Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Krimishkev
Out of Order Cult of War
|
Posted - 2010.07.08 12:52:00 -
[31]
Originally by: foksieloy She has yellow crooked teeth and CCP employees start to vomit too much after seeing her.
i lol'd
ibtl.
If its a NDA breach it most likely had something to do with DUST514 or Incarna.
Who knows, why is this such a big deal?
Also, if CCP wanted this to remain unseen, and kept `quiet`, why did they post a news item on the front page of EVE for everyone to see?
CCPs waving of the banhammer s'posed to be scary?
I got no serious feeling out of this bit, CSM still seems like a big joke to me.
|
Hori To
T.R.I.A.D
|
Posted - 2010.07.08 14:12:00 -
[32]
Originally by: Batolemaeus If CCP choses to keep this private, they have every right to do so tbh.
I believe you are wrong, when they held an election etc, they have a "moral" obligation to do right by it. They've dragged real people into this, with real names, used them as posterboys and girls to get good press, and now they ditch someone just because. I, as a voter want more details, and it is indeed possible to give them if they so choose. I can wait a few feew weeks. I would also like to know more about how it was handled (why didn't she leave quietly etc). CSM is about transparancy (sp.?), and this case is anything but.
In short, internet spaceships is serious business. I want answers. |
Sokratesz
|
Posted - 2010.07.08 14:15:00 -
[33]
Originally by: Hori To
Originally by: Batolemaeus If CCP choses to keep this private, they have every right to do so tbh.
I believe you are wrong, when they held an election etc, they have a "moral" obligation to do right by it. They've dragged real people into this, with real names, used them as posterboys and girls to get good press, and now they ditch someone just because. I, as a voter want more details, and it is indeed possible to give them if they so choose. I can wait a few feew weeks. I would also like to know more about how it was handled (why didn't she leave quietly etc). CSM is about transparancy (sp.?), and this case is anything but.
In short, internet spaceships is serious business. I want answers.
Have you considered the possibility that her NDA breach and subsequent expulsion had nothing to do with the CSM? á
I think CSM is a pretty cool guy. eh creates e-drama and doesnt afraid of anything. |
Ninetails o'Cat
League of Super Evil
|
Posted - 2010.07.08 14:17:00 -
[34]
Originally by: Sokratesz
Originally by: Hori To
Originally by: Batolemaeus If CCP choses to keep this private, they have every right to do so tbh.
I believe you are wrong, when they held an election etc, they have a "moral" obligation to do right by it. They've dragged real people into this, with real names, used them as posterboys and girls to get good press, and now they ditch someone just because. I, as a voter want more details, and it is indeed possible to give them if they so choose. I can wait a few feew weeks. I would also like to know more about how it was handled (why didn't she leave quietly etc). CSM is about transparancy (sp.?), and this case is anything but.
In short, internet spaceships is serious business. I want answers.
Have you considered the possibility that her NDA breach and subsequent expulsion had nothing to do with the CSM?
It has to have something to do with the CSM, because there isn't a NDA for anyone else who plays EVE AFAIK.
If you mean *this* CSM, you may be right though.
|
Yendor Widdershins
University of Caille
|
Posted - 2010.07.08 14:22:00 -
[35]
Originally by: Sokratesz
Have you considered the possibility that her NDA breach and subsequent expulsion had nothing to do with the CSM?
You have repeatedly posted that her ban had nothing to do with her blog post. Do you know why she was banned? Because the CSM chair said CSM wasn't told. And if you don't know why she was banned, why are you running around telling everyone why she was or was not banned?
|
De'Veldrin
Minmatar Special Projects Executive The Obsidian Legion
|
Posted - 2010.07.08 14:26:00 -
[36]
Originally by: Ninetails o'Cat
It has to have something to do with the CSM, because there isn't a NDA for anyone else who plays EVE AFAIK.
Actually, you're oversimplifying the issue.
It is entirely possible that she got information that had nothing to with what the CSM was discussing (thus outside the purview of the CSM) and then acted on that information. That would be a breah of the NDA, yet have nothing to do with her CSM duties per se.
One example: "Saw an emai over the shoulder of some dev I was watching work. Check out what CCP is doing next!" Don't assume that just because the CSM's have to sign an NDA that her breach of it was because of her "official" duties.
In fact, I am more inclined to believe it wasn't, simply because of what happened to Lark. Lark's was clearly based on information passed on directly from CCP to the CSM (based on the details we were provided) and both Lark and CCP were far more open about it.
*shrugs* It's a moot point, anyway. My guess is if Ankh comes out and talks about it directly, they'll invoke that part of the NDA that says they can sue you, and CCP obviously isn't going to give, so all this discussion is really just us rabbling around. --Vel
|
Ninetails o'Cat
League of Super Evil
|
Posted - 2010.07.08 16:33:00 -
[37]
Originally by: De'Veldrin
Originally by: Ninetails o'Cat
It has to have something to do with the CSM, because there isn't a NDA for anyone else who plays EVE AFAIK.
Actually, you're oversimplifying the issue.
It is entirely possible that she got information that had nothing to with what the CSM was discussing (thus outside the purview of the CSM) and then acted on that information. That would be a breah of the NDA, yet have nothing to do with her CSM duties per se.
One example: "Saw an emai over the shoulder of some dev I was watching work. Check out what CCP is doing next!" Don't assume that just because the CSM's have to sign an NDA that her breach of it was because of her "official" duties.
In fact, I am more inclined to believe it wasn't, simply because of what happened to Lark. Lark's was clearly based on information passed on directly from CCP to the CSM (based on the details we were provided) and both Lark and CCP were far more open about it.
*shrugs* It's a moot point, anyway. My guess is if Ankh comes out and talks about it directly, they'll invoke that part of the NDA that says they can sue you, and CCP obviously isn't going to give, so all this discussion is really just us rabbling around.
I guess, but it depends how you define CSM duties. To me, that would seem to be breaching the CSM NDA whilst doing CSM-y things - therefore the breach is about CSM stuff. I'm fairly certain though that it is not a Larkonis-gate style breach though, as all the other CSM members seem just as confused as us, though who knows what they're really thinking...
|
Sokratesz
|
Posted - 2010.07.08 16:34:00 -
[38]
Edited by: Sokratesz on 08/07/2010 16:34:58
Originally by: Yendor Widdershins
Originally by: Sokratesz
Have you considered the possibility that her NDA breach and subsequent expulsion had nothing to do with the CSM?
You have repeatedly posted that her ban had nothing to do with her blog post. Do you know why she was banned? Because the CSM chair said CSM wasn't told. And if you don't know why she was banned, why are you running around telling everyone why she was or was not banned?
Because 4 other CSM members posted the same stuff on blogs and weren't reprimanded for it, and because none of it was NDA sensitive material in the first place?
Originally by: Ninetails o'Cat
It has to have something to do with the CSM, because there isn't a NDA for anyone else who plays EVE AFAIK.
If you mean *this* CSM, you may be right though.
You're wrong, as De'Veldrin nicely illustrated above. á
I think CSM is a pretty cool guy. eh creates e-drama and doesnt afraid of anything. |
Yendor Widdershins
Gallente University of Caille
|
Posted - 2010.07.08 17:21:00 -
[39]
Originally by: Sokratesz Edited by: Sokratesz on 08/07/2010 16:34:58
You have repeatedly posted that her ban had nothing to do with her blog post. Do you know why she was banned? Because the CSM chair said CSM wasn't told. And if you don't know why she was banned, why are you running around telling everyone why she was or was not banned?
Because 4 other CSM members posted the same stuff on blogs and weren't reprimanded for it, and because none of it was NDA sensitive material in the first place?
On the one hand, your point is valid. But it is still an assumption.
Perhaps CCP is unaware of the other blogs. Perhaps CCP considers each of them to be a breach, but is being selective about enforcement. Perhaps the problem comes from her work with the reporter last year. Perhaps it has to do with something several years ago that CCP didn't choose to persue until just now.
Here is my point: None of the posters -- nor CSM -- knows for sure why she was sacked. If you want to join the speculation that's fine. But posting a flat "That's not why she was dismissed" when you don't know anymore than the rest of us is misleading people who might see your CSM tag and think you are speaking from knowledge instead of assumption.
I'm willing to believe CCP that she did something against their NDA other than a blog post. But I also believe that CCP should inform the CSM of more details of what she did. CCP unilaterally removing a CSM delegate without telling the CSM why just reinforces the point that the CSM has no power other than what CCP decides to temporarily allocate them. And certainly isn't transparent or communicating with the playerbase.
|
Sokratesz
|
Posted - 2010.07.08 18:25:00 -
[40]
Edited by: Sokratesz on 08/07/2010 18:27:21 You're just looking for a reason so you can say CCP treated her unfairly?
If you remember correctly, my blog was up long before hers and received quite a bit of attention here and on other boards. Mynxee's is a lot harsher about CCP on certain points so no, it had nothing to do with it, now let go of the idea. á
I think CSM is a pretty cool guy. eh creates e-drama and doesnt afraid of anything. |
|
Fille Balle
Ballbreakers R us
|
Posted - 2010.07.08 23:43:00 -
[41]
So, here's a funny little fact:
Ankh was booted from CSM because she breached the NDA. In other words, revealing information that she was not supposed to reveal. Another way of putting it is: Ankh let the cat out of the bag.
CCP does not want to inform us of what excactly it was that she disclosed, even though it has already been revealed Another way to put it: CCP wants to keep the cat that got out of the bag inside the bag.
One last thought:
Gimme a break. The cats out, at least tell us where the cat is so we can avoid getting our eyes scratched out because accidently sit on it.
|
ceaon
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 00:05:00 -
[42]
i find the massive Sokratesz posting around this issue quite stupid BTW awesome post OP you win the forums today
Originally by: CCP Adida The male thread was locked because the discussion turned into transsexuals and man boobs.
|
Azmodeus Valar
Eve University Ivy League
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 01:30:00 -
[43]
Most of Sok's recent posts have been relevant to the discussion. Its a shame that he has to keep making the same points repeatedly because people can't seem to understand them or find it more convenient to disbelieve them in order to support their conspiracy theories.
|
Jin Nib
Resplendent Knives
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 03:34:00 -
[44]
Originally by: ceaon i find the massive Sokratesz posting around this issue quite stupid
I find the massive amount of blind conjecture and illogical conclusions drawn from it quite stupid. To each there own I guess. -Jin Nib Trading on behalf of Opera Noir since: 2009.03.02 03:53:00
|
Pirokobo
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 04:13:00 -
[45]
Edited by: Pirokobo on 09/07/2010 04:17:11
Originally by: Sokratesz Have you considered the possibility that her NDA breach and subsequent expulsion had nothing to do with the CSM?
Nope, because of the lack of an alternate explanation.
This is 2010 and we have the internet. There are no secrets. If it WASN'T related to the CSM but the CSM knew what it was, then one of you would have leaked it anonymously.
|
Trader Jen
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 05:10:00 -
[46]
Originally by: Sokratesz
Originally by: Hori To
Originally by: Batolemaeus If CCP choses to keep this private, they have every right to do so tbh.
I believe you are wrong, when they held an election etc, they have a "moral" obligation to do right by it. They've dragged real people into this, with real names, used them as posterboys and girls to get good press, and now they ditch someone just because. I, as a voter want more details, and it is indeed possible to give them if they so choose. I can wait a few feew weeks. I would also like to know more about how it was handled (why didn't she leave quietly etc). CSM is about transparancy (sp.?), and this case is anything but.
In short, internet spaceships is serious business. I want answers.
Have you considered the possibility that her NDA breach and subsequent expulsion had nothing to do with the CSM?
you keep giving up more information on her expulsion. I think we might be dealing with two NDA breaches in one week.
If you're expelled, there's many who wont miss you. |
James Tritanius
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 05:53:00 -
[47]
meh. So no one knows what exactly is it that she disclosed?
I mean, it has to be something big, or else CCP won't immediately boot her.
It also has to be something public, because if she just told a few friends, CCP won't know about it.
|
Sokratesz
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 06:30:00 -
[48]
Edited by: Sokratesz on 09/07/2010 06:32:52
:facepalm:
I'm just doing some damage control for CCP within the limits set out for me, given that they failed to properly do it themselves and that loads of weird people keep getting these ******ed ideas. á
I think CSM is a pretty cool guy. eh creates e-drama and doesnt afraid of anything. |
Hori To
T.R.I.A.D
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 06:33:00 -
[49]
Originally by: Sokratesz
Originally by: Hori To *stuff*
Have you considered the possibility that her NDA breach and subsequent expulsion had nothing to do with the CSM?
I did now :) But, if the information is not related to the CSM, how does an ordinary player get access to nda breaching stuff? Do CCP mail stuff around at random?
And regardless, she was in the csm, she got kicked from the csm, therefore it is related to the csm.
It's a sad situation though, for both parties. The reason I have a problem with it is that if feels unfair. |
Sokratesz
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 06:35:00 -
[50]
Originally by: ceaon i find the massive Sokratesz posting around this issue quite stupid
It's not like a novelty or anything. á
I think CSM is a pretty cool guy. eh creates e-drama and doesnt afraid of anything. |
|
Sokratesz
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 06:36:00 -
[51]
Originally by: Hori To
And regardless, she was in the csm, she got kicked from the csm, therefore it is related to the csm.
It's a sad situation though, for both parties. The reason I have a problem with it is that if feels unfair.
You are right there but I wouldn't agree with the wording of your first bit. I agree though that as long as CCP doesn't reveal any other information it feels unfair that I have to fight this fight for them á
I think CSM is a pretty cool guy. eh creates e-drama and doesnt afraid of anything. |
ggfdfasdgfsfdg
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 07:02:00 -
[52]
|
MataSanos
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 07:04:00 -
[53]
|
pemiculostic
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 07:05:00 -
[54]
|
0vermama
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 07:06:00 -
[55]
|
Sokratesz
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 07:07:00 -
[56]
Originally by: pemiculostic
Originally by: MataSanos
Originally by: ggfdfasdgfsfdg
Thank you for your contributions! á
I think CSM is a pretty cool guy. eh creates e-drama and doesnt afraid of anything. |
ceaon
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 07:52:00 -
[57]
|
Venkul Mul
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 10:50:00 -
[58]
Originally by: Sokratesz
Originally by: pemiculostic
Originally by: MataSanos
Originally by: ggfdfasdgfsfdg
Thank you for your contributions!
Maybe in your haste to do "damage control" you have forgot that this is a thread in Assembly Hall and posting simply to support the proposal/request is allowed and a normal procedure.
BTW: at least half of your attempt to do "damage control" had the opposite effect.
|
Sokratesz
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 11:17:00 -
[59]
Originally by: Venkul Mul
Originally by: Sokratesz
Originally by: pemiculostic
Originally by: MataSanos
Originally by: ggfdfasdgfsfdg
Thank you for your contributions!
Maybe in your haste to do "damage control" you have forgot that this is a thread in Assembly Hall and posting simply to support the proposal/request is allowed and a normal procedure.
BTW: at least half of your attempt to do "damage control" had the opposite effect.
I'm just posting information, if people interpret said information incorrectly that's not my problem. SOme people just *want* to see things that aren't there, but it will be a lot easier to convince them or if not that, ridicule them, with CCP backup. á
I think CSM is a pretty cool guy. eh creates e-drama and doesnt afraid of anything. |
Skogen Gump
The Star Fraction
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 22:55:00 -
[60]
Edited by: Skogen Gump on 09/07/2010 22:57:23 You can't talk about privacy, when using someone's handle and real-life name in the same paragraph. in my very humble opinion.
CCP, the CSM is about transparency and this was the most attended ballot thus far - if you don't want this to become such a pipe dream, and you don't want to dissuade people from voting again, please be more transparent.
At the moment, your voters and subscribers don't know what to think, certainly many think that the way this has been handled, smacks of something untowards going on.
Similarly, a lot of people are rubbing their hands together and crowing that Ankh has been removed from the CSM. To you, I say SHAME ON YOU; Ankh was the CSM, her passion, vibrancy and personal sacrifice to the CSM should be an example and inspiration to everyone.
To those who say that it's ok for CCP to be private, let me remind you that they've (afaik) unanimously removed an elected official. What kind of confidence does this give you for anything the CSM can or can't do after this ?
Anyway, she could throw spoons at me, any day of the week, as long as it got Black ops sorted out, and meta level in item detail views
Finally - CCP, I'm not against you; if your decision was fair, then absolutely fine - I'm just begging you to show the transparency that you promised and save the CSM before this goes too far.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |