| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1. Cheeba Investments - Firefly Capital Ventures - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Strrog wrote: Well looks like I missed 1 share there lol. Perhaps reservation is possible? I have 3 shares for sale, not sure how many you want. 1.5b each, so 4.5b for all 3, though I'm willing to sell them individually. I'll leave these a...
- by SetrakDark - at 2012.07.17 08:43:00
|
2. Grats CCP, No armsrace will every be possible vs current tech holders - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I should mention that I, like many people here, am all for a tech nerf. I think tech creates poor strategic incentives, as in the causes for war. However, I am absolutely confident based on verifiable experience that once started, income plays lit...
- by SetrakDark - at 2012.07.10 13:03:00
|
3. Grats CCP, No armsrace will every be possible vs current tech holders - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ping Pang Pong wrote: Being able to replace entire fleets of super caps, baring their availability on the market, is a HUGE morale booster. It's awesome when people betray their own argument in the first couple of lines. Both the SoCo and t...
- by SetrakDark - at 2012.07.10 12:52:00
|
4. Grats CCP, No armsrace will every be possible vs current tech holders - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lord Zim wrote: The problem is that people's morale break so ridiculously early that nobody have even any chance of even seeing the bottom of their alliance's warchest. Precisely. Now, does this mean that, in general, warchests are to...
- by SetrakDark - at 2012.07.10 12:44:00
|
5. Grats CCP, No armsrace will every be possible vs current tech holders - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Abel Merkabah wrote: Doesn't this kind of point to a problem? That the resources of all these alliances are so vast that depletion of your opponents funds is not a viable strategy? Should wars be more destructive? Perhaps the ability to destroy...
- by SetrakDark - at 2012.07.10 12:24:00
|
6. Grats CCP, No armsrace will every be possible vs current tech holders - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Vera Algaert wrote: income (and distribution of income) effects morale, fleet compositions, FCs and logistics. Just stop and think for a minute. Your entire argument here is that you need "income" to fight a war. No ******* ****, idiot. We...
- by SetrakDark - at 2012.07.10 12:11:00
|
7. Grats CCP, No armsrace will every be possible vs current tech holders - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Heck, just look at the current war in the South. The supposedly poor techless alliances are throwing away t3 fleets almost daily and losing, while the supposedly wealthy tech alliances are mainly using drakes and winning. The closest example I ca...
- by SetrakDark - at 2012.07.10 04:27:00
|
8. Grats CCP, No armsrace will every be possible vs current tech holders - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Pipa Porto wrote: Didn't the GSF lose Delve due to money problems? Not having the ISK in the right wallet doesn't exactly qualify as an "income issue" in my mind. :P Quite literally I cannot think of one occasion in the three years I have ...
- by SetrakDark - at 2012.07.10 04:13:00
|
9. Grats CCP, No armsrace will every be possible vs current tech holders - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Marconus Orion wrote: I like how you downplay how important money is when it comes to wars. Made me laugh out loud. Tell us more about nullsec warfare, noted nullsec expert marlona sky.
- by SetrakDark - at 2012.07.10 01:49:00
|
10. Grats CCP, No armsrace will every be possible vs current tech holders - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
lol hisec forum warriors still think income wins wars
- by SetrakDark - at 2012.07.10 00:29:00
|
11. Making ISK in EvE - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sit in JIta. Set buy orders. Sell bought items for profit.
- by SetrakDark - at 2012.07.09 23:40:00
|
12. Technetium Alchemy - in Market Discussions [original thread]
I think the important point to take away from this discussion is that everyone should panic sell their tech to buy orders RIGHT NOW!
- by SetrakDark - at 2012.07.09 16:44:00
|
13. Fixing Tech - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nullsec players have shown that they'll generate content despite absolutely borked game mechanics, so CCP knows they can work on **** like tech and sov last, especially when they did an enormous nullsec focused expansion already (dominion). Again...
- by SetrakDark - at 2012.07.09 16:42:00
|
14. Grats CCP, No armsrace will every be possible vs current tech holders - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lapine Davion wrote: Because GSF has never used bomber gangs to counter BS fleets in the past when bombs weren't broken. Can we get Mr. Vee in here? No, it's only unfair to people who are bad with bombers and need to use a patching error to...
- by SetrakDark - at 2012.07.09 14:41:00
|
15. Fixing Tech - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP aren't "protecting" anything. The people with the most tech want it to be balanced because it makes for **** gameplay. CCP are slow to move because it's an incredibly complex system, and they're likely to just **** it up again for three more ...
- by SetrakDark - at 2012.07.09 13:49:00
|
16. Why CFC Will Lose The War - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
That's not "power projection". You can make up whatever definitions you want for anything, it doesn't mean other people have to acknowledge your intellectual butchery of a subject. I'm going to call deploying an outpost in a hostile region "ice...
- by SetrakDark - at 2012.07.08 20:01:00
|
17. (#76 - 2012.07) BMBE Shareholder Report - BMBE the Premier Bank of EVE - in Market Discussions [original thread]
BMBE, premier bank of our hearts.
- by SetrakDark - at 2012.07.08 14:31:00
|
18. Actual geopolitical situation? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
By last estimates the CFC was a ravening horde of 1.2m mongrel players being held at bay by 10 brave spartan warriors making up the Southern Coalition. So that would mean it is 1,200,010 players altogether involved.
- by SetrakDark - at 2012.07.08 13:08:00
|
19. Why CFC Will Lose The War - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Marconus Orion wrote: Interesting how when the topic of power projection comes up and how it needs looked at; major power blocks come running in screaming it does not need a nerf. Yet if you look in this very thread nothing but bragging by the ...
- by SetrakDark - at 2012.07.08 13:00:00
|
20. Why CFC Will Lose The War - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Destructible (wreckable) player built outposts.
- by SetrakDark - at 2012.07.07 23:20:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |