| Pages: [1] |
1. [Retribution 1.1] Armor Tanking 2.0 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Kittel wrote: I think there should be a shield skill reducing sig rad as well as change shield rigs to be cpu or pg pen as well. Changing the armor to these new values but leaving the penalties for shields intact is unjust and damaging to shiel...
- by deepos - at 2013.02.15 18:02:00
|
2. Sticky:[Retribution Point Release] Combat Battlecruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
.
- by deepos - at 2013.02.15 18:01:00
|
3. Sticky:Dev Blog: The Battle of Asakai and Poinen Must Burn by the numbers. - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Awesome graphs! Thanks a lot quant Poinen must burn was an amazing event !
- by deepos - at 2013.01.31 09:07:00
|
4. [Retribution 1.1] Armor Tanking 2.0 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Moonaura wrote: NetheranE wrote: Moonaura wrote: So, time to rattle the cage. *snip* Allow me to simply and plainly ask you this question: Do you, yourself, on ANY of your toons, consistently or with any frequency actually fly any ...
- by deepos - at 2013.01.23 13:57:00
|
5. [Retribution 1.1] Armor Tanking 2.0 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Apostrof Ahashion wrote: Ancillary Shield Boosters Currently X-Large Ancillary Shield Booster takes 200cpu and 500pg, and repairs 286ehp/s. Heavy Capacitor Booster II+X-Large Shield Booster II+Shield Boost Amplifier II takes 325cpu and 2476...
- by deepos - at 2013.01.23 10:55:00
|
6. [Retribution 1.1] Armor Tanking 2.0 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Iris Bravemount wrote: The incursus nerf means the following to me: You are reading "the incursus works" as "armor repping just needs more repping amount". It works because it can fit decent dps alongside decent tank, while maintaining decent...
- by deepos - at 2013.01.22 08:36:00
|
7. Talos needs to be nerfed. Long live the Vagabond! - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Liang Nuren wrote: Cartheron Crust wrote: Liang Nuren wrote: Smabs wrote: Oh okay, outside of amamake? I'd be happy to be proved wrong if people were actually roaming around killing stuff with them. That's without having stupidly expen...
- by deepos - at 2012.12.21 17:04:00
|
8. So is it safe to say that Amarr ships right now are kinda suck? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
This is a nice thread to promote old and new Amarr ships actually ! Now if we could just disregard the OP entirely, it will definitely be better. I don't think he really wants to understand, Looking forward for new Amarr BCs!
- by deepos - at 2012.12.21 16:57:00
|
9. Sticky:Dev Blog: Fifty-Nine Down - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Takeshi Yamato wrote: Armor Resistance Phasing should be -10% cap usage (instead of 5%), -10% cycle time per level. The cap usage is way out of line even with the current -5% cap usage per level. Here are some numbers: Reactive Armor Hardener...
- by deepos - at 2012.11.15 15:49:00
|
10. Sticky:[Winter] Combat Cruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Garviel Tarrant wrote: I did some tests.. And found out that starting at 0 the Maller gets outbrawled by a shield rupture because it caps out completely before it can kill it. was rather depressing. This. I too, find the Maller to be qui...
- by deepos - at 2012.11.10 11:34:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |