Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Vincent Wright
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.03 23:08:00 -
[1] - Quote
Hello,
I have been playing games for 13 years now and i played a lot of them.
1 1/2 Months ago i joined EVE and the Content is realy exciting and challenging for a HC gamer.
I am interested in PvP so i choose my source of ISK income to have the most Skill synnergy possible: PvE Security Missioning. Im am happily soloing L4s in my Myrmidon, the Hull i want to use for PvP aswell, when i can afford it. Untill then i use Rifters for PvP.
There is something that struck me only recently: L4s became too boring/easy soloing so i fleeted up with some people from my starter coorporation to inc fun. Needless to say L4s get tooooo easy and boring after a while with 1BS 2BC 2Cruisers and a Noctis. Thats a fleet new gamers can do and effectively run when they are like 2 weeks-3 Months in the Game. BS Tankfit pulls aggro, rest fit dps and concentrate on their favourite target.
A L5 mission would now be the perfect challenge for us, but as you all know they are exclusive to low-sec. As PvE and PvP Fits being totaly different and the PvE fittet player will loose 100% of the time, the risk is so high that its not reasonable for us to try it. The L5 would be a challange pushing our small/young fleet to the limit so we cant really risk being ganked on top of that. I know that a skilled and specialised player could gank our whole fleet with only 1 specialized T1 Cruiser., if we choose to stay and defend.
An incursion on the other hand is totaly out of reach for us.
The conclusion is: There is huge Gap in PvE gaming in EVE. The steps between L1, L2, L3, L4 are totaly negligable. Any mediocre skilled Player can run through all those stages in about a Month or less. In Fact: the only thing that kept me from doing L3s or L4s quicker was the Fact that i had to grind reupation to be allowed to get one. (Wich is in my eyes totaly not understandable looking at EVEs general mechanics)
I know that HighSec L5s where discontinued because of exploits of Older players that would easily botfarm/multibox/grind them. Thing is: those players can still do that. The only ones this hurts are medium-young players seeking some fleet experience and teamworking mechanics.
Reintroducing young-player friendly, team oriented PvE game contend egual in difficulty to L5s would totaly make the game more attractive. The other option would be to review Mission level scaling and make it more significant, since the vast Content of diverse L1-L3 missions is finished and forgotten in only a fraction of the Players total ingame lifespan.
Keep in mind that an Old ISK heavy Multiboxig Player can afford to grind L5 missions in lowsec. He is better at compensating the risk and potential ISK lost and is not as vulnurable to gankers because he has much more SP.
Ah and please make it challenging. Not in the sense of "Insert moAr ISK/Time here" but "insert brain and teamplay here"
I love this game and i sure will enjoy it for many years to come. Thx CCP for this outstanding Job of Programming and Gamedesign.
P.S.: Please make a Faction or Tech II Projectile/Drone/Armortank Cruiser or BC =) (sry for the bad english its not my native langauge) |
Tallian Saotome
Fractured Core Fatal Ascension
755
|
Posted - 2012.06.03 23:26:00 -
[2] - Quote
Just have your DPSer PVP fit, and you are all good. A cloaky falcon hiding in the mission site with you can never go wrong either, and is funny as hell if they didn't see it coming.
Also, a domi or ishtar can pack quite a few drones, which can cause them to be decently viable in pvp even when they are PVE for(my ishtar fit has an explosive resist rig for exactly this reason) so they can unless some surprises with a flight of EC-600s that you just hang on to for the purposes of pvp.
As a last consideration, you can pull your local chat out so it is in its own window, allowing you to monitor local and warp to a safe if anyone potentially hostile come into system(you should have many of these, and warp between them continually while the hostiles are there, or have a cloak fit) which should also work to keep you safe.
Doing L5s is very good prep for PVP because it forces you to maintain situational awareness, and a high degree of planning in a group to pull off.
Good luck Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom. |
Unimaginative Guy
Dutch Squad Chained Reactions
11
|
Posted - 2012.06.03 23:41:00 -
[3] - Quote
Just roll with a logi and 3-4other people in buffer pvp ships. Cloaked falcon is a total plus.
I don't know the dps of l5s but im sure a armor cane/armor myrm or shield drake or shield cane can tank one with like...scimitar reps |
Vincent Wright
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.03 23:47:00 -
[4] - Quote
Thx a lot for reply and suggestions Tallian. That would be the way we would try it. But still: 1 Domi with some faction hardeners and TII Items: 120 Million EST Value. 2 Myrm around 100 Million each: 200 Million 2 Vexors: 20 Million 1 Noctis 90 Million Makes 430 Million in total value.
I expect experienced gankers to invest accordingly. 1 month is enough to have such a high opinion on the intelligence and cleverness of the EVE communty ;)
So what u think of reintroducing highsec team oriented PvE for small fleets of semi-rookies? |
Vincent Wright
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.03 23:50:00 -
[5] - Quote
Unimaginative Guy wrote:Just roll with a logi and 3-4other people in buffer pvp ships. Cloaked falcon is a total plus.
I don't know the dps of l5s but im sure a armor cane/armor myrm or shield drake or shield cane can tank one with like...scimitar reps
the point was not how to do L5s. im sure we can do them. the point is the added extreme risk of gankers new players can only hardly manage on top of a L5 |
Tallian Saotome
Fractured Core Fatal Ascension
755
|
Posted - 2012.06.03 23:53:00 -
[6] - Quote
2 Things.
1) Don't give away free intel, by say, posting exactly what you are gonna be flying and how much its worth on the forums
2) Don't use faction fit in that situation, it will get you killed if anyone notices... They will bring enough.
Edit: Remember, we are all out to get you, even those who give you good advice Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom. |
DeMichael Crimson
Republic University Minmatar Republic
2323
|
Posted - 2012.06.03 23:56:00 -
[7] - Quote
Well, since you're all fairly new players you probably could grind standings with the Corporation of lv 4 Epic Arc starting agents, then run the arcs. The Corporation needs to be +5.00 or higher standing and your Faction only needs to be above -2.00 standing. Another option for access is if your Faction standing is +5.00 or higher, you can access the agents. Those missions are tougher than regular level 4 missions and they give an excellent boost to Faction standing with little to no derived standings towards other Factions. They can also be completed every 3 months.
http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Epic_mission_arcs
And then there's Cosmos agents but they require a higher amount of Faction standing for access and don't accept Corporation standing for access. They also give an excellent Faction standing increase, but they also give derived standings, both negative and positive, to all other Factions. Running the Epic Arc missions would definitely give a boost to accessing Cosmos. Each level of Cosmos missions is roughly about a step or 2 above the regular level missions.
http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/COSMOS
Since you have Fleet members, after all of you gain the corp standings needed to access the Epic Arcs, each member could access the Epic Arc agents by themselves and then all Fleet members run each members missions back to back while fleeted. That way you each gain standing but can still stay fleeted. Best when completing the mission with agent, each member does it as a solo player. Also remember that Faction standing increases are not shared.
That will definitely give you experience on working as a team, could even incorporate some EWAR tactics such as point, logistics, etc.
DMC |
Vincent Wright
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.06.03 23:59:00 -
[8] - Quote
again: i dont and we dont plan on doing L5s in lowsec exactly because of those reasons
|
Vincent Wright
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.06.04 00:02:00 -
[9] - Quote
DeMichael Crimson wrote:Well, since you're all fairly new players you probably could grind standings with the Corporation of lv 4 Epic Arc starting agents, then run the arcs. The Corporation needs to be +5.00 or higher standing and your Faction only needs to be above -2.00 standing. Another option for access is if your Faction standing is +5.00 or higher, you can access the agents. Those missions are tougher than regular level 4 missions and they give an excellent boost to Faction standing with little to no derived standings towards other Factions. They can also be completed every 3 months. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Epic_mission_arcsAnd then there's Cosmos agents but they require a higher amount of Faction standing for access and don't accept Corporation standing for access. They also give an excellent Faction standing increase, but they also give derived standings, both negative and positive, to all other Factions. Running the Epic Arc missions would definitely give a boost to accessing Cosmos. Each level of Cosmos missions is roughly about a step or 2 above the regular level missions. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/COSMOSSince you have Fleet members, after all of you gain the corp standings needed to access the Epic Arcs, each member could access the Epic Arc agents by themselves and then all Fleet members run each members missions back to back while fleeted. That way you each gain standing but can still stay fleeted. Best when completing the mission with agent, each member does it as a solo player. Also remember that Faction standing increases are not shared. That will definitely give you experience on working as a team, could even incorporate some EWAR tactics such as point, logistics, etc. DMC
thx man that was awesome info :)
|
Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
1155
|
Posted - 2012.06.04 00:03:00 -
[10] - Quote
Vincent Wright wrote:Thx a lot for reply and suggestions Tallian. That would be the way we would try it. But still: 1 Domi with some faction hardeners and TII Items: 120 Million EST Value. 2 Myrm around 100 Million each: 200 Million 2 Vexors: 20 Million 1 Noctis 90 Million Makes 430 Million in total value.
I expect experienced gankers to invest accordingly. 1 month is enough to have such a high opinion on the intelligence and cleverness of the EVE communty ;)
So what u think of reintroducing highsec team oriented PvE for small fleets of semi-rookies? In high sec? No, not unless it pays as well as or worse than level fours.
As for gankers, not many solo players would take on that fleet. But besides, you shouldn't be fighting in PvE ships, the game goes out of its way to give you methods to avoid combat, try joining a decent low sec corporation and learn them.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |
|
gfldex
542
|
Posted - 2012.06.04 00:09:00 -
[11] - Quote
Vincent Wright wrote:again: i dont and we dont plan on doing L5s in lowsec exactly because of those reasons
We do understand what you want. LVL5 missions in highsec. You want less risk for the same reward. That wont work because not only you but any bad player in the game would utilize that content and in the result drive the value of the reward down. It wont work one way or another.
You further make assumptions about how to operate in lowsec. Those assumptions are wrong. Given that there are players that do run those lvl5 mission in lowsec there must be something they do right that you do wrong. Little hint: it's not related to fittings or skillpoints.
When someone burns down your sandcastle, bring sausages. |
Tallian Saotome
Fractured Core Fatal Ascension
756
|
Posted - 2012.06.04 00:09:00 -
[12] - Quote
Simi Kusoni wrote:Vincent Wright wrote:Thx a lot for reply and suggestions Tallian. That would be the way we would try it. But still: 1 Domi with some faction hardeners and TII Items: 120 Million EST Value. 2 Myrm around 100 Million each: 200 Million 2 Vexors: 20 Million 1 Noctis 90 Million Makes 430 Million in total value.
I expect experienced gankers to invest accordingly. 1 month is enough to have such a high opinion on the intelligence and cleverness of the EVE communty ;)
So what u think of reintroducing highsec team oriented PvE for small fleets of semi-rookies? In high sec? No, not unless it pays as well as or worse than level fours. As for gankers, not many solo players would take on that fleet. But besides, you shouldn't be fighting in PvE ships, the game goes out of its way to give you methods to avoid combat, try joining a decent low sec corporation and learn them. Hes talking about L5s. There are no L5s in highsec. Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom. |
Vincent Wright
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.06.04 00:14:00 -
[13] - Quote
Simi Kusoni wrote:Vincent Wright wrote:Thx a lot for reply and suggestions Tallian. That would be the way we would try it. But still: 1 Domi with some faction hardeners and TII Items: 120 Million EST Value. 2 Myrm around 100 Million each: 200 Million 2 Vexors: 20 Million 1 Noctis 90 Million Makes 430 Million in total value.
I expect experienced gankers to invest accordingly. 1 month is enough to have such a high opinion on the intelligence and cleverness of the EVE communty ;)
So what u think of reintroducing highsec team oriented PvE for small fleets of semi-rookies? In high sec? No, not unless it pays as well as or worse than level fours. As for gankers, not many solo players would take on that fleet. But besides, you shouldn't be fighting in PvE ships, the game goes out of its way to give you methods to avoid combat, try joining a decent low sec corporation and learn them.
i/we dont care if there is less ISK. we play for fun. i didnt explicitly say it would be one person. so i should use an AC/dual or triple rep myrm with web/point and cap boosters (wich would be totaly worth it ISK wise) for level 4 security missions? sounds reasonable. there are as much ways to avoid combat as to prevent that. ability/experience/SP and ISK are the factors in that, all of wich older players exceed.
|
Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
1155
|
Posted - 2012.06.04 00:15:00 -
[14] - Quote
Tallian Saotome wrote:Simi Kusoni wrote:Vincent Wright wrote:Thx a lot for reply and suggestions Tallian. That would be the way we would try it. But still: 1 Domi with some faction hardeners and TII Items: 120 Million EST Value. 2 Myrm around 100 Million each: 200 Million 2 Vexors: 20 Million 1 Noctis 90 Million Makes 430 Million in total value.
I expect experienced gankers to invest accordingly. 1 month is enough to have such a high opinion on the intelligence and cleverness of the EVE communty ;)
So what u think of reintroducing highsec team oriented PvE for small fleets of semi-rookies? In high sec? No, not unless it pays as well as or worse than level fours. As for gankers, not many solo players would take on that fleet. But besides, you shouldn't be fighting in PvE ships, the game goes out of its way to give you methods to avoid combat, try joining a decent low sec corporation and learn them. Hes talking about L5s. There are no L5s in highsec. "So what u think of reintroducing highsec team oriented PvE"
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |
Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
1155
|
Posted - 2012.06.04 00:18:00 -
[15] - Quote
Vincent Wright wrote:Simi Kusoni wrote:Vincent Wright wrote:Thx a lot for reply and suggestions Tallian. That would be the way we would try it. But still: 1 Domi with some faction hardeners and TII Items: 120 Million EST Value. 2 Myrm around 100 Million each: 200 Million 2 Vexors: 20 Million 1 Noctis 90 Million Makes 430 Million in total value.
I expect experienced gankers to invest accordingly. 1 month is enough to have such a high opinion on the intelligence and cleverness of the EVE communty ;)
So what u think of reintroducing highsec team oriented PvE for small fleets of semi-rookies? In high sec? No, not unless it pays as well as or worse than level fours. As for gankers, not many solo players would take on that fleet. But besides, you shouldn't be fighting in PvE ships, the game goes out of its way to give you methods to avoid combat, try joining a decent low sec corporation and learn them. i/we dont care if there is less ISK. we play for fun. i didnt explicitly say it would be one person. so i should use an AC/dual or triple rep myrm with web/point and cap boosters (wich would be totaly worth it ISK wise) for level 4 security missions? sounds reasonable. there are as much ways to avoid combat as to prevent that. ability/experience/SP and ISK are the factors in that, all of wich older players exceed. No, you shouldn't really being PvEing in PvP ships either. Although feel free to if you want to try spider tanking, or buffer fit and use logi.
My point was that you shouldn't be worrying about fighting attackers, just avoid them.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |
Snow Axe
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
375
|
Posted - 2012.06.04 00:21:00 -
[16] - Quote
If you play for fun go do incursions. |
Vincent Wright
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.06.04 00:22:00 -
[17] - Quote
gfldex wrote:Vincent Wright wrote:again: i dont and we dont plan on doing L5s in lowsec exactly because of those reasons
We do understand what you want. LVL5 missions in highsec. You want less risk for the same reward. That wont work because not only you but any bad player in the game would utilize that content and in the result drive the value of the reward down. It wont work one way or another. You further make assumptions about how to operate in lowsec. Those assumptions are wrong. Given that there are players that do run those lvl5 mission in lowsec there must be something they do right that you do wrong. Little hint: it's not related to fittings or skillpoints.
i dont want to have those highsec L5s net the same rewards as lowsec. i would totaly support that every lowsec mission nets more reward no matter wich level it is. true there is a lot i dont know about low sec and i bet there is a lot a player can do to minimize the dangers. but the thing is: for semi-rookie players the huge effort to make low sec L5s is just not worth the fun. so there is a gap for new players and thats what i am referring to.
|
Vincent Wright
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.06.04 00:24:00 -
[18] - Quote
Snow Axe wrote:If you play for fun go do incursions.
there is a reason ppl use T3 Cruiser T2 logi etc fleets for incursions. |
Snow Axe
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
375
|
Posted - 2012.06.04 00:26:00 -
[19] - Quote
Vincent Wright wrote:Snow Axe wrote:If you play for fun go do incursions. there is a reason ppl use T3 Cruiser T2 logi etc fleets for incursions.
Yeah. Speed. Shouldn't be a problem for you guys, right? You're just playing for fun! |
Vincent Wright
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.06.04 00:31:00 -
[20] - Quote
Simi Kusoni wrote:Vincent Wright wrote:Simi Kusoni wrote:Vincent Wright wrote:Thx a lot for reply and suggestions Tallian. That would be the way we would try it. But still: 1 Domi with some faction hardeners and TII Items: 120 Million EST Value. 2 Myrm around 100 Million each: 200 Million 2 Vexors: 20 Million 1 Noctis 90 Million Makes 430 Million in total value.
I expect experienced gankers to invest accordingly. 1 month is enough to have such a high opinion on the intelligence and cleverness of the EVE communty ;)
So what u think of reintroducing highsec team oriented PvE for small fleets of semi-rookies? In high sec? No, not unless it pays as well as or worse than level fours. As for gankers, not many solo players would take on that fleet. But besides, you shouldn't be fighting in PvE ships, the game goes out of its way to give you methods to avoid combat, try joining a decent low sec corporation and learn them. i/we dont care if there is less ISK. we play for fun. i didnt explicitly say it would be one person. so i should use an AC/dual or triple rep myrm with web/point and cap boosters (wich would be totaly worth it ISK wise) for level 4 security missions? sounds reasonable. there are as much ways to avoid combat as to prevent that. ability/experience/SP and ISK are the factors in that, all of wich older players exceed. No, you shouldn't really being PvEing in PvP ships either. Although feel free to if you want to try spider tanking, or buffer fit and use logi. My point was that you shouldn't be worrying about fighting attackers, just avoid them.
scenario: we see probes. check local check scan not much going on, we stay) single frig enters our mission area and warps away. later 6 players enter local. all of wich are 4 year +. all of wich have idk -4 security status, all of wich are in the same corporation. we check the scan. some reasonable pvp able ships in system. we leave. fun! not?
|
|
Eternal Error
Exitus Acta Probant
32
|
Posted - 2012.06.04 01:08:00 -
[21] - Quote
What you say about L5s just isn't accurate/in the spirit of eve (some PvE fits are high dps enough to make certain PvP ships have to warp away, it is also lowsec and you should have to think about security).
In terms of the gap between L1/2/3/4 vs. jumping to other content like incursions, I totally agree. |
God's Apples
C0bra Gang
15
|
Posted - 2012.06.04 01:56:00 -
[22] - Quote
Try running anoms or plexes in low or null sec in a group. They don't take nearly as long as a level 5 and can have some really nice rewards. |
Natsett Amuinn
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
74
|
Posted - 2012.06.04 02:38:00 -
[23] - Quote
Vincent Wright wrote:the point was not how to do L5s. im sure we can do them. the point is the added extreme risk of gankers new players can only hardly manage on top of a L5 I could be wrong, but the reason lvl 5s are in low sec has nothing to do with people cheating to do them.
Your very complaint is the exact reason they're there. Risk vs reward. The highest paying missions are supposed to be in the most dangerous parts of space, which is why they moved them out of hi sec.
Am I remembering this wrong? Was that not CCP's explenation for the reordering of the mission levels? |
DeMichael Crimson
Republic University Minmatar Republic
2328
|
Posted - 2012.06.04 03:38:00 -
[24] - Quote
How much does a level 5 mission pay?
Just curious.
DMC |
Vincent Wright
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.06.04 03:38:00 -
[25] - Quote
Natsett Amuinn wrote:Vincent Wright wrote:the point was not how to do L5s. im sure we can do them. the point is the added extreme risk of gankers new players can only hardly manage on top of a L5 I could be wrong, but the reason lvl 5s are in low sec has nothing to do with people cheating to do them. Your very complaint is the exact reason they're there. Risk vs reward. The highest paying missions are supposed to be in the most dangerous parts of space, which is why they moved them out of hi sec. Am I remembering this wrong? Was that not CCP's explenation for the reordering of the mission levels?
incursions are in highsec and afaik net the highest possible PvE Combat rewards.
I dont care about the ******* ISK. They could pay 10000 times the money in low sec i wouldnt care i just want to do L5 in a fleet of rookies without getting exposed to griefers.
AI could definatly use a giant boost e.g. (a simple one) make frigs sprial towards you and faster (no player frig moves as slow as 400m/s) I dont have anything against difficulty. I just dont like the Fact that if you want to progress in the line of security missions you have to play prey for griefers after 1 Month into the game.
Imagine WOW lvl 40 instances would be under constant danger of hostile lvl 85 PvP players bursting into the group. Blizzard would instantaniously loose 70% of its playerbase.
|
Natsett Amuinn
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
74
|
Posted - 2012.06.04 03:44:00 -
[26] - Quote
Vincent Wright wrote:Natsett Amuinn wrote:Vincent Wright wrote:the point was not how to do L5s. im sure we can do them. the point is the added extreme risk of gankers new players can only hardly manage on top of a L5 I could be wrong, but the reason lvl 5s are in low sec has nothing to do with people cheating to do them. Your very complaint is the exact reason they're there. Risk vs reward. The highest paying missions are supposed to be in the most dangerous parts of space, which is why they moved them out of hi sec. Am I remembering this wrong? Was that not CCP's explenation for the reordering of the mission levels? incursions are in highsec and afaik net the highest possible PvE Combat rewards. I dont care about the ******* ISK. They could pay 10000 times the money in low sec i wouldnt care i just want to do L5 in a fleet of rookies without getting exposed to griefers. AI could definatly use a giant boost e.g. (a simple one) make frigs sprial towards you and faster (no player frig moves as slow as 400m/s) I dont have anything against difficulty. I just dont like the Fact that if you want to progress in the line of security missions you have to play prey for griefers after 1 Month into the game. Imagine WOW lvl 40 instances would be under constant danger of hostile lvl 85 PvP players bursting into the group. Blizzard would instantaniously loose 70% of its playerbase. You didn't get the memo? Mission running is intended as a means of making isk.
What you want doesn't change the fact. CCP put lvl 5's in low sec because of the risk vs reward aspect of space. The missions aren't just categorized by difficulty, it also indicates a level of pay you can expect.
I find it funny that for someone who labelled themself as "hardcore" you're complaining about ganking and chose to use the word griefers. Are you shitting me? You're hardcore but you're afraid to go into low sec and do level 5's or incursions? WTF are you doing that's so hardcore in hi sec exactly?
Please enlighten us mr. hardcore hi sec mission runner. |
Flamewave
Crimson Moon Society
23
|
Posted - 2012.06.04 03:59:00 -
[27] - Quote
Vincent Wright wrote:Imagine WOW This isn't WoW. Some things ISK can't buy. For everything else, there's Jita.
YouTube |
DeMichael Crimson
Republic University Minmatar Republic
2328
|
Posted - 2012.06.04 04:03:00 -
[28] - Quote
OK, obviously nobody cares to answer my question.
I will say this, as a 4 year veteran of this game, the only time I've mainly had to go into low sec for missions was either for courier or chasing down an expedition. Granted there was a few combat missions but with cloak, checking map stats, watching local and using safe spots, they were rather easy even if it did take a while longer to complete.
Other than that, I've already listed 2 different options to engage in tougher than normal level 4 missions. That content is long term, pays good ISK and has some excellent item rewards available.
One final note : Older players in these forums need to lighten up on newer players, there's no need to get sarcastic or disrespectful with them.
DMC |
Apolyon I
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
59
|
Posted - 2012.06.04 04:05:00 -
[29] - Quote
Natsett Amuinn wrote: You didn't get the memo? Mission running is intended as a means of making isk.
What you want doesn't change the fact. CCP put lvl 5's in low sec because of the risk vs reward aspect of space. The missions aren't just categorized by difficulty, it also indicates a level of pay you can expect.
I find it funny that for someone who labelled themself as "hardcore" you're complaining about ganking and chose to use the word griefers. Are you shitting me? You're hardcore but you're afraid to go into low sec and do level 5's or incursions? WTF are you doing that's so hardcore in hi sec exactly?
Please enlighten us mr. hardcore hi sec mission runner.
I think you misunderstand the OP
he wants more challenging content but don't care about the isk
I think OP should try out incursion, in this game, you can't compare older players as lv85s and younger players as lv40s
older players can fly more ships than younger players, that's it.
being able to use meta 4 already make your ship perform at 80% of its maximum |
Natsett Amuinn
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
75
|
Posted - 2012.06.04 04:12:00 -
[30] - Quote
Apolyon I wrote:Natsett Amuinn wrote: You didn't get the memo? Mission running is intended as a means of making isk.
What you want doesn't change the fact. CCP put lvl 5's in low sec because of the risk vs reward aspect of space. The missions aren't just categorized by difficulty, it also indicates a level of pay you can expect.
I find it funny that for someone who labelled themself as "hardcore" you're complaining about ganking and chose to use the word griefers. Are you shitting me? You're hardcore but you're afraid to go into low sec and do level 5's or incursions? WTF are you doing that's so hardcore in hi sec exactly?
Please enlighten us mr. hardcore hi sec mission runner.
I think you misunderstand the OP he wants more challenging content but don't care about the isk I think OP should try out incursion, in this game, you can't compare older players as lv85s and younger players as lv40s older players can fly more ships than younger players, that's it. being able to use meta 4 already make your ship perform at 80% of its maximum
I did actually understand that.
The OP didn't understand the reason for lvl 5's to be in low sec.
Did CCP not move them because of the payout? I could have swore that that was exactly why they moved them. Challenge is fine, ok. I got nothing against that, and completely understand wanting challenge.
However, the OP made the statement that they were moved because people were cheating to do them, and that's wrong, as far as I'm aware. I pointed out why they were moved, to the best of my knowledge, and he decided to offer a rebutal.
There was no reason to respond to my initial post.
At the same time, He called himself a hardcore gamer. How hardcore can you be if you're not willing to go into low sec to do lvl 5's? And herein lies an issue. The OP wants to do lvl 5's in hi sec. I'm not a genius, trust me. It's very clear what he's saying. He wants to do lvl 5 mission, and he wants to be able to do them in hi sec.
CCP doesn't want you doing them in Hi sec. He should have got his initial staement correct and asked for a bump in lvl 4 difficulty, not for lvl 5s in hi sec. The risk in doing them is that you have to go into low sec, that means you'll have to deal with really dangerous pirates in EVE, other players. That's the challenge. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |