Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 [800] 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 |
15981. New wardec system on Sisi - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Roll Sizzle Beef wrote: Hes picking a sisi downtime to spread wild rumors. One would bloody hope so, because a consensual requirement for wardecs would essentially mean that highsec would have to be removedGǪ
- by Tippia - at 2012.02.27 16:43:00
|
15982. New wardec system on Sisi - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
EhGǪ how the hell is a -ÿhigh sec warGÇ¥ even defined? The GÇ£skip the r-wordGÇ¥ campaigners may complain as much as they'd like, but this idea is indeed of the kind that would have had you institutionalised in the early 1900s.
- by Tippia - at 2012.02.27 16:30:00
|
15983. Micro Transactions - Aye or Nay? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Wacktopia wrote: It's less about the "Yes or No" and more about the "How". While I don't really agree with the details listed, I agree with this general statement. MT that in no way affects the game (including not touching the market in any w...
- by Tippia - at 2012.02.27 16:18:00
|
15984. fixed soon?! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Taipion wrote: I do not claim, I point to facts Just one problem: it's not a fact that the old system was easier than the new one, which is what you claim. You are having a hard time proving this claim as fact. Quote: simply addying 1/10/1...
- by Tippia - at 2012.02.27 03:09:00
|
15985. fixed soon?! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Taipion wrote: And sure it was impossible to just add 1/10/100mn to the old names. o.O GǪbut it wasn't there, so the old scheme was not as easy as the new one, contrary to what you're trying to claim. | Quote: Yeah, 4 names for meta 1-4 is ...
- by Tippia - at 2012.02.27 02:52:00
|
15986. fixed soon?! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Taipion wrote: Thats right, before the change you would have AB AND MWD by one name, now you need to remember two for each meta lvl. You had to do that before as well since the name didn't explain what module it was. Now they do. Easier. Quo...
- by Tippia - at 2012.02.27 02:02:00
|
15987. fixed soon?! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Taipion wrote: Oh, sure, just make something up, thats the way to go. Good thing I didn't make anything up then. Quote: - The MWD naming makes NO sense without introducing the missing meta lvls. - The naming before WAS consistent, now ...
- by Tippia - at 2012.02.27 01:35:00
|
15988. fixed soon?! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Taipion wrote: Anything you say, only makes sense if there will be the missing-meta-speed-mods soon Not really, no. It makes just as much sense without it, just like how the meta-11GÇô14 made sense even before the full set of complexes were in...
- by Tippia - at 2012.02.27 00:05:00
|
15989. fixed soon?! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Taipion wrote: and this is an improvement how? Simpler, more consistent, lets them add new modules and still maintain the formula, falls in line with the naming convention for top-meta modules. Quote: There was a consistent naming before, ...
- by Tippia - at 2012.02.26 21:49:00
|
15990. fixed soon?! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Taipion wrote: But the point of this outrage is no less valid, and I will break it up, just for you: 1.) Using any speed-mod other than best named (or t2 for AB only) is usesless, as t2 MWDs are far inferrior to best named (and they are mostly...
- by Tippia - at 2012.02.26 20:30:00
|
15991. fixed soon?! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Might as well give this a serious answerGǪ Taipion wrote: All meta4 ABs are named Experimental, ok, I can live with that, BUT: All MWDs are name DIFFERENT for each (1mn/10mn/100mn) "best named" module: 1mn = limted 10mn = experimental 100mn ...
- by Tippia - at 2012.02.26 19:28:00
|
15992. Guns & Missiles - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
No. No, and no, in roughly that order. No, gunnery does not work like missiles, so it doesn't make any sense to split up the skills that way. No, tier-2 destroyers with medium guns are not the only logical step. No, having destroyers with mediu...
- by Tippia - at 2012.02.26 19:06:00
|
15993. FOR THE LOVE OF GOD fix the invisible station bumpy bits - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Muad 'dib wrote: How can there even BE bits you cant see, i really cant understand how this model works with your ship in space its illogical cpt. ! It's not really bits of station GÇö it's a maintenance crew on an EVA trip to bolt some radia...
- by Tippia - at 2012.02.26 17:14:00
|
15994. Open Letter To CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
They abandoned the Linux client for a reasonGǪ
- by Tippia - at 2012.02.26 11:06:00
|
15995. New players and skill training - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Alaric Faelen wrote: I see what you're saying Tippia, but let me propose that it's not level V that is worthless, but rather level 1 and 2. [GǪ] Combined with very short training times for these levels, often a matter of minutes or hours at...
- by Tippia - at 2012.02.26 09:32:00
|
15996. How Big is the eve client Download. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
RubyPorto wrote: That's a damnable lie. I have never seen an EvE install clock in at less than 10GB (~12 on a Mac, though that client doesn't work atm). Those numbers are the official numbers, and I have no idea how they came up with them. P...
- by Tippia - at 2012.02.26 07:22:00
|
15997. New players and skill training - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It's very simple: by default, level V skills are completely worthless. They need to do something rather spectacular to move away from this default position. Qualifying for this non-worthlessness generally entails one or more of the following: bei...
- by Tippia - at 2012.02.26 04:19:00
|
15998. The REAL EVE Personality Test - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I always waver between INTJ and INTP on these, depending on the day form and the phrasing of the questionsGǪ
- by Tippia - at 2012.02.26 02:48:00
|
15999. Rid core skills that scare new players - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Anyway, just to be constructive GǪ
- by Tippia - at 2012.02.26 00:08:00
|
16000. Rid core skills that scare new players - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Macrathleachlainn Lucian wrote: The outsight of being able to specialize into a cruiser within a considerable amount of (which can still be a long) time instead of someone having to duke it out for FOUR months before they can fly a significant ...
- by Tippia - at 2012.02.25 22:02:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 [800] 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |