsense? Tippia wrote: ... What matters is if they're automated or not, and they aren't. It's as simple as that. ...
- by Razefummel - at 2013.03.06 17:21:00
|
16. Multiboxingsoftware... Y ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: ... Quote: But your Argumentation here is that you have ONE Button with that you are able to ring at 20 other Houses as well if you push the Button at Number 1 in Street instead of ringing at everyone of them. No, he's argume...
- by Razefummel - at 2013.03.06 17:10:00
|
17. Multiboxingsoftware... Y ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
GreenSeed wrote: ... now i know that different languages can lead to slightly different concepts, that's why clarification is often needed when translating. but even so, automation has a strict definition on all languages, that cannot be expand...
- by Razefummel - at 2013.03.06 04:15:00
|
18. Multiboxingsoftware... Y ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mallak Azaria wrote: ... You can argue that their income potential is higher but effective income remains the same as a solo player, & teamwork between an equal amount of people will always perform better than the ISboxer. You really bel...
- by Razefummel - at 2013.03.06 03:02:00
|
19. Multiboxingsoftware... Y ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mallak Azaria wrote: Razefummel wrote: Without that Software they wouldn-¦t do neither. Many people multibox just fine with out software, so yes, those accounts can in fact perform actions with out software. I never sayed that multibo...
- by Razefummel - at 2013.03.06 02:31:00
|
20. Multiboxingsoftware... Y ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Galenwade wrote: ... A pure bot accelerates the gaining of items in the fact it never has to log off . if a bot mines with 20 accounts for 24 hours it will make X amount of isk If a player runs duplication programs for 12 hours it will make ...
- by Razefummel - at 2013.03.06 02:11:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |