| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
61. AFK Cloaking Collection Thread - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
NightmareX wrote: Are you mentally challenged on reading others posts? I have never said you was against removing local and i never have said that i'm against removing local if another system can replace the system of getting intel on who are ...
- by TheGunslinger42 - at 2013.12.09 15:00:00
|
62. AFK Cloaking Collection Thread - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Guys I lost track of this topic about 93 pages ago. Have we all come to an understanding on how local mechanics are the cause behind prolonged cloaking tactics, and how a balanced change would require alterations to both local and cloaks yet?
- by TheGunslinger42 - at 2013.12.09 14:58:00
|
63. Announcement:Announcement regarding rewards and prizes to fansites and third-party contributors - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Argus Sorn wrote: Kate stark wrote: Abrazzar wrote: It's silly that absolutely nothing is coming from CCP. Even the most stupid threads directed at CCP get some Dev response but here? Nothing. Nil. Zilch. Why not just lock this thread wi...
- by TheGunslinger42 - at 2013.12.09 12:16:00
|
64. Announcement:Announcement regarding rewards and prizes to fansites and third-party contributors - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nanatoa wrote: Those who were following my 16B bait-and-switch scam saga, where SOMER BLINK did not grant my request for a refund after prizes in their contest were withdrawn, with SOMER blaming CCP for changing the prizes: a lead GM has confir...
- by TheGunslinger42 - at 2013.12.05 09:48:00
|
65. CSM: Where is the promised survey? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Is a "survey" even necessary? Here, I'll tell you what every EVE player will say: Giving gifts which have a direct ingame value (whether it's a huge chunk of isk from rarity, or if it's actually better than regular items) is unacceptable. Givi...
- by TheGunslinger42 - at 2013.12.04 09:33:00
|
66. Announcement:Announcement regarding rewards and prizes to fansites and third-party contributors - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
So CCP are already back on the "handing out special shinies to people they like" kick? After months of desperately ignoring the outcry from the last time it happened, they do it right again hahahahahaha
- by TheGunslinger42 - at 2013.12.03 10:17:00
|
67. Announcement:Announcement regarding rewards and prizes to fansites and third-party contributors - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It's ok the ISD are here to clean the place up. heh heh heh
- by TheGunslinger42 - at 2013.12.02 12:03:00
|
68. [Proposal]Repeating ship bumping in higsec space should attract concord's at... - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
The tears from people who get bumped are delicious. The tears from the exact same people after they were instantly killed upon undocking from a market after implementing their own poorly thought out ideas would be equally delicious though. It's ...
- by TheGunslinger42 - at 2013.11.28 10:58:00
|
69. CSM: Where is the promised survey? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
CSM? What's the CSM? Is that the thing that CCP explicitly ignored when they decided to directly aid an ingame player ran business over all others with direct endorsements and unjustified claims about legitimacy? Who they deliberately didn't info...
- by TheGunslinger42 - at 2013.11.28 10:53:00
|
70. Announcement:Announcement regarding rewards and prizes to fansites and third-party contributors - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I wish my sub would hurry up and run out. I don't want ccp to get the impression that I'm still part of their game after all of this.
- by TheGunslinger42 - at 2013.11.28 10:48:00
|
71. Announcement:Announcement regarding rewards and prizes to fansites and third-party contributors - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The Legendary Soldier wrote: Kate stark wrote: Nicolai Serkanner wrote: I find it worrisome that besides CCP also the CSM doesn't post a single response anymore. what can they say? ccp clearly don't give a toss and aren't interested so...
- by TheGunslinger42 - at 2013.11.25 10:10:00
|
72. Announcement:Announcement regarding rewards and prizes to fansites and third-party contributors - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
This entire thing is disgraceful, especially the attempt to just brush it all under the rug and not address or reply to anything. Don't expect a penny from me ever again, CCP.
- by TheGunslinger42 - at 2013.11.21 11:04:00
|
73. Announcement:Announcement regarding rewards and prizes to fansites and third-party contributors - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The Legendary Soldier wrote: We cannot let it "go away" It'll go away with my account subscription. It really was the tipping point, for me. Stating a particular ingame player entity were 100% trustworthy and officially endorsed by CCP Gi...
- by TheGunslinger42 - at 2013.11.20 11:11:00
|
74. Announcement:Announcement regarding rewards and prizes to fansites and third-party contributors - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
TinkerHell wrote: Remove sticky, don't reply, hope the thread disappears in the mass of the new Rubicon threads? Rubican't make me forget about this disgusting state of affairs
- by TheGunslinger42 - at 2013.11.19 15:53:00
|
75. Does WAR make players leave Eve? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Wardeccing is already too expensive, and the returns too little. The fact that people are begging for it to be made even worse is horrific. What war decs need in order to improve them is NOT to make them more costly to the aggressor, and NOT to ...
- by TheGunslinger42 - at 2013.11.12 16:37:00
|
76. I heard through the grapevine that if you share accounts and the other person... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lady Areola Fappington wrote: I'm going to take a differing perspective than my CODE buddies, on this one. I'm OK with the whole "brother" thing. People take the metagame waaay too far at times. It would really suck if someone were to compromi...
- by TheGunslinger42 - at 2013.11.11 16:25:00
|
77. I heard through the grapevine that if you share accounts and the other person... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
highonpop wrote: Sharing account information is against the EULA and as such, CCP would not help you in the event a friend took all your stuff because you gave him your password. Why is this so hard for people? I thought it was quite straig...
- by TheGunslinger42 - at 2013.11.11 15:51:00
|
78. How to make high sec suicide ganking more difficult - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I fail to understand why TC thinks highsec needs to be made even more safe when CCP themselves have stated that ganking is at an all time low It is stupidity, laziness and greed that cause you to get ganked in hisec, and as I like to say... CCP ...
- by TheGunslinger42 - at 2013.11.11 15:46:00
|
79. Can we do something about the idiots in highsec already CCP? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The genius of the code is that... If you rage in local If you post tear threads on the forums If you try and form a resistance (how many have there been now lol) If you change how you fit your ships If you change how you mine/mission then you ar...
- by TheGunslinger42 - at 2013.11.11 15:37:00
|
80. I heard through the grapevine that if you share accounts and the other person... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Estella Osoka wrote: Didn't CCP Falcon say these threads would be considered spam and locked? INB4L You mean lock threads that are concerned about the sandbox being interfered with, and in which EULA violations are not only being allowed to...
- by TheGunslinger42 - at 2013.11.11 15:31:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |