Kind of but not quite.

I want them to build on the new system by letting us assign GÇ£root objectsGÇ¥ as specific windows.

Let me define a GÇ£stationGÇ¥ inventory that has things like the station hangar, corp hangar, corp deliveries and ship hangar in its tree, and nothing else (because those are the only things that are subcategories to station inventories). Then let me define a GÇ£shipGÇ¥ inventory window that has things like the ship cargo hold, the drone bay, the ore bay, the whatever-bay in its tree view and nothing else (because those inventories are the only ones that have a ship as its root object).
Then let me define a Gǣcargo canGǣ inventory that listsGǪ (drumroll) cargo cans in its tree view, because that's the only thing that sorts under that root object.

GǪand now let me actually make use of that much-vaunted NeoCom customisation to assign each of these root-object-inventories to a specific button (and as an added bonus, let me define a custom keyboard command for each such button). Then let each such window remember aaaaaaall of its settings: location, size, last seen content, default content, stacking, view modes, tree and filter expansions and settings and so on.

Then we'll have something that starts to look like a good inventory management system (also, cross-port the inventory manager to cover the other two obvious uses: the S&I interface and the asset windows GÇö both corp and personal).

Pretty much all of us did.

THIS IS BROADCAST FOR EVERYONE.

CCP OVERLOOKED OPTION -> ESC -> GENERAL SETTINGS -> "Merge Items and Ships into Station Panel"

SOMEHOW IT ESCAPED THE CLUTCHES OF UNIFIED INVENTORY AND STILL WORKS AS INTENDED.

AMARRIAN GOD PLEASE HELP US ALL TO FORGIVE DEVS FOR THIS NEW INVENTORY SYSTEM.

Post here if you want the following back:

- Button to open corp hangar directly
- Button to open ships hangar directly
- Button to open your station item hangar directly

All the easy access buttons that are missing, the worse part is all the item windows reset when you dock again.

EDIT: Now having played a bit more, and me being a pirate. I like the new missile effects and the new killmails. Also the value shown of all items in a hangar is nice. But please also fix the above.

Oh hi ccp

This inventory system has potential.

That said, bring back the old buttons.

And stop dropping these UI bombs.
I dont mind you put new stuff in the game, but this whole: "we just force it down our clients throats" is not a good business strategy.
Make this stuff more optional.

Remember the right click window changes and the walking in hangar thingy?
I'am sure you guys will (eventually) learn.

Kind of but not quite.

I want them to build on the new system by letting us assign GÇ£root objectsGÇ¥ as specific windows.

Let me define a GÇ£stationGÇ¥ inventory that has things like the station hangar, corp hangar, corp deliveries and ship hangar in its tree, and nothing else (because those are the only things that are subcategories to station inventories). Then let me define a GÇ£shipGÇ¥ inventory window that has things like the ship cargo hold, the drone bay, the ore bay, the whatever-bay in its tree view and nothing else (because those inventories are the only ones that have a ship as its root object).
Then let me define a Gǣcargo canGǣ inventory that listsGǪ (drumroll) cargo cans in its tree view, because that's the only thing that sorts under that root object.

GǪand now let me actually make use of that much-vaunted NeoCom customisation to assign each of these root-object-inventories to a specific button (and as an added bonus, let me define a custom keyboard command for each such button). Then let each such window remember aaaaaaall of its settings: location, size, last seen content, default content, stacking, view modes, tree and filter expansions and settings and so on.

Then we'll have something that starts to look like a good inventory management system (also, cross-port the inventory manager to cover the other two obvious uses: the S&I interface and the asset windows GÇö both corp and personal).

It made it live because when CCP asked for comments, 90% of the responses were "I like" in one form or another.