| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
21. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Starrakatt wrote: Jenn aSide wrote: Beast of Revelations wrote: What a tragedy. I'm sure you think you should have gotten out with no losses, and should have been able to take him on with even less than a small gang. As for me, my BS wa...
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.16 15:56:14
|
22. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Beast of Revelations wrote: *Snipped for brevity* Also, if someone who is familiar would present a history of the balance of these things over the years, and the reasons for various changes over time, I'd be interested in hearing it. Hey B...
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.16 14:09:49
|
23. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The Tigress wrote: Man as a PvPer who uses mainly battleships and nothing else, in solo sometimes 2-3 man gangs you lot make me sick, they do perfectly fine just learn to Fly them correctly christ... Looking at your first page on Zkill you ar...
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.15 17:13:10
|
24. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Korhaka wrote: In the real world, there is a reason why we don't use battleships anymore. Why make this huge expensive battleship when any smaller ship can just launch a missile through the side and sink it just as easily. It is reasonable to e...
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.15 08:36:20
|
25. Thoughts on improving the game - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mark Marconi wrote: xxxTRUSTxxx wrote: Mark Marconi wrote: Given that CCP has taken the step of going to free to play, I see nothing wrong in a more PvE server. That way the PvP die hards can stay on tranquillity and those who want a c...
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.14 13:39:15
|
26. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Steffles wrote: "We" as in just you. Everyone in this thread says they are overpowered. CCP says they are overpowered. So yea, its just you. Steffles wrote: You gave no actual argument basically because you don't have...
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.14 13:30:47
|
27. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Steffles wrote: Nah not really. The onyx can get a battleship tank. Its a cruiser. The Eagle can get a battleship tank its a cruiser. Battlecruisers can get battleship tanks, actually as I demonstrated they get a hell of a lo...
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.14 02:50:17
|
28. Thoughts on improving the game - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Malcanis wrote: Mark Marconi wrote: Black Pedro wrote: Mark Marconi wrote: Amazing, the same people who argue for the safety of gankers are the same people who argue against a more PvE based server. Yes on a more PvE based server plex...
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.13 13:02:25
|
29. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Steffles wrote: They're not pocket battleships. As I've demonstrated they are in line with HP of battle cruisers , interdiction cruisers and some of the heavy assault cruisers and command ships which are also cruisers . ...
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.13 10:58:26
|
30. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Zakks wrote: Command ships are not cruisers Battle cruiser - cruiser fitting and cruiser mods. They are more cruiser than battleship.
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.13 06:05:19
|
31. Thoughts on improving the game - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
xxxTRUSTxxx wrote: Steffles wrote: In regards to it going against everything EvE is supposed to be about - read this , you're clearly wrong. Here's a lil image to back up my earlier assertion that there are more pve'rs vs pvp'rs. This ...
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.13 00:25:54
|
32. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Steffles wrote: The reason nobody is flying them is because there is no T3C emergency and there is no need to have 150k ehp cruisers to counter your fantasy of the T3C emergency. We dont want 130k ehp cruisers to counter ...
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.13 00:19:50
|
33. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Steffles wrote: 600 dps. It fields 5 med drones. That get left behind with the first tactical warp. Steffles wrote: Heres 3 more for you. Damnation - 190k ehp (more than both your Prot and Battleship), 240k ehp i...
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.12 22:30:45
|
34. Thoughts on improving the game - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jagd Wilde wrote: Alastair Ormand wrote: Jagd Wilde wrote: Yup, another one. So OP, Did you not notice the, like, hundred other carebear opinions on this very same subject? All with the same conclusion? There's nothing new here but the ...
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.12 20:48:23
|
35. Thoughts on improving the game - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Teckos Pech wrote: Steffles wrote: I'd be happy with a dev blog that says "We forgot that High Security Space was supposed to be quite safe. Pirating in highsec is now difficult. Go to low sec or null if you want to pirate". Okay and? H...
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.12 20:32:05
|
36. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
600 dps. It fields 5 med drones. Heres 2 more for you. Damnation - 190k ehp (more than both your Prot and Battleship), 220k ehp if you add a links. Fully cap stable with everything running. 500dps. Selectable ammo type. Murders the Proteus wit...
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.12 19:53:18
|
37. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
575 Prot vs 609 Brutix - It has more dps. Brutix can fit both rails AND blasters. The Proteus is a T3 Cruiser. Not a cruiser. The issue is not one of class size its one of "Does the Proteus have a counter within reasonable range in terms of skil...
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.12 17:59:43
|
38. Thoughts on improving the game - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Malcanis wrote: Steffles wrote: Lan Wang wrote: Infinity Ziona, lets do some real talk here for a moment... After looking at your killboard you seem to be a hypocrite. you have 13+ kills of pve/highsec players on your killboard including...
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.12 15:36:05
|
39. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Violet Hurst wrote: Looks interesting, could you please post the fits you used for that graph? Already have.
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.12 12:06:01
|
40. Thoughts on improving the game - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
xxxTRUSTxxx wrote: Steffles wrote: Eve is a PvP & PvE game. EvE was originally designed so that highsec was "Quite Safe", the PvE part of the game. It was supposed to be "difficult" to pirate in high-sec. That was the whole point of hi...
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.12 08:01:20
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |