Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
zoolkhan
Minmatar Mirkur Draug'Tyr Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2009.08.03 17:06:00 -
[61]
Edited by: zoolkhan on 03/08/2009 17:06:53
Originally by: Merdaneth I would have to be morally bankrupt myself before I let murderers operating out of my house
Is it because you need your murderes inside your house so they can continue to harass my kinsmen?
Quote: Additionally, you indiscriminately kill pilots in Providence, even pilots who might be merely passing through,
I got news for you - jita , ammamake and rens are "pass through" systems - whomever comes to providence has all intentions but to "pass through".
You knew it, i knew it - now your brainwash customers know it as well.
Quote: Again, I would have to be morally bankrupt to kill people I don't even know solely on the account that I saw them walking in front of the house of someone I hate.
for the slow learner, we kill people because they actively support slavery with what they do, and although we keep reminding and educating people beforehands - some still dont get the message, or choose to ignore the message or deliberately aid the slaver cause for their own greed (rat rights if you help repell the freedom fighters)
that is not equal to "people walk in front of some house"
Quote: As for traitors, from your transmission it would seem you dislike Sylph more than CVA, is this true?
Thats a tough quiestion, i assume there is no unified answer to that - and i try to be honest with you because your question seem to come honest as well.
I personally would answer "yes"
An enemy who fights for their belief, and uphold their stated principles - may it be as mislead and unfortunate as in the case of CVA -certainly deserve some respect unlike the traitor, who side according to the weather with the winning side and goes from blue to red overnight and then later continues to dance like a muppet to the music of the CVA (i dont blame the cva, they orchestrated rather well) .... these people were ****roaches.
Dont get me wrong, CVA has also a permanent place in our memory. Their time will come. first things first.
Meantime i hope EM will take care of the likes of PIE :-) I am sure you have a permanent place in their memory. Perhaps you should worry for your own safety.
recruiting -forum
|
namelessclone01
Caldari blackbox ops
|
Posted - 2009.08.03 17:17:00 -
[62]
oh, what a bunch of lowlife terrorist scumbags! these matari disease-ridden dogs should be shown their place once again. and their rightful place is only in the cagoholds of salvaging vessels cleaning the debris in space.
|
Butter Dog
Gallente The Littlest Hobos Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2009.08.03 17:18:00 -
[63]
Originally by: Insane Nutmunch
I disagree, you have underestimated the value of that part of catch.
As I explained to you, we have been offered better space very recently, and turned those offers down. So why would we want that worthless strip of space in Northern Catch.
I'm not underestimating it's value at all. I helped build the IS-R outpost 3 years ago. I have complete moons scans. I know the precise value of that area of space.
If Sylph deserted the region tomorrow, we would not anchor towers or claim the space. It is worth nothing to us. Our only wish is to see Sylph die a slow and painful death. ----------
AKA 'Bitter Dog'
Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05 |
Golden Toaster
Amarr Holy Amarrian Battlemonk Libertas Fidelitas
|
Posted - 2009.08.03 18:09:00 -
[64]
What?? Slaves!?
Right at our doorstep?
Fetch my whip!
|
Ugleb
Minmatar Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2009.08.03 19:40:00 -
[65]
Edited by: Ugleb on 03/08/2009 19:40:49
Originally by: Ikar Kaltin I see how time dulls the memory of the Ushra'khan. Either that or the terrorists twist the truth to suit their own purpose, either way you teach the history of events wrong.
What caused Sylph to side with the Holy amarrian cause was not their betrayal of you, but instead your betrayal of them. You allowed pirates to operate out of 9UY, to raid their space and destroy their ships. You sheltered these pirates and refused to allow Sylph to retaliate within 9UY where these vile fiends operated from. You forced them to openly oppose you to oppose those whom you sheltered. And where do these pirates reside now? Within your very ranks! but many of you terrorist dogs may not remember that far back, many have become disillusioned and left to better things, and in their place sit those who create the past to suit themselves, instead of learning from it.
Its funny how such a thing as the truth can become distorted to fit your own view for your newer recruits who don't know better. Then again, your terrorists. Your not particulary well educated.
You expect us to relate detailed and complex history over the course of a fifteen minute speech and still find time to speak of the present? Perhaps I lack the Amarrian love of a long monologue.
My memory is not at fault, only recently I related this chapter of history publically and in a more suitable context.
Originally by: Insane Nutmunch 10 out of 10 for style, but minus several million for accuracy.
Just a couple of questions based around your statement.
1, Sylph is currently made up of both leadership and members who were not present during the CVA v UK war. Is this a case of just sour grapes now ?
2, Was this outburst of nationalistic pride prompted by any particular event ? Have Sylph made peace overtures and this is your response ?
3, Your members may bad mouth Sylph as traitors and cowards, yet they still seem to hold Promethia station AND have added more stations. Who are the "Winners"? Your killboard statistics or their space holding ability?
4, What now for U'K ? More "supply chain" attacks? or will you be executing something more than a campaign of minor irritation? Can we expect to see the glorious sight of U'K capital size vessels engaging in Sylph space?
On a seperate note to Butter Dog, I don't think any entity would remain neutral to their neighbours when they allow attackers to sortie from their stations. Sylph tried diplomatic channels but were ignored. U'K left them no choice but to pick a side. Good job they picked the winners really
Curious words for a member of the TLF who was still in the RMS classroom when the events he speaks of happened. Why the antagonism Vehrokior? I fail to see why you think that we lack in accuracy here.
Many of of the Sylph leaders and membership have changed over the past two years, yes. Their executor who was a senior leader back then very recently departed, but he had been there these past two years. When you join an alliance, you join it in knowledge of what it is and how it came to be. If you do not, you are a fool. Once you know where the alliance comes from, and choose to stay, then you accept responsibility for being a part of that. You do not join a pirate corp and profess to be anti-pirate, do you?
Why did this speech come now? Because we are currently prosecuting a focused campaign and sought to educate our foe about what they should already know. That they are a part of the problem in Providence.
As for respecting neutrality, I recall CVA and their allied pilots using Promethia as a resupply post while attacking our former station Karishal's Defiance. Yet we still did not call Sylph to account for that. So yes, there are some who would respect neutrality. It was us, to our own detriment.
The Journal; Walking The Road To Liberation |
Dinaahk Elam
|
Posted - 2009.08.03 22:56:00 -
[66]
Originally by: Cribb
Originally by: Dinaahk Elam Rumor has it that X-Bob / Kenny Corporations are entering factional warefare
This isnot a rumour, if you cared to check IGS. You would have seen this is a fact.
We are the Ushra'Khan, and we come for our people.
Still does not answer my inquiry, how many of your people were you able to recover ?
|
Dinaahk Elam
|
Posted - 2009.08.03 22:57:00 -
[67]
Originally by: Xennith "We come for our people", not "we come for some stations".
Again, in your last campaign of "revenge" How many of your people did you recover ?
|
Xennith
Neh'bu Kau Beh'Hude Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2009.08.03 23:19:00 -
[68]
I personally saved 36 slaves in my last combat action. Why? |
Gigaer
Minmatar COGNET SpaceSystems Ltd Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2009.08.03 23:28:00 -
[69]
We come for our people!
|
Friek
|
Posted - 2009.08.03 23:29:00 -
[70]
I rescued a CVA gallente POS that was unanchored how many slaves do you think it takes to run one of those??? id say at least 100 ohh and liberated a archon the next day at least 200 in those so at least 300 slaves freed in the last 2 days!!!! Where r ur gods now foolish amarr
|
|
Chooch Chooch
Chooch Inc.
|
Posted - 2009.08.03 23:56:00 -
[71]
Edited by: Chooch Chooch on 04/08/2009 00:06:27 Edited by: Chooch Chooch on 04/08/2009 00:05:21 ôSince U'K started a focused campaign against you, you have lost over half your members. 600 pilots voted with their feet and left for greener pastures. And all the time, U'K grows stronger. Daily, we control your space, and incapacitate stations services at will. We reinforce your POS, and steal unanchoring towers. We deny you your mining grounds. We remove safe passage in Empire.ö ButterDog I being not only one of the executors but of one of the corporations who have recently left Sylph would like to get some records straight. I have fought UK on many levels this past year and although they believe their cause to be just and they do have some true warriors. They are not the reason for corporations and members leaving Sylph. You may wish to think that is so but it is not. Those of who left have left because of our own reasons most fall behind Drakmor who was the glue that held Sylph together. Once he stepped down and left due to accusations of various CEOÆs within Sylph claiming he did not do anything, and blaming him for their own pilots inactivity, the rest followed.
I and my corporation which I can speak directly for refused to see Sylph become what it is becoming. Once Drakmor resigned I spoke to those leaders of my corporation and decided to leave as well. Drakmor offered to help Kueen1 during the transition, as did the rest of us. However certain CEOÆs were concerned that Drakmor would steal form the alliance or worse disband it. This caused many of those left to immediately leave and get out with our dignity intact. Kueen1 has taken over and has a tough challenge ahead, however the infighting and me first mentality within Sylph is not something that many of choose to be part of.
|
Chooch Chooch
Chooch Inc.
|
Posted - 2009.08.04 00:06:00 -
[72]
As for UshraÆKhan warriors and fighters your cloaking in systems is a nuisance nothing more, your attacks on miners and ratters truly gave the pvp force (the ones who actually fought you) a great load of laughs especially reading the kill board fits. Past attacks on when you came in with force were met with equal and greater force, and no we did not always blob you. I have led several fights against with you with equal and lesser numbers at the onset. However when we could blob yes we did, you cloaked, and we blobbed. I look at it no difference as if someone came to my home in Luminiere as a child, If you were not part of our gang and stepped foot in my neighborhood 20 of us would come out and stomp on your head till it popped. I chose to defend Sylph space the same way. Your recent attacks on outposts that have occurred while I stepped down and was leaving from what I saw did nothing but bring those remaining in Sylph closer together as it forces them to work together not against each other. So if you wish to make them stronger keep them up. If you want to see them be gone leave them to their own devises. Do not get me wrong I mean no disrespect to you, your pilots, or your tactics, only do not take credit for that with which you have nothing to do with. It cheapens all that you have accomplished and done.
As for what happened in your war with CVA I know not, as I was not there. However you have several ex Sylph member who were in your alliance as a matter of fact I believe you have more members in your alliance than Sylph does that was with Sylph at that time. I do not think anyone is left. I did research for many hours and days for the cause, and yes it came down to those who came to defend you and according to those in Sylph it was the allies of UK that fired first, according to UK it was Sylph who fired first. According to one source a red status was made overnight, diploÆs from either side were talking trying to straighten it out and then decided for giggles let it stand. UshraÆKhan lost and then began their campaign of terror. I remember reading an old transmission from Butterdog explaining exactly what they would do and you have done it. However it seems your anger has twisted the facts. As time changes so unfortunately do memories. But that is neither the point. The issue is Sylph is cascading very well on its own without your help. They may profess getting rid of dead weight when the most active participants in the alliance leave.
I have rambled on enough I am sure however after a year of not being allowed to post on galnet as was Sylph policy I guess I had a lot to say. I will stop now not to bore you. However to The warriors of UshraÆKhan you know how I feel it has been fun coming up with some really bad jokes at your expense, I will miss it.
|
ice sect
|
Posted - 2009.08.04 00:48:00 -
[73]
if you people are so intent on coming for your people feel free to voluntarily submit yourselves to the joyous task that is subjugation to the amarr way and youll be all up close and personal with your people. you know you want to. i cant think of any other reason that you people constantly infest amarr space yapping barely coherent digital diarrhea in local and littering the space lanes with all the broken parts that are constantly falling off your cloaked space-hoopties when the duct tape wears off.
who you callin' you people.
|
Maestro Ulv
Phaze-9 Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2009.08.04 00:54:00 -
[74]
Originally by: Merdaneth Additionally, you indiscriminately kill pilots in Providence, even pilots who might be merely passing through, on account that the mere presence in Providence indicates support for CVA? Knowing that Providence is open space?
Open space? Open space to me defines it as one with freedom to do what one wishes. Open space is certainly not subject to laws for if it was how can it be open space?
Of course you could define open space with a set of rules too, although it is admittedly far less open with those rules.
How about "Greater Providence is open for transit, commerce, faction bounty hunting and asteroid mining to all pilots, corporations, and alliances who obey the law"
Now to me the words "Commerce" and "obey the law" stand out the most. Commerce of course being only viable in one way, that of CVA stations, therefore supplying the coffers of the slavers with the much vaunted isk to do whatever it is slavers do with it.
Now colour me purple if I don't find that a reason to wage war on these "innocent bystanders" that help the slavers wage war on other with monies supplied from these travellers.
Oh and should PIE members wish to find the other laws such as:
"No pilot, corporation or alliance shall initiate an attack against another unless that pilot, corporation or alliance is expressly wanted on the Deliverance KOS List" - Open space? Hmm not quite.
"No pilot, corporation or alliance shall anchor a station or outpost without the express permission of the constellation’s Administrator " - Open space?... No...
"Corporations shall be held accountable for the actions of their pilots and Alliances shall be held accountable for the actions of their corporations" - Open space? Well this one I agree with tbh, except it us that hold them accountable most times.
"CONCORD sanctioned wars shall not release a pilot, corporation or alliance from adherence to the law" - Open space that doesn't even acknowledge CONCORD sanctioned rights?
They can be found here: http://www.cva-eve.org/
Further more I think you will find we do not "indiscriminately kill". Far from it infact. We plan most of killing quite painstakingly over a deep roast coffee in my corporation at least :)
|
Kirra Liu
|
Posted - 2009.08.04 01:33:00 -
[75]
Maestro Ulv, the points you make are just nitpicking at the words used i.e. open space. There is no true open space yet CVA and their allies have made Providence and a part of Northern Catch as open as possible. The rules in play in those areas are to provide a safer area for the general populace of New Eden to utilise for their own gain. Without the rules, most residents would no longer be there and the region would be in a state of constant hostility "and yes I know there are fights there, but nowhere near the scale that it would be if the rules didn't exist nor enforced". The KOS list is a necessary tool and without it the residents would have no idea who is friendly and who is a known hostile until it is too late. The rule about people not putting up towers or outposts without previou consent is again a measure that is needed to ensure the prolonged safety for residents in the area.
So to be brief, Providence is open space, open to all those that respect and follow the rules as laid out by the holders, who in return give people access to a vast number of systems, stations and services. Oh and the commerce that lines CVA's pockets, well I think it is more than fair that the holders make isk, after all it is their outposts, structures, time and ships that keep the region open to te general public.
"we do not "indiscriminately kill", I think we all know that Ushra'Khan do, in fact from my experience if you do not support U'K you are a valid target as far as your ROE goes in and around Providence.
Originally by: Chooch Chooch
However certain CEOÆs were concerned that Drakmor would steal form the alliance or worse disband it.
I wasn't aware of that and if that was the overall feeling of those leaders left in Sylph now then may it burn. Nothing but the utmost trust and respect for Drakmor and if it wasn't for him Sylph would have been gone and forgotten long ago.
|
Cipher7
No Limit Productions
|
Posted - 2009.08.04 03:17:00 -
[76]
Dear friends in UK,
I believe the "Burn Providence" policy to be counter-productive and short-sighted.
The people who today dock in 9uy know nothing of any cause, they dock because the station is THERE, they dock because it's a place to live and eak out a living. The CVA make it convenient for regular people to just show up and live.
The guerilla needs the common people like a fish needs water.
Freespace concept, anarcho-capitalism and anti-slavery are all aspects of the same cause, bolstering one bolsters the others.
My 2 isk
C7
|
Clavius XIV
Auctoritan Syndicate Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.08.04 03:57:00 -
[77]
Originally by: Ugleb
As for respecting neutrality, I recall CVA and their allied pilots using Promethia as a resupply post while attacking our former station Karishal's Defiance. Yet we still did not call Sylph to account for that. So yes, there are some who would respect neutrality. It was us, to our own detriment.
You recall incorrectly. In fact CVA had specific orders not to dock or use Promethia and to avoid passage through the system, despite the fact that we had docking privileges at the time (as did Ushra'Khan).
The main reasons for this directive? 1) CVA respected Sylph's neutrality and wanted to insure they remained neutral. Basing out of their stations to attack U'K would have put them in a position of having to chose between their relationship with us and with U'K, and since we would be instigating the diplomatic trouble for them it would be logical they would favor U'K. 2) In the event of a successful conquest of QR CVA did not want to set a precedent that would allow U'K to use Sylph's station and neutrality as a base to attack from and potentially recapture the station. By not using Sylph's station to attack QR it was believed that there would be a good case to bring before a presumably still neutral Sylph in the post QR period.
Of course CVA planning assumed that Sylph would remain neutral and that U'K would not antagonize them. At some point U'K calculated that they would be better off placating their pirate allies than with a neutral Sylph that was not harming them, but not helping them either. As a result rather than further constrain the actions of their allies (basing in the 9uy station), they allowed them to run amok in Sylph systems when not directly aiding the U'K war effort.
If Sylph could have be turned by U'K it would have been a significant wrench in CVA plans, but CVA went to great lengths ensure that we did nothing that might have compromised Sylph's neutral position.
Perhaps once U'K command realized that Sylph couldn't be turned and would stay neutral in the best case, they decided to burn the bridges, look the other way and allow their allies to use Sylph space as hunting grounds. Perhaps understandable given the dire circumstances... but to become indignant at Sylph's response is laughable given it is a situation that Ushra'Khan forced.
U'K could have easily had a neutral Sylph at the end of the high-intensity portion of the conflict, but either intentionally or through blunder they created the current antagonistic relationship.
So outrage at Sylph for treachery is misplaced... although I am sure it is useful within the ranks. A great excuse to beat up on relatively inexperienced capsuleer's to boost morale and beat the terrorist footsoilders into a frenzy, as long as they don't think to hard. Ushra'Khan leaders are to be commended for their shrewdness. However, the Vitoc method would have required less effort and been nearly as effective.
|
Tomahawk Bliss
Minmatar Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
|
Posted - 2009.08.04 06:16:00 -
[78]
Not saying what you said was making my face purple.
|
Garst Tyrell
Amarr PIE Inc.
|
Posted - 2009.08.04 07:29:00 -
[79]
The Amarr Empire has lasted millenia by the grace of God. Millenia. Providence has resisted the insurgency of corrupt tribals for years and is stronger for it. The Amarr Empire is implaceable, and like God himself it will outlast the heresies and failings of heathens who shun his love and authority. Do you really think you are the first to proclaim the end of the Amarr, the end of civilization? What makes you so unique, so sure? Resisting the spread of the Word is like spitting into the tide--futile and soon forgotten. The Amarr empire is cemented with the blood of martyrs. Every sacrifice makes us stronger. We stand on the shoulders of the fallen, and I pledge my life and death to the greater glory of God and His will. To my brothers in Providence, I salute you. Stand firm and continue the work of God. To the misguided heathens of Ushra'Khan, I beg you to repent. I beg you embrace God as he longs to embrace you. Those of you that refuse will find no glory in death, no fame. Only eternal damnation and infamy await you in death, ignoble, callously squandered by your corrupt leaders. Repent before you die, because by then it will be all too late.
Hate the infidel! Burn the heretic! Amarr Victor! Amarr Eternus! Deus Vult. "I long for death, not because I seek peace, but because I seek the war eternal" |
Karn Mithralia
Minmatar Neh'bu Kau Beh'Hude Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2009.08.04 09:01:00 -
[80]
Originally by: Cipher7 The guerilla needs the common people like a fish needs water.
Oh we have the respect of the common people, thats why we grow (often from disillusioned ex-slaver supporters) and they shrink.
The truth once known sets many on the road to freedom, the gripesyou see here are the bitter few who refuse to wake up.
|
|
Dan Deoxys
Minmatar Masuat'aa Matari Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2009.08.04 09:15:00 -
[81]
Neutral ships that ply the trade lanes in Providence with CVA,SYPLH Friendly,Slaves are fun,splashed on the pod pilots bio unfortunatly become legitimate targets.
Ships that renounce slavery and Amarrian ways are treated with the respect they deserve and are allowed to go on their way. Unfortunatly I struggle to remember when we last encountered such a vessel, most are fully laden with the spoils from their illgotten gains. Hauling minerals and loot from stations owned and operated by slave masters means they have the same blood on their hands as if they had used the whip themselves.
|
Butter Dog
Gallente The Littlest Hobos Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2009.08.04 09:49:00 -
[82]
Originally by: Clavius XIV
Perhaps once U'K command realized that Sylph couldn't be turned and would stay neutral in the best case, they decided to burn the bridges, look the other way and allow their allies to use Sylph space as hunting grounds. Perhaps understandable given the dire circumstances... but to become indignant at Sylph's response is laughable given it is a situation that Ushra'Khan forced.
Actually, it was Sylph alliance who fired the first shot against Ushra'Khan, by attacking industrial POS installations (I believe in the VKI deadend). When U'K requested that Sylph cease their land grab, they refused, leading to open hostility.
----------
AKA 'Bitter Dog'
Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05 |
Butter Dog
Gallente The Littlest Hobos Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2009.08.04 09:54:00 -
[83]
Originally by: Chooch Chooch However to The warriors of UshraÆKhan you know how I feel it has been fun coming up with some really bad jokes at your expense, I will miss it.
Chooch, thank you for expressing your views on Galnet. You were one of the few within Sylph alliance who had the nerves and skill for combat.
However, what I would say, is that although I agree that internal tensions are always the cause of alliances entering 'failure cascade', it is almost always external pressure and actions which acts as the tinder which causes the alliance to burn to the ground.
For corporations who reside in Sylph to make money from 0.0 space, denial of that space is exceptionally effective and leads to tensions. And we have already seen the last of the active FC's resign specifically because of our actions. Small evens like this build up into a bigger picture. We're happy to help speed things along to the natural conclusion.
----------
AKA 'Bitter Dog'
Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05 |
ChippieG60
Madison Industrial Co. Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.08.04 12:42:00 -
[84]
i am pretty sure the first pos sylph attacked was the one in BR as it was good staging point for UK. sylph had set UK red a good week before any pos where hit and when we did i recived this gem.
2007.05.06 05:20 As i'm sure somone has told you by now, CVA are losing the fight in 9uy. So far they've failed to kill any of ours and lost 6 cap ships. We have Evoke, Outbreak, ENH, BUM, EST and U'K fighting as one. ATM i'm not feeling overly kind to Sylph and EST would like an OP(outpost). Think long and hard about firing on that pos or any of ours again.
-=Sapphrine=
i realy miss those days fighting hobo's and the uncertainty of what the future held
|
Lord Windu
Amarr
|
Posted - 2009.08.04 13:42:00 -
[85]
Originally by: ChippieG60 i am pretty sure the first pos sylph attacked was the one in BR as it was good staging point for UK.
I remember the first POS that Sylph assaulted, can't remember which system but thought it was a dead end system although could be mistaken. Anyway, the POS was assaulted but instead of destroying it which could have been easily accomplished, Sylph decided to offer an ultimatum to UK, pull it down and UK would get safe passage during the process or leave it where it's at and it will be destroyed. More than fair I think considering it had been UK who had been pressurising Sylph into taking sides.
Kirra Liu will not be broadcasting for six months so I will be speaking on her behalf
|
Poreuomai
Minmatar Mirkur Draug'Tyr Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2009.08.04 15:27:00 -
[86]
Originally by: ChippieG60 when we did i recived this gem
I foresee much pain on both sides if this avenue is explored.
Let My People Go |
Insane Nutmunch
|
Posted - 2009.08.04 15:42:00 -
[87]
Originally by: Poreuomai I foresee much pain on both sides if this avenue is explored.
Is that your way of saying "Oh Crikey they've got facts to counter our bluster!"
or
"We can back our claims of backstabbing with corresponding mails"
Just wondering
|
Yvain Dragonheart
|
Posted - 2009.08.04 16:51:00 -
[88]
This makes me laugh. Enough said. Ahah. I've always loved Ushra'Khan because they keep entertaining me. Go on people, you're fun !
|
Ronan Ironhide
|
Posted - 2009.08.04 16:53:00 -
[89]
just a question.
will their be a UK circle jerk to accompany the massive amounts of roleplaying in this thread later on tonight perhaps?
|
Il Morte
|
Posted - 2009.08.04 17:00:00 -
[90]
Originally by: Ronan Ironhide just a question.
will their be a UK circle jerk to accompany the massive amounts of roleplaying in this thread later on tonight perhaps?
(ooC) Last I checked *Il Morte looks around* This is the role playing section ******
In regards to this post i see a lot of chest thumping and finger pointing. I am patiently awaiting to hear from Kelban our favorite poster. His words of wise wisdon always make me laugh. (gets the popcorn out) Looks like Sylph pilots are finally responding interesting.
My suggestion is maybe the two of you should just bust out some caps pick an agreed upon system and slug it out. Fraps it from both sides and then you can decide who can gifht and who can hide. No outside experience, no allies, just the two of you.
Of course that would mean no claoking and no blobbing actual fighting for a change. It is amazing you two shoot anything, as all Sylph says is UK cloaks and hides, and all UK says is Sylph docks and hides.
Do continue though as it does make my boring day at work go that much more quicker
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |