| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
1. Anti-Alpha Mechinism - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Brokk Witgenstein wrote: -1. This idea reeks to high heavens; so, when I'm cruising around in my Typhoon, you not only need tackle to actually grab stuff, more tackle or paint to mitigate the way large weapons apply to smaller targets, but now...
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.21 06:24:02
|
2. Anti-Alpha Mechinism - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Violet Hurst wrote: So if a frigate pushes their dps over some arbitrary boundary 10 dreadnoughts now do as much damage as 9, correct? The logic behind that is lost to me, could you please elaborate? And why does artillery need a nerf? And why ...
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.21 03:40:19
|
3. Maybe Alphas should have Cloaking I - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Teckos Pech wrote: Mark Marconi wrote: Teckos Pech wrote: Rin Vocaloid2 wrote: I think you're asking for a **** ton of AFK Cloaky Alpha Alts in null-sec space by account holder who are very likely to be Eve veterans who are looking for...
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.21 02:02:49
|
4. Anti-Alpha Mechinism - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Tusker Crazinski wrote: first off all this game involves HPz and reps so focused fire will always be a thing. although I do see what you're getting at I don't think this is the right way to accomplish that. what about ECM. Instead of it preven...
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.20 20:48:25
|
5. My thoughts on the so-called "Free to Play" scheme - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dark Lord Trump wrote: The reason why EvE is a sandbox is because the story is player-driven, not developer-driven. What a load of crap. What freaking story? EvE is all about pew pew pew pew pew pew pew pew pew pew pew pew pew pew pew pew. S...
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.20 20:32:57
|
6. My thoughts on the so-called "Free to Play" scheme - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Yalus Malanbi wrote: Steffles wrote: Want to blow up someones stuff? Can you? Not really, unlike sandcastles at the beach that you can destroy when no ones looking EvE sandcastles have timers that send a message to the castle creator and bec...
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.20 11:16:37
|
7. My thoughts on the so-called "Free to Play" scheme - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Do Little wrote: Those of us who prefer a player driven sandbox to a developer driven theme park will disagree. The game isn't for everyone but - those of us who like it, like it a lot. The Alpha State gives players time to scale the "learning...
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.20 09:46:34
|
8. Maybe Alphas should have Cloaking I - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Scipio Artelius wrote: Steffles wrote: Scipio Artelius wrote: Steffles wrote: Isn't the whole point to get people playing and then subscribing so they can get these benefits? I see that as a good reason to subscribe for an Omega, not a...
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.20 09:28:24
|
9. Maybe Alphas should have Cloaking I - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Scipio Artelius wrote: Steffles wrote: Isn't the whole point to get people playing and then subscribing so they can get these benefits? I see that as a good reason to subscribe for an Omega, not a reason to make it more viable for staying an...
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.20 08:35:52
|
10. Maybe Alphas should have Cloaking I - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Scipio Artelius wrote: Ok, so after a post by Cagali in twitter, I'm sort of agreeing with the need for some sort of cloak capability. Since alphas can't use any of the better haulers (eg. blockade runner), having access to MWD/Cloak trick isn...
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.20 07:40:27
|
11. Maybe Alphas should have Cloaking I - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Zappity wrote: Steffles wrote: Iria Ahrens wrote: I've been thinking about this. Especially after talking to some older players returning to play the alpha. The whole point of the Alpha program is to give people a taste as many different...
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.20 03:25:53
|
12. Maybe Alphas should have Cloaking I - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Iria Ahrens wrote: I've been thinking about this. Especially after talking to some older players returning to play the alpha. The whole point of the Alpha program is to give people a taste as many different facets of eve play while still reser...
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.19 20:54:37
|
13. Bring back watchlist. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Verlyn wrote: Pure and simple. Bring back targeted Mercenary work to its former glory. Granted it was a harsh mechanic against those on the receiving end, but this is Eve, and not some kitty online crap. Thanks. Or better yet instead of si...
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.19 20:39:27
|
14. This free to play move is funny - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
sisterofeve6 wrote: in my mind, free to play isnt just a model, its more like the future of gaming, you would be shooting yourself in the leg if you didnt take the opportunity to make your game free to play nowadays Not really. Saying free to...
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.19 20:25:24
|
15. Eve WiS - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
John WarpingSlow wrote: Read up on the "Summer of Rage" and you'll get an idea why this is... unlikely Please stop the "Summer of Rage" garbage. Its embarassing. There was no "Summer of Rage". There were a bunch of nerds shooting an indestruc...
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.18 01:35:48
|
16. Eve WiS - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: Whats funny and sad is that people acknowledge that CCP has only really done one thing well (spaceships) while at the exact same time saying that CCP needs to add walking around to the game, despite the fact that it's been tr...
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.18 01:29:54
|
17. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: This is what you posted. baltec1 wrote: Pest and cruise phoon This is the reply you will get. BUT BUT BUT!! Not at all he's extremely good with his battleships. He has lost 5 navy ravens this month though not...
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.16 19:42:21
|
18. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Bronson Hughes wrote: Steffles wrote: That's not true I don't think. The line of EvE ships was based on naval ships. The original line up was frigates, cruisers, battleships, then destroyers, battlecruisers, carriers and dreadnoughts were ad...
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.16 17:31:58
|
19. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Bronson Hughes wrote: Jenn aSide wrote: Here is another, click on this link and actually watch it. Unless, that is, you want to concede that you are not at all interested in the truth of the matter. "Balls of Pure Amarrian Steel." Pric...
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.16 17:19:23
|
20. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Bronson Hughes wrote: Othran wrote: I think this is probably trolling from the OP now. The last BS the USA built (USS Wisconsin) was 72 years ago & had a lifespan of just over 2 years before being decommissioned. It was reactivated for ...
- by Steffles - at 2016.11.16 17:05:31
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |