Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Skippermonkey
|
Posted - 2010.04.06 16:16:00 -
[1]
For each race there are 3 t1 battleships, and 2 of them have t2 variants, what happened to the other Battleships t2 versions?
I would like to see a t2 Rohk...
not sure what area this t2 ship would perform in, but it would be good nonetheless.
|

Khalik Artonid
|
Posted - 2010.04.06 16:32:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Skippermonkey For each race there are 3 t1 not sure what area this t2 ship would perform in
Bingo. What else do you need from battleship hulls? Gank in t1, tank in t1, auxil (ECM/EWAR/etc) in t1. Cloaky t2 higher tank/gank t2
Youve covered 99% of the bases.
|

Skippermonkey
|
Posted - 2010.04.06 16:37:00 -
[3]
but i want my t2 'range boosted' Rohk to hit the next system over 
|

Veritaal
Amarr Red Federation
|
Posted - 2010.04.06 16:51:00 -
[4]
Hmm, perhaps a mini dreadnought?
I'm serious. Make a special, midslot siege mod (so the hulls can keep their 8 turrets), and have it fill an anti BS/support role. It would function as one heck of a sniper too.
Pros - Massive volley damage. - Highly skill intensive/expensive like the other T2 BSs. So they aren't going to break the game. - High sec pos bashing would be slightly more tolerable.
Cons - Horrendous tracking, just like a seiged dread. - Highly expensive/skill intensive. - No more durable than the T1 hull, so it wont be a solo pwnmobile. - If you still feel that this is overpowered, have the siege mod anchor this thing in place just like a regular dread.
I now dream of my sieged Abbaddon taking potshots and webbed/TPed battleships lol.
|

Ran Khanon
Amarr Vengeance Innovations
|
Posted - 2010.04.06 16:54:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Ran Khanon on 06/04/2010 16:55:01 I'll have a .... T2 Abaddon hulled flying fortress. And make it the Khanid "Black Panther - Blue Lightning" colour scheme please. And sprinkle it with laser bonuses, I'm allergic for missile ones.
In fact I am going to photoshop one right now!!!1 (edit: I mean .. soonish)
Help us to make parrots game related today! |

King Rothgar
Amarrian Retribution
|
Posted - 2010.04.06 17:00:00 -
[6]
A t2 BS geared towards pvp would be nice. We have the ninja-ratting/covert jump portal of epic fail black ops and the carebear's dream ship in marauders. But there really isn't a proper direct combat t2 BS nor a proper t2 EW model. That's two classes of t2 BS's that don't exist currently.
Thus far you shall read, but no further; for this is my sig. |

Khalik Artonid
|
Posted - 2010.04.06 17:07:00 -
[7]
Have you ever used a marauder in combat? Theyre ****ing insane if fit/flown well (and in the proper gang of course).
|

Avensis Darko
Tangential Endeavors Swords Of Athena
|
Posted - 2010.04.06 17:27:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Skippermonkey For each race there are 3 t1 battleships, and 2 of them have t2 variants, what happened to the other Battleships t2 versions?
I would like to see a t2 Rohk...
not sure what area this t2 ship would perform in, but it would be good nonetheless.
I'll have a Tier 2 T2 Battlecruiser whilst you're at it.... maybe a tanked EWAR vessel? -- A.D. |

Kenpotchi
|
Posted - 2010.04.06 17:27:00 -
[9]
And then you get perma jammed by a flight of light ecm drones....... 1v1 I would destroy a marauder in a cruiser or battle cruiser.
|

Kenpotchi
|
Posted - 2010.04.06 17:33:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Avensis Darko
Originally by: Skippermonkey For each race there are 3 t1 battleships, and 2 of them have t2 variants, what happened to the other Battleships t2 versions?
I would like to see a t2 Rohk...
not sure what area this t2 ship would perform in, but it would be good nonetheless.
I'll have a Tier 2 T2 Battlecruiser whilst you're at it.... maybe a tanked EWAR vessel?
I would give CCP a sexual favor for a T2 Hurricane. You could call it the Monsoon to boot. Just make them heavy versions of HACs. You could even make them sniper oriented and I would be happy.
|
|

Seriously Bored
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.04.06 17:33:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Khalik Artonid Have you ever used a marauder in combat? Theyre ****ing insane if fit/flown well (and in the proper gang of course).
I have an idea for a PVP Vargur I've been working on, but have been playing it close to the chest...
Mainly because of the instant lolage that would come with posting it, and for stuff like this:
Originally by: Kenpotchi And then you get perma jammed by a flight of light ecm drones....... 1v1 I would destroy a marauder in a cruiser or battle cruiser.
|

Aeon Noblemagus
Minmatar Sto-vo-kor C0NVICTED
|
Posted - 2010.04.06 17:45:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Khalik Artonid Have you ever used a marauder in combat? Theyre ****ing insane if fit/flown well (and in the proper gang of course).
Until the first ECM boat rocks up, marauders are notorious for being easy to jam
|

Yarinor
Yarinors Trust Fund
|
Posted - 2010.04.06 17:53:00 -
[13]
Super Heavy Assault Ship!
|

Jardine Khan
Caldari Grey Wolves Mercenary Guild
|
Posted - 2010.04.06 18:11:00 -
[14]
The T2 version of the Rokh could potentially be a larger version of a heavy interdictor, with a much larger warp disruption bubble radius than the cruiser version, a limited range cyno jammer (would only cover maybe 10 AUs rather than a whole system), or both depending on how the pilot fits the ship.
You already have a mini-dreadnaught in the Raven, especially considering its insane T1 cruise missile range of more than 250km with all skills to lvl 5, or its sheer damage potential when equipped with torps at ridiculously close range despite the range bonuses (only about 30km for T1 torps at all skills to lvl 5). But then again, it wouldn't hurt for the Caldari to have a decent railgun platform to go along with the Raven.
Of course, I'd like to see some improvement in the T1 versions of the Raven and the Rokh before I see a T2 version of the Rokh. For both ships, I'd like to see an improvement in their tanks, which are quite dismal especially when compared with other ships, both other BSs and smaller ship classes. For the Rokh specifically, I'd like to see more capacitor and powergrid so that it can actually make use of those railguns it favors without having to sacrifice what little tank it already has.
Very little escapes my notice. If something has, I don't know about it. |

Colonel Evans
|
Posted - 2010.04.06 20:06:00 -
[15]
Edited by: Colonel Evans on 06/04/2010 20:06:44 Edited by: Colonel Evans on 06/04/2010 20:06:03 Make them dedicated sniper ships that can effectively hit out to 249km and target there as well. Let them have resist bonuses to make them into true fleet ships, the ultimate in fleet ships, if you will.
Rokh: 1.) PG boost to allow fitting of a full rack of 425mms without fitting mods. 2.) +1 low slot 3.) Bonuses: Caldari Battleship: 10% Large Hybrid Optimal and 5% to shield resistances per level. Caldari Fleet Battleship: 10% Large Hybrid Optimal and 10% bonus to Large Hybrid Damage per level. 4.) Base targeting range and scan resolution boost.
Abaddon: 1.) PG Boost for full rack of Tachyons 2.) +1 md slot 3.) Bonuses: Amarr Battleshp: 5% Large Energy Damage and 5% to armor resistances per level. Amarr Fleet Battleship: 10% Large Energy Optimal and 5% Large Energy RoF per level 4.) Base targeting range and scan resolution boost.
ETC ETC
|

Jardine Khan
Caldari Grey Wolves Mercenary Guild
|
Posted - 2010.04.06 22:42:00 -
[16]
Originally by: Colonel Evans Rokh: 1.) PG boost to allow fitting of a full rack of 425mms without fitting mods. 2.) +1 low slot 3.) Bonuses: Caldari Battleship: 10% Large Hybrid Optimal and 5% to shield resistances per level. Caldari Fleet Battleship: 10% Large Hybrid Optimal and 10% bonus to Large Hybrid Damage per level. 4.) Base targeting range and scan resolution boost.
Abaddon: 1.) PG Boost for full rack of Tachyons 2.) +1 md slot 3.) Bonuses: Amarr Battleshp: 5% Large Energy Damage and 5% to armor resistances per level. Amarr Fleet Battleship: 10% Large Energy Optimal and 5% Large Energy RoF per level 4.) Base targeting range and scan resolution boost.
ETC ETC
Where does this "fleet battleship" bonus come from? I don't recall there being such a skill in existence. Very little escapes my notice. If something has, I don't know about it. |

Dario Wall
|
Posted - 2010.04.06 23:06:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Jardine Khan
Originally by: Colonel Evans Rokh: 1.) PG boost to allow fitting of a full rack of 425mms without fitting mods. 2.) +1 low slot 3.) Bonuses: Caldari Battleship: 10% Large Hybrid Optimal and 5% to shield resistances per level. Caldari Fleet Battleship: 10% Large Hybrid Optimal and 10% bonus to Large Hybrid Damage per level. 4.) Base targeting range and scan resolution boost.
Abaddon: 1.) PG Boost for full rack of Tachyons 2.) +1 md slot 3.) Bonuses: Amarr Battleshp: 5% Large Energy Damage and 5% to armor resistances per level. Amarr Fleet Battleship: 10% Large Energy Optimal and 5% Large Energy RoF per level 4.) Base targeting range and scan resolution boost.
ETC ETC
Where does this "fleet battleship" bonus come from? I don't recall there being such a skill in existence.
It doesn't exist, but what he's implying with the bonus is that it would be where the T2 ship skill bonus would go. Much like how all T2 ships have a base bonus for their hull type, then the T2 bonus.
|

Demolishar
G-Force Enterprises Wildly Inappropriate.
|
Posted - 2010.04.07 03:47:00 -
[18]
Edited by: Demolishar on 07/04/2010 03:46:55 Combat Recon Battleship -------------------------
Maelstrom Hull -95% powergrid use of Capital Siege Launcher +50% target painter effectiveness/lvl +10% web strength/lvl +100% web range/lvl +20% siege torpedo rate of fire/lvl
6 lows 7 mids 8 highs 8 launcher slots
Yes, I know it's OP.
|

Dr Fighter
|
Posted - 2010.04.07 08:46:00 -
[19]
Super Heavy Interdictor
Can Fit: Warp Disruption Field Generators
Battleship Skill Bonus: 5% to ALL *Racial* weapon systems 7.5% tracking
Super Heavy Interdictor Bonus: 5% to all shield and armor resistances 7.5% shield boosting/armor repping
ROLE BONUS: 50% capacitor defence shielding (neuts and nos remove half the cap)
Very low PG, lower than a dominix to avoid too many large weapons, slot layout similar to T1 teir one BS (6/8 highs, 4/6 mids, 4/7 lows)
fills a role like a heavy interdictor only with a local tank and undersized guns to defend itss elf while tackling a super cap wihtout RR support.
Cost at around 200m.
plopping this idea out there for the EFT ****stars to rip open.
|

MartinFALCON
|
Posted - 2010.04.07 09:51:00 -
[20]
I want a brand new class Assault marauders which needed skill marauder to lvl5 and armor compensation (or shield) to lvl5 and large guns spec to lvl5 and something else. With ships something like marauders, but primary focused to the PvP. If I imagine a T2 Hyperion (I dont know which name has to be, maybe a Theya - the wife of the Hyperion) that has a 8hi slots 5 for guns with 100% role bonus to guns damage and 37,5% tracking, 50% to web strench. Gallente battleship bonus 5% to damage per lvl and 7,5% to activ rep. with good sensor strench, I thing 50. Assault marauders bonus 5% to all resistances for armor or shield and 7,5% for armor rep or boost. About 50% high armor, shield and structure higher then T1 hulls. Higher cap, cpu, power. 5 med slots, 7low slots. With good resists and so on. Drone bay 250m3 with 125drone bandwich. 3x rig slots with 600callibration points. This could be a great ships for pvp with activ tanking. Building cost must be very high to prevent that not everyone has those ships, but only high skilled and valuable players. I thing about 4bill. And skill assault marauder like carriers 400mill. I hope that ccp can do some specialized T2 PvP battleships.
|
|

Niveon
|
Posted - 2010.04.07 11:44:00 -
[21]
No |

Dengen Krastinov
Amarr Navy of Xoc Wildly Inappropriate.
|
Posted - 2010.04.07 12:13:00 -
[22]
Originally by: Veritaal Hmm, perhaps a mini dreadnought?
I'm serious. Make a special, midslot siege mod (so the hulls can keep their 8 turrets), and have it fill an anti BS/support role. It would function as one heck of a sniper too.
Pros - Massive volley damage. - Highly skill intensive/expensive like the other T2 BSs. So they aren't going to break the game. - High sec pos bashing would be slightly more tolerable.
Cons - Horrendous tracking, just like a seiged dread. - Highly expensive/skill intensive. - No more durable than the T1 hull, so it wont be a solo pwnmobile. - If you still feel that this is overpowered, have the siege mod anchor this thing in place just like a regular dread.
I now dream of my sieged Abbaddon taking potshots and webbed/TPed battleships lol.
no role though. why develop it. BS and Dreads would do each job better.
|

Tyrael Primus
Paxton Industries Paxton Federation
|
Posted - 2010.04.07 13:50:00 -
[23]
Answer:
The 3rd BS and 2nd BC for each race were added a few years ago after the initial round of T2 ships and modules were introduced to Tranquility. So there is room for expansion 
Hopefully it is a huge ISK sink for bitter vets since the base T1 hulls are already more expensive than the lower tier hulls
|

Krist Valentine
Amarr British Armoured Division The G0dfathers
|
Posted - 2010.04.07 13:58:00 -
[24]
Originally by: Kenpotchi And then you get perma jammed by a flight of light ecm drones....... 1v1 I would destroy a marauder in a cruiser or battle cruiser.
l f_cking ol youve got to be kidding me
|

Zephna
|
Posted - 2010.04.07 14:17:00 -
[25]
Originally by: Demolishar Edited by: Demolishar on 07/04/2010 03:46:55 Combat Recon Battleship -------------------------
Maelstrom Hull -95% powergrid use of Capital Siege Launcher +50% target painter effectiveness/lvl +10% web strength/lvl +100% web range/lvl +20% siege torpedo rate of fire/lvl
6 lows 7 mids 8 highs 8 launcher slots
Yes, I know it's OP.
OP sure but why the hell would you turn their best gun boat into a missile boat? the Minmatar standard is to slap on a **** load of guns not rocket launchers... which puts me on the the rant of why the hell does the naglfar have split weapons...
if anything i kinda like the assault marauder idea, but toss a few capital gun turrets on or something would be kinda neat 
|

Poses
|
Posted - 2010.04.07 14:23:00 -
[26]
I'd like to see super heavy assault ships... (khanid scheme abaddon would be hot).
CCP has said that one of their stated goals is to never have regular T1 BS get replaced at the 'standard fleet ship' (and price isn't enough)
so I'd like to see a bonus like this:
amarr BS bonus: 10% bonus to armor repair amount, 5% bonus to Torpedo ROF Super Heavy Assault ship: 5% bonus to torpedo explosion velocity, 5% bonus to torpedo velocity
role bonus: 100% bonus to Torpedo damage, cannot fit remote repair modulus, 25% bonus to stasis web velocity factor (75% for t2)
6/5/8 4 launcher hard points
EM/therm/Kine/EXP 0%/20%/50%/75% (shield) 50%/35%/35%/50% (armor)
you can see how this would translate to other raves, basically the 'close range HAC' with a rep/boost bonus, and a little less then the base t2 resists.
Not only do i think this would be fun and have a role as a 'solo' or 'small gang', I think it fits the role of 'not replacing BS in fleets'.
|

Mordican
|
Posted - 2010.04.07 14:52:00 -
[27]
I'd perosnally like to see a bit of diversity in the Amarr battleship line. The other three races each have a some diversity to them and their weapon systems, but Amarr are all laser all the time. I'd like a Khanid based battleship that is a Torp using monster personally. I'd much rather see a T2 non-command ship based BC hull, the final extension of Recon ships maybe. BC sized versions.
|

Cadult Seaid
|
Posted - 2010.04.10 23:58:00 -
[28]
Originally by: Demolishar Edited by: Demolishar on 07/04/2010 03:46:55 Combat Recon Battleship -------------------------
Maelstrom Hull -95% powergrid use of Capital Siege Launcher +50% target painter effectiveness/lvl +10% web strength/lvl +100% web range/lvl +20% siege torpedo rate of fire/lvl
6 lows 7 mids 8 highs 8 launcher slots
Yes, I know it's OP.
I love this idea, but not as a combat recon battleship. What about a BS version of the stealth bomber? Seriously, just as a stealth bomber is VERY effective at killing battleships, a "Heavy Bomber" would be a battleship capable of doing serious damage to capital ships  
|

Bossman Slim
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 02:41:00 -
[29]
Here are the options I see for the T2 battleships based on my perceived gaps in the fleet structure with a somewhat limited knowledge base.
1) Escort Carrier - From my understanding fighters and fighter bombers can only be used by carriers. Carriers are restrained to low and null sec. This is basically using a battleship hull and creating a small carrier out of it.
2) Escort Battleship - Ship with 16 to 20 high slots and turrets which can only fit small weapons. The ship is primarily designed to take out frigates and cruisers, while giving up it's ability to take out other battleships. Maybe 12 to 15 high slots fitting medium weapons. Caldari version could swap turrets for launchers.
The primary issue with adding new content for ship classes is how to prevent out dating previous ships. I'd almost rather see T3 frigates and battleships than adding more ships.
|

Chocratess
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 03:06:00 -
[30]
Originally by: Bossman Slim Here are the options I see for the T2 battleships based on my perceived gaps in the fleet structure with a somewhat limited knowledge base.
1) Escort Carrier - From my understanding fighters and fighter bombers can only be used by carriers. Carriers are restrained to low and null sec. This is basically using a battleship hull and creating a small carrier out of it.
2) Escort Battleship - Ship with 16 to 20 high slots and turrets which can only fit small weapons. The ship is primarily designed to take out frigates and cruisers, while giving up it's ability to take out other battleships. Maybe 12 to 15 high slots fitting medium weapons. Caldari version could swap turrets for launchers.
The primary issue with adding new content for ship classes is how to prevent out dating previous ships. I'd almost rather see T3 frigates and battleships than adding more ships.
haha i like it, ive always wanted a heavy destroyer. Was thinking of capital level to take out bs's but that would be far more op than a bs version for cruisers (which would still have its problems) only big problem is that you cant fit more than 8 turrets on a hull without some serious reprogramming as far as i know Touch not the Cat bot a Glove |
|

Jerid Verges
Gallente The Society of Innovation The Last Stand
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 05:14:00 -
[31]
tier 3 t2 BS with mini-Triage module
|

Hirana Yoshida
Behavioral Affront
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 05:37:00 -
[32]
Super Destroyers!
4 Guns, 2 utility, pitiful tanks (think HAC/untanked BC). +50% damage/lvl (applicable to all size guns). +15% tracking/lvl (applicable to all size guns). +25% speed/level -10% sig/level with MWD
|

Zilberfrid
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 06:07:00 -
[33]
Originally by: Hirana Yoshida Super Destroyers!
4 Guns, 2 utility, pitiful tanks (think HAC/untanked BC). +50% damage/lvl (applicable to all size guns). +15% tracking/lvl (applicable to all size guns). +25% speed/level -10% sig/level with MWD
Have you tried minmatar ships?
|

Telinturco
Rogue Clones
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 07:42:00 -
[34]
Edited by: Telinturco on 13/04/2010 07:44:37 Edited by: Telinturco on 13/04/2010 07:42:59 Call it a Grievous Assualt Ship, or some similar name. Role is fixed fire support in massive PvP engagements, and Highsec POS destruction.
Amarr: "Revisionist" (Abbadon Hull)
Roll Bonus: 99% Reduction in the fitting requirements for siege modules Battleship Bonus: 5% Bonus to all armor resistances per level, 10% Bonus to Torpedo Range per level Grievous Assualt Ship Bonus: 5% Bonus to missile rate of fire per level, 10% Bonus to capacitor capacity per level.
Ship would be Khanid Black/Blue design. Not sure about slot layout yet. Thinking only 4 (maybe 5) missile hardpoints, to prevent it from out DPSing a Dreadnought.
"'Treason' is nothing more than a concept invented by winners, as an excuse for hanging losers."
-Benjamin Franklin |

Cpt Branko
Retired Pirate Club
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 09:42:00 -
[35]
Edited by: Cpt Branko on 13/04/2010 09:42:37
Originally by: Telinturco
Ships like this would make large scale wardec combat a lot more interesting. The strong active tanks they would sport (in addition to non-existent mobility) would shake up the dogma that EHP buffer tanks coupled with mwd's are the only way to go.
In gangs.
Time to die = (EHP/(hostile_DPS-personal tank))
Let us assume that the EHP ship will have X times more EHP at cost of all personal tank, where X>1.
Therefore, extra EHP equals local tank whenever (EHP*X)/(hostile_DPS) = (EHP)/(hostile_DPS-personal_tank), and is better whenever EHP*X / hostile_DPS is greater then EHP/(hostile_DPS-personal_tank). This is not rocket science.
What you are looking for is RR, where the entire gang -1 (the primary) contributes their reps, resulting in a far larger tank on every ship then it would be possible with local tank on top of having competitive buffer (and DPS, since it's easier to fit then local tank) to boot.
Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint |

Salen Kane
Amarr
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 11:11:00 -
[36]
Does EVE really need more tank/gank battleships? Yes, it would be awesome to have a black abbadon with torps. Everyone wants a khanid battleship, except the gallante who wants everything nerfed so blasters will be cool again. But really, do we need more tank/gank battleships?
Besides, look at HACs- the useful ones are the ones that fill a role that can NOT be taken by a T1 ship. Considering the cost of T2 BS hulls, any T2 BS that can be replaced by a T1 equivilent without too much loss in efficiency, will most likely be replaced by said T1 ship. And as I have previously stated, there are plenty of T1 tank/gank BS already. Once you get past how cool the black abbadon is, its still a 1 bil hull with no escapability.
The super heavy intredictor idea was interesting, but it would likely lead to unkillable bubbles in remote rep fleets. But lets build on it: maybe a mobile cyno jammer type ship? Jams cynofields so its impossible to jump into an area affected by this bubble. 50km range at max skill, uses isotopes and cap to run, so its vulnerable both to being neuted and to running out of fuel. Fuel bay enough to carry enough for 15 minutes of operation, so if you want to run it for a long time you need several ships or someone to carry fuel for you. High resists/ehp, lowish damage, just like HICs. Quite slow.
This would open up some interesting options:
It wouldn't really prevent hotdropping in major fleet fights, because its easier to bring lots of cynos than to bring lots of T2 battleships. It would make it harder to hotdrop in small engagements (some will love it, some will hate it). It requires you to drag along a slowass battleship on your roams, however, and we all know how popular battleships are in smaller roams. It offers something to counter a currently un-counterable tactic. It doesn't compete with any ship in existance.
Personally, I dont really think we need more T2 battleships, but if there was to be one, this is the kind I'd favour. And yes, the amarr one could be khanid style :P Im just some nobody who trolls the forums during work.
EVE- I love everything about it except actually playing it! |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |