| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
758
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 19:49:00 -
[1] - Quote
Quote:Procurer/Skiff: primarily made for self-defense. Better mining rate than the ORE frig, good ore bay, but capable of having battleship-like EHP
Now please kindly shut the hell up.
Oh and I'm gonna go ahead and spoil it for you, Battleship HP will help, but all the HP in world wont stop people from nuking you, but at least this change may push the threshold too high for people to want to gank solo miners.
The trade off for your safety will be that you must give up some of your yield and hold to gain this advantage.
|

Roll Sizzle Beef
Space Mutiny
511
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 19:52:00 -
[2] - Quote
This is new and exciting information... |

Kijo Rikki
Killboard Padding Services
97
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 19:53:00 -
[3] - Quote
Panda McLegion weighs in on the matter. |

Andoria Thara
Fallen Avatars
35
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 19:53:00 -
[4] - Quote
You forgot this part:
Quote:Mining output: first and most visible balancing factor, plan is to increase all barge mining output to be within an acceptable margin of the Hulk, not miles behind as it is currently. |

Ana Vyr
Vyral Technologies
314
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 19:58:00 -
[5] - Quote
Some of the yield...you meant 1/3rd of the yield right?
But hey, it mines better than a FRIGATE, how could we possibly complain?
Personally, I'm gonna just stick to tanking my Hulk and paying attention, unless they plan to really up the input you get from the new procurer/skiff. Last time I checked, you can only mount one laser to both of these right?
The post above does contain very hopeful info though...if the yield is less, but not a whole lot less, this stuff will be great. |

THE L0CK
Denying You Access
506
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 20:01:00 -
[6] - Quote
Why hello there new, exciting, and completely original thread. And how are we doing today? Do you smell what the Lock's cooking? |

Indeterminacy
THORN Syndicate THORN Alliance
216
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 20:02:00 -
[7] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Quote:Procurer/Skiff: primarily made for self-defense. Better mining rate than the ORE frig, good ore bay, but capable of having battleship-like EHP Now please kindly shut the hell up. Oh and I'm gonna go ahead and spoil it for you, Battleship HP will help, but all the HP in world wont stop people from nuking you, but at least this change may push the threshold too high for people to want to gank solo miners. The trade off for your safety will be that you must give up some of your yield and hold to gain this advantage.
I suspect the price point for one of these new brick barges will right on par with a sufficient gank squad of Tier3 BCs. |

Andoria Thara
Fallen Avatars
36
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 20:02:00 -
[8] - Quote
Ana Vyr wrote:Some of the yield...you meant 1/3rd of the yield right?
But hey, it mines better than a FRIGATE, how could we possibly complain?
Personally, I'm gonna just stick to tanking my Hulk and paying attention, unless they plan to really up the input you get from the new procurer/skiff. Last time I checked, you can only mount one laser to both of these right?
The post above does contain very hopeful info though...if the yield is less, but not a whole lot less, this stuff will be great.
I guess you completely skipped the post I made just before this.
Mining output: first and most visible balancing factor, plan is to increase all barge mining output to be within an acceptable margin of the Hulk, not miles behind as it is currently. |

Ana Vyr
Vyral Technologies
314
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 20:04:00 -
[9] - Quote
Andoria Thara wrote:Ana Vyr wrote:Some of the yield...you meant 1/3rd of the yield right?
But hey, it mines better than a FRIGATE, how could we possibly complain?
Personally, I'm gonna just stick to tanking my Hulk and paying attention, unless they plan to really up the input you get from the new procurer/skiff. Last time I checked, you can only mount one laser to both of these right?
The post above does contain very hopeful info though...if the yield is less, but not a whole lot less, this stuff will be great. I guess you completely skipped the post I made just before this. Mining output: first and most visible balancing factor, plan is to increase all barge mining output to be within an acceptable margin of the Hulk, not miles behind as it is currently.
I referenced your post. I was writing mine when you posted yours, and it's very welcome news. |

Andoria Thara
Fallen Avatars
36
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 20:05:00 -
[10] - Quote
Ana Vyr wrote: I referenced your post. I was writing mine when you posted yours, and it's very welcome news.
D'oh, you updated it while I was replying lol  |

Nyreanya
Serenity Labs New Eden Research.
164
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 20:10:00 -
[11] - Quote
I heard the Lion King theme in my head when I read this. NAAAAAAaaants ingonyaamaaaaaaaa bagithi Baba And there was much rejoicing. |

Joe Hinken
Cetan Consortium
2
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 20:15:00 -
[12] - Quote
Nyreanya wrote:I heard the Lion King theme in my head when I read this. NAAAAAAaaants ingonyaamaaaaaaaa bagithi Baba And there was much rejoicing.
That which has been heard cannot be unheard. |

Mac Tir
State War Academy Caldari State
47
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 20:17:00 -
[13] - Quote
Roll Sizzle Beef wrote:This is new and exciting information...
...and yet you still bumbled into this thread |

Anazzar
Howling Stones Mining Corporation
14
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 20:32:00 -
[14] - Quote
The mining frigate sounds like it would be fun to run about lowsec with, mining is still boring as hell though, think ill stick to WHs until they make it a bit more interactive. |

Ris Dnalor
Black Rebel Rifter Club
354
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 20:38:00 -
[15] - Quote
Nyreanya wrote:I heard the Lion King theme in my head when I read this. NAAAAAAaaants ingonyaamaaaaaaaa bagithi Baba And there was much rejoicing.
Hakuna Matata https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=118961
EvE = Everybody Vs. Everybody
- Qolde |

Fabulousli Obvious
State War Academy Caldari State
347
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 20:52:00 -
[16] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:The trade off for your safety will be that you must give up some of your yield  and hold to gain this advantage.
Hooo boy. Wiping away those laughter tears.
Taking off 2 strippers to leave the ONE that the silly ship even holds.............yessir, that is SOME yield.
OMG forbid they ever nerf your PI tax rates by 66%. We will never hear the end of it. I think that God, in creating man, somewhat overestimated his ability. In all matters of opinion, our adversaries are insane. ~~ Oscar Wilde, writer, d. November 30, 1900 |

Marlona Sky
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
1169
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 21:21:00 -
[17] - Quote
No, YOU shut the hell up!
Nothing really about the blog or mining, just zip it in general.
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
758
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 21:21:00 -
[18] - Quote
Fabulousli Obvious wrote:
Or give up 66% yield of your OTECMoons. There we go.
Sometimes i have to wake up at 6am on a sunday to go defend or repair my moons.
Just because you don't see the downside to the moons doesn't meant there isn't one thats there. Moons (even the non broken ones that aren't tech) take a ton of care, feeding, and sometimes ruining a whole day of your life that you'll literally never get back just to deal with.
So, if I were you, I'd probably just shut up and be happy that CCP paid attention to all your whining and gave you a platform that has a chance to do all the things you ninnys have been begging for.
You're also failing to note that barges will get a yield increase, but do go on being a bitter sour little cry baby.
|

Gaia Ma'chello
V.I.C.E. Comic Mischief
13
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 21:24:00 -
[19] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Quote:Procurer/Skiff: primarily made for self-defense. Better mining rate than the ORE frig, good ore bay, but capable of having battleship-like EHP Now please kindly shut the hell up. Oh and I'm gonna go ahead and spoil it for you, Battleship HP will help, but all the HP in world wont stop people from nuking you, but at least this change may push the threshold too high for people to want to gank solo miners. The trade off for your safety will be that you must give up some of your yield and hold to gain this advantage.
If its going to be a useful ship it should mine better than a battleship. |

Shea Valerien
House of Valerien
54
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 21:27:00 -
[20] - Quote
Fantastic changes!! |

Momoyo
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
28
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 21:28:00 -
[21] - Quote
Im gonna go mine in a procurer now before it becomes cool.  |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
758
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 21:29:00 -
[22] - Quote
Edited the OP with all the actual mining barge changes so all the retards who don't bother reading these (yet still post half cocked stupidity that is obviously addressed in the blog like mining yield ect) can see all the changes intended.
Mining should actually get better, at least in the tools for use department. |

Marlona Sky
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
1169
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 21:40:00 -
[23] - Quote
Grath, stop crying.
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Homo Jesus
The LGBT Last Supper
18
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 21:45:00 -
[24] - Quote
Updated barges...mining is still on par with playing Desert Bus. |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
758
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 21:46:00 -
[25] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:Grath, stop crying.
Marlona, if you took me places after i get all dressed up like this maybe I wouldn't cry, did you ever think about me? WHAT ABOUT ME MARLONA, WHEN DO MY FEELINGS MATTER.
God, this is the same thing we talked about a couples therapy, its like you're not taking our relationship seriously.
|

Marlona Sky
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
1169
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 21:53:00 -
[26] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:Grath, stop crying. Marlona, if you took me places after i get all dressed up like this maybe I wouldn't cry, did you ever think about me? WHAT ABOUT ME MARLONA, WHEN DO MY FEELINGS MATTER. God, this is the same thing we talked about at couples therapy, its like you're not taking our relationship seriously. Your feeling don't matter and our relationship was just supposed to be platonic! Then you had to complicate things. 
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

SmilingVagrant
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
442
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 21:54:00 -
[27] - Quote
Fabulousli Obvious wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:The trade off for your safety will be that you must give up some of your yield  and hold to gain this advantage. Hooo boy. Wiping away those laughter tears. Taking off 2 strippers to leave the ONE that the silly ship even holds.............yessir, that is only SOME yield I guess. OMG forbid they ever nerf your PI tax rates by 66%. We will never hear the end of it. Or give up 66% yield of your OTECMoons. There we go.
I have to fit a tank to my ratting ship. You have to fit a tank to your mining ship. Also PI is glutted right now and the prices have been consistently dropping on individual income for it for a while, so you are talking out your ass. As far as tech goes: You could easily cut 66% of our income by coming and taking away our tech. Just like I'm taking away 50% of your income by shooting you unless you fly something else.
You don't get to lived in a closed system while the rest of us have to face the consequences of other players actually existing. I'm sorry you think that it should be the case: but it never will. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
7959
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 22:06:00 -
[28] - Quote
Fabulousli Obvious wrote:Taking off 2 strippers to leave the ONE that the silly ship even holds.............yessir, that is only SOME yield I guess. Good thing that nothing of the kind is happening, then. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

Ocular Shadows
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
9
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 03:19:00 -
[29] - Quote
Ris Dnalor wrote:Nyreanya wrote:I heard the Lion King theme in my head when I read this. NAAAAAAaaants ingonyaamaaaaaaaa bagithi Baba And there was much rejoicing. Hakuna Matata
What a wonderful phrase. |

Implying Implications
Broski Enterprises
106
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 03:25:00 -
[30] - Quote
WE WANT A MINING SHIP WITH DREADNOUGHT HP, FREIGHTER SIZED CARGOHOLD AND 2000% HULK MINING YEILD WTF CCP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Minmatar V3 gallery: http://minus.com/mOqXRikn5 |

Frederick Sanger
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
133
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 03:30:00 -
[31] - Quote
Mining frigate looks cool. |

Maddy Joringer
United Society of Xziles The Skeleton Crew
10
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 03:35:00 -
[32] - Quote
EPIC win by CCP ... Its natural change large amount of hulks and mining barges being killed would make spaceships to have structural changes to their ships ..
This made my day completely.. CCP.. you have given us a fighing chance,, now am gonna shutup since i got what i wanted... |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
398
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 03:37:00 -
[33] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Quote:Barge in on me
Changing the mining frigates to have combat roles made us realize that we need something to replace them. Which lead us to realize how outdated mining barges are. ThatGÇÖs something we want to tackle over the course of the summer as well. Our goal is simple: each and every single mining barge (and their tech 2 variant) should have an appealing role, and not just be a stepping stone on the way to something better. Players should'nt only aim for the Hulk without considering anything else when doing some hard rock and roll mining. That means playing with the following variables:
Mining output: first and most visible balancing factor, plan is to increase all barge mining output to be within an acceptable margin of the Hulk, not miles behind as it is currently. Autonomy: mining barges should have proper cargo holds so they not always have to rely on jet cans (without turning them into industrials however). That means giving them large, specialized ore bays where all the ore will automatically go into when mining. Resilience: another point is to give some of them proper EHP not to be one-shot by anything that even remotely sneezes on them.
As a result we thus get:
New ORE frig: we want this ship to replace current mining frigates as low barrier of entry vessel, but also fulfill high-end gameplay expectations by providing a very mobile platform for mining in hostile space. Lowest mining output, decent ore bay, little to no resilience. Procurer/Skiff: primarily made for self-defense. Better mining rate than the ORE frig, good ore bay, but capable of having battleship-like EHP. Retriever/Mackinaw: made for self-reliance. Has the largest ore bay, similear to the size of a jet can, second best mining output but less EHP than the procurer mining barge. Covetor/hulk: ore bay is identical to its current cargo hold, little to average EHP, but best mining output. Basically made for group operations when players have industrials and protection to back them up. Now please kindly shut the hell up. Oh and I'm gonna go ahead and spoil it for you, Battleship HP will help, but all the HP in world wont stop people from nuking you, but at least this change may push the threshold too high for people to want to gank solo miners. The trade off for your safety will be that you must give up some of your yield and hold to gain this advantage.
bs ehp is over 100k so depending on the cost but i dont think its worth 10 nadoes
PLEX FOR PIZZA!
tech III industrial ships! |

Xython
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
917
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 05:47:00 -
[34] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Quote: New ORE frig: we want this ship to replace current mining frigates as low barrier of entry vessel, but also fulfill high-end gameplay expectations by providing a very mobile platform for mining in hostile space. Lowest mining output, decent ore bay, little to no resilience. Procurer/Skiff: primarily made for self-defense. Better mining rate than the ORE frig, good ore bay, but capable of having battleship-like EHP. Retriever/Mackinaw: made for self-reliance. Has the largest ore bay, similear to the size of a jet can, second best mining output but less EHP than the procurer mining barge. Covetor/hulk: ore bay is identical to its current cargo hold, little to average EHP, but best mining output. Basically made for group operations when players have industrials and protection to back them up.
Now please kindly shut the hell up. Oh and I'm gonna go ahead and spoil it for you, Battleship HP will help, but all the HP in world wont stop people from nuking you, but at least this change may push the threshold too high for people to want to gank solo miners. The trade off for your safety will be that you must give up some of your yield and hold to gain this advantage.
Ah, but my friend, they won't. They don't want to, they want the game to be changed so they can continue being foolish. This won't change anything, they'll still get in their hulks, they'll still paper fit them so that they're max possible yield, and they'll still go abloobloobloo when someone ganks them. Because "Skiff output sucks" and "only a noob wouldn't use a hulk and 23 bot accounts."
And of course, the Skiff will be buffed, over and over again, over the upcoming years, just to shut the rock junkies up.
I do like that CCP has flat out said right up there (I went ahead and bolded it) that the Covetor / Hulk are not meant for solo miners, though. Unfortunately, the only thing harder than space rocks is Highsec Bot Miner skulls. |

Xython
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
917
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 05:48:00 -
[35] - Quote
SmilingVagrant wrote:Fabulousli Obvious wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:The trade off for your safety will be that you must give up some of your yield  and hold to gain this advantage. Hooo boy. Wiping away those laughter tears. Taking off 2 strippers to leave the ONE that the silly ship even holds.............yessir, that is only SOME yield I guess. OMG forbid they ever nerf your PI tax rates by 66%. We will never hear the end of it. Or give up 66% yield of your OTECMoons. There we go. I have to fit a tank to my ratting ship. You have to fit a tank to your mining ship. Also PI is glutted right now and the prices have been consistently dropping on individual income for it for a while, so you are talking out your ass. As far as tech goes: You could easily cut 66% of our income by coming and taking away our tech. Just like I'm taking away 50% of your income by shooting you unless you fly something else. You don't get to lived in a closed system while the rest of us have to face the consequences of other players actually existing. I'm sorry you think that it should be the case: but it never will.
This is me, not empty quoting. Instead, I am slowly clapping. Good show, sir!
|

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1036
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 05:53:00 -
[36] - Quote
Quote:Procurer/Skiff: primarily made for self-defense. Better mining rate than the ORE frig, good ore bay, but capable of having battleship-like EHP. Oh boy, the next time people get popped in hulks we can tell them "use a Skiff - it's yield is still better than a FRIGATE :) " Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd |

Ocih
Space Mermaids Somethin Awfull Forums
221
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 06:07:00 -
[37] - Quote
It's CCP. You really think there won't be sand in the Vaseline? You must be new here. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1036
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 06:10:00 -
[38] - Quote
Ocih wrote:It's CCP. You really think there won't be sand in the Vaseline? You must be new here. I... I never thought of it that way.
Hope there won't be too many people using that Vaseline then... Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd |

Zoe Athame
Fweddit
65
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 06:12:00 -
[39] - Quote
in before miners keep losing hulks and whining that they can't have the best tank AND the best efficiency |

Ned Black
Driders
40
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 06:21:00 -
[40] - Quote
Momoyo wrote:Im gonna go mine in a procurer now before it becomes cool. 
Get yourself an osprey it mines better than that said procurer... |

Xython
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
917
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 06:22:00 -
[41] - Quote
Zoe Athame wrote:in before miners keep losing hulks and whining that they can't have the best tank AND the best efficiency
Pretty much this. The forums are going to explode when these changes come into effect. |

Xercodo
Disturbed Friends Of Diazepam Dark Matter Coalition
1128
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 06:23:00 -
[42] - Quote
current yeild:
==== - mining frigs ===== - procuror ====== - scythe/osprey ======== - retriever ======== - battleship ========= - maxed yield battleship ========== - covetor =========== - hulk
new yeilds: ====== - ore frig ======== - procuror ========= - retriever ========== - covetor ========= - skiff ========== - mack =========== - hulk
(these are my own estimates and interpretations on the dev blog, the procuror/skiff and retri/mack will only be a step or two under the hulk instead of leaps) The Drake is a Lie |

Anya Ohaya
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
129
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 06:42:00 -
[43] - Quote
Momoyo wrote:Im gonna go mine in a procurer now before it becomes cool. 
I think I'm going to procure some procurers. |

coolzero
The Replicators Northern Associates.
23
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 07:01:00 -
[44] - Quote
Procurer/Skiff: primarily made for self-defense. Better mining rate than the ORE frig, good ore bay, but capable of having battleship-like EHP.
better but still there is a problem with the skiff...... the drone bay.
it needs to be bigger for a nullsec ship and should at least hold 5 medium drones (maby more becuase you cant use mining drones on mercoxit afaik.)
|

Tore Vest
298
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 07:09:00 -
[45] - Quote
I cant wait for those new mining ships.....  Its a long time to x-mas tho....
A lot of things can happen before then..... No troll. |

Ziranda Hakuli
Relativity Holding Corp AAA Citizens
79
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 07:16:00 -
[46] - Quote
your just jealous that the mining ships are getting adjust. so go back to your null bear land corner before your put in a cage like any pet |

Cass Lie
State War Academy Caldari State
31
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 07:28:00 -
[47] - Quote
Fabulousli Obvious wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:The trade off for your safety will be that you must give up some of your yield  and hold to gain this advantage. Hooo boy. Wiping away those laughter tears. Taking off 2 strippers to leave the ONE that the silly ship even holds.............yessir, that is only SOME yield I guess. OMG forbid they ever nerf your PI tax rates by 66%. We will never hear the end of it. Or give up 66% yield of your OTECMoons. There we go.
/facedesk (/facepalm just didn't cut it). What a glorious idea! Nerf their tech yield, that will teach them! Nerf it into oblivion! Only, ehm, now that that there is only a third of the former amount of tech pouring into the game, my hulk kinda costs three times more and is thus a more juicy gang target. And it has only made the tech holders richer! Foul play! Nerf it more!
If anything, you should lobby for increasing the supply of tech and watch OTEC try to stockpile it and perpetually distrust each other because of the possibility of cashing in. |

MarKand
Aimonme Technology
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 07:38:00 -
[48] - Quote
Greed is good, all gankers can relax. Even with a haulersized cargo emp-miners will still move ore to a can becouse they dont want to move the Hulk out of the spot, with drones of the Hulk on aggro and a canflip, the day is done.
On topic I think this is the secondbest idea for a long time, but I still think the best idea is to remove orebelts from highsec and just have them in missions or probedsites. The very idea that resources respawn in the most dense and populated areas is contraproductiv for the game. Riches by resources should be amassed where the risc meets the value, and not as it is now. With the new friggs commin lowsec mining could be a very profiteble incomme, since they will have a chance to sneak by camped entrypoints.
Regarding the Hulk/Covetor as a soloship, I personally, have always wanted to see a change were co-op ships only actually work in co-op, as an example, make the mindlink of the miningforeman the activationkey for T2 stripminers, wont work without a miningforeman. Mayne a litte to much descriptive to get multiplayer work, but the very idea to have a Deep Space Mining Vessel working roids in highsec is a little alike the idea having a deep sea explorer in the pool, cleaning the tiles.
I know these are old and flamable ideas, but I still think they are valid, when I started playing eve a long time ago, I felt like a explorer back in the 1500 centrury, and all the riches where in the mystic unknown deep space called 0.0. And lowsec, lowsec were the horror stemed sea of pirates and most of all oppertunities, mining omber( even looks like gold) in a trasher, always on the lookout for the ebilpirates, becouse you knew they were comming, just not when :)
Please bring that feeling back! Pretty please...
PS Really good and constructive OP, felt I had to make a post and a edit! |

Ned Black
Driders
40
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 08:17:00 -
[49] - Quote
Cass Lie wrote:Fabulousli Obvious wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:The trade off for your safety will be that you must give up some of your yield  and hold to gain this advantage. Hooo boy. Wiping away those laughter tears. Taking off 2 strippers to leave the ONE that the silly ship even holds.............yessir, that is only SOME yield I guess. OMG forbid they ever nerf your PI tax rates by 66%. We will never hear the end of it. Or give up 66% yield of your OTECMoons. There we go. /facedesk (/facepalm just didn't cut it). What a glorious idea! Nerf their tech yield, that will teach them! Nerf it into oblivion! Only, ehm, now that that there is only a third of the former amount of tech pouring into the game, my hulk kinda costs three times more and is thus a more juicy gang target. And it has only made the tech holders richer! Foul play! Nerf it more! If anything, you should lobby for increasing the supply of tech and watch OTEC try to stockpile it and perpetually distrust each other because of the possibility of cashing in.
Actually, they should remove moon mining entirely if you ask me... and if not they really should make it more like PI where the veins go away after a time... not the isk printing machine it is today. |

Marlona Sky
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
1172
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 08:43:00 -
[50] - Quote
Xercodo wrote:current yield: ==== - mining frigs ===== - procuror ====== - scythe/osprey ======== - retriever ======== - battleship ========= - maxed yield battleship ========== - covetor =========== - hulk
new yeilds: ====== - ore frig ======== - procuror ========= - retriever ========== - covetor ========= - skiff ========== - mack =========== - hulk
(these are my own estimates and interpretations on the dev blog, the procuror/skiff and retri/mack will only be a step or two under the hulk instead of leaps)
Even if your text visualization is not accurate, I do like it. 
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Reaver Glitterstim
Dromedaworks inc
142
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 08:47:00 -
[51] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Sometimes i have to wake up at 6am on a sunday to go defend or repair my moons. Stop, you're giving me ideas!
coolzero wrote:better but still there is a problem with the skiff...... the drone bay.
it needs to be bigger for a nullsec ship and should at least hold 5 medium drones (maby more becuase you cant use mining drones on mercoxit afaik.) I vote 75m3 so you can fit a flight of medium drones and a flight of small drones. I bet there will be stupid noobs who stick 3 large drones in there. -á"The Mittani: Hated By Badposters i'm strangely comfortable with it" -Mittens |

Sal Alo
Pane e Panelle
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 09:57:00 -
[52] - Quote
My impression is that CCCP won't change the current mining system and its semi-AFK-friendly current status (before <3 Goons) and they'd like to bring that back. IIRC once or twice they had admitted the above pretty explicitly.
Anyway, I could be more interested in the Retriever/Mackinaw: made for self-reliance. Has the largest ore bay, similar to the size of a jet can , second best mining output but less EHP (how much less?) than the procurer mining barge. |

Yolanta Geezenstack
GWA Corp Unified Church of the Unobligated
6
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 10:03:00 -
[53] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Just because you don't see the downside to the moons doesn't meant there isn't one thats there. Moons (even the non broken ones that aren't tech) take a ton of care, feeding, and sometimes ruining a whole day of your life that you'll literally never get back just to deal with.
Hm, does that mean you do boring stuff to earn your ISK, maybe even as boring and non-emergent as mining?  |

Lipbite
Express Hauler
82
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 10:26:00 -
[54] - Quote
Everyone should be happy - it's only 6 months to wait and $90 to pay for hulkageddoners to be able to shoot your barge. |

Pinstar Colton
Sweet Asteroid Acres
142
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 14:24:00 -
[55] - Quote
Ask yourselves this miners: What costs you more ISK? Gankers or >4.00 trit? In the cat-and-mouse game that is low sec, there is no shame in learning to be a better mouse. |

JitaPriceChecker2
State War Academy Caldari State
173
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 14:30:00 -
[56] - Quote
Will they revamp ice mining ???
10 minute cycle ??? Really ??? |

Fabulousli Obvious
State War Academy Caldari State
350
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 14:32:00 -
[57] - Quote
Sal Alo wrote:My impression is that CCCP  won't change the current mining system and its semi-AFK-friendly current status (before <3 Goons) and they'd like to bring that back. IIRC once or twice they had admitted the above pretty explicitly. Anyway, I could be more interested in the Retriever/Mackinaw: made for self-reliance. Has the largest ore bay, similar to the size of a jet can , second best mining output but less EHP (how much less?) than the procurer mining barge.
Yeah, great design scheme ain't it ? The better, more expensive ship (Hulk) shall remain a paper bag.
I'm glad Real Life design is much better than EVE. I think that God, in creating man, somewhat overestimated his ability. In all matters of opinion, our adversaries are insane. ~~ Oscar Wilde, writer, d. November 30, 1900 |

Kijo Rikki
Killboard Padding Services
106
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 16:20:00 -
[58] - Quote
Yeah, small compact armored trucks aren't as sturdy as tractor trailers. |

Raekek
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 16:27:00 -
[59] - Quote
I wonder how the mining cruisers will fit into this plan? (Osprey, Exequror, etc.)
They are pretty useless right now. Hopefully they will be rebalanced to fit (viable) support roles or something. |

Alia Gon'die
Aliastra Gallente Federation
110
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 16:33:00 -
[60] - Quote
Ziranda Hakuli wrote:your just jealous that the mining ships are getting adjust. so go back to your null bear land corner before your put in a cage like any pet
What? Don't AAA Citizens live in nullsec?
I'm pretty sure most people are down for these kinds of changes. Self-appointed forums hallway monitor |

Savage Angel
Garoun Investment Bank Gallente Federation
94
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 16:33:00 -
[61] - Quote
Raekek wrote:I wonder how the mining cruisers will fit into this plan? (Osprey, Exequror, etc.)
They are pretty useless right now. Hopefully they will be rebalanced to fit (viable) support roles or something.
I always considered those are mostly for people who do not want to spend the SP on barges, an only mine infrequently. |

Alia Gon'die
Aliastra Gallente Federation
110
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 16:35:00 -
[62] - Quote
Fabulousli Obvious wrote:Sal Alo wrote:My impression is that CCCP  won't change the current mining system and its semi-AFK-friendly current status (before <3 Goons) and they'd like to bring that back. IIRC once or twice they had admitted the above pretty explicitly. Anyway, I could be more interested in the Retriever/Mackinaw: made for self-reliance. Has the largest ore bay, similar to the size of a jet can , second best mining output but less EHP (how much less?) than the procurer mining barge. Yeah, great design scheme ain't it ? The better, more expensive ship (Hulk) shall remain a paper bag. I'm glad Real Life design is much better than EVE. You mean miners will have to decide whether they want an easier time surviving or if they want high isk/hour? This is a huge change. Self-appointed forums hallway monitor |

Barbara Nichole
Cryogenic Consultancy Black Sun Alliance
236
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 16:36:00 -
[63] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Quote:Barge in on me
Changing the mining frigates to have combat roles made us realize that we need something to replace them. Which lead us to realize how outdated mining barges are. ThatGÇÖs something we want to tackle over the course of the summer as well. Our goal is simple: each and every single mining barge (and their tech 2 variant) should have an appealing role, and not just be a stepping stone on the way to something better. Players should'nt only aim for the Hulk without considering anything else when doing some hard rock and roll mining. That means playing with the following variables:
Mining output: first and most visible balancing factor, plan is to increase all barge mining output to be within an acceptable margin of the Hulk, not miles behind as it is currently. Autonomy: mining barges should have proper cargo holds so they not always have to rely on jet cans (without turning them into industrials however). That means giving them large, specialized ore bays where all the ore will automatically go into when mining. Resilience: another point is to give some of them proper EHP not to be one-shot by anything that even remotely sneezes on them.
As a result we thus get:
New ORE frig: we want this ship to replace current mining frigates as low barrier of entry vessel, but also fulfill high-end gameplay expectations by providing a very mobile platform for mining in hostile space. Lowest mining output, decent ore bay, little to no resilience. Procurer/Skiff: primarily made for self-defense. Better mining rate than the ORE frig, good ore bay, but capable of having battleship-like EHP. Retriever/Mackinaw: made for self-reliance. Has the largest ore bay, similear to the size of a jet can, second best mining output but less EHP than the procurer mining barge. Covetor/hulk: ore bay is identical to its current cargo hold, little to average EHP, but best mining output. Basically made for group operations when players have industrials and protection to back them up. Now please kindly shut the hell up. Oh and I'm gonna go ahead and spoil it for you, Battleship HP will help, but all the HP in world wont stop people from nuking you, but at least this change may push the threshold too high for people to want to gank solo miners. The trade off for your safety will be that you must give up some of your yield and hold to gain this advantage.
You know what I would rather listen to whiney miners than a pontificating, rude dumb hump like you. Changes are not set in stone but "shut -the hell- up and don't voice your opinions (even though you are the majorty) or give input because this is my game and I'm going to bore you by dicatating how you have to play it.' in the forums"
yeah, these posts are a dime a dozen. [IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/OldST.jpg[/IMG] |

baltec1
1452
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 16:38:00 -
[64] - Quote
Gaia Ma'chello wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:Quote:Procurer/Skiff: primarily made for self-defense. Better mining rate than the ORE frig, good ore bay, but capable of having battleship-like EHP Now please kindly shut the hell up. Oh and I'm gonna go ahead and spoil it for you, Battleship HP will help, but all the HP in world wont stop people from nuking you, but at least this change may push the threshold too high for people to want to gank solo miners. The trade off for your safety will be that you must give up some of your yield and hold to gain this advantage. If its going to be a useful ship it should mine better than a battleship.
Nerf battleships. |

Xython
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
920
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 16:56:00 -
[65] - Quote
Sal Alo wrote:My impression is that CCCP  won't change the current mining system and its semi-AFK-friendly current status (before <3 Goons) and they'd like to bring that back. IIRC once or twice they had admitted the above pretty explicitly.
If they wanted to end AFK or Bot Mining, they could do what hundreds of free MMORPGs and many pay RPGs do: Add a captcha to Mining. Every time your miners cycle, they have a 1 in 50 chance of popping up a "please enter this number" type thing. Only can happen once every 30-60 minutes or so. Don't do the Captcha, your miners are offlined and you have to go dock to fix them.
You could log the failures as well, so if you see someone fail the captcha, then go dock, fix their ship, then immediately go back, well you probably have a bot if they do this 5 or 6 or 25 times in a row. Better yet: If they fail the captcha once, go back and re-online their modules, the chance of the captcha reappearing goes up to 100%.
This would be a stopgap measure, of course, designed to stop bot mining until such a time that CCP can have someone redesign the mining interface to make it fun enough to actually bother doing.
It would instantly and permanently end AFK Bot Mining. It would be trivial to implement. Why CCP hasn't done so is beyond me. |

Xython
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
920
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 16:58:00 -
[66] - Quote
Barbara Nichole wrote: You know what I would rather listen to whiney miners than a pontificating, rude dumb hump like you. Changes are not set in stone but "shut -the hell- up and don't voice your opinions (even though you are the majorty) or give input because this is my game and I'm going to bore you by dicatating how you have to play it.' in the forums"
yeah, these posts are a dime a dozen.
I was going to just shrug and ignore this post, then I realized that you have an image tag (which doesn't work) in your signature.
Now I have rolled my eyes so hard I believe I tore something. Go fix your signature, it looks horrible, even for a badposter. |

Xercodo
Disturbed Friends Of Diazepam Dark Matter Coalition
1132
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 17:53:00 -
[67] - Quote
JitaPriceChecker2 wrote:Will they revamp ice mining ???
10 minute cycle ??? Really ???
NO, best semi-afk activity evar!
I can actually focus on another thing for half an hour straight without fear of overloading a mack
(I purposely left the ice skill at level 1 for this xD) The Drake is a Lie |

Sal Alo
Pane e Panelle
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 22:34:00 -
[68] - Quote
Xython wrote:Sal Alo wrote:My impression is that CCCP  won't change the current mining system and its semi-AFK-friendly current status (before <3 Goons) and they'd like to bring that back. IIRC once or twice they had admitted the above pretty explicitly. If they wanted to end AFK or Bot Mining, they could do what hundreds of free MMORPGs and many pay RPGs do: Add a captcha to Mining. Every time your miners cycle, they have a 1 in 50 chance of popping up a "please enter this number" type thing. Only can happen once every 30-60 minutes or so. Don't do the Captcha, your miners are offlined and you have to go dock to fix them. You could log the failures as well, so if you see someone fail the captcha, then go dock, fix their ship, then immediately go back, well you probably have a bot if they do this 5 or 6 or 25 times in a row. Better yet: If they fail the captcha once, go back and re-online their modules, the chance of the captcha reappearing goes up to 100%. This would be a stopgap measure, of course, designed to stop bot mining until such a time that CCP can have someone redesign the mining interface to make it fun enough to actually bother doing. It would instantly and permanently end AFK Bot Mining. It would be trivial to implement. Why CCP hasn't done so is beyond me.
Indeed, it would be a not so difficult fix.
For the bold, here's my guess: they want to keep this semi-AFK-friendly because EVE has older players that like to "play" while focusing in other activities and switching to EVE every 20-30 minutes? |

Grumpy Owly
Paladin Philanthropists
633
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 07:39:00 -
[69] - Quote
I wouldn't be fooled by these "improvements" by CCP.
It means that the mining yeilds could be reduced overall as people might switch to solo play in more defensible ships with lower yields than the hulk due to the ongoing threat from Ganking. Good for miners wallet I guess as individuals, bad for the economy.
If they don't then the slight increase "overall" with yields due to lower tier ships having improvements will mean that mineral prices will fall due to the supply being better.
Then realising that to make any money from the profession you will need to be in an Organisations that employs OPs in groups to be able to profit from the exercise. (Some might say this is the case now). But the emphasis is more promotion to this style of play.
This is actually good practice for mining and is the optimum best way of doing it of course. Which does add some more defensive options if done right, with appropriate skilling and links in a fleet arrangement.
But this then makes it a gankers paradise, as they then have a concentration of targets to make profits more obtainable in singular runs as opposed to gambling more on solo targets.
Might help with ICE mining however, if the Mack and Retriever are to get a significant boost with EHP whilst retaining its relative performance.
Interestingly if the ORE frig is helpful as an avoidance to threat, it will help the null sec miners to extract ABC ores in theory as it then provides a faster ship to avoid threats whilst aquiring more profitable ores when in lower volumes.
The market has already seemingly reacted positively to the news, at least for those selling mining craft, with barge prices climbing following the announcement. Not neccesarily good news for those wanting to mine however? Wether awareness to the Permageddon exercise is also a main factor to any drive coupled with the news circulating amongst miners I dont know. Bounty Hunting for CSM7 |

Degren
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1420
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 07:42:00 -
[70] - Quote
Upvote all the Grath Dare to dream of a better New Eden. -áDegren for CSM 8 |

Elsa Nietchize
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
28
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 11:02:00 -
[71] - Quote
you guys talk as if CCP has ever followed through with one of these "we promise the world" dev blogs.... |

Malacath Azaria
xX-Crusader-Xx
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 13:00:00 -
[72] - Quote
This will only shut them up for so long. People will still fly Hulks for maximum yield & will still be ganked by destroyers. |

Dimitryy
Love Squad Confederation of xXPIZZAXx
53
|
Posted - 2012.06.16 13:12:00 -
[73] - Quote
Fabulousli Obvious wrote:Sal Alo wrote:My impression is that CCCP  won't change the current mining system and its semi-AFK-friendly current status (before <3 Goons) and they'd like to bring that back. IIRC once or twice they had admitted the above pretty explicitly. Anyway, I could be more interested in the Retriever/Mackinaw: made for self-reliance. Has the largest ore bay, similar to the size of a jet can , second best mining output but less EHP (how much less?) than the procurer mining barge. Yeah, great design scheme ain't it ? The better, more expensive ship (Hulk) shall remain a paper bag. I'm glad Real Life design is much better than EVE.
You are literally ********. |

Tex Steele
Department of Defence Fatal Ascension
9
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 17:00:00 -
[74] - Quote
I cannot see how this constitutes any kind of good news. The Hulk is the only capable mining ship we have. Even if they raise the mining output levels on other platforms, they still do not have 3 turrets for strip miners. This is good for entry level people who can only fly frigates, but for those of us dedicated miners (who by the way, support he backbone of industry in New Eden) who spent the time and effort to train for the Hulk, we need some serious help.
Consider this: In the real world, in a business or a government, if massive investment ships were being taken down by solo pirates, either the ships would get better at defense or the government would step in - Notice the various governments who have started taking on the Somali Pirates lately?
So, Since CCP, the government of EVE is determined to make this a PvP - Ganking Oriented game, or to cause everyone to have to join Massive alliances in order to be in massive fleets to even be able to play the game, we can obviously expect little from them to support the solo miners and industrialists out here who simply enjoy playing the game without fear of being ganked every 5 minutes by some noob in a crap-fit cheap ship.
The Hulk needs better passive defense or "tank". Maybe the ability to evade warp disruption in order to attempt escape from a solo ganker, or survive an alpha strike first shot from a solo ganker. Let's get real - any miner who continues mining after a FLEET of ganking ships shows up in their system on d-scan isn't doing it right, and will learn the hard way. So, just a little help on this, please. Currently,the cargo bay on a hulk will either just barely or NOT hold the output from 2 cycles of the mining lasers. This is pretty ridiculous - the ore-bay should be about twice that size at a minimum. This allows the miner to focus on getting the hauler in place or move the Orca and still mine without having to drop cans while ore is being hauled away. NOT big steps, just some common sense improvements to a great ship.
|

Ituhata
The Scope Gallente Federation
14
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 17:07:00 -
[75] - Quote
Wow, the changes haven't even been implemented and already there is whining.
FYI consider during WWII the government had merchant ships travel in a zig-zag pattern to evade german u-boats. Sometimes doing things actively yourself is the best protection available. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |