| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Kawaai
|
Posted - 2009.04.20 19:10:00 -
[31]
If I didn't know better I'd say it's scetch of something like saturday night live, or is it? nah can't be it's lacking of laughter in the back. God hate people who don't know what they're talk about.
|

FOl2TY8
Tribal Liberation Force
|
Posted - 2009.04.20 19:14:00 -
[32]
Originally by: La5eR Sex is overrated. Me being one of those hardcore Christians believe you should save yourself for that special person. I would strongly encourage you all to visit www.lustfreeliving.org .
In social circles Men give love for sex, and Woman give sex for love. I dont mean to be pushy and all but in the bible it says states in the gospel Matthew that if a man looks upon a woman with sexual desires he has adulterated her heart.
In today's society sex has been commercialized and over-emphasized. The desire of the flesh is very strong in our lives. The desire to pleasure oneself with another can be strong and nature wants us to pro-create. We as humans have something no other species has on this Earth: choice. Choice was given to us to make decisions to benefit and berate us.
I totally want to stick things in this post. ---------- This post brought to you by the worst PVP'er in Eve |

Jago Kain
Amarr Ramm's RDI
|
Posted - 2009.04.20 20:30:00 -
[33]
Edited by: Jago Kain on 20/04/2009 20:30:40
Sex is boring, Pain is fun, I wanna cut my fingers off one by one, There ain't no point in staying alive, I wanna be dead when I'm twenty five.....
___________________________________________________ The game will never be over, because we're keeping the meme alive. |

Ranik Sandaris
Caldari The Centurions Eternus Imperium Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.04.21 10:44:00 -
[34]
Originally by: La5eR Sex is overrated. Me being one of those hardcore Christians believe you should save yourself for that special person. I would strongly encourage you all to visit www.lustfreeliving.org .
In social circles Men give love for sex, and Woman give sex for love. I dont mean to be pushy and all but in the bible it says states in the gospel Matthew that if a man looks upon a woman with sexual desires he has adulterated her heart.
In today's society sex has been commercialized and over-emphasized. The desire of the flesh is very strong in our lives. The desire to pleasure oneself with another can be strong and nature wants us to pro-create. We as humans have something no other species has on this Earth: choice. Choice was given to us to make decisions to benefit and berate us.
Either God can create a stone which he cannot lift, or he cannot create a stone which he cannot lift. If God can create a stone which he cannot lift, then he is not omnipotent (since he cannot lift the stone in question). If God cannot create a stone which he cannot lift, then he is not omnipotent (since he cannot create the stone in question). Therefore God is not omnipotent.
SO STOP LISTENING |

Corwain
|
Posted - 2009.04.21 12:39:00 -
[35]
Originally by: Sera Ryskin
Quote: In social circles Men give love for sex, and Woman give sex for love. I dont mean to be pushy and all but in the bible it says states in the gospel Matthew that if a man looks upon a woman with sexual desires he has adulterated her heart.
*looks upon your girlfriend*
PS: outdated gender roles FTL. Women want sex just as much as men. You might know this if you actually had a girlfriend.
Haha, so true. Often I think women like sex MORE than men. Of course the state of affairs have always been this way, society was just rejecting the notion before. I am reminded of the sexually repressed Victorian women:
Quote: In 1859, it was claimed that a quarter of all women suffered from hysteria. This number makes sense if you consider that there was a 75-page catalogue with possible symptoms, and this list was seen as incomplete. Some of the symptoms of female hysteria are faintness, nervousness, insomnia, fluid retention, heaviness in the abdomen, muscle spasms, shortness of breath, irritability and a loss of appetite for food. The exact cause of hysteria is not clearly defined, except that is was a æwomb disease.Æ According to the Victorians, it had either to do with pent-up fluids in the female body, stress of modern-day life, or the æwanderings of the womb.Æ It was definately an upper-class disease, an American physician expressed pleasure that the country was æcatching upÆ to Europe in the prevalence of hysteria. Luckily, there was a temporary solution for hysteria (hysteria was a chronic disease so it could never be fully cured.) The woman suffering from hysteria would go to the doctor for a æpelvic massage to the point of hysterical paroxysm.Æ The doctors thought this to be a very tedious task indeed, and due to this, the first vibrators were invented: around 1870 the first ones were in use by physicians.
-- Distortion| Distortion 2 Preview |

Malvaceae Veri
|
Posted - 2009.04.21 16:13:00 -
[36]
Originally by: Jago Kain Edited by: Jago Kain on 20/04/2009 20:30:40
Sex is boring, Pain is fun,
You might want to check out BDSM:)
Kinky sex makes the wolrd go around....
|

masternerdguy
Gallente Point of No Return Blade.
|
Posted - 2009.04.21 20:25:00 -
[37]
rofl, this thread is entartaining. Now go and shoot yourselves in the foot if you are more into that kind of thing
|

Aarin Wrath
Caldari Perkone
|
Posted - 2009.04.21 20:48:00 -
[38]
Edited by: Aarin Wrath on 21/04/2009 20:48:22
Originally by: Sera Ryskin
And why is this a bad thing? Sex is fun. Try ditching the whole "more repressed than thou" act, and you might have a happier life.
Good post Sera, but I'd clarify one bit ...
Sex is fun, when your with the right girl, who has some skill in the art, and enjoys it. Sex with a woman who dosen't know what she is doing, or dosen't do anything (the worst kind), or is clearly just going through the motions, ... isen't fun.
Bad x-girlfriends .... FTL.  |

Onus Mian
Amarr Kingfisher Industries
|
Posted - 2009.04.21 20:49:00 -
[39]
Sexual repression leads to sexual abuse. Look at the catholics church! |

Aarin Wrath
Caldari Perkone
|
Posted - 2009.04.21 20:53:00 -
[40]
Originally by: Onus Mian Sexual repression leads to sexual abuse. Look at the catholics church!
Sorry dude, correlation does not imply causation.
Eg. All serial killers breath air. Badgers breath air. Therefore all badgers are serial killers.
Sorry for the derail but those type of assertions bug me.
|

Onus Mian
Amarr Kingfisher Industries
|
Posted - 2009.04.21 20:55:00 -
[41]
Edited by: Onus Mian on 21/04/2009 20:55:09
Originally by: Aarin Wrath
Originally by: Onus Mian Sexual repression leads to sexual abuse. Look at the catholics church!
Sorry dude, correlation does not imply causation.
Eg. All serial killers breath air. Badgers breath air. Therefore all badgers are serial killers.
Sorry for the derail but those type of assertions bug me.
Aye you've got me there
Badges can give you a nasty bite though |

TimMc
Gallente Brutal Deliverance Blackguard Coalition
|
Posted - 2009.04.22 07:54:00 -
[42]
Originally by: Ranik Sandaris Either God can create a stone which he cannot lift, or he cannot create a stone which he cannot lift. If God can create a stone which he cannot lift, then he is not omnipotent (since he cannot lift the stone in question). If God cannot create a stone which he cannot lift, then he is not omnipotent (since he cannot create the stone in question). Therefore God is not omnipotent.
SO STOP LISTENING
ITS A TRAP!!!
Logic there is just meant to trap people, God wouldn't lift stuff. |

Mercurye
Gallente
|
Posted - 2009.04.27 11:54:00 -
[43]
I dont have sex because of Falcon :( --~--~--~--~ ~NOTE: Freak~ |

Ratchman
|
Posted - 2009.04.27 12:29:00 -
[44]
Originally by: Ranik Sandaris
Either God can create a stone which he cannot lift, or he cannot create a stone which he cannot lift. If God can create a stone which he cannot lift, then he is not omnipotent (since he cannot lift the stone in question). If God cannot create a stone which he cannot lift, then he is not omnipotent (since he cannot create the stone in question). Therefore God is not omnipotent.
That is quite a good logical argument, sir. Did you make that up, or is it a quote?
I've used this kind of argument before, but this is a more succinct expression that what I was using.
|

Ratchman
|
Posted - 2009.04.27 12:37:00 -
[45]
Corwain, if you haven't seen it already, I would recommend the film The Road To Wellville, which is a comedy based on the sanitarium that Dr Kellogg (of cornflake fame) ran. It exposes the lunacy of what people thought was was healthy and unhealthy, and how repression was the order of the day. It includes quite a few references to 'womb massage'. Despite being a comedy, a lot of it was based in reality, and the medical treatments were simply bizarre.
|

Ratchman
|
Posted - 2009.04.27 13:33:00 -
[46]
As someone else said, sex is fun.
The problem comes from people, not the biology. Far too many people are still quite repressed, and there are far too many people who still see this subject as taboo and somehow 'wrong'. Ask yourself this question: why is ****ography so taboo when it is simply showing something we have evolved to do naturally? The answer is by keeping it taboo, there is a section of society that makes a great deal of money from it.
Large organisations, such as religions and governments still cling on to archaic thinking, and see sex as something that can only be done in a 'productive' way. Taking pleasure from it may deviate you from the productive nature of the family unit, so it is seen as being something to be a little dispassionate about. This has changed over time, and now they are a little more grudgingly accepting in that it is now okay to enjoy sex, as long as it is still kept behind closed doors, and done with the moral permission of those in authority.
There is a further obstacle in the fact that people do have very individual viewpoints. Some people can say they're very open, but are far more repressed than they would ever admit too. Why do you think so much casual sex is done when people are drunk? It's because they want to, but can't bring themselves to do it when sober. This is unfortunate, because drunk sex is more likely to create problems than be enjoyable. Other people can say they want one thing and mean another, such as the person who intially appears to be interested in casual sex and then turns into psycho-commitment bunny-boiler.
In summary, there's nothing wrong with casual sex, as long as you take precautions, and don't hurt anyone. The only problems that exist with sex are the ones we have made for ourselves. Both men and women enjoy sex in equal measure, but the views we have been brought up with skew our view of something that should be naturally enjoyed like any other part of our biological imperatives.
All that said, sex is not the be all and end all. It's fun, no denying that, but it becomes less of an obsession once you get out of your early twenties. There are plenty of things to enjoy in life, and plenty of things to see.
Enjoy sex whenever you can, but don't be ruled by it.
|

Terianna Eri
Amarr Scrutari
|
Posted - 2009.04.27 17:24:00 -
[47]
Originally by: Ratchman
Originally by: Ranik Sandaris
Either God can create a stone which he cannot lift, or he cannot create a stone which he cannot lift. If God can create a stone which he cannot lift, then he is not omnipotent (since he cannot lift the stone in question). If God cannot create a stone which he cannot lift, then he is not omnipotent (since he cannot create the stone in question). Therefore God is not omnipotent.
That is quite a good logical argument, sir. Did you make that up, or is it a quote?
I've used this kind of argument before, but this is a more succinct expression that what I was using.
It's very, very old. And not a particularly good argument, for that matter. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omnipotence_paradox Really it just comes from the difficulty in defining what constitutes omnipotence and whether omnipotence lets a being ignore logic.
I tend to see it as the same sort of question as "Can God draw a square circle without changing the definitions of a square or circle?" - nonsense.
Alternatively, it's what comes up when you define the inability to do something as its own ability. __________________________________
Originally by: CCP Whisper Boo hoo. Cry some more.
|

Dong Ninja
|
Posted - 2009.04.27 20:58:00 -
[48]
Between the definition of omnipotence and what constitutes it, or why God would not be considered omnipotent because he made a rock he couldn't lift, you could also say that the rock is in fact unliftable...until God decides to lift it, or change the definition of unliftable, or change the rules of the universe entirely so there is no such thing as liftable or unliftable.
Paradoxes can be fun, but they're often just the result of a lack of information or an incomplete perspective.
Originally by: Xen Gin Indeed, upgrading an MS OS is like taking a **** into a cake mixture, then complaining that it doesn't taste good when it's all done.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |