Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
fuze
Gallente Quam Singulari Cult of War
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 10:05:00 -
[31]
Originally by: CCP Abathur Actually, we hoped it would happen and are pleased it is happening. Time will tell though if the original inhabitants of WH space are pleased by it...
Bring it.
|
Ned Black
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 10:14:00 -
[32]
Originally by: CCP Abathur
Originally by: Autobot Amarr I would probably agree that CCP didn't think we'd populate worm hole spaces with towers, carriers, dreadnoughts and capital industrial ships.
Actually, we hoped it would happen and are pleased it is happening. Time will tell though if the original inhabitants of WH space are pleased by it...
Quote: Now that we're there, we want Sovereignty in our worm hole homes.
No.
Please oh PLEASE make it so that the sleepers start hunting players and player installation in the WHs. It would be sweet if you would in fact need to man guns in order to defend your poses... hell there might even become possible to practice some kind of good neighbour policy, that multiple corps/alliances share the same hole for the sake of security. You help our pos in case of a sleeper attack and we will do the same for you. Instead of like now where the only danger is from other players... |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 10:15:00 -
[33]
Originally by: Autobot Amarr I would probably agree that CCP didn't think we'd populate worm hole spaces with towers, carriers, dreadnoughts and capital industrial ships. But CCP allowed the mechanics of the worm hole, they had to of known we'd go there...
Now that we're there, we want Sovereignty in our worm hole homes. We want to spend less on POS fuel, build the next level of POS related items!
So give it up ccp for self sufficent worm holes...
Rally here to voice your opinion!
Regards,
Autobot
What's the point of sovereignty in wormholes? Unless you want to build an oupost there, what benefit would it bring you?
|
HeliosGal
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 10:25:00 -
[34]
i think there is just a shortage of new 00 space for em to build in with the nap fest
|
Tippia
Raddick Explorations Controlled Chaos
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 10:27:00 -
[35]
Originally by: HeliosGal i think there is just a shortage of new 00 space for em to build in with the nap fest
Solution: remove napping… ——— “If you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡… you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.” — Karath Piki |
HeliosGal
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 10:29:00 -
[36]
or generate more high sec to 00 wormholes bring he carebears and pvpers to the industrial backbone of the large alliances
This in turn would cause more interaction and we know areas taht arent considered "safe" to alliance members cause members to start shfiting around, this affects leaership causes pvp and then causes ltos of fun changes
|
Synex
Gallente Federal Defence Union
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 10:32:00 -
[37]
Originally by: Autobot Amarr I would probably agree that CCP didn't think we'd populate worm hole spaces with towers, carriers, dreadnoughts and capital industrial ships. But CCP allowed the mechanics of the worm hole, they had to of known we'd go there...
Now that we're there, we want Sovereignty in our worm hole homes. We want to spend less on POS fuel, build the next level of POS related items!
So give it up ccp for self sufficent worm holes...
Rally here to voice your opinion!
Regards,
Autobot
You're the reason the Decepticons should win. Synex Oursulaert Industries
|
HeliosGal
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 10:38:00 -
[38]
next patch should solve some sov issues
|
CrestoftheStars
Caldari Recreation Of The World
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 10:47:00 -
[39]
... maybe just correcting the mistake instead.. meaning removing all pos's from wormholes and disallowing angoring in wh space..
yer i think that would work a LOT better for every one... ___________________________________________ Whoever appeals to the law against his fellow man is either a fool or a coward. Whoever cannot take care of himself without that law is both. For a wounded |
CrestoftheStars
Caldari Recreation Of The World
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 10:49:00 -
[40]
Originally by: Ned Black
Originally by: CCP Abathur
Originally by: Autobot Amarr I would probably agree that CCP didn't think we'd populate worm hole spaces with towers, carriers, dreadnoughts and capital industrial ships.
Actually, we hoped it would happen and are pleased it is happening. Time will tell though if the original inhabitants of WH space are pleased by it...
Quote: Now that we're there, we want Sovereignty in our worm hole homes.
No.
hahaha only if the sleepers suddenly jump in a cap fleet and rip you i new hole :P else it is just free isk at the pos ;)
Please oh PLEASE make it so that the sleepers start hunting players and player installation in the WHs. It would be sweet if you would in fact need to man guns in order to defend your poses... hell there might even become possible to practice some kind of good neighbour policy, that multiple corps/alliances share the same hole for the sake of security. You help our pos in case of a sleeper attack and we will do the same for you. Instead of like now where the only danger is from other players...
___________________________________________ Whoever appeals to the law against his fellow man is either a fool or a coward. Whoever cannot take care of himself without that law is both. For a wounded |
|
jst tstng
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 10:53:00 -
[41]
Quote: Actually, we hoped it would happen and are pleased it is happening. Time will tell though if the original inhabitants of WH space are pleased by it...
Now that would be improved NPC AI.
>hey guys our wormhole pos is under attack.... By sleepers
|
Baron Agamemnon
Caldari Holy Grail Construction
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 11:21:00 -
[42]
Originally by: CCP Abathur
Originally by: Autobot Amarr I would probably agree that CCP didn't think we'd populate worm hole spaces with towers, carriers, dreadnoughts and capital industrial ships.
Actually, we hoped it would happen and are pleased it is happening. Time will tell though if the original inhabitants of WH space are pleased by it...
Quote: Now that we're there, we want Sovereignty in our worm hole homes.
No.
Interesting. As a WH guy with POS in the WH, can I expect more stuff to come knocking at my door then other players?
|
JitaPriceChecker2
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 11:59:00 -
[43]
Originally by: CCP Abathur
Originally by: Autobot Amarr I would probably agree that CCP didn't think we'd populate worm hole spaces with towers, carriers, dreadnoughts and capital industrial ships.
Actually, we hoped it would happen and are pleased it is happening. Time will tell though if the original inhabitants of WH space are pleased by it...
Quote: Now that we're there, we want Sovereignty in our worm hole homes.
No.
Thats smell like a suprise from CCP to make our lifes miserable. Hopefully we will get good isk if we prevail .
|
Kaalen
Caldari Shards of Apathy
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 12:02:00 -
[44]
If they were going to do that they may aswell not have bothered with wormholes at all and just added new 0.0 systems.
No.
|
hired goon
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 12:40:00 -
[45]
-THIS THREAD IS OVER- It ended on page one. Everyone go home.
If you want sovreignty, go to nullsec. You cannot have sov without alliance dominions and territory disputes. One begets the other. You have either or, not both. -omg-
|
B1FF
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 12:43:00 -
[46]
Originally by: Autobot Amarr So far everyone has said no or kind of no... But no one has said why they don't agree...
First off, lets see some benefits of WH Sov.
Moon mining and T2 production becomes possible. This reduces the cost of T2 things on the market and allows someone other than the big alliances to compete, God for bid that...
More over player's that live in worm holes can more effectively work in their space and fend off intruders of such claimed space a little easier. Especially if a Sov. LvL were allowed to reach the Const. Sov. equivalent, where player owned stations could be built.
So why does having this ability inside a worm hole have any bearing negitively on any of you players in low or high sec? I say it doesn't.
Regards,
Autobot
It's broken. Due to WH mechanics it's so lopsidded toward the defenders. You'd have to spend literally weeks building up an attack force. It would be 0.0 but unable to be fought over.
You're asking for a personal playground. Go play a single player game.
|
HeliosGal
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 12:44:00 -
[47]
more 00 systems and more connections between them and high sec is another option
|
Attrezzo Pox
Amarr The Bastards The Bastards.
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 12:45:00 -
[48]
Originally by: Frenzei
Originally by: CCP Abathur
No.
Pwned, Hard.
OHHHH Incineration! You got buuuuurrrrrnnneeed! *-------------------------* PoX IS Eve!!! BOOM!!! |
Kendar
Gallente Disney inc
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 12:46:00 -
[49]
im more interested in knowing if the sleepers are coming to known space to explore
|
HeliosGal
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 12:52:00 -
[50]
sleepers in known space would be good they already are cosmos sites lol
|
|
Gnulpie
Minmatar Miner Tech
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 12:56:00 -
[51]
Originally by: CCP Abathur
Originally by: Autobot Amarr I would probably agree that CCP didn't think we'd populate worm hole spaces with towers, carriers, dreadnoughts and capital industrial ships.
Actually, we hoped it would happen and are pleased it is happening. Time will tell though if the original inhabitants of WH space are pleased by it...
Quote: Now that we're there, we want Sovereignty in our worm hole homes.
No.
<3
|
Anslo
The Aduro Protocol
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 13:10:00 -
[52]
Originally by: hired goon -THIS THREAD IS OVER- It ended on page one. Everyone go home.
If you want sovreignty, go to nullsec. You cannot have sov without alliance dominions and territory disputes. One begets the other. You have either or, not both.
f*ck you :)
|
aka Ishur
Aperture Harmonics
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 13:17:00 -
[53]
Seriously its over. let it die.
|
Myra2007
Shafrak Industries
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 13:46:00 -
[54]
Originally by: CCP Abathur
Actually, we hoped it would happen and are pleased it is happening. Time will tell though if the original inhabitants of WH space are pleased by it...
Originally by: CCP Greyscale
It was a design decision early on in the process that we didn't want people to "settle" in w-space at this stage.
Source
What gives?
--
Originally by: Professor Slocombe
I will only buy tickets if the prize is your stuff and you leave Eve. Forever. You irritating self obsessed cretin.
|
Tippia
Raddick Explorations Controlled Chaos
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 13:58:00 -
[55]
Originally by: Myra2007
Originally by: CCP Abathur
Actually, we hoped it would happen and are pleased it is happening. Time will tell though if the original inhabitants of WH space are pleased by it...
Originally by: CCP Greyscale
It was a design decision early on in the process that we didn't want people to "settle" in w-space at this stage.
Source
What gives?
Plunking down a POS isn't exactly "settling" — when you get an outpost in there, we can start talking. ——— “If you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡… you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.” — Karath Piki |
Myra2007
Shafrak Industries
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 14:01:00 -
[56]
Originally by: Tippia
Plunking down a POS isn't exactly "settling" ù when you get an outpost in there, we can start talking.
If you notice the context of the linked thread it is indeed about pos in wormholes not outposts which iirc cannot be build over there.
Maybe thats what he meant. But it still strikes me as odd. --
Originally by: Professor Slocombe
I will only buy tickets if the prize is your stuff and you leave Eve. Forever. You irritating self obsessed cretin.
|
Blane Xero
Amarr The Firestorm Cartel
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 14:12:00 -
[57]
Originally by: Myra2007
Originally by: Tippia
Plunking down a POS isn't exactly "settling" ù when you get an outpost in there, we can start talking.
If you notice the context of the linked thread it is indeed about pos in wormholes not outposts which iirc cannot be build over there.
Maybe thats what he meant. But it still strikes me as odd.
Same. I was a bit "What? CCP Changing their tune to a game mechanics intended direction? I've seen this before " _____________________________________ Haruhiist since December 2008
Originally by: CCP Fallout :facepalm:
|
|
CCP Abathur
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 14:16:00 -
[58]
Originally by: Tippia Plunking down a POS isn't exactly "settling"
This.
|
|
JitaPriceChecker2
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 14:43:00 -
[59]
Originally by: CCP Abathur
Originally by: Tippia Plunking down a POS isn't exactly "settling"
This.
Many corps do much more than just plunk a POS.
|
Irida Mershkov
Gallente War is Bliss
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 14:49:00 -
[60]
Originally by: JitaPriceChecker2
Originally by: CCP Abathur
Originally by: Tippia Plunking down a POS isn't exactly "settling"
This.
Many corps do much more than just plunk a POS.
They plunk two.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |