Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |
IIS PRIMARY
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 00:18:00 -
[91] - Quote
I get nothing but a black screen when undocking from 4/4 now, and have to relog to fix it. This issue just started in the last 30 minutes and was not present at all yesterday.
So it would seem that all is not well with the server at the moment. |
Sigurd Sig Hansen
Hedion University Amarr Empire
68
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 00:38:00 -
[92] - Quote
Koby Botick wrote:Lyron-Baktos wrote:If Jita, which is on it's own node/server gets locked down at 1900 people, what does that say about the rest of the servers? It's less about the hardware and far more about using a scripting language for heavy lifting stuff. It may have been a great choice back in the day but nowadays the fact it still has a single global lock for certain things is seriously eating a huge amount of performance right out by killing concurrency gains (and frequency of CPUs does not go up significantly, but concurrency/core count does). So they have to run many seperate processess in parallel to be able to use up the hardware and while this gives concurrency gains, it's an increased cost in communication between those processes again.
I think its CCPs way to minimize the damage you guys do to the stupid ppl willing to run stuff through Jita
Mining is the "Deadliest Catch" in this game |
Sigurd Sig Hansen
Hedion University Amarr Empire
70
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 00:58:00 -
[93] - Quote
supr3m3justic3 wrote:Isnt this a rant? Why isnt this topic closed?
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=101626&find=unread
same question. 19 post OP rant in fact
Mining is the "Deadliest Catch" in this game |
Seamus MacMartin
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 02:55:00 -
[94] - Quote
CCP Goliath wrote:Midge Mo'yb wrote:CCP Goliath wrote:Midge Mo'yb wrote:CCP Goliath wrote:We raise and lower the cap based on technological factors - if the system is getting hammered repeatedly, sometimes it has to be lowered to ensure performance. Simple as that. isnt that what tidi is for... gracreful degradation of the service i dont see our fleet fights in 0.0 being locked at 1850 lame excuse You just aren't considering all of the angles. TiDi helps, but consider that the pop cap was 1028 when it was first introduced in 2008, was 1500 during the Jita riots of last year, and has now risen considerably (and is constantly being altered as things spike or smooth out). Jita, and high sec systems in general, are far more complex in terms of load than nullsec systems. the limits were introduced when the servers didnt degrade gracefully, i fail to see how this is any different to massive fight of nullsec - when we have to just deall with it when we hit the limits the server seems quite content at the limit, that imo says that the limit is too low. Due respect, but you don't have any information at hand except anecdotal, and I have the server technical information open on a page in front of me, as do people far more well versed in these matters who actually control the cap, so while you are entitled to your opinion, in this case it is inapplicable.
CCP, definitely better to not feed the trolls, especially when they seem to lack understanding of the technology involved. "Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength." --áEric Hoffer
"A warrior may choose pacifism. Others are condemned to it." - Unknown |
Morganta
Peripheral Madness The Midget Mafia
1059
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 03:35:00 -
[95] - Quote
supr3m3justic3 wrote:Isnt this a rant?
how you figure?
pointing out an adjustment to pop caps when higher pop and more action resulted in tdi doing its thing without the need for pop caps is hardly a rant.
more pointing out the failure of tdi (and gcc apparently)
it would seem that tdi is simply a bandage for a bit of server strain and not the blobfest cure-all it was vaunted as seeing as though SOP today has been to prevent tdi from kicking in at over 50%
pointing that out is fully in line with GD rules and it has nothing to do with jita access per-se. you might consider actually reading the thread before adding your feeble 2 pesos The American public's reaction to the change was poor and the new cola was a major marketing failure. The subsequent reintroduction of Coke's original formula, re-branded as "Coca-Cola Classic", resulted in a significant gain in sales, leading to speculation that the introduction of the New Coke formula was just a marketing ploy |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |