| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
SetrakDark
Caldari
DarkCorp Technology and Finance
   |
Posted - 2009.11.19 04:10:00 -
[1]
Can you even lock minerals down with corp votes?
Regardless, this idea has too many holes to be worth considering in detail.
|
SetrakDark
Caldari
DarkCorp Technology and Finance
|
Posted - 2009.11.19 14:46:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Selene D'Celeste
Before you hammer yourselves too much on security, there is only a single method of securing in-game assets by a group provided by CCP, and that is the BPO lockdown. If you're not basing your methods on that -and- you're aiming for security, you're doing it wrong.
yup yup
|
SetrakDark
Caldari
DarkCorp Technology and Finance
|
Posted - 2009.11.20 15:06:00 -
[3]
I believe you guys are missing the emphasis in Selene's post. The point is that the lockdown mechanism is the only ingame tool available for adding some potential layer of security, so any effort that does not involve this tool is wasted.
The emphasis is on its singleness as an available tool, not its absolute quality in terms of security.
|
SetrakDark
Caldari
DarkCorp Technology and Finance
|
Posted - 2009.11.20 17:38:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Johnny ReeRee
Edited by: Johnny ReeRee on 20/11/2009 17:21:53
Originally by: SetrakDark
I believe you guys are missing the emphasis in Selene's post. The point is that the lockdown mechanism is the only ingame tool available for adding some potential layer of security, so any effort that does not involve this tool is wasted.
The emphasis is on its singleness as an available tool, not its absolute quality in terms of security.
Uh...I missed nothing at all. Evidently you missed the part where I addressed that point. My post was a pretty intimidating one (3 sentences!), so I can understand your confusion on that point.
If it's available, and yet still crap, that's worth pointing out -- which we did. You choose to emphasize that it's available, and we chose to emphasize that it's crap.
Well, I'll just quote this so you can't change it, and leave it for any non-idiot to see how your post is non-responsive to mine.
|
SetrakDark
Caldari
DarkCorp Technology and Finance
|
Posted - 2009.11.20 18:19:00 -
[5]
I can imagine multiple ways that the lockdown process is insecure or problematic in other ways. All it does is stop x amount of persons from doing a runner if x+1 persons vote against the unlock in 24 hours. "Near-impossibility" is an extremely poor choice of words.
|
| |
|