| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
1. Questions about Salvage drones and their operation - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Did anyone try the salvage drones AI, range wise? If i pull 10 wrecks close to noctis, and a few stay at 40-50km, will they primarily salvage close ones till they run out, or will they pull a CCP AI and go and salvage a 50km away wreck for reason...
- by Sellendis - at 2012.12.04 09:01:00
|
2. ANY response from CCP on these pathetic explosion effects? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Same with all features that were crap, 90% of comments on it are how bad it is. 10% are usual trolls or patented asskissers. Even missile effects aren't that good, they just make a bit of a flare and smoke, from HAMs to Cruises and Torps, there ...
- by Sellendis - at 2012.12.04 08:49:00
|
3. Explosion feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Bienator II wrote: Sellendis wrote: The new effect is....plane and simply....crap. A titan blew up, a ship of 15km size, and it makes a "fart" in space. No shockwave to be seen, no big flash of light, no orgasmic sense of satisfaction when ...
- by Sellendis - at 2012.11.14 20:32:00
|
4. Explosion feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
The new effect is....plane and simply....crap. A titan blew up, a ship of 15km size, and it makes a "fart" in space. No shockwave to be seen, no big flash of light, no orgasmic sense of satisfaction when you kill that monstrosity. This effect lo...
- by Sellendis - at 2012.11.14 17:02:00
|
5. two small tweaks i'd like to see implemented... - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
CCP Sisyphus wrote: bonkerss wrote: 1 - Can we please have the possibility to move the damage (and tactical) notification pop-up, anywhere on the screen? 2 - On directional scanner: instead of ''Use active overview settings'' can we have ''U...
- by Sellendis - at 2012.11.14 16:56:00
|
6. Agent mission panel hud - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
+1 So far mission HUD does nothing i cant find in journal or RMB in space and warp to destination. For each mission to highlight location, complete yes/no would be better. Dropdown menu is ok, but nothing groundbreaking.
- by Sellendis - at 2012.08.07 07:00:00
|
7. Machariel downsized to 1400 meters is a joke!!! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Since i hardly think they will listen to community for once, i took a crapload of pictures. From time when Machariel was most impressive looking BS, no one forgets first time they see one on undock. Usually in a small frigate, but then the sense...
- by Sellendis - at 2012.07.25 11:08:00
|
8. FLORENCE The late summer release is on Sisi -Changes list - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Noriko Mai wrote: New Feature: Expired missions remain in journal and you have to remove them manual without the option to remove them... You can only quit the expired mission and lose standing. Answer to my Bug report: "The problem you hav...
- by Sellendis - at 2012.07.24 08:29:00
|
9. Machariel downsized to 1400 meters is a joke!!! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Correct, downsizing the Mach was pointless. Archon is bigger than Wyvren and almost same size as Nxy, and thats a carrier we are talking about. Carriers need to get bigger, not BS to get smaller.
- by Sellendis - at 2012.07.23 14:32:00
|
10. Machariel downsized to 1400 meters is a joke!!! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
James Amril-Kesh wrote: Sellendis wrote: Sig sizes and weight aside, titans should then be ~30km, SC 10-13km, and carriers around at least twice the current size to get any sense of scale. I don't think titans need to double in size (maybe...
- by Sellendis - at 2012.07.20 09:05:00
|
11. Machariel downsized to 1400 meters is a joke!!! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I agree, Mach was big, but it should remain the biggest BS in the game. Its made from Jove desighs, so its advanced tech somewhat. Big, fast and agile. Seeing Mach in action next to other ships is awesome, now resized its like all other BSs, not...
- by Sellendis - at 2012.07.20 08:47:00
|
12. FLORENCE The late summer release is on Sisi -Changes list - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Machariel downsized to 1.4km, i think it was 1.9km before Apoc is now the biggest BS with 1.5km in length, few meters bigger than Hyperion. Damn this patch :)
- by Sellendis - at 2012.07.12 18:09:00
|
13. Insane FPS drop with missiles - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Rrama Ratamnim wrote: It is a brilliant answer, stop being a tard he said they are working to find what is causing it, and to fix it. As the GPU particles is a new feature the fact that you have to disable it isn't like its some huge change fr...
- by Sellendis - at 2012.06.20 16:41:00
|
14. Insane FPS drop with missiles - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Brilliant answer, honestly. From noticeable FPS drop on TQ it goes to insane fps drop on SISI, and best advice is to disable GPU particles. How about finding whats wrong and making it work, or at least rollback to TQ missiles setting that didnt ...
- by Sellendis - at 2012.06.20 14:53:00
|
15. Yet another inventory post that no one will read - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
+1 Sucks plain and simple. Explained in multiple posts, documented and got a video. Promptly ignored by CCP.
- by Sellendis - at 2012.06.18 18:05:00
|
16. Insane FPS drop with missiles - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Its reported already, we are just commenting.
- by Sellendis - at 2012.06.18 15:25:00
|
17. Insane FPS drop with missiles - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Ichabod Raffreider wrote: Jumping into a belt on TQ with my ATI 5870 cripples my fps without even firing missiles. Please CCP make ATI cards work a little bit better can't really afford anything new at the moment. Shadows on high maybe?
- by Sellendis - at 2012.06.18 11:09:00
|
18. Insane FPS drop with missiles - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Tested v-sync, its not it. With interval imd. i get around 130 fps, Gpu particles on and drops to 30-35. Interval def. 60 fps drops to 30-35. So if other ati card works without issues, and TQ doesn't have this problem.... drivers maybe? I am ru...
- by Sellendis - at 2012.06.17 07:10:00
|
19. Insane FPS drop with missiles - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
@Ribikoka Tnx for confirmation, vastly superior CPU takes that possible issue from the list. So ATI or CCP optimization is at fault. We only need someone with a nVidia to confirm or deny the issue.
- by Sellendis - at 2012.06.16 09:53:00
|
20. Insane FPS drop with missiles - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Same ship, same asteroid belt, same detail options options. Test rig: E6500 4gb ram Ati 6850 Win7 x64 On TQ, 50-60 fps. On Sisi, 30 fps. Explanation: On TQ framerate drops with the amount of missiles on screen, trails, smoke and shock-wave effe...
- by Sellendis - at 2012.06.16 08:46:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |