Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 |
81. Nozh: why changing webs is dangerous - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: MotherMoon I didn't read the whole thing. And therein lies the problem. You failed to read the phrase 'over simplified' that I used to describe my example. The example wasnt meant to descibe in detailed text exactly wh...
- by khosta - at 2008.07.30 15:06:00
|
82. Nozh: why changing webs is dangerous - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
(continued) I think the huge imbalance will become obvious during the sisi testing phase, but I dont think you will do enough to keep short range gunnery usable. After all, your focus is on eliminating ludicrous speed. As such, let me be the fir...
- by khosta - at 2008.07.30 14:26:00
|
83. Nozh: why changing webs is dangerous - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I think what you are trying to do by reducing webifier effectiveness is a good idea, but it is going to have profound effects and expose a flaw that has been with eve from the start. The issue of course is the delicate balance between guns and mi...
- by khosta - at 2008.07.30 14:10:00
|
84. CSM impotent? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Thank you for your reply Constantine. Im feeling much positive could come from this situation as it illustrates in the most obvious way possible the need for developers and experienced players to communicate possible changes to the balance of a co...
- by khosta - at 2008.07.29 15:19:00
|
85. Balance approach suggestions! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I reckon balancing ships/setups in EVE must be an incredibly difficult job sometimes. Perhaps some positive suggestions from players might be gathered and combined with your own, to form a 'change template' as part of a QA process when it comes ...
- by khosta - at 2008.07.29 14:45:00
|
86. Balance approach suggestions! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I reckon balancing ships/setups in EVE must be an incredibly difficult job sometimes. Perhaps some positive suggestions from players might be gathered and combined with your own, to form a 'change template' as part of a QA process when it comes ...
- by khosta - at 2008.07.29 14:45:00
|
87. CSM impotent? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Dalia Diamond There are some things that letting the players have too strong a voice in will destroy a game - nerfs are usually one of them. Again, I've always felt you took a moderate approach to the CSM role, and applaude...
- by khosta - at 2008.07.29 13:38:00
|
88. CSM impotent? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: LaVista Vista I had no idea this was happening. I could have told CCP that some of their ideas were quite crappy, before they even wrote the dev-blog. THANK YOU I suspected this was the case. Since the CSM members ac...
- by khosta - at 2008.07.29 13:23:00
|
89. CSM impotent? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Avon So if the proposed changes go through then the CSM are worthless? I'd say the opposite is true, these changes are very much needed to balance the game in general, even if it means reducing the effectiveness of some asp...
- by khosta - at 2008.07.29 12:47:00
|
90. CSM impotent? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Jowen Datloran What is going on with the blaming here? No blaming, just wanting to know if the CSM play any advisory role, or indeed any role at all, when it comes to making large changes to EVE. Cant see any blame in ...
- by khosta - at 2008.07.29 12:32:00
|
91. CSM impotent? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I would love to know (and perhaps other players would too) if the CSM had any part in the proposed balance changes? I can understand CCP devs inadvertently destroying a weapon and ship type whilst trying to nerf something else, but I really expec...
- by khosta - at 2008.07.29 12:14:00
|
92. EXPECT the Nerf Bat. This will not be the last time we see it. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
From my own experience I would advise players not to specialise too much. Easiest way to achieve this is to not train a level 5 skill unless it is required to train another. Here's why. From the very start of this game I decided I would adopt the...
- by khosta - at 2008.07.29 11:45:00
|
93. QA Engineering Dev Blog - Empyrean Age - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Impressive. How about developing a similar set of tools for testing the effects of balancing changes too? This might help avoid silly errors going public such as trying to nerf nano ships, but ending up nerfing blaster ships unintentionally inst...
- by khosta - at 2008.07.29 03:14:00
|
94. CCP: A challenge to your balancing competence - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Cpt Branko They won't be able to insta-**** anything smaller then them? If CCP believed blaster BS to be overpowered and needed a nerf, thats fine. I just want them to clarify that they intended to nerf them. Since th...
- by khosta - at 2008.07.28 11:43:00
|
95. CCP: A challenge to your balancing competence - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Right now i suspect that the staff in charge of balance changes dont play the game and/or have little knowledge of the game mechanics. I suspect im not the only one with such doubts. So please help restore our confidence that the current balanci...
- by khosta - at 2008.07.28 11:23:00
|
96. How is it that so many players focus on non-existant problems? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: khosta on 27/07/2008 16:58:01 The aspect of these and previous changes by CCP that worries me, is how they fail to explain the rationale behind their changes where they obviously effect a given race more than the others. I think th...
- by khosta - at 2008.07.27 16:54:00
|
97. Dont panic yet! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Neither CCP nor the player base have complained that blaster ships are overpowered. As such it will be obvious to them and us that a crippling nerf to MWD use and webbers will need a hefty counter boost to blasters to keep the current balance int...
- by khosta - at 2008.07.26 11:17:00
|
98. omg overview settings have NOT been lost \o/ - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Now that this is the case, I would like to invest effort into customizing the overview and learning how to use the tabs etc. Is there a good guide anywhere?
- by khosta - at 2008.04.15 17:18:00
|
99. omg overview settings have NOT been lost \o/ - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Yesss :)
- by khosta - at 2008.04.15 16:59:00
|
100. Mind games. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Start server up, let 20 people login, then dont allow anyone else in. Make posts about how great the new patch is, and also why your local pos forcefield is down, and that it appears there are free capital ships awaiting collection
- by khosta - at 2008.04.15 16:24:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |