EVE Search - Nice collection of ambulation screenies

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Nice collection of ambulation screenies

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 2 post(s)
Destination SkillQueue Are We There Yet	Posted - 2009.03.11 17:51:00 - [31] Originally by: Marielle TueurDeCoeur Originally by: Ruze Believe it or not, not all cultures believe 'fat' is bad or ugly. I know that this is the way we're trained to think in the US ... YEAH F**ING RIGHT!! Liar. Something like %65 of our (USA) population is overweight, so this "training" you speak of is absolute bullsht. It would, however, be a good idea. Seeing so many overweight and downright obese people absolutely disgusts me. Pathetic, what people will do to themselves. As a matter of fact, I think the opposite of your statement is true: people in the US are pretty much fed that it's "OK" to be overweight and has become somewhat of a norm. I believe Ruze is trying to point to the fact that in some cultures and time periods fat/plump has been the idolized perfect beauty. While fat has become the norm in many countries today, it is not the ideal figure. What you see on the cover of the most popular magazines would be the perfect beauty in our culture.

CCP Atropos C C P	Posted - 2009.03.11 17:53:00 - [32] Originally by: Razin Not a single window into space? We already know that CCP deemed that looking at your (or any) ship while in station is not required. Apparently anything that hints that you are 'in space' is also not required. I don't know where you got that from. It was deemed not feasible to have windows looking into space because of technical constraints with the EVE server design. I do agree though, windows would be awesome Software Engineer CCP Engineering Services

Thrawnfl	Posted - 2009.03.11 17:56:00 - [33] What about being able to go into the hanger and look at your ship? like what was in the first video we saw of wis. Just to get a real sense of the size of the ships.
Iamien Caldari Stargate SG-1 Sev3rance	Posted - 2009.03.11 17:58:00 - [34] Originally by: Thrawnfl What about being able to go into the hanger and look at your ship? like what was in the first video we saw of wis. Just to get a real sense of the size of the ships. Just settle with they are big. Look at your ship and look at all of the decks of windows you have.
Bish Ounen Gallente Best Path Inc. Ethereal Dawn	Posted - 2009.03.11 18:04:00 - [35] Originally by: CCP Atropos Originally by: Razin Not a single window into space? We already know that CCP deemed that looking at your (or any) ship while in station is not required. Apparently anything that hints that you are 'in space' is also not required. I don't know where you got that from. It was deemed not feasible to have windows looking into space because of technical constraints with the EVE server design. I do agree though, windows would be awesome I'd imagine that it would be possible to have windows looking into space WITHIN the server constraints, BUT what you would be seeing would be a generated "pretend" space. IE: an animation with random ships flying about, NOT a live image of what's actually out there. Personally, I'd like to even have that, although I can understand why CCP didn't implement it. For some people it would be immersion breaking. Still, it's too bad that there can't be a single window looking out with a view that corresponds to a static camera stuck on the side of the station. Similar to the CCP Tank Cam concept. However, with the number of stations and cameras that would entail it would be incredibly load-inducing. I suppose you could also have the unusual situation of the server being a client of itself and causing some kind of crazy "divide by zero" problem causing the EVE universe to implode. ---- Fix the Wardec System!
Ivy Scorn Amarr Nethro Ore Conglomerate	Posted - 2009.03.11 18:05:00 - [36] Originally by: Marielle TueurDeCoeur Something like %65 of our (USA) population is overweight, so this "training" you speak of is absolute bullsh*t. Ever watched TV? How many fat people did you see?... Training sounds like the correct term to me.
Ruze Amarr No Applicable Corporation	Posted - 2009.03.11 19:01:00 - [37] Originally by: Destination SkillQueue Originally by: Marielle TueurDeCoeur Originally by: Ruze Believe it or not, not all cultures believe 'fat' is bad or ugly. I know that this is the way we're trained to think in the US ... YEAH F**ING RIGHT!! Liar. Something like %65 of our (USA) population is overweight, so this "training" you speak of is absolute bullsht. It would, however, be a good idea. Seeing so many overweight and downright obese people absolutely disgusts me. Pathetic, what people will do to themselves. As a matter of fact, I think the opposite of your statement is true: people in the US are pretty much fed that it's "OK" to be overweight and has become somewhat of a norm. I believe Ruze is trying to point to the fact that in some cultures and time periods fat/plump has been the idolized perfect beauty. While fat has become the norm in many countries today, it is not the ideal figure. What you see on the cover of the most popular magazines would be the perfect beauty in our culture. That was exactly the point. And the 'training' I was referring to is our TV, video games and magazines. Our media, so to speak. People in the US have a tendency to be fat and/or obese, but they're also trained to hate themselves and each other for it. And as research shows, depression and self loathing only hurts the issue. It's a shame you are so disgusted by the human body, Tueur. And you don't think you've been trained? Before Wormholes
Zaqar Pator Tech School	Posted - 2009.03.11 19:07:00 - [38] I want a job making pictures of ladies with shiny bums.
Dallenn Minmatar Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction	Posted - 2009.03.11 20:57:00 - [39] Originally by: Marielle TueurDeCoeur Female models have fantastic rear ends, I must say. Don't worry, CCP has plenty of time for nerfs and other balance adjustments, based on Sisi testing. The shiny suit is faction equipment and cannot be used on trial accounts. The pictures shown have skinny people because they are taken in alpha testing, thus only fresh clones are shown. If your character walks through the canteen area of the station regularly, he/she will pick up weight at approximately 1kg per week. About hand gestures, how are your Social skills looking? Not to mention people flying around in a pod all the time probably don't get to use their hands/arms a lot... Roleplaying in Eve
Vixisti Wrath of Fenris	Posted - 2009.03.11 21:04:00 - [40] Glad to see moons being upgraded

Ruze Amarr No Applicable Corporation	Posted - 2009.03.11 21:10:00 - [41] Originally by: Dallenn Originally by: Marielle TueurDeCoeur Female models have fantastic rear ends, I must say. Don't worry, CCP has plenty of time for nerfs and other balance adjustments, based on Sisi testing. The shiny suit is faction equipment and cannot be used on trial accounts. The pictures shown have skinny people because they are taken in alpha testing, thus only fresh clones are shown. If your character walks through the canteen area of the station regularly, he/she will pick up weight at approximately 1kg per week. About hand gestures, how are your Social skills looking? Not to mention people flying around in a pod all the time probably don't get to use their hands/arms a lot... /emote cross-arms NOTICE: Your character lacks the phyiscal strength to lift his/her arms. Please train 'physical discipline' and 'workout regimen' and try again! Before Wormholes
Bethulsunamen Amarr Viziam	Posted - 2009.03.11 21:12:00 - [42] The female bodies are like..... Perfect.. Those juicy legs.. mmmm
Janu Hull Caldari Terra Incognita Ethereal Dawn	Posted - 2009.03.11 21:14:00 - [43] Originally by: Ivy Scorn Ever watched TV? How many fat people did you see?... Training sounds like the correct term to me. A few, actually. Kevin James, Camryn Manheim, Wayne Knight, Leon Rippy, Paul Sorvino, John Goodman. Not all of them are obese, but all are overweight. In the event of an emergency, my ego may be used as a floatation device.
Bethulsunamen Amarr Viziam	Posted - 2009.03.11 21:20:00 - [44] Edited by: Bethulsunamen on 11/03/2009 21:21:34 And to end the "USA trains ppl to think fat ppl are ugly" conversation.. Many widely regarded UBERHAWT women in USA are in fact a tad bit on the chunky side. If people in USA were to live in Spain, Italy, France or Sweden for a month, they would call everyone anorexic. In fact USA trains ppl to think chunky is the new normal, even though we ALL decended from Africa, where people ran around hunting and gathering for food while their ribs were showing due to the fact that they had to WORK for their food, not just sit in McDonalds. So if you wanna be really anal (pun intended), being slim is the norm. It sort of sickens me how society works. First it was a sickness to be obese. Now its considered a sickness to be slim. Geez. Why cant we all just get along, no matter our size?
SadisticSavior Caldari	Posted - 2009.03.11 21:21:00 - [45] The graphics arent realistic enough. I demand more camel toe! (Reunification is Coming)
Alexis Machine Minmatar Ceraphite Technologies	Posted - 2009.03.11 21:36:00 - [46] Some of these images aren't proper for a "t" rated forums.
BrottarBritta	Posted - 2009.03.11 21:49:00 - [47] EVE-butt vs Flander's butt I have to much time.
The Snowman Gallente Aliastra	Posted - 2009.03.11 21:50:00 - [48] so, what? we arnt going to be able to see our ship docked like in that video? and there will be no windows... er.. Well this really does change things. I like space, I dont want to be cooped up in what looks like a metal box judging from those screenies. I never beleived it when people said that stations would just be empty and noone would be interested in them, but now im not so sure.
Bullageddon Caldari	Posted - 2009.03.11 21:56:00 - [49] Ooh world of evecraft. So which race gets the jump flip? === This Space For Lease or Sale.
Doctor Penguin Amarr Shadow Command Tenth Legion	Posted - 2009.03.11 21:56:00 - [50] Originally by: BrottarBritta EVE-butt vs Flander's butt I have to much time. Nothing at all! Nothing at all! Nothing at all! God, I love that episode. ________________________________________________

SadisticSavior Caldari	Posted - 2009.03.11 22:00:00 - [51] Yeah, WIS seems a lot less appealing if there is no interaction with the regular EVE universe... At the very least I'd like to be able to see docked ships. You cant honestly tell me that the server cant handle simply telling the client what ships are currently docked...that would take virtually no effort from the server. I can live without more camel toe, but we need windows. (Reunification is Coming)
Iamien Caldari Stargate SG-1 Sev3rance	Posted - 2009.03.11 22:03:00 - [52] To set the record straight. The reason our population is characteristically overweight is because our massive supply of corn. Corn syrup is used to flavor almost anything we eat, which is harder to break down. This combined with the global trend of people becoming less active is what leaves us where we are today.
Iamien Caldari Stargate SG-1 Sev3rance	Posted - 2009.03.11 22:04:00 - [53] Edited by: Iamien on 11/03/2009 22:05:06 Originally by: SadisticSavior At the very least I'd like to be able to see docked ships. You cant honestly tell me that the server cant handle simply telling the client what ships are currently docked...that would take virtually no effort from Do you have ANY idea how many ships are docked at a stations at any given time? Hell, at my alliance's outpost alone I have no less than 30 rigged ships ready to be flown.
Wu Jiaqiu Minmatar	Posted - 2009.03.11 22:10:00 - [54] Originally by: CCP Atropos Originally by: Razin Not a single window into space? We already know that CCP deemed that looking at your (or any) ship while in station is not required. Apparently anything that hints that you are 'in space' is also not required. I don't know where you got that from. It was deemed not feasible to have windows looking into space because of technical constraints with the EVE server design. I do agree though, windows would be awesome Well, you can make a "Screen window" where its like a T.V that plays a timelapse of space outside and ships going in and out. MUCH easier.
Ruze Amarr No Applicable Corporation	Posted - 2009.03.11 22:11:00 - [55] Edited by: Ruze on 11/03/2009 22:10:59 Originally by: Iamien To set the record straight. The reason our population is characteristically overweight is because our massive supply of corn. Corn syrup is used to flavor almost anything we eat, which is harder to break down. This combined with the global trend of people becoming less active is what leaves us where we are today. Popular Science recently did an article on some of the interesting things that effect obesity: chemical effects from certain plastics on the genetic-level processing of fat; the result of a society that uses air conditioners (and doesn't regularly force their body to do the work necessary for temperature adjustements); the increase in sugar substitutes, which bypass the bodies natural hunger mechanism; etc. That being said, there's a very difference between what is 'obese', and what is fat. As I've said and stand by, especially in the states, we're shown daily that skinny people are the thing to be. Of course, everyone seems to have a different definition of what is 'skinny' and what is 'fat'. Me, personally? That's not fat. That's obese. And that's not thin. That's skinny. Before Wormholes
Ruze Amarr No Applicable Corporation	Posted - 2009.03.11 22:12:00 - [56] Originally by: Wu Jiaqiu Originally by: CCP Atropos Originally by: Razin Not a single window into space? We already know that CCP deemed that looking at your (or any) ship while in station is not required. Apparently anything that hints that you are 'in space' is also not required. I don't know where you got that from. It was deemed not feasible to have windows looking into space because of technical constraints with the EVE server design. I do agree though, windows would be awesome Well, you can make a "Screen window" where its like a T.V that plays a timelapse of space outside and ships going in and out. MUCH easier. Some type of representation that 'we are still in space' would be nice. Even necessary. And yes, I still want to view my own ship. Before Wormholes
InVictus Kell Gallente Tactical Solutions Inc.	Posted - 2009.03.11 22:17:00 - [57] Originally by: Ruze Edited by: Ruze on 11/03/2009 22:10:59 Originally by: Iamien To set the record straight. The reason our population is characteristically overweight is because our massive supply of corn. Corn syrup is used to flavor almost anything we eat, which is harder to break down. This combined with the global trend of people becoming less active is what leaves us where we are today. Popular Science recently did an article on some of the interesting things that effect obesity: chemical effects from certain plastics on the genetic-level processing of fat; the result of a society that uses air conditioners (and doesn't regularly force their body to do the work necessary for temperature adjustements); the increase in sugar substitutes, which bypass the bodies natural hunger mechanism; etc. That being said, there's a very difference between what is 'obese', and what is fat. As I've said and stand by, especially in the states, we're shown daily that skinny people are the thing to be. Of course, everyone seems to have a different definition of what is 'skinny' and what is 'fat'. Me, personally? That's not fat. That's obese. And that's not thin. That's skinny. AAAUUUGH! MY EYEZ!!! a little back on topic, what is the general science behind windows on a space-craft or station? obviously their are going to be different rules since the see-through portions are weaker than the rest of the structure. I know on modern day shuttles, the windows are very small due to weight and limiting the exposed areas that may be potentially weaker than the rest of the hull.
SadisticSavior Caldari	Posted - 2009.03.11 22:36:00 - [58] Quote: Do you have ANY idea how many ships are docked at a stations at any given time? Is it a billion? Quote: Hell, at my alliance's outpost alone I have no less than 30 rigged ships ready to be flown. Thats much less than a billion. BFD. How much bandwidth could it POSSIBLY take the server to define what type of ships are docked and how many? We don't need to know what rigs you have to display them on the client...rigs aren't displayed graphically anyway. We don't even need to know most of the modules. How many total ship models are in the game? 100? 500? So assign every ship model a number between 1 and 500, and transmit each number to the client. That'd take a few k at most. All the processing (such as it is) could be done on the client side. All that needs to be transmitted from the server are the basics, and that is a trivial amount of data. Some WIS is better than nothing I suppose. And they could always enhance it later. But no windows would be a let down for me. (Reunification is Coming)
Quantar Raalsken Gallente	Posted - 2009.03.11 22:37:00 - [59] DO WANT
Dmian Gallente Gallenterrorisme	Posted - 2009.03.11 23:13:00 - [60] Originally by: Zey Nadar Ive seen some of those pics before, but I gotta say they look so good I cant believe they are legit :D We discussed the pictures (and the rears) in this thread a couple of months ago. ---- Eve Alpha - The font of Eve - Get it here



Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.