| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
baltec1
1194
   |
Posted - 2012.05.27 20:52:00 -
[1] - Quote
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
Now if you're referring to doing prolonged Suicide Ganking in high security with little to no risk, that's a different issue.
Its only no risk if the target makes it zero risk of failing. Not only is that pvp but it is also rather good at making isk, most people call it priracy because thats what it is. |
baltec1
1209
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 06:02:00 -
[2] - Quote
DeMichael Crimson wrote:Agreed. Choices and Consequences.
CCP should enact a 3 strike rule.
1. Wanna be Pirate player ganks ships in high security until his security status forces him into low security where he quickly 'rats' it back up to positive again.
2. That wanna be Pirate player then returns to high security and ganks more ships again until he's forced back into low security to rat his security status back up positive.
3. That same wanna be Pirate player once again returns to high security ganking more ships until he's forced back into low security due to his negative security status.
3-Strike Rule is enacted. No more security status increase for killing NPC rats.
That wanna be Pirate player has now graduated into a full fledged Pirate player.
Choices and Consequences.
This will impact gankers about as much as the insurance nerf did. Then you will try to push for yet another nerf. |
baltec1
1209
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 06:21:00 -
[3] - Quote
EVE Roy Mustang wrote:
unless they start killing pods
youre neg status you jump in in your (as it is now) safe pod, you can go anywhere.
They start killin them you CANT get into high sec cause you ****** yer sec
So you want to effectively bar a large group of players from a huge part of EVE? This is good for the game how? |
baltec1
1209
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 06:25:00 -
[4] - Quote
EVE Roy Mustang wrote:baltec1 wrote:EVE Roy Mustang wrote:
unless they start killing pods
youre neg status you jump in in your (as it is now) safe pod, you can go anywhere.
They start killin them you CANT get into high sec cause you ****** yer sec
So you want to effectively bar a large group of players from a huge part of EVE? This is good for the game how? whats the word ppl throw around but never understand? OH YEAH consequences which there arent any now
So you want to "save EVE" by getting a large group of people to quit because they cannot do their activity. You are exactly the sort of person who will kill EVE. |
baltec1
1218
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 10:10:00 -
[5] - Quote
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:
It would impact if Orca exploit wasn't aloud and even encouraged, if at the right moment you board the ship concord would instantly warp/kill your ship.
But of course, if we know even having -10 in high sec it's not a problem it's not because of that -10 uberness skill or intelligence, it's because high sec in intendedly out of proper rules and mechanics so a few can use and abuse existing mechanics to destroy other players fun, then the same uber elite pvp dudes ask for CCP to kill npc corps, make high sec like null etc etc.
You're shooting your own foot for years at the point you have to claim your uberness and elite attitude by killing miners and haulers (everyone knows how dangerous those are).
If it looks like a pawn, if it acts like a pawn then it's probably and simply a pawn.
Using the orca is not an exploit and being -10 in high sec is not abusing any rules or mechanics. I also fight againt daft ideas from people who want to take away safety from high sec, want to nerf something that doesn't need it or demand buffs to things which are perfectly fine. Right now high sec is well balanced in that if you take steps to protect yourself and dont do something daft you will be safe. |
| |
|