EVE Search - [PETITION] Ban Character Huhuhuhuhuhuh Until His Exploits are Fixed

All Channels

Assembly Hall

[PETITION] Ban Character Huhuhuhuhuhuh Until His Exploits are Fixed

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Dri Kulsane Amarr Body Count Inc. Against ALL Authorities	Posted - 2010.04.23 03:47:00 - [61] I see no point to this thread. CCP will have to respond themselves and decide what's to happen in this exceptional situation. You seem to be only looking for some false glory attention by even creating this petition to ban someone who's endeavoring to make this a better game for the public. I vote: Fail Post!
Arec Bardwin	Posted - 2010.04.23 04:00:00 - [62] Originally by: Lady Spank This gives him an unfair advantage over others on the test server Agreed. Permaban him on test server please.
Ranka Mei Caldari	Posted - 2010.04.23 04:06:00 - [63] Originally by: Dri Kulsane I vote: Fail Post! +1 -- Gorgeous, delicious, deculture!
Lady Spank Amarr Trillionaire High-Rollers Suicidal Bassoon Orkesta	Posted - 2010.04.23 04:07:00 - [64] Originally by: Arec Bardwin Originally by: Lady Spank This gives him an unfair advantage over others on the test server Agreed. Permaban him on test server please. Please do not rephrase my comments. Your contribution can therefore be regarded as irrelevant. ~_~
Rawr Cristina Caldari Omerta Syndicate	Posted - 2010.04.23 04:31:00 - [65] this is almost as bad as that other thread, although I suspect that's the point. I hate macros, I hate local and I can totally understand why people would back Monkey knowing fully he was cheating (if it turns out he was cheating) since he was using it for good and all that - and yes it IS suspicious that huhuhuhu managed to reproduce it so easily, but seriously ppl get a grip. Cheating ruins games, end of story. Now I think it's time we pressured CCP to give us a verdict, don't you? Who knows, might even be that Monkeysphere was innocent all along and the discovery of the exploit was little more than an accident - Malyutka (The Virus) -
Jeremey Glittering Dust	Posted - 2010.04.23 05:27:00 - [66] Originally by: Lady Spank Please do not rephrase my comments. Your contribution can therefore be regarded as irrelevant. Spank, look at this killmail's comments. It seems that Pandemic Legion plans to backstab and slander The Monkeysphere!
Sciencegeek deathdealer	Posted - 2010.04.23 06:07:00 - [67] Try reading the thread it came from. huhuhuhu was trying to reproduce the exploit for bug hunting purposes. bug reports ASK for reproduction steps, and ccp was petioned several times before they investigated on their own, and ccp didnt take action then. punishing someone who is working to make eve better is stupid any way you look at it. /not signed
Chingyz Caldari Raata Invicti Reckoning.	Posted - 2010.04.23 06:16:00 - [68] Yes let's ban people who finds bugs and exploits on test server for bugreporting. How dare they make this game better for the ones of us not cheating? Bad people I tell you, very bad people.
didyouspillmypint	Posted - 2010.04.23 06:55:00 - [69] Originally by: Lady Spank Edited by: Lady Spank on 22/04/2010 20:25:53 Originally by: Jeremey Edited by: Jeremey on 22/04/2010 20:22:56 Originally by: Lady Spank The Character Huhuhuhuhuhuh has posted video evidence of his ability to exploit the eve client in order to mask his appearance in local. This gives him an unfair advantage over others and until the exploit he discovered is fixed I propose that he be banned from the game. Stupid, fat PL troll. Huhuh is just reproduced on test server and bugreported an exploit that was used by Pandemic Legion's The Monkeysphere to kill common players on Tranqulity for years. Not supported. I'm not PL I'm not trolling No, but you are just about the BIGGEST attention seeker on these forums and you just had to find a way to steal some limelight from the current drama .. "look at me me meeeeeeeeee" ps Not supported, I'm glad the guy put in the work to bring it to light, I ain't going to penalise him for that. If you had any genuine interest in an exploit free EvE instead of an EvE forum centred around Ladyspank, you'd be grateful for what he has done... I know I am.
Jane Vherokior	Posted - 2010.04.23 07:24:00 - [70] Edited by: Jane Vherokior on 23/04/2010 07:25:11 Good job trying to assassinate the whistleblower while giving comfort to the exploiter. Love to know how much you and your alt toons have made from this. :) Go SPANK elsewhere, mmm'kay?
Jane Vherokior	Posted - 2010.04.23 07:30:00 - [71] Originally by: Rawr Cristina Cheating ruins games, end of story. Wow. Classic. Almost as awesome as a pedo proclaiming child abuse "is bad". Maybe you should just give Spank your login ID.
Jobby Minmatar Sebiestor tribe	Posted - 2010.04.23 09:49:00 - [72] Presumably this is some kind of joke.
kaisersauzee Caldari Provisions	Posted - 2010.04.23 09:51:00 - [73] I agree to banning this character.....are we supposed to just take his word that he wont use the exploit to his advantage in TQ
Zilberfrid	Posted - 2010.04.23 09:59:00 - [74] Are there any attacks by huhu reported with questionable local availability? I think that if he wanted to continue using this exploit, this would be a very bad way to do it, and do not believe he did it for anything else then to prove it exists (and an inch of e-peen). The video was cried for in literally dozens of posts, and in my opinion needed. If this holds true (which I believe), there is stormy weather for eve, I do not believe this is easy to fix. Not supported
Cpt Branko Retired Pirate Club	Posted - 2010.04.23 11:12:00 - [75] Edited by: Cpt Branko on 23/04/2010 11:18:56 Until we can get definite irrefutable proof via the system (and not player testimonials) that someone is using a exploit, we cannot ban them unless we accept that player testimonials (in whatever form) are valid proof that someone is exploiting. Either proof beyond reasonable doubt is the standard or it is not. Furthermore, knowing a exploit being bannable leads to the following situation: (a) I uncover a exploit. (b) I use my alt to send you a ingame mail detailing how the exploit is done. (which is logged somewhere, so proof exists) (c) Both my alt and your main get banned for knowing a exploit. Knowing how a exploit is done becoming a bannable offense is definitely exploitable itself. For instance, imagine if he posted how the exploit is done in the thread; should not every single player who read the thread get banned for it? Originally by: kaisersauzee I agree to banning this character.....are we supposed to just take his word that he wont use the exploit to his advantage in TQ How is this different then taking his word that the exploit exists and he didn't just shop the video? Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint
Duncan Ophyr	Posted - 2010.04.23 11:32:00 - [76] I find the attitude of PL trolls and their backers simply disgusting.
Jobby Minmatar Sebiestor tribe	Posted - 2010.04.23 11:51:00 - [77] lol, ludicrous. Can we get a thumbs-down symbol? I need one.
Dav Varan	Posted - 2010.04.23 13:14:00 - [78] HuHuHuHu was the guy that proved the Exploit by exposing it on sing afaik. Was Monkey a Friend of yours ? are you trying to get revenge by getting HuHu banned ? Trying to get a player banned by makin false statement is most probably against the EULA , be careful its not you that gets the ban.
My Postman	Posted - 2010.04.23 13:41:00 - [79] Originally by: Lady Spank The Character Huhuhuhuhuhuh has posted video evidence of his ability to exploit the eve client in order to mask his appearance in local. This gives him an unfair advantage over others and until the exploit he discovered is fixed I propose that he be banned from the game. This also goes for anyone else that has demonstrated their participation in this nefarious breach of the EULA. Originally by: Vaerah Vahrokha - I did not tamper a game client and break the EULA to force it in the developers skins to potentially slow down the work in the expansion and only deal with your pretend immediate WANTS. Originally by: Huhuhuhuhuhuh Bug is bug, test server is test server. Bugs should be fixed. That's all. Proof This is a disgraceful attempt to turn the facts. A guy from Pandemic Legion (Monkeysphere) used this exploit. Proofed. PL may have used this exploit. Not proofed. Huhuhu helped to proof on Sisi (!). Ban Monkeysphere Ban PL Exploiters And you, dear lady spank, burn in a fire (IG) for this attempt.
xLSDx	Posted - 2010.04.23 14:02:00 - [80] Lady Spank from Amarr Trollollo High-Rollollo... oh wait... a lot of text about nothing not supported
Lady Spank Amarr Trillionaire High-Rollers Suicidal Bassoon Orkesta	Posted - 2010.04.23 15:18:00 - [81] Originally by: Jeremey Originally by: Lady Spank Please do not rephrase my comments. Your contribution can therefore be regarded as irrelevant. Spank, look at this killmail's comments. It seems that Pandemic Legion plans to backstab and slander The Monkeysphere! Firstly, the killboard comments are clearly sarcastic and prove nothing. Secondly how is this relevant to the comment you quoted? Originally by: Chingyz Yes let's ban people who finds bugs and exploits on test server for bugreporting. How dare they make this game better for the ones of us not cheating? Bad people I tell you, very bad people. Please read earlier this point has already been covered. Originally by: didyouspillmypint No, but you are just about the BIGGEST attention seeker on these forums and you just had to find a way to steal some limelight from the current drama .. "look at me me meeeeeeeeee" ps Not supported, I'm glad the guy put in the work to bring it to light, I ain't going to penalise him for that. If you had any genuine interest in an exploit free EvE instead of an EvE forum centred around Ladyspank, you'd be grateful for what he has done... I know I am. This is the assembly hall where people have the right to request attention to an issue. Sorry you seem to have a personal issue with me but it does not change the validity of this concern. Originally by: Jane Vherokior Edited by: Jane Vherokior on 23/04/2010 07:25:11 Good job trying to assassinate the whistleblower while giving comfort to the exploiter. Love to know how much you and your alt toons have made from this. :) Go SPANK elsewhere, mmm'kay? Yet again, this has been covered previously. Lets not have a circular argument here. I'm working with people who exposed themselves as exploiters through evidence, not speculation. Originally by: kaisersauzee I agree to banning this character.....are we supposed to just take his word that he wont use the exploit to his advantage in TQ Thank you, please show your support. Originally by: Duncan Ophyr I find the attitude of PL trolls and their backers simply disgusting. Most trolling is disgusting. Why do you feel the need to target a single alliance? If you are implying I have a connection with PL you are mistaken. They don't have time for the small time players like me. Originally by: Dav Varan HuHuHuHu was the guy that proved the Exploit by exposing it on sing afaik. Was Monkey a Friend of yours ? are you trying to get revenge by getting HuHu banned ? Trying to get a player banned by makin false statement is most probably against the EULA , be careful its not you that gets the ban. Please let me know where I have made a false statement? I am only asking for a temporary ban as I think his actions in publically sharing knowledge set a bad precedent. Had he kept the information sharing to CCP alone I would not have felt the need to raise this issue. It is a shame people misconstrue this as a spiteful act. I only care for the equality of eve online. Rawr Christina seems to understand best. Originally by: My Postman Originally by: Lady Spank This is a disgraceful attempt to turn the facts. A guy from Pandemic Legion (Monkeysphere) used this exploit. Proofed. PL may have used this exploit. Not proofed. Huhuhu helped to proof on Sisi (!). Ban Monkeysphere Ban PL Exploiters And you, dear lady spank, burn in a fire (IG) for this attempt. Again, I am not turning facts. I am working on solid ones. You are in fact taking speculation and heresay and treating them as solid evidence. I find it ridiculous that you can be so transparent in your spin while at the same time attempting to besmirch my rational treatment of the information at hand. Your personal comment is also not appreciated. ~_~
Lady Karma	Posted - 2010.04.23 15:33:00 - [82] Originally by: My Postman This is a disgraceful attempt to turn the facts. A guy from Pandemic Legion (Monkeysphere) used this exploit. Proofed. PL may have used this exploit. Not proofed. Huhuhu helped to proof on Sisi (!). Ban Monkeysphere Ban PL Exploiters And you, dear lady spank, burn in a fire (IG) for this attempt. You can hand over that proof anytime you like. I have an odd feeling however that there is no proof, and that is why Monkey is not banned. The only proof we have of anything untoward is that huhuhu is able to hack the eve client. PS finding a bug, and creating one are not the same
Certero Hades and Charon funeral parlour	Posted - 2010.04.23 15:37:00 - [83] Holy **! I thought it was a joke, but now i see Lady Spank is crazy... so good luck with your efforts Lady, you'll need it (and new brains will not be unnecessary too). * EVE-RU vs Cheaters ***
Arec Bardwin	Posted - 2010.04.23 15:50:00 - [84] Originally by: Lady Spank Please do not rephrase my comments. Your contribution can therefore be regarded as irrelevant. Irregardless, my contribution stands.
Dav Varan	Posted - 2010.04.23 16:40:00 - [85] Originally by: Lady Spank Originally by: Dav Varan HuHuHuHu was the guy that proved the Exploit by exposing it on sing afaik. Was Monkey a Friend of yours ? are you trying to get revenge by getting HuHu banned ? Trying to get a player banned by makin false statement is most probably against the EULA , be careful its not you that gets the ban. Please let me know where I have made a false statement? I am only asking for a temporary ban as I think his actions in publically sharing knowledge set a bad precedent. Had he kept the information sharing to CCP alone I would not have felt the need to raise this issue. It is a shame people misconstrue this as a spiteful act. I only care for the equality of eve online. Rawr Christina seems to understand best. Let me rephrase that. Trying to get a player banned by makin Misleading statements is most probably against the EULA , be careful its not you that gets the ban. Just sayin CCP are not stupid. They'll investigate this exploit like they investigate any other and they're more than capable of decerning whether involved parties have acted with the Best Interests of the game in mind or not. They dont need You or Us to point fingers with "petitions" Reading between the lines in that other thread leads me to belive that you are buddies with some of the people that may or may not have been banned for using the spolit on tranq. Which [If true] would make this thread a vindictive attempt at getting a player banned because he exposed a sploit used by your buddies. Maybe thats right maybe it isnt. If it is true then you are skating on thin ice my friend. Afaik the C.S.M. does not have the power to call for bans on players anyway, Its never has been part of there remit.
Certero Hades and Charon funeral parlour	Posted - 2010.04.23 16:49:00 - [86] Lady Spank is just macroratter! It's clear enough! Just scared of huhuhuhu, he can kill bots easily and Lady Spank don't want to lose money. Lady Spank need to banned! * EVE-RU vs Cheaters *
Dianeces SiN. Corp Daisho Syndicate	Posted - 2010.04.23 16:50:00 - [87] Originally by: Dav Varan Afaik the C.S.M. does not have the power to call for bans on players anyway, Its never has been part of there remit. If you're going to use a word, you probably ought to know what it means first. (Hint: remit is normally a verb)
Lady Spank Amarr Trillionaire High-Rollers Suicidal Bassoon Orkesta	Posted - 2010.04.23 16:54:00 - [88] Originally by: Dav Varan Originally by: Lady Spank Originally by: Dav Varan HuHuHuHu was the guy that proved the Exploit by exposing it on sing afaik. Was Monkey a Friend of yours ? are you trying to get revenge by getting HuHu banned ? Trying to get a player banned by makin false statement is most probably against the EULA , be careful its not you that gets the ban. Please let me know where I have made a false statement? I am only asking for a temporary ban as I think his actions in publically sharing knowledge set a bad precedent. Had he kept the information sharing to CCP alone I would not have felt the need to raise this issue. It is a shame people misconstrue this as a spiteful act. I only care for the equality of eve online. Rawr Christina seems to understand best. Let me rephrase that. Trying to get a player banned by makin Misleading statements is most probably against the EULA , be careful its not you that gets the ban. Just sayin CCP are not stupid. They'll investigate this exploit like they investigate any other and they're more than capable of decerning whether involved parties have acted with the Best Interests of the game in mind or not. They dont need You or Us to point fingers with "petitions" Reading between the lines in that other thread leads me to belive that you are buddies with some of the people that may or may not have been banned for using the spolit on tranq. Which [If true] would make this thread a vindictive attempt at getting a player banned because he exposed a sploit used by your buddies. Maybe thats right maybe it isnt. If it is true then you are skating on thin ice my friend. Afaik the C.S.M. does not have the power to call for bans on players anyway, Its never has been part of there remit. Please show me any element of the EULA you believe I have breached by showing this concern. I'm amazed you think intentionally manipulating the client is acceptable for players yet protesting about this is a breach. I am simply voicing a concern to something I believe CCP should consider. That is the purpose of the Assembly Hall. As for your reading between the lines, it is no more worthy speculation than the sensationalism and heresay implied in 'that' thread, and on eve ru. If you want to know my stance, I side with rationality rather than wild speculation. I have no ties with PL. Surely if I did they would all be jumping in here showing support. They aren't. The last time I saw PL in game Viper was failing to bait people in Amamake. The time before that I was entering Cloud Ring, landed on their fleet at a gate, jumped through for fear of getting killed and got bubbled and killed by the opposing fleet. But now im rambling... Let's stick to concrete evidence please. Allegedly CCP have made a response to the overall issue saying they have taken details on board and are investigating. Hopefully this is true. ~_~
Dav Varan	Posted - 2010.04.23 16:59:00 - [89] Originally by: Dianeces Originally by: Dav Varan Afaik the C.S.M. does not have the power to call for bans on players anyway, Its never has been part of there remit. If you're going to use a word, you probably ought to know what it means first. (Hint: remit is normally a verb) Remit Scroll down to Noun usage Quoted for the lazy Noun Pronunciation(British) IPA: /ˈrimɪt/ NounSingular remit Plural remits (chiefly British) terms of reference; set of responsibilities. Remit is also a Noun. Learn to understand context before making yourself look like a fool.
Lady Spank Amarr Trillionaire High-Rollers Suicidal Bassoon Orkesta	Posted - 2010.04.23 17:06:00 - [90] Originally by: Certero Lady Spank is just macroratter! It's clear enough! Just scared of huhuhuhu, he can kill bots easily and Lady Spank don't want to lose money. Lady Spank need to banned! I think I can count the number of NPC's I have killed on one hand. Please do not attempt to troll in the Assembly Hall. ~_~

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.