| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
21. Sticky:New dev blog: Factional Warfare overhaul - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Hormus wrote: Datacores is the main source of price difference between T2 BPO and T2 BPC manufactured items. If datacores get more expensive, ppl that manufacture with invention will have to increase prices - but those with T2 BPO's are not aff...
- by SigmaPi - at 2012.05.13 02:49:00
|
22. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Yuri Intaki wrote: Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: You just made some developer very happy Working as intended. So you admit that you never wanted to stop station lock-out after all and were always biased for your own side? that is obvious...
- by SigmaPi - at 2012.05.10 10:27:00
|
23. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Hrett wrote: Oh, and can someone please explain to me WTF a datacore is, and why they are important? It appears I should be buying some soon. they are used for invention - it's a minor cost in the grand scheme of the invention process and th...
- by SigmaPi - at 2012.05.10 01:09:00
|
24. Sticky:New dev blog: Factional Warfare overhaul - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Mirei Jun wrote: Really great changes, overall. I was happy to see the idea of "diminishing returns" being mentioned in the blog. However, one major difference between FW and null sec should be incentives to join the losing side. Basicall...
- by SigmaPi - at 2012.05.09 23:36:00
|
25. Sticky:New dev blog: Factional Warfare overhaul - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I'm kidna wondering how many of these RP/Datacore whiners actually use them in invention... I do invention all the time (primary source of income) and datacores are BY FAR the lowest price impact in the process.
- by SigmaPi - at 2012.05.09 23:34:00
|
26. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
RougeOperator wrote: It should not go live until people have tested it thoroughly on sisi sigma. But they are steamrolling this crap out without much testing. Once something is implemented its hard to take it back. Thats the problem. Also...
- by SigmaPi - at 2012.05.09 23:26:00
|
27. Thinking about checking out FW again with the upcoming changes - a few questions. - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
We have jumpclones in gal/cal land - it's much more busy (especially with neutrals) than the min/amarr area ever will be. There is just so much more access on that side than on this side, but meh. Cearain nailed most of this stuff, I'd say. We (t...
- by SigmaPi - at 2012.05.09 23:19:00
|
28. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
RougeOperator wrote: Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: The long-awaited Dev Blog is up!! http://community.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=28659 ... Maybe its just me but I tend to think the goal should be to make gameplay interesti...
- by SigmaPi - at 2012.05.09 23:06:00
|
29. Keeping FW corp recruitment going -- advice? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Once you get a critical mass of people with good standings and as people run the lvl 4 missions, it becomes less and less of a problem. We've got about 40 people and all of them have pretty solid standings. That being said though, it sure was a pr...
- by SigmaPi - at 2012.05.08 22:56:00
|
30. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Amarrian Slavetrader wrote: Deen Wispa wrote: People should take this poll that Susan has set up. I'd like to see more quantifiable numbers rather than heresy Yea, because a website poll is scientifically valid and provides a representati...
- by SigmaPi - at 2012.05.07 23:41:00
|
31. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
I'd rather just shoot them myself, tbh.
- by SigmaPi - at 2012.05.07 12:07:00
|
32. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Hidden Snake wrote: Btw ccp did great job with crucible and they are going to masive fallback with inferno. Couldn't disagree more. Just because there is one item (albeit a big item) that people don't agree on, the vast majority of the chan...
- by SigmaPi - at 2012.05.07 11:36:00
|
33. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Almity wrote: When you plex now you need three different ship sizes. When you fight over systems people die, they use over heat, they take damage. This is not 0.0. We don't go in, hit a structure and leave. We have to stay and grind for hours ...
- by SigmaPi - at 2012.05.06 17:16:00
|
34. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
the amarr are perfectly capable of getting a blob together and doing anything they want. the difference is that we've stuck with (and worked) the grind much harder than them. On the numbers front, the two sides are actually very close, and in qual...
- by SigmaPi - at 2012.05.06 01:51:00
|
35. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Shalee Lianne wrote: lol all the Gallente and Minmatar think it's a bad idea to reset Sov after Inferno for FW. Jeeze, wonder why that is. Because we've put in effort and the others havent?
- by SigmaPi - at 2012.05.05 03:57:00
|
36. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
I'm glad to see there are still people out there stupid enough to think being forced to use neutral alts and/or being forced to quit the very game mechanic that's being 'updated' is a good idea. Please don't breed.
- by SigmaPi - at 2012.05.03 01:23:00
|
37. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Vyktor Abyss wrote: Removal of docking rights is great. War should have consequences. And remember; removing docking rights does not stop you contracting stuff, neither does it stop you using an alt to grab stuff.... OR... *shock horror* dropp...
- by SigmaPi - at 2012.05.03 00:42:00
|
38. Bring FALCON for a frigate 3v1... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Muad 'dib wrote: as much as i hate you beasty (and i know you know i do :P) that sucks, but it is minnies and they bring falcons to frig fights because they simply need to, or they would all die and be on the forum whining about how over powere...
- by SigmaPi - at 2012.04.22 21:52:00
|
39. Bring FALCON for a frigate 3v1... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
BeastlyRage wrote: Khanh'rhh wrote: You re-agressed with your buffer nearly bust, fully aware that there was a falcon on the field, and somehow it's the other guys fault you lost? Are you implying that if I didn't agress I would have live...
- by SigmaPi - at 2012.04.22 01:23:00
|
40. Bring FALCON for a frigate 3v1... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
BeastlyRage wrote: Oxylan wrote: i dont blame pirates they got right to use falcon, even tytan if they want.. Thats why we can't have nice things Oxylan wrote: I can blame only my self because i dont use anty ecm modules. Can't ECC...
- by SigmaPi - at 2012.04.22 01:20:00
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |