Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Turin
Caldari Body Count Inc. Against ALL Authorities
|
Posted - 2009.07.21 18:56:00 -
[91]
Originally by: CCP Wrangler Apparently the system for this is currently broken and that is why it is considered an exploit. Our Customer Support team are making sure it's being worked on and we hope it will be fixed soon. 
Well this is lame and stupid. How am I supposed to help a friend who isnt in my corp? Fix your damn game. I for one, will CONTINUE to help my friends. Its not MY fault you cant make your game work correctly.
|

Gul Tural
|
Posted - 2009.07.21 19:26:00 -
[92]
Edited by: Gul Tural on 21/07/2009 19:28:35
Originally by: CCP Wrangler
Originally by: Weight What
Originally by: CCP Wrangler Apparently the system for this is currently broken and that is why it is considered an exploit. Our Customer Support team are making sure it's being worked on and we hope it will be fixed soon. 
So, is it an exploit or not, as you mention the system is broken? 
As long as the intended function is broken it is considered an exploit by our Customer Support department.
WHOOOOOO ... hold on there for a second.
You mean im doing exploits every time i launch drones?
Clearly i must be cause as far as i know drones are still not working completely as the funtion is intended. Am i now banned?
/sarcasm
What i mean to say is that how on earth are we to ensure were not "exploiting" intended game mechanics if we dont have a usable way of knowing about them .. like a specific page that lists all known exploits/not working game mechanics...
Tell me that.
|

MEBHansen
Euphoria Released
|
Posted - 2009.07.21 22:37:00 -
[93]
Originally by: Gul Tural
What i mean to say is that how on earth are we to ensure were not "exploiting" intended game mechanics if we dont have a usable way of knowing about them .. like a specific page that lists all known exploits/not working game mechanics...
Tell me that.
Having a page that lists all known exploits is baad, m'kay 
|

Gone'Postal
Void Engineers Mass - Effect
|
Posted - 2009.07.21 22:47:00 -
[94]
Originally by: MEBHansen
Originally by: Gul Tural
What i mean to say is that how on earth are we to ensure were not "exploiting" intended game mechanics if we dont have a usable way of knowing about them .. like a specific page that lists all known exploits/not working game mechanics...
Tell me that.
Having a page that lists all known exploits is baad, m'kay 
And banning players for using an exploit without informing the players what is and what isn't one is just really good practice?
Originally by: masternerdguy
Officer mods arent spread out because the bpos are innacesible to 99% of eve.
|

Constable Chang
Amarr Ministry of War
|
Posted - 2009.07.21 23:03:00 -
[95]
Originally by: Gone'Postal
Originally by: MEBHansen
Originally by: Gul Tural
What i mean to say is that how on earth are we to ensure were not "exploiting" intended game mechanics if we dont have a usable way of knowing about them .. like a specific page that lists all known exploits/not working game mechanics...
Tell me that.
Having a page that lists all known exploits is baad, m'kay 
And banning players for using an exploit without informing the players what is and what isn't one is just really good practice?
MMO companies will ban players for any reason they like.
They are desperately trying to assert their sovereignty over the virtual worlds that they have created.
|

Teldan Powers
|
Posted - 2009.07.22 13:07:00 -
[96]
Originally by: Constable Chang They are desperately trying to assert their sovereignty over the virtual worlds that they have created.
They should have to do it like the rest of us and put up towers...
|

Roemy Schneider
Vanishing Point.
|
Posted - 2009.07.22 13:31:00 -
[97]
LOL
but iguess it's fixed on some internal server and will only take 2 more years until it's on TQ amirite?
until then, ban away \o/ - putting the gist back into logistics |

N'tek alar
|
Posted - 2009.07.22 13:52:00 -
[98]
Originally by: Turin I for one, will CONTINUE to help my friends. Its not MY fault you cant make your game work correctly.
And it isn't THEIR fault that you continue doing it even after being told it's not allowed, Therefor it isn't THEIR faul when you get banned. |

Poreuomai
Minmatar Mirkur Draug'Tyr Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2009.07.22 14:20:00 -
[99]
Originally by: MEBHansen Having a page that lists all known exploits is baad, m'kay 
I've never heard a convincing argument for that. If something is not allowed, you tell people "this is not allowed". Just about every set of rules in the world work like that. ---
Let My People Go |

Rashmika Clavain
Gallente Shadows Of The Federation
|
Posted - 2009.07.22 14:48:00 -
[100]
Ummm so it is okay for a neutral to remote other ships but it's not okay for a neutral to remote rep a POS.
Makes perfect sense  Removed. Please keep your EVE signature related to your EVE persona and not that of a real life politician. Navigator |
|

Weight What
|
Posted - 2009.07.22 15:48:00 -
[101]
Edited by: Weight What on 22/07/2009 15:56:16
Originally by: CCP Wrangler
Originally by: Weight What
Originally by: CCP Wrangler Apparently the system for this is currently broken and that is why it is considered an exploit. Our Customer Support team are making sure it's being worked on and we hope it will be fixed soon. 
So, is it an exploit or not, as you mention the system is broken? 
As long as the intended function is broken it is considered an exploit by our Customer Support department.
Sorry for the late reply and the forthcoming angry tone...
How much of a clown do you have to be to assert this, whilst maintaining the fiction of looking away while neutrals RR WTs? Ooh yes, and as the poster above me stated, how about the whole drone issue? They are obviously not functioning as they should (nor have they been for quite some time), so really, does that make me an exploiter too?
Seriously, the lack of communication and even understanding by the GMs (not the Devs, obviously [I think]) just baffles and dazzles me 
e for nastiness, sorry  -----------------------------------------------
Annonymous, trading as "Weight What". |

Suitonia
Gallente Genos Occidere
|
Posted - 2009.07.31 06:41:00 -
[102]
I think the bug is that it doesn't flag you to wartarget corps when you remote rep a POS, only to people who have agressed it in the last 15 minutes, like normal aggro transfer, although I'm not sure having not tested it, just going on what I've been hearing.
Still, making neutral repping a POS an exploit is pretty silly, considering that it is commonly done mercs/posrey alts/friends etc.
|

Frug
Repo Industries
|
Posted - 2009.07.31 07:48:00 -
[103]
Originally by: Suitonia I think the bug is that it doesn't flag you to wartarget corps when you remote rep a POS, only to people who have agressed it in the last 15 minutes, like normal aggro transfer, although I'm not sure having not tested it, just going on what I've been hearing.
Still, making neutral repping a POS an exploit is pretty silly, considering that it is commonly done mercs/posrey alts/friends etc.
This.
All of it.
They should fix it, but it's not a big deal really. Anyway they tend to issue warnings, not bans, so who cares.
- - - - - - - - - Do not use dotted lines - - - - - - If you think I'm awesome say BOOO BOOO!! - Ductoris Neat look what I found - Kreul Whisper/PrismX 4 emperor |

Tiny Tove
|
Posted - 2009.07.31 08:47:00 -
[104]
Edited by: Tiny Tove on 31/07/2009 08:48:12 They didn't mention THIS in the butterfly effect video....
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |