Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 27 post(s) |
Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E. Comic Mischief
621
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 22:12:00 -
[151] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote:Haifisch Zahne wrote:Graphs! Where are the graphs! Graphs are Stillman's department
How about tables? How many and how much week one, week two, week three? http://vincentoneve.wordpress.com/ |
Etil DeLaFuente
New Eclipse Initiative Mercenaries
4
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 23:09:00 -
[152] - Quote
PIES! we want PIES! |
profundus fossura
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 23:35:00 -
[153] - Quote
Great work CCP - keep it up. and please keep the blogs on RMT/Botting coming.
+1 for pies |
Fyrkraag
The Knights Templar Intrepid Crossing
8
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 00:17:00 -
[154] - Quote
I've been inactive in New Eden since "monocle gate" of last year, and I have quietly been watching and reading the fixes made to the game in hopes of mustering up interest in coming back and re-activating my alts.
I have to say, this RMT clamp down has been one of those most significant actions CCP has done in rekindling my interests.
I despise people using money to gain an advantage over others, but at least with PLEX, it does go to support the development of the game and someone else somewhere can legitamitely support their account through in-game activities (I prefer to think of them as "another target"), which makes it at least bearable.
RMTrs on the other hand, are pure scum.
Please never relax your stance against RMT.
|
Rosewalker
Khumaak Flying Circus
1
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 01:10:00 -
[155] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote:Unfortunately RMT tears are a bit harder to harvest but if you can find a way feel free to share (don't link the site) and I will give you a virtual hug in my head.
Haven't found a seller but did find a buyer...
Dumb Busted Botter wrote:so with 3 of my miners being down I couldn't afford a PLEX with isk so I bought one for 9 bucks, anyways it was taken from me and I got this nice little notification.
has anyone else been banned lately since fanfest?
Buying in-game items/ISK for real money From: GM ****** Sent: today To: ***********,
According to our logs, you have received in-game assets (ISK or other items) from characters which have been verified as having been involved in selling these assets for real money. We can only conclude that you have bought these assets for real money and we are therefore issuing a formal warning in accordance with our policies since this is a breach of the EULA section 7.B. We have also removed the PLEX you obtained from your hangar.
As we have mentioned, buying in-game items from illicit sources such as ISK selling/Real Money Trading websites or auction sites is a serious EULA violation and is damaging to our game world. The ISK or assets you obtained have been acquired by hacking into other playerGÇÖs accounts, by buying PLEX with stolen credit cards or by using modified clients and macros. We hope that you understand, in light of these facts, why we must take action against such activities. We also hope you realise that there is a possibility of your computer being at risk of being hacked by the ISK sellers and you should take steps to ensure that your computer is free of viruses, trojans, worms or other malicious software.
We would like to point out that if you need to supplement your wallet balance by buying more ISK, then you have the option to buy PLEX from the EVE Online website and then sell them on the market, since this is the only way that you may buy ISK legitimately. We also sincerely hope that this will the the only time that we will have to issue a warning of this nature and should point out that any other similar incidents in the future will lead to further action being taken against your account, up to and including a permanent ban.
Regards, EVE Online Customer Support
Botter #2 wrote:curious about this... you needed a plex so instead of just buying one from eve itself you paid hmm $6 less and got one from a place that sells isk etc when you know they go after real money traders and this is right after you got 3 14 day bans?
The Nosy Gamer |
Imigo Montoya
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
35
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 02:11:00 -
[156] - Quote
Loving it. Treat the bogey man to a permanent ban. |
Galphii
Sileo In Pacis THE SPACE P0LICE
41
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 02:16:00 -
[157] - Quote
This is an amazing achievement, keep up the solid work guys! |
Ad'Hakim Tahous
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
37
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 03:10:00 -
[158] - Quote
Go Sreegs! Hit 'em, hit 'em again, and kick 'em while they're down! |
Ayame Tao
State War Academy Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 03:36:00 -
[159] - Quote
Toawa wrote:Sorry, but I have an irresistible compulsion to be pedantic here.
RMT ISK sales are not "illegal." They do not meet any countries' legal definition of a crime (AFAIK). They are against the EULA, but breaking the EULA is not illegal (despite certain protestations by certain US federal courts and politicians whenever it happens suits their PR interests). The EULA has language specifically dealing with EULA violations, specifying cancellation of the account.
A more correct term would be "unauthorized."
I feel that I have to point this out precisely because of the aforementioned US federal courts and politicians (especially politicians!) who go out of their way to cast everything they don't happen to like as being a crime; the fact that you don't like something does not make it criminal.
(Of course, fraudulently breaking into an account may, depending upon the circumstances, meet the legal definition of a crime, but that's not what this devblog was about.)
RMT operations could very really be classed a crime, most likely Fraud (payment card fraud or plain selling what's not theirs to sell (criminal conversion) or Computer Crime related (unlawful access, hacking)
Difficulty is that online, it is nearly impossible without massive resources and cooperation from disparate governments and enforcement aganecies to track down, reliably identify and prosecute perpetrators.
CCP is pretty much doing the best it can by taking a stand and kicking as many of them in the nuts as hard as they can through the means they have (bans, blacklists, publicity)
(Standard IANALE disclaimer :) )
|
Mars Theran
EVE Rogues EVE Rogues Alliance
148
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 03:56:00 -
[160] - Quote
VaMei wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote:Ines Fy wrote:Your economics guy was complaining that was too much isk in the economy. He also says that goods are not isk and removing goods is not a sink for the isk. So what about the Eve Central Bank make an auction of of this seized goods with starting bids of 50% the market value and this way the ECB can remove even more isk from the economy and we all win in the process? One problem I have with this is that we're seeing patterns of activity where the isk is botted up and in this case we're printing isk at a rate which it should not be happening at out of thin air. At the end of the day though I'm not an economics guy so the assets sit in the banned accounts until or unless someone decides to use them for something. I'd considered at one point using them as a reward system but I can't get over the fact that a lot of this stuff just simply shouldnGÇÖt exist and that can't be good for an economy. I like the idea of an GÇÿEBCGÇÖ. It gives CCP a tool to sink isk from the economy without manipulating taxes & fees. Using confiscated goods (goods only, no isk) to do it would be rather like a SheriffGÇÖs Auction, but the isk would go back to the central bank rather than continuing to circulate. I understand that you have reservations about returning ill-gotten goods to the economy, but thereGÇÖs a sizeable amount of isk in circulation that was created through illicit means as well; and Dr. E. seems to be more worried about the isk at this point.
Basically the same thing I thought of when I read that post. Government and police often do auction of assets seized from criminals and those unable to pay their tax debts, and banks do the same with foreclosed homes, etc.. Would be an interesting way of redistributing assets on seized accounts while sinking ISK back to CCP to destroy.
I can't see how they would spend it, so it is effectively destroyed as far as I'm concerned. This also offsets the issue of redistibuting assets that were gathered by botting and such being inappropriate. Wipe the ISK on the accounts, redistribute the assets, sink the ISK from that redistribution and remove it from game.
Obviously there are going to be some assets which may be very common and potentially capable of unsettling the market in a mass redistribution, and there is the possibility that only the truly wealthy of EVE may pick up those redistributed assets. Okay, that one is very likely.
It's not like most of us have the ability to compete in auctions for anything worth anything, and auctioning T1 items in bits would be tedious at best. Stacking everything of common value and either deleting it or auctioning it wholesale would make more sense. 1000 T1 small lasers for example. as a lot item for auction. The problem being that suddenly somebody has a 1000 small T1 lasers to flood the market with at more than they paid and very likely highly competative prices.
Expensive Tech 2 ships, T3s, and Faction, Complex, and Officer stuff would make more sense. Storyline to I suppose, or other rare items that don't fall into any of those categories.
That said, it is both a good idea and a bad idea for the various reasons mentioned and more I can't be bothered to-or couldn't-think of I'm sure.
Also: o/\o <-- It's funny, I always thought that was an owl.
+ voted most interesting thread (so far) 2012. Turn WiS into wIN! ..make all the characters Nude. |
|
Henry Haphorn
Aliastra Gallente Federation
315
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 04:19:00 -
[161] - Quote
Sundarbolt wrote:In terms of getting the message out to new and existing players, why not use the ingame billboards and the captain's quarters screen to run numbers/tickers of reclaimed assets/ISK and banned players etc
oh and great work guys
This please.
This would make it more worthwhile for me to actually get out of my goo-filled pod and browse the CQ. The stats that I like to see posted on the CQ TV are...
- How many bots perma banned
- How many bots temp. banned
- Number of bots in each region (may need to open a window for this)
- ISK removed/reversed
- ISK in assets removed
- Number of RMT accounts perma banned
Also, it would be nice to have the stats in the CQ TV updated once a week if possible. Twice a month of you're too busy.
Quote:
The lesson that begins to appear from this is one that starts to put a real dampner on the "common" "wisdom" that it's not profitable for us to crack down on this activity. While 1268 accounts had to be permanently banned they were not what we would qualify as "EVE Players". Buyers tend to be people who make a poor decision and try to save a couple of bucks by doing something illegal, but still want to be engaged in the game. We negative this activity and give them an opportunity to continue enjoying the game and they stay loyal customers, which helps to make New Eden a more enjoyable place for everyone. Instead of people sending cash to some shady dude running a sweat shop out in *insert country name here*, they purchase a PLEX, which can be used by you to fund your game time and the money goes into developing a better spaceship game instead of buying the equivalent of a digital drug dealer a cool new diamond-covered blingy case for his beeper.
So much for the obviously-wrong conspiracy theory that CCP doesn't ban botters/RMTers as it's against their interests. Suck on that, tinfoil hat wearers. Welcome to Eve Online. Don't expect people to be nice to you. |
Imigo Montoya
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
35
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 04:23:00 -
[162] - Quote
I want to highlight the part of CCP Sreeg's comment that people seem to be missing: "a lot of this stuff just simply shouldnGÇÖt exist".
A police auction or similar concept might be nice, but ultimately these things have been bought into the EVE economy (one way or another) by activities that are outside the bounds of the game. Therefore if they simply cease to exist the footprint left on the game by "illegal" activity isn't as big, and problem solved.
If (almost) everything that exists in EVE is created in one way or another by active human players, then the EVE universe will be much more vibrant and interesting. Seized RMT/botting proceeds are counter-productive to this. |
Bruce Blacky
Blacky Invention Research Development YinYang
8
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 05:43:00 -
[163] - Quote
Hello,
GOOD STUFF...thumbs up
keep doing this and don stop.
CCP waited too long to get this started, but i am very happy and pleased that you finally got on this problem and I believe you will succeed in removing this problem from EVE completly.
sincerly a very happy customer Bruce Blacky |
Sizeof Void
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
213
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 07:30:00 -
[164] - Quote
Impressive - thumbs up to Sreegs and Team Security!
A few ideas for taking it to the next step:
- Make a list of all known Internet RMT sites (you've probably done this already).
- Contact the various Eve fansites, as well as general MMO and gaming sites, and ask them (politely, ofc) to delete and refuse to accept ads, articles, or forum postings promoting these sites. They won't all agree, but a surprising number of them will do so.
- Contact the ISPs of the RMT sites and ask them to remove the sites. Again, they won't all agree, but some will, if asked politely. Sure, the RMTers will just move the site, but it does send them a clear notice that you are out to harass and shut them down.
- Do some interviews with the various Eve news sites and popular fansites, to get the word out more widely and clearly to the player base (some of whom obvously can't read the EULA).
- Ask the CCP video team to make you a very cool 3D CG video, showing what happens to folks who break the rules. Most of the Eve player base watches the 3D CG videos, even if they don't read the EULA, the dev blogs or the forums.
- Contact the leaders of the largest corps and alliances in the game, and ask them to spread the word to their members. As we've seen in the past, a large corp/alliance can be severely impacted by the poorly considered actions of just a few members - and it doesn't hurt to remind them.
And, keep up the most excellent work! |
Seloena
Mighty Orca Inc
11
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 09:41:00 -
[165] - Quote
Good job guys. Kick all the f*ckin bots! I hate when hulks come out and suck same ore i do.
I think you should do one more thing. Exactly the same thing you did for England. Prices for game time (not plex, but game time) should be compared to the country we live in (CCP than you for that move! For me game time in GBP will be much cheaper :] ) What exactly I mean? I did some researches and calculated some numbers:
- average pay for job here is 1800 (some units) - price of new hot game title on the store shelf is 80-120 (some units) - cost of 1 Gé¼ is 4.1 - EVE cost per month when taking 3 months is 12.95 Gé¼
4.1 * 12.95 = 53 per moth.
I earn much much more than the average, so I can afford that, but for most people here its much too much when you compare to what they earn. Most box titles after few months are available as "gold editions" or something like that in price like 40-50 (some units). So monthly EvE fee is like buying a new game every month. LOL
After some more research i found plex on black market. WOW & SHOCK!!!. This is not "few bucks"! Average price for 1 plex in different sellers was 32 (some units). This is 60% off the oryginal price - its almost like 5 months for free.
This why i think you should add more currencies based on country average earnings (like you did for GBP).
Cool job, keep it going! |
Ken Kyoukan
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 11:15:00 -
[166] - Quote
Jita spam should be easy to clear up,
Just add an internal timer, messages outside this timer are free, inside the timer would give a cspa isk cost warning and charge as well as starting a second timer, this second timer is used to double the isk cost/message.
Continual spam...spam...spam... Would (per spammer) become: Spam... Priced Spam, Double Priced Spam, Expensive Spam, Extortionate Spam, Minimal Spam.
Always worth a try, and CSPA charges are in game supposedly for spam prevention, so lets use it in spam heavy systems like Jita.
P.S. CCP Sreegs, Just so you are aware, I'm still waiting for a reply from my earlier post, evemail and email. |
|
CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
1264
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 11:37:00 -
[167] - Quote
Ken Kyoukan wrote:Jita spam should be easy to clear up,
Just add an internal timer, messages outside this timer are free, inside the timer would give a cspa isk cost warning and charge as well as starting a second timer, this second timer is used to double the isk cost/message.
Continual spam...spam...spam... Would (per spammer) become: Spam... Priced Spam, Double Priced Spam, Expensive Spam, Extortionate Spam, Minimal Spam.
Always worth a try, and CSPA charges are in game supposedly for spam prevention, so lets use it in spam heavy systems like Jita.
P.S. CCP Sreegs, Just so you are aware, I'm still waiting for a reply from my earlier post, evemail and email.
Neither of your evemails requested a response. You gave me information. We may or may not use it. I appreciate it and read it but there was nothing in them that seemed to require a response of any kind. "Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012 |
|
Diomedes Calypso
Aetolian Armada
71
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 18:33:00 -
[168] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote:Ken Kyoukan wrote:Jita spam should be easy to clear up,
Just add an internal timer, messages outside this timer are free, inside the timer would give a cspa isk cost warning and charge as well as starting a second timer, this second timer is used to double the isk cost/message.
Continual spam...spam...spam... Would (per spammer) become: Spam... Priced Spam, Double Priced Spam, Expensive Spam, Extortionate Spam, Minimal Spam.
Always worth a try, and CSPA charges are in game supposedly for spam prevention, so lets use it in spam heavy systems like Jita.
P.S. CCP Sreegs, Just so you are aware, I'm still waiting for a reply from my earlier post, evemail and email. Neither of your evemails requested a response. You gave me information. We may or may not use it. I appreciate it and read it but there was nothing in them that seemed to require a response of any kind.
I make this mistake sometimes when I recieve a compliment in an email or a FYI something.
A one line "thanks for the support" or "I'lll read it, thanks" brings a good finality while still showing that you appreciated their time they took to share something. Of course we don't have time to enter conversations with hundreds of people each day but a one line "thanks" probably is possible. Making it really really short.. like two or three words does convey you're too busy to do justice to any further conversation while a the same time not ignoring them. |
elitatwo
Congregatio
20
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 19:00:00 -
[169] - Quote
A virtual high five from me on your work here! Well done and keep going! |
Rob Crowley
State War Academy
7
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 19:58:00 -
[170] - Quote
Diomedes Calypso wrote:I make this mistake sometimes when I recieve a compliment in an email or a FYI something.
A one line "thanks for the support" or "I'lll read it, thanks" brings a good finality while still showing that you appreciated their time they took to share something. Of course we don't have time to enter conversations with hundreds of people each day but a one line "thanks" probably is possible. Making it really really short.. like two or three words does convey you're too busy to do justice to any further conversation while a the same time not ignoring them.
Thanks for your forum post, I'll read it later. |
|
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
661
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 20:05:00 -
[171] - Quote
corestwo wrote:
Taking a good long while to properly investigate is fine and we'd be okay with that, if not for the whole lack of any contact at all. A month without so much as a "We're looking at it and will keep you updated."
The previous similar thread I was just saying the same concepts.
CCP Sreegs is really REALLY commendable in his job, it's really going to finally kick those RMTers in the ass.
BUT
The "customer care" department following the applied bans it's slow as hell.
He can tell "it's not my job don't tell me" all day long but this is the very only place where we can post something that will not be completely ignored by CCP employees.
The times are BIBLICAL, 2 months is right the average.
I have 2 petitions stuck in the same queue since 1.5 months now (just asking for clarifications about EULA and asking for CCP to investigate on a suspicious guy).
I NEVER got a single "we are working on it" message. Just nothing, full ignore.
I filed a simple petition on another account about a skill question and that too took 3 weeks to reply.
Can CCP hire some more people?
If CCP Sreegs creates 1000 bans a months CCP cannot keep the same GMs they hired when they banned 10 people a month, their queues EXPLODE.
Once again, CCP Sreegs is doing RIGHT GOOD and deserves all the applauses but please pass on your CCP colleagues the big, big discomfort the months long petition queues take just for the first reply.
Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |
Diomedes Calypso
Aetolian Armada
71
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 20:12:00 -
[172] - Quote
Rob Crowley wrote:Diomedes Calypso wrote:I make this mistake sometimes when I recieve a compliment in an email or a FYI something.
A one line "thanks for the support" or "I'lll read it, thanks" brings a good finality while still showing that you appreciated their time they took to share something. Of course we don't have time to enter conversations with hundreds of people each day but a one line "thanks" probably is possible. Making it really really short.. like two or three words does convey you're too busy to do justice to any further conversation while a the same time not ignoring them. Thanks for your forum post, I'll read it later.
LMAO.. well, I'm happy someone read it at least |
Golden Gnu
EVE University Ivy League
53
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 21:58:00 -
[173] - Quote
*Hi Five* Team Security! Download is the meaning of life, upload is the meaning of intelligent life http://eve.nikr.net - home of jEveAssets |
Lemming Alpha1dash1
Lemmings Online
6
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 22:35:00 -
[174] - Quote
Do you start your day by punching plush toys and thinking they are RMT ppl ?
gratz team on the RMT kill reports |
Ken Kyoukan
1
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 23:04:00 -
[175] - Quote
Many thanks for the receipt acknowledgement CCP Sreegs.
Sorry that I have an AS Condition, if you were offended in any way sir. |
Benteen
Drone A.I. Servicing Inc.
7
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 05:23:00 -
[176] - Quote
Hi Five security guys... keep up the good work! |
Tazuki Falorn
Eighty Joule Brewery Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 08:21:00 -
[177] - Quote
Hi. I'm the person mentioned by Kazanir et al. earlier in the thread. Obviously I'm now unbanned but I can't say the process was in any way a good experience. Tickets were ignored or closed without comment, e-mails to security@ went unanswered - after 2 weeks of trying and failing to get anyone to reply I gave up. It's very difficult to get unbanned when your protestations of innocence disappear into a black hole.
Luckily, my CEO and another director spent a bunch of their time pestering people at CCP via various sources, eventually getting a reply to the effect of "If he is innocent, please explain Dodgy Character's actions". Dodgy Character (not his name) being a freighter/industry guy I legitimately bought and transferred to one of my accounts. Apparently it had something to do with RMT before I bought it and the character transfer wasn't taken into account when bans were handed out :(
I'm all for getting rid of bots and RMTers but there really needs to be a system in place to deal with ban appeals in a reasonable timeframe, especially with the way skill training works. My lost game time got reimbursed but I'm still out a month of training on multiple accounts. |
Vera Algaert
Republic University Minmatar Republic
78
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 12:12:00 -
[178] - Quote
Tazuki Falorn wrote:Apparently it had something to do with RMT before I bought it and the character transfer wasn't taken into account when bans were handed out :(
|
|
CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
1269
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 12:52:00 -
[179] - Quote
Ken Kyoukan wrote:Many thanks for the receipt acknowledgement CCP Sreegs.
Sorry that I have an AS Condition, if you were offended in any way sir.
No no not offended in any way, we just get a lot of email so if the email doesn't require a response I generally don't send one. :) "Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012 |
|
|
CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
1269
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 12:57:00 -
[180] - Quote
Tazuki Falorn wrote:Hi. I'm the person mentioned by Kazanir et al. earlier in the thread. Obviously I'm now unbanned but I can't say the process was in any way a good experience. Tickets were ignored or closed without comment, e-mails to security@ went unanswered - after 2 weeks of trying and failing to get anyone to reply I gave up. It's very difficult to get unbanned when your protestations of innocence disappear into a black hole.
Luckily, my CEO and another director spent a bunch of their time pestering people at CCP via various sources, eventually getting a reply to the effect of "If he is innocent, please explain Dodgy Character's actions". Dodgy Character (not his name) being a freighter/industry guy I legitimately bought and transferred to one of my accounts. Apparently it had something to do with RMT before I bought it and the character transfer wasn't taken into account when bans were handed out :(
I'm all for getting rid of bots and RMTers but there really needs to be a system in place to deal with ban appeals in a reasonable timeframe, especially with the way skill training works. My lost game time got reimbursed but I'm still out a month of training on multiple accounts.
We're working on improving this but I will say that everyone appeals which floods the system. We didn't have anything in place to check for character transfers and that'll be rectified. CS doesn't have insight into our investigations and we don't have the people to be handling petitions so we're working on creative ways to get around that.
In this particular case the evidence was there of wrongdoing but we didn't note the transfer of character. We made a mistake in that regard and for that we apologize. We also compensated you for more than your time lost.
Ultimately it's easy to say "answer petitions faster" and as a customer that's really where your concerns end. Unfortunately for us the solution just isn't that simple. "Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |