Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 |
81. How long until Imperium disbands? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mbby scoopla yrrs?
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.07 20:49:27
|
82. Ganking alleged AFK miners in Hi-Sec 0.5 - 1.0 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Bella Jennie wrote: nah.. and I got a lotta stuff! just cancelled all my accounts and it feels so good! SoGǪ Your stuff GåÆ my hangar. Stat. I mean, you explicitly said that you're not coming back, so it's not as if you're going to miss it....
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.07 19:54:41
|
83. Ganking alleged AFK miners in Hi-Sec 0.5 - 1.0 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Bella Jennie wrote: Have been going around the Forums and came across the post above... - this is something I have always felt... That post and reading CCP Falcon's extremist views on gameplay have convinced me to quit... I'll check back ever...
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.07 19:19:37
|
84. Skill extractors should be free - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote: For some reason, that same argument didn't worked well for those who wanted more avatar content in EVE. Mainly because creating that additional content would take away developer resources from more critical featur...
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.07 16:54:41
|
85. Skill extractors should be free - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Thorian Baalnorn wrote: Loyalty is a factor to me and many others. GǪbut has absolutely no bearing on game mechanics, and for good reason. It certainly doesn't affect how GǣpenalisedGǥ you are (mainly because you're not penalised at all). T...
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.07 15:12:25
|
86. Skill extractors should be free - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: No it was set so ccp could use the "it's for the new player" angle Well, yeah. Ok. Fair enough. The outcome is the same anyway. It's still not a way to penalise loyalty regardless.
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.07 13:25:37
|
87. Ganking alleged AFK miners in Hi-Sec 0.5 - 1.0 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Infinity Ziona wrote: All safety-free unlike ganking. That's because safeties weren't implemented until a few years ago.
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.07 12:55:33
|
88. Skill extractors should be free - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Thorian Baalnorn wrote: My issue is, i dont really feed its fair to penalize the most loyal customers. You're not being penalised, and loyalty is not a factor. You choose to pay an age-scaled price that is set so that all comers will be disin...
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.07 12:34:42
|
89. Ganking alleged AFK miners in Hi-Sec 0.5 - 1.0 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Infinity Ziona wrote: sorry but I spent plenty of time GǪlying. And yes, you should be sorry about that. Regardless, the fact remains: in highsec, AFK has become so safe and mundane that it has become a widely adopted way of GǥplayingGǥ th...
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.07 12:29:20
|
90. Ganking alleged AFK miners in Hi-Sec 0.5 - 1.0 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Infinity Ziona wrote: last paragraph describes null perfectly. GǪaside from the complete safety and having to be at your computer most of the time. As the long tradition of AFK piloting (and the shock on the exceedingly rare occasions when i...
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.07 12:17:31
|
91. Ganking alleged AFK miners in Hi-Sec 0.5 - 1.0 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
ShahFluffers wrote: [devil's advocate hat] Tippa wrote: There's a very important parity at play here: since you are free to go about your business, they must also be free to go about theirs, otherwise the sandbox is broken on a fundamental ...
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.07 09:46:43
|
92. Who would want to hunt and kill players who inject SP.? **FEELER** - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Poddington Bare wrote: Tippia wrote: That seems like a spectacularly pointless exercise, as well as a mindbogglingly silly waste of time and money. Hey, it's his sandbox too. True enough. I just can't get my head around the concept of sp...
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.07 07:13:14
|
93. Ganking alleged AFK miners in Hi-Sec 0.5 - 1.0 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Michel Petit wrote: Outright lawlessness is allowed in low and null sec. Why can't we keep these activities there? Because it is also allowed in highsec and there is no reason why it shouldn't be. The only difference is that in highsec, aggres...
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.07 07:07:16
|
94. EVE fleets are using Teamspeak? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Droidster wrote: What's the rationale? It doesn't actually make any difference.
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.06 21:45:44
|
95. Who would want to hunt and kill players who inject SP.? **FEELER** - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Minkki wrote: My goal is to have all skills at level 5 and I will spend my EVE career on grinding ISK and buying SP. That seems like a spectacularly pointless exercise, as well as a mindbogglingly silly waste of time and money.
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.06 21:44:16
|
96. Misalignment between AUR packages and skill extractor prices - CCP? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
TigerXtrm wrote: It's not about it being optional. It's about CCP doing dirty business things that were previously reserved for publishers GǪand for CCP (cf. the first NEX implementation and items). Getting upset over it now is 4-+ years l...
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.06 19:18:41
|
97. Reformed gankster, AMA - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
What do you mean by GÇ£reformedGÇ¥?
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.06 15:34:29
|
98. What 3 things would you change about eve? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Avvy wrote: Moving more wealth at more risk. That makes it more profitable and easier for the gankers, but who else does it create fun for? The ones who move stuff around.
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.06 15:26:10
|
99. What 3 things would you change about eve? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Infinity Ziona wrote: All in the sig GǪwhich doesn't really contradict what he said. Anyway: 1. Highsec earning potential. 2. Highsec safety and protection levels. 3. Ease of movement. GǪall of which need to be lowered. Make it far more ...
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.06 14:51:18
|
100. Skill extractors should be free - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
ArmyOfMe wrote: As i said in the first dev blog about this, trust CCP to **** it up for themselfs anyhow with taking to much money for it Personally i hate this feature, so im quite happy with the price. And it will deffo not **** up normal ...
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.06 14:32:23
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |