| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 .. 98 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Monica Foulkes
BFG Tech
   |
Posted - 2010.07.14 09:49:00 -
[2281]
Supported
|
Ophelia Ursus
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 09:51:00 -
[2282]
Hey, did I support this with all my alts yet?
Looking forward to CCP maybe starting to think about excellence at some point 18 months in the future.
|
Morwennon
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 09:55:00 -
[2283]
I'm only two weeks old and even I can see that CCP need to re-evaluate their priorities. 
|
ElweSingollo
The Higher Standard
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 10:25:00 -
[2284]
Sadly the heads of CCP seem to have lost touch with what they created and what both us older timers and the newer players loved about Eve for the love of god and for the health of Eve I hope the heads pay some notice to the discontent that the CSM minutes have stirred.. it is not too late for Eve yet and it is not too late for us to start working together to make Eve what it should be.
CCP and Eve Online... It's not a bug, it's a feature
In Before I Get M***** Again
|
Lady Laserlance
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 11:00:00 -
[2285]
|
Mistress Angelica
Zebra Corp
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 11:02:00 -
[2286]
Edited by: Mistress Angelica on 14/07/2010 11:01:58
what makes me sad is the fact ccp just dont care about what we the players think.
this seams to be a drastic shift from the company i started paying back in 07.
fix eve please ccp
|
Kareena Evol
Bat Country
Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 11:04:00 -
[2287]
Friendlies showing up in local and overview as neutral bug happening again. Next patch should be wholly dedicated to a GUI overhaul and fixing bugs.
PI is lovely to look at and the interface is nice, but it takes too many clicks to do things. CCP you need to get GUI designers and Beta testers who understand that people don't like doing boring monotonous stuff in a game that they pay for.
|
Sa'Shena
Nomad LLP
Wayfarer Stellar Initiative
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 11:04:00 -
[2288]
Clear and concise.
I can appreciate that in a thread, but even more so in an idea.
|
Jev North
Tachibana Heavy Industries
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 11:13:00 -
[2289]
Make good on promises.
|
Rawls Canardly
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 11:50:00 -
[2290]
Agreed. Among the items I can think of offhand which are presently broken or incomplete:
Drone control(incomplete and buggy)
Gallente Drone-boat progression(Myrmidon matches the dps of the Vexor, should have at least a slight boost similar to the Drake's role... more bandwidth please)
Defender Missiles (broken, useless as is. Perhaps if it were to target more intelligently? [if missile x has been assigned d-missile, reroute to missile y])
Rockets (broken, lacks the speed to catch frigates at point blank range. perhaps doubling the speed and cutting the flight time in half would fix this.)
Faction Warfare(I don't know where to begin with this mess)
Active tanking (semi-broken, on most smaller caldari craft - including those where CCP reccomends it - a passive tank is superior; while in gallente craft, the Armor Repairer bonus is almost completely ignored outside of PVE.)
Gallente Hyperion (semi-broken, powergrid issues, often the second bonus is ignored due to said fitting issues)
LP pricing on ships and weapons. (broken- by the time I can use it, I've outgrown it - 80,000LP is insane for a T1 frigate. same with the weaponry.)
Blasters (semi-broken: inadequate against anything not sitting still, thanks to the awful tracking and pathetic range. Buffing the falloff may help.)
Assault Frigates (broken, what purpose does this fill that a cruiser can't do better for a fraction of the cost?)
Aggro-Lag (Seriously, what the heck is up with this? had a corp-mate lose his boat because corp aggro was delayed on a neutral repper for over 2 minutes. After he had died the repper finally turned red.)
Destroyers (broken, signature radius of a cruiser, slower than a cruiser and tanks like a frigate... what purpose does this serve?)
Interdictors (semi-broken, could use the resists T2 craft are known for)
Ewar Drones (semi-broken, perhaps a T2 version of each type, or allowing signature skills to apply would help)
That's all I can think of at the moment.
|
Dodgy Past
Amarr
Trans-Solar Works
Rooks and Kings
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 12:08:00 -
[2291]
Unfortunately as seen in the CSM summit minutes at the highest levels CCP think quantity of development time means excellence.
I can't quite get my head around the double think that allows them to state that won't polish anything that they acknowledge desperately needs polish for more than 18 months yet turn around and state they are achieving excellence.
Virtuozzo wrote:
EVE used to be internet spaceships.
Then those became serious business.
Now, it is only serious business, and internet spaceships are in dock for two years until after Incarna |
Erick Odin
Amarr
Local-Spike
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 13:00:00 -
[2292]
I am glad Eve Online development isn't controlled by the mob. I don't like the mob.
|
SARPIDON
THE BLUE BEYOND
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 13:00:00 -
[2293]
Has my complete support.
Back to basics please CCP.
You really are doing it wrong.
|
Urah Dedman
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 13:08:00 -
[2294]
Supported.
|
Aypse
Empire Assault Corp
Dead Terrorists
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 13:09:00 -
[2295]
Not that CCP give a **** what this thread says, but supported.
|
Theodicy
Entropy associates
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 13:25:00 -
[2296]
Supported all the way.
|
Neu Bastian
Valklear Guard
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 13:44:00 -
[2297]
yes
 Quote:
Neu Bastian
Valklear Guard - CEO
|
Positr0n
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 14:13:00 -
[2298]
bout time this is adressed. 
|
Auri Hella
Downwind Trading Guild
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 14:20:00 -
[2299]
I support this proposal.
|
Cire XIII
Ever Flow
Atlas Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 14:21:00 -
[2300]
Better Late than never. Here's to hoping this thread gets noticed by people in positions to make a difference in the game that fits my lifestyle like a glove.
|
Helicity Boson
Amarr
The Python Cartel.
The Jerk Cartel
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 14:30:00 -
[2301]
I don't think any of the execs can even find this forum, let alone read it...
And don't think anyone else in the structure is going to show this to them either. 
|
Orion Sebestes
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 14:30:00 -
[2302]
Edited by: Orion Sebestes on 14/07/2010 14:30:40
I doubt that stretching the development cycle will have the intended effect of allowing more time to fix bugs and flesh out existing features. The issue is as you discussed "must haves" and "could haves", bug fixes and extension of existing features will more like than not fall into the "could haves" 90% of the time.
What would be better is to have two teams running on different schedules with different priorities. Have a "patch team" work strictly on extending and fixing existing features with a one month development cycle. And then an "expansion team" on the current six month cycle working on building new features. This would allow for the different teams to have distinct priorities and should lead to more regular bug fixes.
|
Ibn Taymiyyah
Brotherhood Of Fallen Angels
Etherium Cartel
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 15:15:00 -
[2303]
I wish us all luck in having any of CCPs management reading these 77 pages (so far!)!!!
I support the OP!
|
Jaketh Shae
Rage For Order
En Garde
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 16:21:00 -
[2304]
Excellent post
|
Rage Spear
Minmatar
Republic Military School
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 16:25:00 -
[2305]
Already +1ed long ago but thought I would revisit this after the recent CSM minutes debacle.
How long can they ignore this threadnought?
|
Otin Bison
Bison Industrial Inc
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 16:35:00 -
[2306]
Massive support.
<rant>
Side note, after reading all the CSM minutes, it seems like CCP most used response to issues was, "huh, yeah but were not gonna look at that for another year" and for bugs, "really, fill out a bug report"
Really?!?!? Come on guys, we expect better.
</rant>
OK, all that said, I am keeping my fingers crossed for a CCP change of heart. They will realize soon that we wouldn't be complaining if we didn't love this game.
-------
Nothing especially witty to say at this time. |
Xodd Hil
Trucido Veritas
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 17:33:00 -
[2307]
Supported. Not that CCP actually gives a damn what their customers really need.
60day ETC |
Sauterelle
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 18:13:00 -
[2308]
+1
I like the 6 months fix things, 12 months expansion. With a full team on fixing things not the guy down in the basement with an abacus and a note pad. Just to say they have people assigned to quality control.
|
Harlon Mathuin
Eve University
Ivy League
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 18:38:00 -
[2309]
|
Marlenus
Ironfleet Towing And Salvage
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 19:09:00 -
[2310]
18 months before any serious resources can be devoted to fixing broken and neglected content?
It's amazing CCP can even say the word "Excellence" with a straight face.
Like the man in the movie says: "I don't think that word means, what you think it means."
------------------
Ironfleet.com |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 .. 98 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |